Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ATT 3 - Academic Misconduct Fact Sheet 21062023
ATT 3 - Academic Misconduct Fact Sheet 21062023
RESPONDING TO AN
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
ALLEGATION
Disclaimer: this information is a guide only and is not designed to replace or overrule any CQUniversity policies or
procedures published on CQUniversity’s policy website at https://www.cqu.edu.au/policy. V 21062023
If you receive an email containing an
‘Invitation to Respond to an Alleged Breach of Academic Integrity’
PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE IT
Page 2 of 5
• have the opportunity to present your case and be given a fair hearing
• be treated without bias
• have a decision made on an objective and unbiased assessment of the evidence
• seek assistance from a Student Advocacy Officer when formulating your response
• challenge an outcome decision by lodging an appeal to the University’s Academic Appeals
Committee, and
• seek assistance from a Student Advocacy Officer when making an application to appeal.
Contact details for Student Advocacy, and other support services, are provided in your Invitation
to Respond notification, and at the end of this document.
1 Working days includes weekdays from Monday to Friday, excluding Australian public holidays.
Page 3 of 5
What if I’ve been accused of not being the sole author of my assessment?
Contract cheating is one of the most severe breaches of academic integrity and will often result in
heavy penalties. Contract cheating covers a wide range of cheating behaviour as defined in the
Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure.
Your response to an allegation of this nature, involving evidence of suspicious authorship might
include:
• All previous drafts of your assessment to show a progression of the work you have been
completing, including the date and time stamps of the document creation and editing.
• Emails and messages showing any times you may have shared the work with yourself or
another person for feedback if you have not saved the document on your computer.
• If your document was constructed on Google docs (or similar) you may wish to provide
access to the document online for review.
• Screenshots of your internet search history accessing the sources in your reference list to
demonstrate that you were researching the topic and submission during the time the
assessment was written.
• Explanations and any available evidence for any unusual metadata or document
properties identified in your submission e.g.:
What is the editing time?
Who is the author?
Who was the last modifier?
When was the work started and finished?
What is the company name?
Why is the document written in a non-Australian English language setting?
Why was the document constructed using a different Application to your normal
setting?
• An explanation for any irregularities in your work that have been identified by the
investigation.
Page 4 of 5
What are the penalties for Breaching Academic Integrity?
Once the Case Decision-Maker reviews all the evidence and your response (if any), they may
determine that a breach of academic integrity has occurred and record one of the following
outcomes, depending on the severity:
• inappropriate academic conduct (level 1 breach of academic integrity)
• minor academic misconduct (level 2 breach of academic integrity)
• moderate academic misconduct (level 3 breach of academic integrity)
• substantial academic misconduct (level 4 breach of academic integrity), or
• serious academic misconduct (level 5 breach of academic integrity).
Penalties imposed can range from receiving a formal written warning to expulsion from the
University. More details regarding the range of penalties can be found in the Student Academic
Integrity Policy and Procedure.
2 Working days includes weekdays from Monday to Friday, excluding Australian public holidays.
Page 5 of 5