Arguments in Favor of Altering Genetics:

1. Ethical Concerns:
 Delving into the genes of de-extinct species raises important ethical questions.
Some argue that humans have a responsibility to act as stewards of the Earth, and
bringing back extinct species is a form of ecological responsibility. On the other
hand, there are concerns about the unintended consequences and ethical
implications of manipulating the genetic makeup of organisms.
2. Ecological Impact:
 The introduction of de-extinct species into existing ecosystems poses potential
ecological challenges. These resurrected species might lack natural predators or
face difficulties adapting to current environmental conditions, potentially leading
to disruptions in the delicate balance of ecosystems.
3. Scientific Feasibility:
 While the concept of de-extinction is fascinating, the technical challenges and
feasibility are still being explored. Even if it were possible to recreate an extinct
species genetically, there may be limitations in recreating its natural habitat and
ensuring its successful reintroduction and survival in the wild.
4. Resource Allocation:
 Allocating resources to de-extinction projects raises the question of priorities.
Some argue that the funds and efforts could be more effectively directed toward
conserving existing endangered species and preserving their habitats. The focus,
they suggest, should be on preventing extinctions rather than attempting to
recreate extinct species.
5. Long-Term Viability:
 Even if de-extinct species can be successfully reintroduced, questions persist
about their long-term viability. Factors such as their adaptability to changed
environments and their ability to thrive independently without ongoing human
intervention are uncertainties that need careful consideration.
Arguments in Favor of Altering Genetics:

1. Biodiversity Conservation:
 Advocates argue that altering the genetics of de-extinct species contributes
positively to biodiversity conservation. Bringing back extinct species is seen as a
means to restore ecosystems to a more natural and diverse state, promoting the
health and resilience of natural environments.
2. Ecological Restoration:
 De-extinct species are envisioned as playing a crucial role in ecological
restoration by filling vacant niches within ecosystems. This introduction is
believed to help restore balance and functionality to ecosystems that have been
disrupted by the loss of certain species.
3. Scientific Knowledge:
 The study of de-extinct species provides valuable insights into the biology,
behavior, and ecology of these organisms. This knowledge contributes to a deeper
understanding of evolution, genetics, and the intricate relationships within
ecosystems. It's akin to unlocking the secrets of the natural world.
4. Ecosystem Services:
 Some argue that certain extinct species may have provided specific ecosystem
services beneficial to humans, such as pollination or pest control. Bringing back
these species could help restore these services to ecosystems, presenting potential
advantages for both nature and human societies.
5. Educational Opportunities:
 De-extinction projects can serve as powerful educational tools, raising awareness
about the importance of biodiversity, conservation, and the consequences of
human impact on the environment. It provides a tangible way to engage the public
in understanding and appreciating the interconnectedness of all living things.
6. Ethical Responsibility:
 Proponents stress that given the role humans have played in the extinction of
numerous species, there is an ethical responsibility to explore ways to revive these
species and rectify past mistakes. This viewpoint sees de-extinction as a form of
making amends for human-induced biodiversity loss.