Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2|Page
3.2 Apparatus.................................................................................................................... 19
3.3 Related Theory............................................................................................................ 19
3.3.1 Types of Particles.................................................................................................19
3.3.2 Angularity............................................................................................................ 20
3.3.3 Angularity Number .............................................................................................. 20
3.3.4 Significance ......................................................................................................... 20
3.4 Procedure .................................................................................................................... 21
3.5 Methods of Calculations.............................................................................................. 21
3.5.1 Method – 1........................................................................................................... 21
3.5.2 Method – 2........................................................................................................... 21
3.6 Observations & Calculations ....................................................................................... 22
3.7 Comments ................................................................................................................... 23
4 Specific Gravity and Water Absorption Test for Aggregates .............................................. 24
4.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 24
4.2 Apparatus.................................................................................................................... 24
4.3 Related Theory:........................................................................................................... 24
4.3.1 Aggregates ........................................................................................................... 24
4.3.2 Types of Crush Available In Pakistan...................................................................25
4.3.3 Absorption ........................................................................................................... 26
4.3.4 Saturated Surface Dry (S.S.D.) Condition ............................................................ 26
4.3.5 Oven Dry Density ................................................................................................ 26
4.3.6 Saturated Surface Dry (S.S.D) Density .................................................................27
4.3.7 Apparent Density .................................................................................................27
4.3.8 Specific Gravity ...................................................................................................27
4.3.9 Types of Specific Gravity .................................................................................... 27
4.3.10 Scope & Significance: .......................................................................................... 28
4.4 Sample: ....................................................................................................................... 28
4.5 Procedure: ................................................................................................................... 29
4.6 Observations ...............................................................................................................30
4.7 Calculations ................................................................................................................ 30
4.8 Precaution ................................................................................................................... 31
4.9 Comments ................................................................................................................... 31
3|Page
5 To perform the Los Angeles Abrasion test on aggregates ................................................... 32
5.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 32
5.2 Apparatus....................................................................................................................32
5.3 Related Theory:........................................................................................................... 32
5.3.1 Abrasion .............................................................................................................. 32
5.3.2 Pounding Action ..................................................................................................33
5.3.3 Los Angeles Abrasion Value ................................................................................ 33
5.3.4 Significance of Abrasion ...................................................................................... 33
5.4 Procedure: ................................................................................................................... 34
5.5 Grading Of Test Sample (Los Angeles Abrasion Test) ................................................35
5.6 Observations & Calculations: ...................................................................................... 35
5.7 Precautions ................................................................................................................. 35
5.8 Comments ................................................................................................................... 35
6 Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using British Pendulum Skid Resistance Tester. ..36
6.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 36
6.2 Apparatus....................................................................................................................36
6.3 Related Theory............................................................................................................ 37
6.3.1 Skid Resistance ....................................................................................................37
6.3.2 Skidding .............................................................................................................. 37
6.3.3 Slipping ............................................................................................................... 38
6.3.4 Measurement of Texture Depth ............................................................................ 38
6.3.5 Scope & Significance: .......................................................................................... 39
6.3.6 Factors Affecting Skidding Resistance .................................................................40
6.3.7 Improving the Skid-Resistance Value: .................................................................41
6.4 Reparation of Apparatus.............................................................................................. 41
6.4.1 Leveling ............................................................................................................... 41
6.4.2 Zero adjustment ...................................................................................................41
6.4.3 Slide length adjustment ........................................................................................ 42
6.5 Test Procedure ............................................................................................................ 42
6.6 Suggested Values Of Skid-Resistance: ........................................................................43
6.7 Observations & Calculations ....................................................................................... 44
6.8 Comments ................................................................................................................... 45
4|Page
7 Flash & Fire Point Test for Asphalt by Cleveland Open Cup .............................................. 46
7.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 46
7.2 References .................................................................................................................. 46
7.3 Apparatus....................................................................................................................46
7.3.1 Cleveland Cup Apparatus:.................................................................................... 46
7.3.2 Shield .................................................................................................................. 48
7.3.3 Thermometer: ...................................................................................................... 48
7.4 Related Theory............................................................................................................ 48
7.4.1 Flash Point: .......................................................................................................... 48
7.4.2 Fire Point: ............................................................................................................ 48
7.4.3 Flammable material ............................................................................................. 49
7.4.4 Combustible material ........................................................................................... 49
7.4.5 Sources of Bitumen .............................................................................................. 49
7.4.6 Scope & Significance of Fire Point ...................................................................... 50
7.5 Preparation of Apparatus ............................................................................................. 51
7.6 Procedure .................................................................................................................... 51
7.7 Precautions ................................................................................................................. 52
7.8 Calculations and Observations .................................................................................... 52
7.9 Observations & Results ............................................................................................... 53
7.10 Graphsint .................................................................................................................... 54
7.11 Comments ................................................................................................................... 55
8 Marshall Method of Mix Design ........................................................................................ 56
8.1 Objectives: .................................................................................................................. 56
8.2 References .................................................................................................................. 56
8.3 Apparatus:................................................................................................................... 57
8.4 Related Theory............................................................................................................ 58
8.4.1 Stability: .............................................................................................................. 58
8.4.2 Flow: ................................................................................................................... 58
8.4.3 Marshall Method of Mix Design .......................................................................... 58
8.4.4 Outline of Method................................................................................................ 59
8.4.5 Selection and combination of Aggregates............................................................. 59
8.4.6 Mineral Aggregate and Mix Composition ............................................................ 59
5|Page
8.4.7 Sieve Analysis of Aggregates (Percentage Used For Experiment) ........................ 61
8.5 Calculations for Sieve Analysis ................................................................................... 62
8.5.1 Design Bitumen Content ...................................................................................... 63
8.6 Test Procedure ............................................................................................................ 64
8.7 Computations .............................................................................................................. 64
9 Specific Gravity Test on Bituminous Materials. .................................................................67
9.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 67
9.2 Reference .................................................................................................................... 67
9.3 Apparatus.................................................................................................................... 67
9.4 Related Theory............................................................................................................ 68
9.4.1 Specific Gravity ...................................................................................................68
9.4.2 Scope & Significance ........................................................................................... 68
9.4.3 Sources of Bitumen:............................................................................................. 69
9.4.4 Grades of Bitumen: .............................................................................................. 69
9.4.5 Facts about Bitumen: ........................................................................................... 69
9.5 Procedure .................................................................................................................... 70
9.6 Calculations ................................................................................................................ 71
9.7 Observations & Results ............................................................................................... 72
9.8 Comments ................................................................................................................... 72
10 Penetration Test on Bituminous Materials....................................................................... 73
10.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 73
10.2 Reference .................................................................................................................... 73
10.3 Apparatus.................................................................................................................... 73
10.4 Related Theory............................................................................................................ 75
10.4.1 Penetration ........................................................................................................... 75
10.4.2 Sources of Bitumen:............................................................................................. 75
10.4.3 Grades of Bitumen: .............................................................................................. 76
10.4.4 Facts about Bitumen: ........................................................................................... 76
10.4.5 Scope & Significance ........................................................................................... 76
10.5 Preparation of Test Specimen ...................................................................................... 77
10.6 Test Conditions ........................................................................................................... 77
10.7 Procedure .................................................................................................................... 78
6|Page
10.8 Observations and Calculation ...................................................................................... 78
10.9 Comments ................................................................................................................... 79
11 Determination of Specific Viscosity of Liquid Asphalt Using Engler Viscometer. .......... 80
11.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 80
11.2 Reference .................................................................................................................... 80
➢ ASTM DESIGNATION: D 1665-98............................................................................... 80
11.3 Apparatus.................................................................................................................... 80
11.4 Related Theory S ........................................................................................................ 82
11.4.1 Engler Specific Viscosity: .................................................................................... 82
11.4.2 Properties of Bitumen: ......................................................................................... 83
11.4.3 Liquid Asphalt: ....................................................................................................83
11.4.4 Types of Liquid Asphalt:...................................................................................... 83
11.4.5 Scope & Significance ........................................................................................... 83
11.5 Preparation of Sample .................................................................................................84
11.6 Procedure .................................................................................................................... 84
11.7 Calculations ................................................................................................................ 85
11.8 Comments ................................................................................................................... 85
12 To Perform Ductility Test on Asphalt. ............................................................................ 86
12.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 86
12.2 Reference .................................................................................................................... 86
12.3 Apparatus.................................................................................................................... 86
12.4 Related Theory............................................................................................................ 88
12.4.1 Ductility............................................................................................................... 88
12.4.2 Importance of Ductility: ....................................................................................... 88
12.4.3 Scope & Significance ........................................................................................... 89
12.5 Procedure .................................................................................................................... 89
12.6 Testing: ....................................................................................................................... 90
12.7 Observations & Results ............................................................................................... 90
12.8 Comments ................................................................................................................... 91
13 Softening Point Of Bitumen (Ring-And-Ball Apparatus). ............................................... 92
13.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 92
13.2 Reference .................................................................................................................... 92
7|Page
13.3 Apparatus.................................................................................................................... 92
13.4 Related Theory............................................................................................................ 94
13.4.1 Softening Point: ...................................................................................................94
13.4.2 Scope & Significance: .......................................................................................... 94
13.5 Test Specimens ...........................................................................................................94
13.6 Procedure .................................................................................................................... 95
13.6.1 For Materials Having Softening Points 80°C Or Below ........................................ 95
13.7 For Materials Having Softening Points above 80°C ..................................................... 96
13.8 Observations & Results ............................................................................................... 96
13.9 Comments ................................................................................................................... 96
8|Page
Experiment No: 1
1.1 Objectives
This test is used to determine the particle shape of the aggregate and each particle shape being
preferred under specific conditions.
