This document outlines key elements of making a good argument. It discusses that claims should acknowledge limiting conditions and hedge statements. Reasons provided must be relevant to the claim. Types of evidence include factual, statistical, logical, and anecdotal evidence, which can be evaluated based on representativeness, reliability, and accuracy. A strong argument will acknowledge the intrinsic soundness of the claim and consider alternative perspectives, evidence, and ways of framing the issue. Warrants are also important to connect the reasons to the overall claim.
This document outlines key elements of making a good argument. It discusses that claims should acknowledge limiting conditions and hedge statements. Reasons provided must be relevant to the claim. Types of evidence include factual, statistical, logical, and anecdotal evidence, which can be evaluated based on representativeness, reliability, and accuracy. A strong argument will acknowledge the intrinsic soundness of the claim and consider alternative perspectives, evidence, and ways of framing the issue. Warrants are also important to connect the reasons to the overall claim.
This document outlines key elements of making a good argument. It discusses that claims should acknowledge limiting conditions and hedge statements. Reasons provided must be relevant to the claim. Types of evidence include factual, statistical, logical, and anecdotal evidence, which can be evaluated based on representativeness, reliability, and accuracy. A strong argument will acknowledge the intrinsic soundness of the claim and consider alternative perspectives, evidence, and ways of framing the issue. Warrants are also important to connect the reasons to the overall claim.
Identify claims, reasons, evidence, as well as any refutations/concessions/critiques/reservations/etc. that
might lead to acknowledgements and responses.
1. What makes a good claim?
- It acknowledges limiting conditions and hedges o Hedging = “we believe that…”, “it is my conviction that…”, “I think…” – being more honest and forthright with how you present information o Acknowledging limiting conditions = “eating disorders tend to/often arise from projections of body image in the media” 2. Reasons must be relevant o Ex. It is raining bcs I am hungry X It is raining bcs of the climate change 3. Types of evidence: o Factual – I am hungry bcs I did not eat. The human body needs calories to function. o Statictical o Logical o Anecdotal We can evaluate evidence based on the following factors: Representativeness Reliability Accuracy & precision – how well you relay the information Sufficiency 4. Acknowledgments: intrinsic soundness & alternatives o intrinsic soundness = logical fallacies, strength of the claim, relevance of the reason o unconsidered evidence, alternative ways of framing the problem o unconsidered warrants 5. warrants connect your reasons to your claims