1.2 Apparatus:
9|Page
1.3 Related Theory:
1.3.2 Flaky
➢ A flaky particle is the one whose least dimension (thickness) is than 0.6 times the mean
size.
➢ These are the materials of which the thickness is small as compared to the other two
dimensions.
➢ Limit of flaky particles in the mixes is 30%. If the flaky particles are greater than 30%
then the aggregate is considered undesirable for the intended use.
Flaky Particles
10 | P a g e
1.3.4 Significance of Flakiness Index
1.4 Applicability
Flakiness tests are not applicable to sizes smaller then 6.3mm i.e. ¼’’ sieve.
1.5 Procedure
11 | P a g e
1.6 Observation and Calculation
(in.) (in.)
Σ= 8913.5 Σ = 23.07
1.7 Precautions:
➢ While sieving, care must be taken that the particles that are chocked in the sieve must not
be forced down into the next sieve. Such particles should be pushed back into the same
sieve.
➢ While placing different fractions on the table, place them some distance apart so that no
two fractions may get mixed.
➢ Be careful while selecting the opening of the flakiness and elongation gauges for any
particular fraction
12 | P a g e
1.8 Comments:
➢ The flakiness index of the sample is 23.07% .The value of flakiness index is within the
allowable limit of 30%.
➢ In actual practice a number of tests are performed and a variety of properties are
determined before accepting or neglecting any sample. Particularly, the selection of any
aggregate is quite heavily dependent on the strength tests results. And if the strength test
results are satisfactory, then a sample showing small discrepancy from the allowable
value in the elongation index (as in our case) may be selected.
13 | P a g e
Experiment No: 2
2.1 Objectives
This test is used to determine the particle shape of the aggregate and each particle shape being
preferred under specific conditions.
2.2 Apparatus:
14 | P a g e
2.3 Related Theory:
➢ These are the particles having length considerably larger than the other two dimensions
and it is the particle whose greater dimension is 1.8 times its mean size.
➢ Limit of elongated particles in the mixes is 45%. Thus, if the elongated particles are
greater than 45%, then the aggregate is considered undesirable for the intended use.
Elongated Particles
15 | P a g e
2.3.4 Significance of Elongation Index
2.4 Applicability
Flakiness tests are not applicable to sizes smaller then 6.3mm i.e. ¼’’ sieve.
2.5 Procedure
➢ The given sample is divided into different fractions by sieve analysis as before and
weight of each fraction is recorded.
➢ In order to separate Elongated particles, each fraction is gauged individually for length in
a length gauge.
➢ The pieces of aggregate from each fraction which do not pass through the specified gauge
are separated and weighted. These are termed as Elongated particles.
➢ The process is separated for all other fractions.
➢ The Elongated index is calculated by expressing the weight of Elongated particles as
percentage of total weight of the sample.
16 | P a g e
2.6 Observation and Calculation
(in.) (in.)
Σ=8913.5 Σ = 48.91
2.7 Precautions:
➢ While sieving, care must be taken that the particles that are chocked in the sieve must not
be forced down into the next sieve. Such particles should be pushed back into the same
sieve.
➢ While placing different fractions on the table, place them some distance apart so that no
two fractions may get mixed.
➢ Be careful while selecting the opening of the elongation gauges for any particular
fraction
17 | P a g e
2.8 Comments:
➢ The elongation index is greater than the maximum permissible value of 45%.
➢ If the sample is to be selected solely on the bases of elongation test results then the use of
such aggregate must be avoided as the elongation index value lies outside the permissible
range and the use of such aggregate will serve as a source of weakness.
➢ However, in actual practice a number of tests are performed and a variety of properties are
determined before accepting or neglecting any sample. Particularly, the selection of any
aggregate is quite heavily dependent on the strength tests results. And if the strength test
results are satisfactory, then a sample showing small discrepancy from the allowable value
in the elongation index (as in our case) may be selected.
18 | P a g e
Experiment No: 3
3.1 Objectives
This test is performed to determine the angularity number i.e. the absence of roundedness or the
degree of angularity of the aggregate specimen.
3.2 Apparatus
19 | P a g e
3.3.2 Angularity
It is the absence of roundness. An aggregate particle, which is more rounded, is less angular and
vice versa.
Angularity number of an aggregate is the amount (to the higher whole number) by which the
percentage of voids in it after compacting in a prescribed manner exceeds 33.
Where, “33” is the percentage of volume of voids, in a perfectly rounded aggregate. “67” is the
percentage of volume of solids in a perfectly rounded aggregate.
The value of angularity number generally lies between 0 & 11. In road construction angularity
number of 7 – 10 is generally preferred.
3.3.4 Significance
➢ The degree of packing of particles of single sized aggregate depends upon the angularity
of aggregate.
➢ The angularity of the aggregate can be estimated from the properties of voids in a sample
of aggregate compacted in a specified manner.
➢ The angularity number ranges from 0 for a highly rounded grave to about 11 for freshly
crushed angular aggregates.
➢ Higher the angularity number, more angular and less workable is the concrete mix.
➢ In cement concrete roads (rigid pavements) rounded aggregates are preferred because of
better workability and higher strength.
➢ In bituminous or water bound macadam construction (like flexible pavements), angular
aggregates with high angularity number are preferred because of high stability due to
better interlocking and friction.
➢ Higher the angularity number, more angular and less workable is the concrete mix.
➢ In road construction, angularity number of 7 -10 is generally preferred
20 | P a g e
3.4 Procedure
➢ This procedure is for aggregate size ¾to No.4. If aggregate is coarser than ¾, a cylinder of
large capacity shall be required but amount of compactive effort or energy should be
proportional to the volume of the cylinder.
➢ 10 Kg of the sample is taken for the test. The material should be oven dried.
➢ The aggregate is compacted in three layers, each layer being given 100 blows using the
standard tamping rod at a rate of 2 blows/second by lifting the rod 5 cm above the surface
of the aggregate and then allowing it to fall freely.
➢ The blows are uniformly distributed over the surface of the aggregate.
➢ After compacting the third layer, the cylinder is filled to overflowing and excess material
is removed off with temping rod as a straight edge.
➢ The aggregate with cylinder is then weighed. Three separate determinations are made and
mean weight of the aggregate in the cylinder is calculated.
3.5.1 Method – 1
Add measured quantity of water in the compacted aggregate till all the voids are filled and water
appears to the surface. Volume of water added is approximately equal to the volume of voids in
the compacted aggregate.
3.5.2 Method – 2
21 | P a g e
Where,
W = mean weight of the aggregate filling cylinder.
C = Weight/Volume of water that can completely fill the cylinder
Gs = Specific Gravity of the aggregate.
Notes:
1- Method – 1 determines the angularity number from the solids point of view.
2- Method – 2 determines the angularity number from the voids point of view
Mean
Value 5040 9935
to be
used 5040 9971.67 11233 4931.67 1261.33 8 6
22 | P a g e
3.7 Comments
There is a slight variation in the results obtained by method#1 & method#2. This may be
because; our assumed value of the specific gravity (i.e. 2.67) is incorrect. The correct value of
the specific gravity can thus be computed by comparing the equations of method –1 & method –
2 as done below;
23 | P a g e
Experiment No: 4
4.1 Objectives
In this test method we determine the relative density (i.e. specific gravity) and the water absorption
of the coarse aggregates.
4.2 Apparatus
4.3.1 Aggregates
Aggregates may be classified as;
➢ Coarse Aggregates
➢ Fine Aggregates
24 | P a g e
Any material which is retained on BS sieve #4 (ASTM sieve 4.75mm) is known as coarse
aggregate.
25 | P a g e
4.3.3 Absorption
It is the increase in the mass of the aggregate due to the penetration of water into the pores of the
particles during a prescribed period of time.
The term absorption does not include the amount of water adhering to the surface of the particles.
Water absorption is expressed as percentage of the dry mass.
It is the condition related with the aggregate particles in which the permeable pores of the aggregate
particles are filled with water but without free water on the surface of the particles.
It is the mass of the oven dried aggregate per unit volume of the aggregate particles. The term
volume includes the volume of the permeable and the impermeable pores and does not include the
volume of the voids between the particles.
26 | P a g e
4.3.6 Saturated Surface Dry (S.S.D) Density
It is the mass of the saturated surface dry aggregate per unit volume of the aggregate particles.
The term volume includes the volume of the permeable and the impermeable pores which are filled
with water and does not include the volume of the voids between the particles.
It is the mass per unit volume of the impermeable portion of the aggregate particles.
Or
It is the mass per unit volume of the solid portion of the particles excluding the voids.
It is the ratio of the density of the aggregate material to the density of the gas free distilled water
at a standard temperature (i.e. 4 oC).
Or
It is the ratio between the ‘weights of the aggregate in air’ to the ‘loss of aggregate weight in
water’.
The relative density is a dimensionless quantity and is expressed as oven dried, saturated surface
dry and apparent
It is the ratio of the oven dried density of the aggregate to the density of the gas free distilled
water at a standard temperature (i.e. 4 oC).
27 | P a g e
4.3.9.2 Saturated Surface Dry Specific Gravity
It is the ratio of the saturated surface dry density of the aggregate to the density of the gas free
distilled water at a standard temperature (i.e. 4 oC).
It is the ratio of the apparent density of the aggregate to the density of the gas free distilled water
at a standard temperature (i.e. 4 oC).
In this test method we determine the relative density (i.e. specific gravity) and the water absorption
of the coarse aggregates.
The information obtained from specific gravity is helpful in the following ways;
➢ The knowledge of the specific gravity is important for the concrete technologist to
determine the properties of concrete made from such aggregates.
➢ It is used for the calculation of the volume occupied by the aggregates in various mixtures.
➢ The pores at the surface of the particles affect the bond between the aggregate and the
cement paste and thus influence the concrete strength.
➢ Though higher specific gravity of aggregate is considered as an indication of its high
strength; it is not possible to judge the suitability on this basis alone without finding the
mechanical properties like aggregate abrasion value, e.t.c.
➢ Water absorption is a measure of porosity of aggregates and its resistance to frost action.
➢ The higher the water absorption, the weaker generally is the aggregate.
➢ Water absorption value ranges from 0.1 – 2.0% for aggregate normally used in roads
surfaces.
➢ Aggregates with water absorption up to 4.0% are recommended in base coarse
4.4 Sample:
Take representative sample. Reject all material passing #4, weight of sample to be used for the
test would depend upon the nominal maximum size as given in table below
28 | P a g e
(mm) 13 19 25 38 50 63 75 90
Nominal
Maximum Size (in.) ½ ¾ 1 1½ 2 2½ 3 3½
(Kg) 2 3 4 5 8 12 18 25
4.5 Procedure:
➢ The sample of the aggregate is immersed in water for 24hrs to essentially fill all the
pores.
➢ Remove the test sample from the water and roll it in a large absorbent cloth until all
visible films of water are removed.
➢ Wipe the larger particles individually. A moving stream of air is permitted to assist in the
drying operation.
➢ Take care to avoid evaporation of water from aggregate pores during the surface-drying
operation.
➢ Determine the mass of the test sample in the saturated surface-dry condition. Record this
and all subsequent masses to the nearest 0.5 g or 0.05 % of the sample mass, whichever is
greater.
➢ In order to calculate the volume of the aggregate, immediately place the saturated
surface- dry test sample in the sample container and determine its apparent mass in water
at 23±2.0 °C.
➢ Take care to remove all entrapped air before determining its mass by shaking the
container while immersed. The difference between the mass in air and the mass when the
sample is immersed in water equals the mass of water displaced by the sample. This mass
of water equals the volume of water displaced because ρwater = mwater x Vwater
mwater = Vwater (ρwater=1 gm/cm3)
Vwater = Vaggregate
➢ Dry the test sample in the oven to constant mass at a temperature of 110±5 °C, cool in air
at room temperature 1 to 3 h, or until the aggregate has cooled to a temperature that is
comfortable to handle (approximately 50 °C),
➢ Determine the mass in order to calculate the oven specific gravity of the specimen.
29 | P a g e
4.6 Observations
4.7 Calculations
A
d = BC
2493
d = 25021625 = .8
B
S = BC
2502
S = 25021625 = .8
A
a = AC
2493
a = 24931625 = .87
30 | P a g e
Water Absorption
BA
A = A
×
2502
A = 25022493 × = .
4.8 Precaution
➢ If the aggregate is not oven-dried before soaking, specific gravity values may be
significantly higher. This is because in the normal procedure the water may not be able to
penetrate the pores to the center of the aggregate particle during the soaking time. If the
aggregate is not oven-dry to start, the existing water in the aggregate pore structrure may
be able to penetrate further into the pores (AASHTO, 2000c).
➢ Make sure to use cloth and not paper towels. Paper towels may absorb water in the
aggregate pores.
4.9 Comments
➢ Specific gravities of our samples came out to be 2.8 which lies in the general range of
specific gravity values. The results confirm the fact that the Dry Bulk Specific Gravity
has the least,
➢ Saturated Surface Dry Bulk Specific Gravity has the intermediate and the Apparent
Specific Gravity has the maximum value out of the three
➢ Water absorption value of our sample comes out to be 0.361, Value ranges from 0.1 –
2.0% for aggregate normally used in roads surfaces. So our sample cannot be used in
road surfaces whereas aggregates with water absorption up to 4.0% are acceptable in base
coarse. So our sample can be used as base coarse.
31 | P a g e
Experiment No: 5
5.1 Objectives
This test is used to assess the hardness of the aggregate used in road construction
5.2 Apparatus
➢ Los Angeles Abrasion machine – consists of a hollow steel cylinder closed at both ends,
having inside diameter of 28’’ and inside length of 20’’. The cylinder is mounted on stub
shafts in such a way that it rotates about horizontal axis at 30-33 rpm.
➢ An opening in the cylinder with a dust tight cover is provided for the introduction of test
sample. A steel shelf extending full length of the cylinder and projecting full length of
the cylinder and projecting 3.5’’ inward is mounted on interior surface of the cylinder.
➢ Sieves confirming to ASTM Standards.
➢ Balance
➢ Abrasive charges (consisting of steel spheres 1 27/32’’ in diameter and each weighing
between (390 – 445 gms.)).
5.3.1 Abrasion
32 | P a g e
5.3.2 Pounding Action
Striking action of an object on a surface for a short instant of time is called the pounding effect.
It is an indicative of the abrasion strength of the aggregates. It can be computed by using the
relationship;
Orignal WeightFinal Weight
Ls s = Orignal Weight
×
Where,
Final weight = Weight retained on sieve #12
The road aggregate is subjected to wearing action by the moving traffic and therefore resistance to
wear or hardness is an essential property of the aggregate. The aggregate should be hard enough
to resist abrasion due to traffic.
Los Angeles Abrasion test is used to find out the percentage wear due to relative rubbing action
between aggregate and steel balls used as abrasive charges. Pounding action of these balls also
exists while conducting the test. The test is considered more dependable as rubbing and pounding
action simulate field conditions.
The test has been standardized by ASTM and AASHTO.
FHWA recommendations are that coarse aggregate for dense graded mixes have a percent wear of
50% or less. For open graded mixes or where requirements are more exacting, the requirement is
40% or less.
Notes:
33 | P a g e
➢ Larger the LAA value, softer will be the aggregate and vice versa
➢ If we have two samples to be used in the wearing surface having LAA value of 0%
& 10%, then we should use the one having LAA value of 10% (note this is true only for
wearing surface and the opposite is true for sub-grade, sub-base and base coarse). This is
because, even though 0% will provide a good hard surface but its coefficient of friction
will be too high and it will severely damage the tyres.
➢ If two different samples are obtained from the same source, then the results of the LAA
value will be same for both of the samples because LAA value is a material property
5.4 Procedure:
➢ The sample taken should be representative and confirming to any of the grading given in
the table.
➢ The sample is placed in the cylinder along with the abrasive charges and the machine is
rotated for the required number of revolutions (500 – 1000).
➢ After the required number of revolutions, material is discharged from the machine and
sieved through #12 US sieve.
➢ Wash the material coarser than #12 sieve, oven dry and weigh.
➢ Then compute the LAA value by using the relationship;
Where,
Final weight = Weight retained on sieve #12
34 | P a g e
5.5 Grading Of Test Sample (Los Angeles Abrasion Test)
5.7 Precautions
5.8 Comments
35 | P a g e
Experiment No: 6
6.1 Objectives
This test is used to determine the braking distance of the road surface
6.2 Apparatus
(a) Parts
➢ Slider – Slider assembly consists of an aluminum backing plate to which a rubber strip
3’’ x 1’’ x ¼’’ is bonded.
➢ Leveling screws
➢ Scale
➢ Drag pointer
➢ Locking and control knobs
➢ Frictional rings
(b) Accessories
➢ Contact path gauge – shall consist of a thin ruler suitably marked for measuring contact
path length between (4 7/8’’ and 5’’).
➢ Water container
➢ Surface thermometer and
➢ Brush
36 | P a g e
6.3 Related Theory
The British Pendulum Skid Resistance Tester is an impact type pendulum used to measure the
energy loss when a rubber slider edge is propelled over a test surface. The values measured
represent the frictional properties and are expressed as BPN (British Pendulum Number).
6.3.2 Skidding
In skidding phenomenon, the distance travelled by wheel on the road is more than the
circumferential movement. When brakes are applied, wheels get locked and still if the vehicle
moves ahead, longitudinal skidding is said to occur. Skid Resistance
37 | P a g e
6.3.3 Slipping
In slipping, the distance traveled by wheel on the road is less than the circumferential movement.
If the wheels of the vehicle are rotating but the vehicle is not moving forward, then slipping is
said to occur. Skid
It is also necessary to record the surface texture of the road surface tested. This is measured by
Sand Patch Method. A known volume of fine sand of uniform particle size is poured on the road
and spread to form a patch of a regular shape so that its area couldn’t be measured. Sand should
be spread in such a manner that all “valleys” are filled to level of “peaks”. Then the texture depth
can be computed by using the formula
38 | P a g e
Volume of Sand
x Dp = Area of Patch
More the texture depth, better is the road surface but a high value of texture depth also increases
the chances of severe injuries
➢ This test is used to determine the braking distance of the road surface.
39 | P a g e
➢ Braking distance is particularly important at crossings, road signals, school intersections
and turns, etc.
➢ Road pavements are designed to provide reasonably high coefficient of friction but with
the movement of traffic, the aggregates in the wearing coarse of the road get polished
resulting in reduction of the frictional or skid resistance of the road. British Pendulum
Tester is used to measure the frictional resistance of road at sections which appear to be
potentially slippery and unsafe against skidding.
➢ The tester is dynamic Pendulum Impact type used to measure the energy loss when a
rubber slider edge is propelled over a test surface.
➢ Used for field and laboratory tests.
➢ The values measured represent the frictional properties and are expressed as BPN (British
Pendulum Number).
➢ Friction between vehicle and road surface plays a vital role in determining the maximum
operating speed and the distance required in safely stopping the vehicles.
➢ Higher the skid-resistance results, better is the road surface but a high value of skid
resistance also increases the chances of severe injuries.
➢ More the texture depth, better is the road surface but a high value of texture depth also
increases the chances of severe injuries.
Vehicles having smooth tires would have slightly lower skidding resistance.
Skidding resistance of wet roads is higher in winter than in summer. Skidding resistance of roads
is at its lowest between April and September. So roads with satisfactory values in winter may prove
slippery during summer. Skid Resistance
40 | P a g e
6.3.6.4 Type of aggregate
Sand stones and granites are more resistant to polishing action than limestone.
Higher the skid-resistance results, better is the road surface but a high value of skid-resistance
also increases the chances of severe injuries
If the results of skid-resistance test are not satisfactory, then one of the following steps should be
performed to improve the skid-resistance.
➢ Install cat-eyes
➢ Build speed-barkers
➢ Add an extra coarser layer of the wearing surface near the braking zones (e.g. signals).
6.4.1 Leveling
Apparatus is levelled using 3 levelling screws until the bubble is centered in the spirit level.
Raise the pendulum mechanism by loosening locking knob, till it swings free of test surface.
Tighten the knob. Place pendulum in release position and drag pointer in horizontal position and
drag pointer in horizontal position. Execute a free swing and note the pointer reading. If reading
is not zero; make adjustment by friction ring until pendulum swing carries the pointer to zero.
Skid Resistance
41 | P a g e
6.4.3 Slide length adjustment
With pendulum hanging free, place spacer under adjusting screw of lifting handle and allow
pendulum to move slowly to the left until the edge of the slider touches the surface. Place gauge
beside slider and parallel to the direction of swing to verify the length of contact path which
should be between (4 7/8’’ and 5’’) on flat surfaces as measured from trailing edge to trailing
edge of the rubber slider. Skid Resistance
Place pendulum in release position and rotate drag pointer counter clockwise until it comes to
original position.
Inspect the road and choose the section to be tested. Set the apparatus so that the slider swings in
the direction of traffic.
➢ Apply sufficient water to cover the test area thoroughly. Execute one swing but don’t
record reading.
➢ Make four more swings, rewetting the test area each time and record the results. The
readings should not differ by more than 3 units. Skid Resistance
➢ Report the individual values as B.P.N. also note down the age, condition, texture and
location of test area
➢ It is also necessary to record the surface texture of the road surface tested. This is
measured by Sand Patch Method.
➢ A known volume of fine sand of uniform particle size is poured on the road and spread to
form a patch of a regular shape so that its area couldn’t be measured. Sand should be
spread in such a manner that all “valleys” are filled to level of “peaks”. Then the texture
depth can be computed by using the formula;
Volume of Sand
x Dp = Area of Patch
42 | P a g e
6.6 Suggested Values Of Skid-Resistance:
‘SKID STANDARD OF
RESISTANCE’ SKIDDING
ON WET RESISTANCE
CATEGORY TYPE OF SITE SURFACE REPRESENTED
i)- Roundabouts
‘Generally
Satisfactory’:
General requirements, meeting all but the
i.e. roads and most difficult
conditions not conditions
covered by categories encountered on the
B* A & C. Above 55 roads.
43 | P a g e
Easy sites, e.g.
straight roads, with
easy gradients and
curves, without
junctions, and free
from any features,
such as mixed traffic,
especially liable to ‘Satisfactory only
create conditions of in favorable
C* emergency. Above 45 circumstances.’
‘Potentially
D All sites Below 45 Slippery’
Texture Depth
Skid Resistance
44 | P a g e
British Pendulum Number
Surface Skid-
Distance Distance Texture Resistance Mean
Group Date from (m) (in) (BPN) (BPN)
6.8 Comments
After performing the experiment and calculating the surface texture it is concluded that the road
surface texture on which we performed the experiment was Coarse/Open Textured surface for both
the groups & the standard of skid resistance for 1st group came out to be good but for second group
it came out to be Generally Satisfactory.
45 | P a g e
Experiment No: 7
7 Flash & Fire Point Test for Asphalt by Cleveland Open Cup
7.1 Objectives
To determine the flash and fire point of asphalt by using Cleveland open cup apparatus
7.2 References
➢ ASTM: D 92-85
➢ AASHTO: T 48-89
7.3 Apparatus
It consists of test cup, heating plate, test flame applicator, heater, thermometer support and heating
plate support, all conforming to the following requirements.
➢ Test Cup
➢ Heating Plate
A brass, cast iron, wrought iron, or steel plate with a center hole surrounded by an area of plane
depression, and a sheet of hard asbestos board which covers the metal plate except over the area
of plane depression in which the test cup is supported. The metal plate may be square instead of
round and have suitable extension for mounting the test flame applicator device and the
46 | P a g e
thermometer support. The metal bead is mounted on the plate so that it extends through and slightly
above a small hole in the asbestos board. Fi
The device for applying the test flame may be of any suitable design, but the tip shall be 1.6 to 5.0
mm in diameter at the end and the orifice shall have an approximate diameter of 0.8 mm. The
device for applying the test flame shall be so mounted to permit automatic duplication of the sweep
of the test flame, the radius of swing being not less than 150 mm and the center of the orifice
moving’ in a plane not more than 2.5 mm above the cup. A bead having a diameter of 3.8 to 5.4
mm may be mounted in a convenient position on the apparatus so the size of the test flame can be
compared to it.
Fire Point
➢ Heater
Heat may be supplied from any convenient source. The use of a gas burner or alcohol lamp is
permitted, but under no circumstances are products of combustion or free flame to be allowed to
come up around the cup. An electric heater controlled by a variable voltage transformer is
preferred. The source of heat shall be centered under the opening of the heating plate with no local
superheating.
47 | P a g e
➢ Thermometer Support
A device which will hold the thermometer in the specified position during a test and permits easy
removal of the thermometer from the test cup upon completion of a test.
Any convenient support which will hold the heating plate level and steady may be employed. Fire
Point
7.3.2 Shield
A shield having an area of 460mm2 and 610mm high and having an open front is used.
7.3.3 Thermometer:
Flash point is the lowest temperature corrected to a barometric pressure of 101.3 kPa (760 mm
Hg), at which application of a test flame causes the vapor of a specimen to ignite under specified
conditions of test. The material is deemed to have flashed when a large flame appears and
instantaneously propagates itself over the surface of the specimen.
Note: Occasionally, particularly near the actual flash point, the application of test flame will
cause the blue halo or an enlarged flame; this is not a flash and should be ignored.
It is the lowest temperature at which a specimen will sustain burning for 5 seconds
48 | P a g e
7.4.3 Flammable material
A flammable material is the one, which form flames, but does not sustain fire.
49 | P a g e
Temperature Condition * Asphalt Grade
AC-10
AR-4000
Cold, mean annual air temperature < 7 °C (45 °F) 80 / 100 pen
AC-20
AR-8000
Warm, mean annual air temperature between 7 °C
(45 °F) and 24 °C (75 °F) 60 / 70 pen
AC-40
AR-8000
➢ Flash point measures the tendency of the sample to form a flammable mixture with air
under controlled laboratory conditions. It is only one of a number of properties that must
be considered in assessing the overall flammability hazard of a material.
➢ Flash point is used in shipping and safety regulations to differentiate between
‘‘flammable’’ and ‘‘combustible’’ materials.
➢ Flash point can indicate the possible presence of highly volatile and flammable materials
in a relatively nonvolatile or nonflammable material.
➢ Fire point measures the characteristics of the sample to support combustion.
➢ Bituminous materials give rise to volatiles at high temperature, as they are basically the
hydrocarbons. These volatiles catch fire causing a flash, which is very hazardous.
➢ During construction of bituminous pavements, the engineer may restrict the mixing or
application temperatures well within the limits. The test therefore gives indication of
critical temperature at and above which suitable precautions should be taken to eliminate
fire hazards during use of asphalts. In other words heating should be limited to a
temperature well below the flash point.
50 | P a g e
7.5 Preparation of Apparatus
Support the apparatus on a level table. Shield the top of the apparatus from strong intensity of
light by any suitable means to permit ready detection of the flash point. Fire Point
Wash the test cup with an appropriate solvent to remove any oil or traces of gum or residue
remaining from a previous test. If any deposits of carbon are present, they should be removed
with steel wool. Flush the cup with cold water and dry for a few minutes over an open flame, on
a hot plate, or in an oven to remove the last traces of solvent and water. Cool the cup to at least
56 °C below the expected flash point before using.
Support the thermometer in a vertical position with the bottom of the bulb 6.4 mm from the
bottom of the cup and located at a point halfway between the center and side of the cup on the
diameter perpendicular to the line of the sweep of the test flame and on the side opposite to the
test flame burner arm. Fire
7.6 Procedure
➢ Fill the cup; at any convenient temperature not exceeding 100 °C or above the softening
point; so that the top of the meniscus is at the filling line.
➢ Remove the excess sample using a pipette or other suitable device; however, if there is
sample on the outside of the apparatus, empty, clean, and refill it. Destroy any air bubbles
on the surface of the sample.
➢ Lit the test flame and adjust it to a diameter of 3.8 to 5.4 mm.
➢ Apply heat initially so that the rate of temperature rise of the sample is 14 to 17 °C per
minute. When the sample temperature is approximately 56 °C below the anticipated flash
point, decrease the heat so that the rate of temperature rise for 28°C before the flash point
is 5 to 6°C per minute.
➢ Starting at least 28 °C below the flash point, apply the test flame when the temperature
read on the thermometer reaches each successive 2 °C mark. Pass the test flame across
the center of the cup, at right angles to the diameter, which passes through the
thermometer. With a smooth, continuous motion apply the flame either in a straight line
or along the circumference of a circle having a radius of at least 150 mm. The center of
the test flame must move in a plane not more than 2.5 mm above the plane of the upper
edge of the cup passing in one direction first, then in the opposite direction the next lime.
The time consumed in passing the test flame across the cup shall be about one second (1
s.). During the last 17 °C rise in temperature prior to the flash point, care must be taken to
avoid disturbing the vapors in the test cup by careless movements or bathing near the cup.
51 | P a g e
➢ Record as the observed flash point the temperature read on the thermometer when a flash
appears at any point on the surface of the material, but does not confuse the true flash
with the bluish halo that sometimes surrounds the test flame.
➢ To determine the fire point, continue heating so that the sample temperature increases at a
rate of 5 to 6 °C. Continue the application of the test flame at 2°C intervals until the oil
ignites and continues to burn for at least 5 second. Record the temperature at the point as
the fire point of the oil.
7.7 Precautions
➢ Do not breathe close to the apparatus as the fumes are injurious to health.
➢ Turn the fans off so that the fumes can be accumulated over the cup.
➢ Tip of the thermometer should not touch the bottom or sides of the cup.
➢ The operator must exercise and take appropriate safety precautions during the initial
application of the test flame, since samples containing low flash material may give an
abnormally strong flash when the test flame is first applied.
Observe and record the barometric pressure at the time of the test. When the pressure differs
from 760 mm Hg, correct the flash or fire point, or both, by means of the following equations:
Corrected flash or fire point, or both = C + 0.03 (760 — P)
Where,
C = observed flash or fire point, or both, to the nearest 2 °C, and
P = Barometric pressure, mm Hg.
Record the corrected flash or fire joint value, or both, to the nearest 5 °C or 2°C.
Point
Flash Point of Different Grades Of Asphalt:
Viscosity Grades
52 | P a g e
Property AC – 2.5 AC – 5 AC – 10 AC – 20 AC – 40
Flash Point
COC, °C min. 163 177 219 232 232
0 24
1 30
2 36
3 41
4 47
5 53
6 60
7 67
8 73
9 80
10 112
11 156
12 182
13 202
14 222
53 | P a g e
15 240
16 256
17 271
18 284
19 299
20 310
21 318
22 329
23 340
24 351
7.10 Graphsint
.
54 | P a g e
7.11 Comments
The Experiment has been performed successfully and the results which we have got are showing
that the flash point of the bitumen sample came out to be at 308◦ and time corresponding to this
temperature was 9.12 minutes. Whereas the fire point was found out to be at temperature of
352◦and the time corresponding to this temperature was 24.25 minutes. The trend line of the graph
is showing the relationship between temperature and time.
55 | P a g e
Experiment NO: 8
8.1 Objectives:
Marshall Test Procedure is used in designing and evaluating asphalt concrete mixes (Bitumen
Paving mixes). Density-Void analysis and stability-Flow Test are done. Marshall mix design
criteria by Asphalt Institute by U.S.A. is given in the table number five. Optimum percentages of
bitumen are obtained for type of aggregate mix and traffic intensity
8.2 References
➢ ASTM: D 1663-73
➢ ASTM: D 1559-75
56 | P a g e
8.3 Apparatus:
57 | P a g e
8.4 Related Theory
8.4.1 Stability:
The stability of the mix is the maximum load carried by a compacted specimen at a standard
temperature of 60'C.
8.4.2 Flow:
The flow is measured as a deformation in unit of 0.01 inch between no load and maximum load
carried by the specimen during stability test
The Marshall Method of mix design is intended both for laboratory design and field control of
bituminous hot-mix dense graded paving mixtures. Originally developed by Bruce Marshall of
the Mississippi State Highway Department, the US Army Corps of Engineers refined and added
certain features to Marshall’s approach and it was then subsequently formalized as ASTM D
1559 and AASHTO T245.
58 | P a g e
8.4.4 Outline of Method
It uses standard cylindrical test specimens (64 mm high and 102 mm in diameter). Two principal
features of Marshall Method of mix design are Density Void Analysis and Stability Flow Test of
compacted test specimen.
Stability of test specimens is the maximum load resistance developed by standard test specimen
at 60°C in Newton.
Flow value is the total movement or displacement occurring in the specimen between no load
and the point of maximum load during stability test in units of 0.25mm.
Selection of the aggregates to be used in a given paving mixture is a very important phase of the
design phase. In normal procedure, both coarse and fine aggregates available in the near vicinity
of the proposed work are sampled and carefully examined for compliance with the individual
specifications for these materials. In case no suitable single aggregate is available then
aggregates from several different sources may have to be blended to get the required specified
specimen. The proportions selected must be within the specification and far enough from its
extremes to provide room for the job mix tolerance so that when it is added or subtracted the
mixture will not be outside the original specification master range. Sieve Analysis of the
aggregates can most economically be used in this case as determined by AASHTO methods of
T27 and T37
Retained on Sieve
Passing Sieve Designation Designation Percent by weight
59 | P a g e
½ in. (12.5 mm) 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) 9-40
Total Mix
60 | P a g e
It is obvious that the fine aggregate and coarse aggregate only, in any combination, cannot meet
the requirements of the pecifications for total mineral aggregate. So, mineral fillers must be used
in the mixture.
3/8in.(9.5mm) No.4(4.75mm) 37 —- —-
No.4(4.75mm) No.10(2.00mm) 22 7 —-
No.10(2.00mm) No.40(0.475mm) 4 28 —-
No.40(0.475mm) No.80(0.177mm) —- 39 5
No.80(0.177mm) No.200(0.75mm) —- 24 30
61 | P a g e
No.200(0.75mm) —– —- 2 65
For first trial, the amount of mineral filler is arbitrarily set at 8 percent. The total coarse aggregate
in the mix must be from 50 to 65 percent, and this figure is set as 52 percent. The remaining 40
percent must be fine aggregate.
Calculations made using the indicated proportions in determining the sieve analysis of the
combined aggregates are as follows. A comparison of the figures in the last column of the table
with the requirements of the specification will show that this combination of aggregates meets the
stipulated requirements. This combination will therefore be judged satisfactory and no additional
trials are made here.
Percent by weight
Agg.
Passing Retained on COARSE FINE MINERAL TOTAL Wt.
Sieve Size Sieve Size AGGREGATE AGGREGATE FILLER AGG. (gm)
62 | P a g e
0.52 x 4 = 0.40 x 28 =
No.10 No.40
(2.00mm (0.475m 2.2 11.2 —- 13.4 160.8
0.40 x 24 = 0.08 x 30
No.80 No.200
(0.177mm (0.75mm) —- 9.6 2.4 12 144
0.40 x 2 = 0.08 x 65
No.200
(0.75mm —– —- 0.8 5.2 6 72
When determining the design bitumen content for a particular blend or gradation of aggregates by
Marshall Method, a series of test specimens is prepared for a range of different bitumen contents
so that the test data curves show well-defined relationships.
➢ Experience
➢ Using filler-to-bitumen ratio guideline ( ranges 06 to 1.2 )
➢ Computational Formula
P = 0.035a + 0.045b + K c + F
Where
63 | P a g e
b = Percentage of mineral aggregate passing sieve No.10 and retained on sieve No.200
c = Percentage of mineral aggregate passing sieve No.200
K = 0.15, 11-15% passing sieve No.200.
= 0.18, 6-10% passing sieve No.200
=0.20, 5% passing sieve No.200
F = 0 to 2%, based on the absorption of light and heavy aggregates. F = 0.7 incase no data is
available.
In Marshall Method, each compacted test specimen is subjected to following tests and analysis in
the order listed.
8.7 Computations
[× ]
=
Where,
64 | P a g e
= air voids in compacted mixture as a percentage of total volume.
= maximum specific gravity of a paving mixture,
= Bulk specific gravity of a compacted mixture.
=
Where,
= +
= × ( )
= ( ) ×
W1 = 52
W2 = 40
W3 = 8
W4 = 5
G1 = 2.85
65 | P a g e
G2 = 2.65
G3 = 2.7
G4 = 1
Mean
Mean Mean Mean
Weigh Weigh Bulk Specifi % of % of Voids Voids
% of Height Bulk % of % of Voids
t of t of specifi c air voids in filled
Sampl Bitu. of specifi air voids in
Group agg. in agg. in c Gravit voids in minera with
e# Cont sample c voids in bit. minera
air water gravity y in agg. bitume l agg bit.
gravity in agg. l agg
n
% mm gm gm % % % %
1 64 1239 708 1.75 2.75 36.47 5.25 41.72
A1 2 3 64 1223 750 1.63 1.71 2.75 40.80 36.34 0.00 5.25 - 38.97 12.58 31.4
3 64 1230 700 1.76 2.75 36.21 0.00 36.21
1 64 1238.4 717 1.73 2.75 37.30 6.05 43.34
A2 2 3.5 64 1259.2 725 1.74 1.74 2.75 36.95 36.98 0.00 6.05 36.95 39.00 13.95 37
3 64 1251.9 718 1.74 2.75 36.70 0.00 36.70
1 64 1245 710 1.75 2.75 36.34 7.01 43.36
B1 2 4 64 1250 720 1.74 1.77 2.75 36.97 35.64 0.00 7.01 36.97 37.97 16.18
3 64 1211 662 1.83 2.75 33.59 0.00 33.59
1 64 1244.4 717 1.74 2.75 36.99 7.81 44.80
B2 2 4.5 64 1244.6 720 1.73 1.73 2.75 37.25 37.11 0.00 7.81 37.25 39.71 17.43
3 64 1251.2 722 1.73 2.75 37.09 0.00 37.09
1 64 1252 710 1.76 2.75 35.98 8.82 44.80
C1 2 5 64 1264 728 1.74 1.80 2.75 36.97 34.78 0.00 8.82 36.97 37.72 19.68
3 64 1032 546 1.89 2.75 31.38 0.00 31.38
1 64 1296.6 731 1.77 2.75 35.61 9.76 45.36
C2 2 5.5 64 1298.7 716 1.81 1.79 2.75 34.15 34.86 0.00 9.76 34.15 38.11 21.51
3 64 1292.8 720 1.80 2.75 34.82 0.00 34.82
1 64 1272 730 1.74 2.75 36.74 10.45 47.20
D1 2 6 64 1282 740 1.73 1.73 2.75 37.11 37.05 0.00 10.45 37.11 40.54 22.15
3 64 1278 740 1.73 2.75 37.30 0.00 37.30
1 64 1280 753 1.70 2.75 38.29 11.05 49.34
D2 2 6.5 64 1285 758 1.70 1.70 2.75 38.46 38.30 0.00 11.05 38.46 41.99 22.39
3 64 1240 728 1.70 2.75 38.17 0.00 38.17
66 | P a g e
Experiment NO: 9
9.1 Objectives
9.2 Reference
9.3 Apparatus
➢ Pycnometer
67 | P a g e
➢ Water Bath
➢ Thermometers
➢ Balance
➢ Distilled water
Freshly boiled and cooled distilled water shall he used to fill the Pycnometer and the beaker
The specific gravity of semi-solid bituminous material, asphalt cements, and soft tar pitches shall
be expressed as the ratio of the mass of a given volume of the material at 25 °C to that of an
equal volume of water at the same temperature.
68 | P a g e
➢ Bitumen weights sometimes have to be converted into volumes for asphalt concrete mix
design calculations for which a knowledge of specific gravity is essential.
➢ Specific gravity is also used in identifying the source of bitumen binder.
➢ Bitumen binder has specific gravity in the range of 0.97 to 1.02
➢ In case bitumen contains mineral impurities the specific gravity will be higher. Thus it is
possible for a quantitative extraction of mineral impurity in bitumen.
69 | P a g e
➢ By repeated heating and cooling of bitumen, more and more volatiles will be ejected and
the properties of bitumen will be altered
9.5 Procedure
➢ Heat the sample with care, stirring to prevent local overheating until the sample has become
sufficiently fluid to pour. While heating, keep in mind the following considerations;
1. In no case should the temperature be raised to more than 56 °C above the expected
softening point for tar, or to more than 111°Cabove the expected softening point for
asphalt.
2. Do not heat for more than 30 minutes over a flame or hot plate or for more than 2hours
in an oven, and avoid incorporating air bubbles in the sample.
➢ Thoroughly clean, dry, and weigh the Pycnometer to the nearest 1 mg. Designate this
mass as ‘A’.
➢ Then fill the beaker with freshly boiled distilled water, placing the stopper loosely in the
Pycnometer. Place the Pycnometer in the beaker and press the stopper firmly in place.
70 | P a g e
Return the beaker to the water bath, and allow the Pycnometer to remaining the water bath
for a period of not less than 30 minutes. Remove the Pycnometer, immediately dry the top
of the stopper with one stroke of a dry towel, then quickly dry the remaining outside area
of the Pycnometer and weigh to the nearest 1 mg. Designate the mass of the Pycnometer
plus water as ‘B’.
➢ Pour enough sample into the clean, dry, warmed Pycnometer to fill it about three-fourths
of its capacity. Take precautions to keep the material from touching the sides of the
Pycnometer above the final level, and to prevent the inclusion of air bubbles. Allow the
Pycnometer and its contents to cool to ambient temperature for a period of not less than 40
minutes, and weigh with, the stopper to the nearest 1 mg. designate the mass of the
Pycnometer plus sample as ‘C’.
➢ Remove the beaker from the water bath. Fill the Pycnometer containing the asphalt with
freshly boiled distilled water, placing the stopper loosely in the Pycnometer. Do not allow
any air bubbles to remain in the Pycnometer. Place the Pycnometer in the beaker and press
the stopper firmly in place. Return the beaker to the water bath. Allow the Pycnometer to
remain in the water bath for a period of not less than 30 minutes. Remove the Pycnometer
from the bath. Dry and weigh using the same technique and timing as that employed in #
2. Designate this mass of Pycnometer plus sample plus water as ‘D’.
9.6 Calculations
71 | P a g e
Where,
A = mass of Pycnometer (+ stopper) = 22.277 g
B = mass of Pycnometer filled with water = 74.151 g
C = mass of Pycnometer partially filled with asphalt = 55.445 g
D = mass of Pycnometer + asphalt + water = 74.628 g
9.8 Comments
The experiment has been performed successfully and the specific gravity determined is 1.015
which is in the range of 0.97 to 1.02. So it is acceptable. There were no bubbles in the Pycnometer
so chance of error was eliminated and thus the value is correct.
72 | P a g e
Experiment No: 10
10.1 Objectives
10.2 Reference
10.3 Apparatus
➢ Penetration Apparatus
Any apparatus that permits the needle holder (spindle) to move vertically without
measurable friction and is capable of indicating the depth of penetration to the nearest 0.1 mm,
will be acceptable. The weight of the spindle shall be 47.5 ± 0.05gram. The total weight of the
needle and spindle assembly shall be 50.0 ±0.05 grams. Weights of 50 ± 0.05 grams and 100 ±
0.05 grams shall also be provided for total loads of 100 gram and 200 gram, as required for some
conditions of the test. The surface on which the sample container rests shall be flat and the axis
of the plunger shall be at approximately 90° to this surface. The spindle shall be easily detached
for checking its weight.
73 | P a g e
➢ Penetration Needle
The needle shall be made from fully hardened and tapered stainless steel. The standard needle shall
be approximately 50 mm in length. The diameter of needle shall be 1.00 to 1.02 mm. It shall be
symmetrically tapered at one end by grinding to a cone having an angle between 8.7° and 9.7° over
the entire cone length. The cone should be coaxial with the straight body of the needle. The
truncated tip of the cone shall be within the diameter limits of 0.14 and 0.16 mm and square to the
needle axis within 2°. The needle shall he mounted in a non-corroding metal ferrule. The exposed
length of the standard needle shall be within the limits of 40 and 45 mm and the exposed length
of the long needle shall be 50 to 55 mm. The needle shall be rigidly mounted in the ferrule. The
weight of the ferrule needle assembly should be 2.50 ± 0.05 grams.
➢ Sample Container
A metal or glass cylindrical, flat-bottom container of the following dimensions shall be used.
➢ Water Bath
➢ Timing Device
For hand operated Penetrometers any convenient timing device such as an electric timer, a
stop watch, or other spring activated device may be used provided it is graduated in 0.1 second
or less and is accurate to within ± 0.1 second for a 60 second interval.
➢ Thermometers
74 | P a g e
10.4 Related Theory
10.4.1 Penetration
Consistency of a bituminous material expressed as the distance in tenths of a millimeter that a
standard needle vertically penetrates a sample of the material under known conditions of loading,
time, and temperature
75 | P a g e
10.4.3 Grades of Bitumen:
76 | P a g e
10.5 Preparation of Test Specimen
Heat the sample with care, stirring when possible to prevent local overheating, until it has
become sufficiently fluid to pour. In no case should the temperature be raised to more than 90 °C
above expected softening point for petroleum asphalt (bitumen). Do not heat samples for more
than 30 minutes. Avoid incorporating bubbles into the sample.
Pour the sample into the sample container to a depth such that, when cooled to the temperature of
test, the depth of the sample is at least 10 mm greater than the depth to which the needle is
expected to penetrate. Pour two separate portions for each variation in test conditions.
Loosely cover each container as a protection against dust (covering with a lipped beaker) and
allow cooling in air at a temperature between 15° and 30 °C for 1 to 1.5 hours for the small
container and 1.5 to 2 hours for the taller.
Where the conditions of test are not specifically mentioned, the temperature, load, and time are
understood to be 25 °C, 100 gram, and 5 seconds, respectively. Other conditions may be used for
special testing, such as the following:
In such cases the specific conditions of test shall be reported. Report to nearest whole unit the
average of three penetrations whose values do not differ by more than the following:
77 | P a g e
10.7 Procedure
Examine the needle holder and guide to establish the absence of water and other extraneous
materials. Clean a penetration needle with toluene or other suitable solvent, dry with a clean
cloth, and insert the needle into the penetrometer. Unless otherwise specified place the 50 gram
weight above the needle, making the total weight 100 ± 0.1gram. Place the sample container in
the transfer dish, cover the container completely with water with the constant temperature bath
and place the transfer dish on the stand of the penetrometer.
Position the needle by slowly lowering it until its tip just makes contact with the surface of the
sample. This is accomplished by bringing the actual needle tip into contact with its image reflected
on the surface of the sample from a properly placed source of light. Either note the reading of the
penetrometer dial or bring the pointer to zero. Quickly release the needle holder for the specified
period of time and adjust the instrument to measure the distance penetrated in tenths of a
millimeter. If the container moves, ignore the result.
Make at least three determinations at points on the surface of the sample not less than 10 mm from
the side of the container and not less than 10 mm apart. If the transfer dish is used, return the
sample and transfer dish to the constant temperature bath between determinations. Use a clean
needle for each determination. If the penetration is greater than 200, use at least three needles
leaving them in the sample until the three determinations have been completed.
78 | P a g e
10.9 Comments
The experiment has been performed successfully and the mean penetration value came out to be
79.33. According to the tables the values ranging from 50 to 149 should have difference of
maximum 4. In our case the difference is = 80-79 = 1 which is lesser then 4 so our performed
experiment and the penetration value is correct. We performed the experiment at room
temperature.
79 | P a g e
Experiment No: 11
11.1 Objectives
11.2 Reference
11.3 Apparatus
➢ Engler Viscometer
Cup — this is a gold-plated cylindrical brass vessel having an inner diameter of 106.0 ±
1.0 mm, closed at the top by a double walled lid. To the rounded bottom is attached a metal—
encase tapered platinum efflux tube 20.0 ± 0.1 mm long with an inside diameter of 2.90 ±
0.1 mm at the top and 2.80 ± 0.02 mm at the bottom. Three metal measuring points spaced
equidistantly around the circumference of the cup. They serve both for indicating when the
instrument is level and for measuring the discharge of material, which is approximately 250
ml.
80 | P a g e
➢ Jacket
The cup is surrounded by a jacket which holds water or other suitable liquid serving as a constant
temperature bath. It is provided with a thermometer clamp and stirring device.
➢ A tripod supports the apparatus and also carries a ring burner by means of which the bath
is heated. Adjustable legs on the tripod serve to level the instrument.
➢ Stopper
The efflux tube in the cup is closed or opened by the insertion or withdrawal of a tapered hardwood
stopper .The stopper shall be a smooth, round wooden rod 180 mm long 8 mm in diameter.
➢ Receivers
➢ Thermometers
ASTM Engler Thermometers 23 °C, 24 °C and 25 °C are required, and conforming to the
requirements for these thermometers.
➢ Timer
Stop watch or other timing device graduated in divisions of 0.1 seconds or less and accurate to
within 0.1 % when tested over a 60 minute period.
➢ Strainer
81 | P a g e
11.4 Related Theory S
Viscosity of liquid asphalt
11.4.1 Engler Specific Viscosity:
Engler specific viscosity is the ratio of time of flow for 50 ml of material in seconds using an
Engler viscometer at a selected temperature to the time of flow, in second, for an equal volume of
water at 20°C.
The usual temperatures for determination of specific viscosity for tar materials are 25°C, 40°C,
50°C, and 100°C, and generally the temperature is so selected that the specific viscosity is not
more than 45.
Engler’s viscometer which is efflux tube was developed in Germany. The method is basically
empirical but it is possible to relate efflux time to absolute viscosity using charts/tables developed
by Asphalt institute for this purpose.
Note: At a temperature more than 100°C, the water will boil. So we cannot perform this test at a
temperature more than 100°C.
82 | P a g e
11.4.2 Properties of Bitumen:
It is asphalt present in the liquid or molten state and having a flash point of about 60–70 °C. Liquid
asphalt is in the liquid form due to the presence of mineral impurities.
➢ Cut back
➢ Emulsion
➢ This test method is useful in characterizing the consistency of tar and tar distillates by
measuring, their flow properties. It is applicable to materials that are readily liquid at
temperature up to 100°C.
➢ Viscosity in Engler’s degrees ≈ 1/4th of say bolt furol viscosity (seconds).
➢ The degree of fluidity at application temperature greatly influences the strength
characteristics of resulting paving mixes. High or low fluidity at mixing and compaction
has been observed to result in lower stability values.
➢ There is an optimum value of fluidity or viscosity for mixing and compaction for each
aggregate grading of the mix and bitumen grade. At low Viscosity, the binder simply
83 | P a g e
lubricates the aggregate particles instead of providing a uniform film thickness for binding
action. Similarly high viscosity also resists the comp active effort and the resulting mix
will be heterogeneous in character exhibiting low stability values.
➢ Liquid asphalt is used to save large amount of energy required to melt or make the asphalt
workable.
11.6 Procedure
➢ Thoroughly clean and dry the cup and outlet tube of the viscometer and insert the stopper.
➢ Fill the outer bath and bring it to the required temperature of test.
➢ Maintain the temperature not more than 1 oC high for tests at 25 °C, 40 °C, or 50 °C, and
not more than 2 or 3 oC for tests at 100 °C,
➢ Pour the material into the cup until it exactly reaches the top of the three measuring points
when the instrument is level.
➢ Place the lid and inner thermometer into position and maintain the bath, with frequent
agitation, at such a temperature that the material in the viscometer cup remains at the test
temperature.
➢ Maintain these conditions for 3 minutes.
➢ Check the accuracy of the temperature reading by holding the stopper firmly in position
and rotating the cover at short intervals during the first 2 minutes, but do not disturb the
material during the last minute.
➢ When these conditions have been met, withdraw the stopper from the efflux tube,
simultaneously start the timer.
➢ Determine the time in seconds for 50 ml of material to flow from the viscometer.
➢ Find time of flow for the same quantity of distilled water at the same temperature.
84 | P a g e
11.7 Calculations
Calculate the Engler specific viscosity by time of flow for 50 ml. of material at the selected
temperature by the lime of flow for the same quantity of distilled Water, according to the
following formula:
11.8 Comments
The Experiment has been performed successfully and the Engler specific viscosity determined has
been shown in the above table, the mean value of Engler specific viscosity came out to be 4.589◦E
.The temperature was not kept constant as the apparatus was slightly damaged so we measured the
specific viscosity at the room temperature.
85 | P a g e
Experiment No. 12
12.1 Objectives
12.2 Reference
12.3 Apparatus
➢ Mold
The mold is made of brass, the ends being known as clips, and the middle parts asides of the
mold.
➢ Water Bath
The water bath shall be maintained at the specified test temperature, varying not more than 0.1
°C from this temperature. The volume of water shall be not less than 10 liters, and the specimen
shall be immersed to a depth of not less than 10 cm and shall be supported on a perforated shelf
86 | P a g e
not less than 5 cm from the bottom of the bath.
➢ Testing Machine
For pulling the briquet of bituminous material apart, any apparatus may be used which is so
constructed that the specimen will continuously immersed in water, while the two clips are
pulled apart at a uniform speed, as specified, without undue vibration.
➢ Thermometer
87 | P a g e
12.4 Related Theory
12.4.1 Ductility
The ductility of a bituminous material is defined as the distance in centimeters, to which it will
elongate before breaking when two ends of a briquet specimen of the material, are pulled apart at
a specified speed and a specified temperature. Unless otherwise specified, the test shall be made
at a temperature of 25 ± 0.5 °C and with a speed of 5 cm/min ± 5.0 %. At other temperatures the
speed should be specified. Ductility of asphalt depends upon the grade of asphalt, pouring
temperature, dimensions of briquet, test temperature, rate of pull and levelling of mold.
88 | P a g e
12.4.3 Scope & Significance
This test method provides measure of tensile properties of bituminous materials and may be used
to measure ductility for specification requirements.
Bituminous materials used in pavement construction should possess sufficient ductility otherwise
the pavement would crack due to temperature or traffic stresses and may render the pavement
pervious and damage the pavement structure.
The ductility value varies from 5 to over 100 cm’s.
Several agencies have specified minimum ductility values for various types of bitumen
pavements. However a ductility of 100 cm’s is specified generally for bituminous construction.
Roads expand at daytime while they contract at night. So, if the bitumen is not adequately ductile
cracking will occur.
More than one grade may be used in the same project. For example; we may use grade 80/100 on
the main traffic lane and lower grades on the arteries.
12.5 Procedure
➢ Assemble the mold on a brass plate. Thoroughly coat the surface of the plate and interior
surfaces of the sides of the mold with a thin layer of a mixture of glycerin and china clay
to prevent the material under test from sticking.
➢ The plate upon which the mold is placed shall be perfectly flat and level so that the
bottom surface of the mold will be in contact throughout.
➢ Carefully heat the sample to prevent local overheating until it has become sufficiently
fluid to pour.
➢ Strain the molten sample through a # 50 sieve. After a thorough stirring, pour it into the
mold. In filling the mold, take care not to disarrange the parts and thus distort the briquet.
➢ Infilling, pour the material in a thin stream hack and forth from end to end of the mold
until the mold is more than level full.
➢ Let the mold containing the material cool to room temperature for a period of from 30 to
40 minutes and then place it in the water bath maintained at the specified temperature of
test for 30 minutes; then cut off the excess bitumen with a hot straight edged knife or
spatula to make the mold just level full.
➢ Place the brass plate and mold, with briquet specimen, in water bath and keep at the
specified temperature for a period of from 85 to 95 minutes. Then remove the briquet
from the plate, detach the sidepieces, and immediately test the briquet.
89 | P a g e
12.6 Testing:
➢ Attach the rings at each end of the clips to the pin or hooks in the testing machine and
pull the two clips apart at a uniform speed specified until the briquet ruptures.
➢ Measure the distance in centimeters through which the clips have been pulled to produce
rupture. While the test is being made, the water in the tank of the testing machine shall
cover the specimen both above and below it by at least 2.5 cm and shall be kept
continuously at the temperature specified.
➢ If the bituminous material comes in contact with the surface of the water or the bottom of
the bath, the test shall not be considered normal. Adjust the specific gravity of the bath by
the addition of either methyl alcohol or sodium chloride so that the bituminous material
neither comes to the surface of the water, nor touches the bottom of the bath at any time
during the test.
90 | P a g e
12.8 Comments
The Ductility test has been performed and the ductility value has been calculated as 116 cm. The
ASTM D-113 for 60/70 grade the value of Ductility = 100 min. Temperature was not
maintained in the lab so the value may differ at 25o C as we performed at the Lab temperature
91 | P a g e
Experiment No: 13
13.1 Objectives
13.2 Reference
13.3 Apparatus
➢ Ring
➢ Ball
A steel ball, 9.53 mm (3/8”) in diameter, weighing between 3.45 and 3.55 grams.
92 | P a g e
➢ Ball Centering Guide
➢ Ring Holder
The rings shall be supported on a brass ring holder. Rings shall be supported in a horizontal
position with the bottoms of the rings 25 mm above the upper surface of the bottom plate and a
distance of at least 13 mm and not more than 19 mm between the bottom plate and the bottom of
the bath. The thermometer shall be suspended so that the bottom of the bulb is level with the
bottom of the rings and within 13 mm of the rings but not touching them.
A flat, smooth brass plate approximately 75 by 50 mm that has been treated to prevent the
bituminous material from adhering to it. A suitable treatment is to coat the plate just before use
with a thin layer of a mixture of glycerin and dextrin, talc, or china clay.
➢ Bath
A glass vessel, capable of being heated, not less than 85 mm in diameter and not less than 120
mm in depth from the bottom of the flare.
➢ Thermometers
93 | P a g e
13.4 Related Theory
The softening point is defined as the mean of the temperatures at which the bitumen disks soften
and sag downwards a distance of 25 mm under the weight of a steel ball.
Heat the sample with care to prevent local overheating, with constant stirring until it has become
sufficiently fluid to pour. In no case, however, shall the temperature be raised to more than 55°C
above the expected softening point for tar pitch, or to more than 110 °C above the expected
softening point for asphalt. Avoid incorporating air bubbles in the sample.
Bring an asphalt sample to the pouring temperature in not more than 2 hrs. Bring coal tar pitch to
the desired pouring conditions in minimum time, not exceeding 30 min.
Pour a slight excess of the heated sample into two rings, preheated to approximately the pouring
temperature. While being filled the rings shall rest on the brass pouring plate, previously treated
to prevent bituminous materials from adhering to it.
94 | P a g e
Cool the specimen disks for a minimum of 30 min. In no case shall more than 240 min elapse
before completion of the test. Cool specimens that are soft at room temperature for at least 30
min at a minimum of 8 °C below the expected softening point.
After cooling, cut the excess material off cleanly with a slightly heated knife or spatula. In case
the test is repeated, use a clean container and fresh sample to prepare the test specimen.
13.6 Procedure
➢ Assemble the apparatus with the rings, ASTM Thermometer 15 °C or I5 °F, and ball
centering guides in position and fill the bath with freshly boiled water to a depth of not
less than 102mm and not more than 108mm.
➢ Maintain the bath temperature at 5 ± 1°C for 15 min, placing the test container in ice
water if necessary.
➢ Using forceps, place a ball, previously adjusted to the bath temperature, in each ball-
centering guide.
➢ Apply heat in such a manner that the temperature of the liquid is raised 5°C/min.
➢ Avoid the effect of drafts, using shields if necessary. (Rigid adherence to the prescribed
rate of heating is absolutely essential for reproducibility of results.
➢ Either a gas burner or electric heater may be used; however, the latter must be of the low-
lag, variable output type to maintain the necessary rate of heating.)
➢ The rate of rise of temperature shall be uniform and shall not be averaged over the period
of the test. The maximum permissible variation of any 1-mm period after the first 3 mm
shall be ± 0.5°C. Reject all tests in which the rate of rise does not fall within these limits.
➢ Record for each ring and ball the temperature shown by the thermometer at the instant the
specimen surrounding the ball touches the bottom plate.
➢ Make no correction for the emergent stem of the thermometer. If the difference between
the values obtained in the duplicate determinations exceeds 1°C repeat the test.
95 | P a g e
13.7 For Materials Having Softening Points above 80°C
Follow the same procedure as described above, except use USP glycerin instead of water and use
ASTM Thermometer l6°C or 16°F. The starting temperature of the glycerin bath shall be 32°C.
13.9 Comments
The experiment has been performed successfully and the softening point came out to be 46.4oC.
Bitumen having this softening point should not be used in Lahore as the city’s highest maximum
temperature was 48.3 °C recorded on May 30, 1944 And 48 °C was recorded on June 10, 2007.
At the time the meteorological office recorded this official temperature in the shade, it reported a
heat index in direct sunlight of 55 °C. So to avoid the problems of Rutting and bleeding this
bitumen should not be used in Lahore.
96 | P a g e
97 | P a g e