Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/358328144
CITATIONS READS
9 1,215
3 authors:
Elif Ballikaya
Hacettepe University
23 PUBLICATIONS 106 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Zafer C. Cehreli on 22 May 2022.
ABSTRACT
SIGNIFICANCE
Introduction: In young individuals, deciduous tooth pulp might be used as a natural, biologic
scaffold for the regenerative endodontic treatment (RET) of young permanent teeth with Autotransplantation of
necrotic pulps and apical periodontitis. The present case series demonstrates the clinical and deciduous tooth pulp as a
radiographic outcomes of a novel RET using deciduous pulp autotransplantation in biologic scaffold could be a
traumatized, necrotic young permanent incisors. Methods: Five previously traumatized viable approach in the
maxillary incisors of four 8- to 11.5-year-old patients were treated with a RET protocol that regenerative endodontic
used 2.5% NaOCl irrigation and placement of calcium hydroxide dressing in the first visit. After treatment of young permanent
4 weeks, the intracanal medication was removed, and the whole pulp tissue harvested from teeth with pulp necrosis.
the neighboring maxillary deciduous canine was transplanted into the disinfected root canal
without induced apical bleeding. Following placement of a mineral trioxide aggregate coronal
barrier, the access cavities were restored with acid-etch resin composite. The root canals of
donor primary canines were filled with calcium hydroxide-iodoform paste and were restored
as with the permanent incisors. Results: Three patients were followed-up for 24 months, and
1 patient for 12 months. All teeth demonstrated radiographic evidence of complete periapical
healing, slight increase in dentinal wall thickness, and continued apical closure in the absence
of clinical symptoms. A positive response to cold test was obtained in 1 incisor at 12 months
and 2 at 24 months. Conclusions: Based on 12- and 24-month clinical and radiographic
findings, the present cases demonstrate a favorable outcome of a RET protocol using de-
ciduous pulp autotransplantation in young permanent incisors with pulp necrosis. (J Endod
2022;-:1–6.)
KEY WORDS
Autologous transplantation; deciduous tooth; pulp; regeneration; regenerative endodontics;
revascularization
Two decades ago, revascularization was introduced as a biologically based treatment for regenerating
From the Department of Pediatric
the pulp-dentin complex in immature teeth with pulp necrosis1–3. Since then, there has been an Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe
exponential growth in the number of clinical and preclinical publications in the field of regenerative University, Ankara, Turkey
endodontics4,5, leading to a better understanding of the nature and behavior of the revitalized tissue Address requests for reprints to Dr Zafer
within the root canal, as well as factors associated with favorable and unfavorable treatment outcomes3. C. Cehreli, Department of Pediatric
The widely used terms “revascularization” and “revitalization” refer to regenerative endodontic Dentistry, Hacettepe University Faculty of
procedures (REPs), which aim to facilitate ingrowth of new, vascularized tissue within the disinfected root Dentistry, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
E-mail address: zcehreli@gmail.com
canal space following delivery of stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) and cells from other periapical 0099-2399/$ - see front matter
tissues by induced apical bleeding3. After the root canal is passively filled with the blood, the clot that
Copyright © 2022 American Association
forms in the canal space serves as a biologic scaffold for cell growth and differentiation6. The blood clot of Endodontists.
also contains several blood-derived growth factors capable of attracting other stem cells from periapical https://doi.org/10.1016/
tissues that can initiate ectopic deposition of mineralized tissues (ie, bone, cementum) within the root j.joen.2022.01.015
irrigation (PUI) using an Endoultra Ultrasonic pulp scaffold and sealed with a thin layer of deciduous pulp autotransplantation. Cases 1,
activator (Vista Apex, Racine, WI) with the tip of flowable light-cured glass ionomer cement 2, and 3 were followed for 24 months and case
the ultrasonic activator placed 2 mm below the (Ionoseal; VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany) to 4 for 12 months. All teeth showed complete
apical level, followed by a final flush with saline prevent MTA from washout during subsequent periradicular healing in the absence of clinical
to remove the remnants of calcium hydroxide adhesive procedures. The coronal level of the symptoms. Cases 1, 2, and 3 showed a slight
loosened by PUI. The root canals were dried autotransplant, together with the blood volume increase in root wall thickness, with the
with sterile paper points, and then gently transferred from the primary canine(s) resultant canal space being similar in size to
irrigated with 20 mL of 17% EDTA15. No apical determined the thickness of the MTA barriers. that of adjacent vital teeth. There was no visible
bleeding was induced before Accordingly, the coronal barriers were thicker sign of root canal narrowing or obliteration
autotransplantation. Then, a mechanical pulp in case 1 compared with cases 2, 3, and 4, (Fig. 1). Compared with cases 1, 2, and 3, case
exposure, in the size of an endodontic access which had a thickness of approximately 3 to 4 showed greater thickening of the apical half
cavity, was created on the donor primary 4 mm. of root walls, but the pulp space was similar to
maxillary canine crown using a separate, high- The access cavities were restored with the adjacent vital incisor as with cases 1, 2,
speed water-cooled sterile diamond bur. A acid-etch resin composite (Filtek Ultimate; 3 M/ and 3 (Fig. 1). All teeth showed a blunt
new, presterilized barbed broach was used to ESPE, St Paul, MN). Before removal of the narrowing of the apical region (with case 3 to a
remove the whole pulp (coronal 1 radicular rubber dam, the primary root canal was filled lesser extent), rather than a typical, conical
pulp), to provide enough pulp volume to fill the with a calcium hydroxide paste with iodoform apical closure pattern. All 3 teeth in case 1 and
permanent root canal. Thereafter, the whole (Calciplast Forte; Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, case 2 responded to cold test at 12 and
pulp was quickly released from the broach Poland), and the access cavity was restored as 24 months, respectively, whereas the
using a sterile tweezer, and gently inserted into with the recipient incisor. No medications were remaining teeth did not respond to cold test or
the recipient root canal using disinfected gutta- prescribed. Following oral hygiene instructions, EPTs at any recall period. The donor primary
percha cones, lubricated with the blood the patients were scheduled for clinical and canines were free of clinical symptoms and
volume from the primary canine root canal. In radiographic follow-up visits at 3 and showed radiographic evidence of physiologic
case 1, both maxillary canines were used as 6 months, and thereafter, every 6 months. root resorption along with resorption of the
donors for the treatment of permanent central calcium hydroxide-iodoform paste (Fig. 1).
and lateral incisors, because the whole pulp
volume of a deciduous canine could suffice for
RESULTS
1 permanent root canal. A non-staining MTA A total of 5 maxillary incisors (4 central and 1
DISCUSSION
coronal barrier (Neo MTA 2.0; NuSmile, lateral) were treated with the regenerative Although current REPs using the so-called
Houston, TX) was placed over the deciduous endodontic treatment protocol using revascularization or revitalization technique
REFERENCES
1. Iwaya SI, Ikawa M, Kubota M. Revascularization of an immature permanent tooth with apical
periodontitis and sinus tract. Dent Traumatol 2001;17:185–7.
2. Banchs F, Trope M. Revascularization of immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis: new
treatment protocol? J Endod 2004;30:196–200.
3. Diogenes A, Ruparel NB, Shiloah Y, et al. Regenerative endodontics: a way forward. J Am Dent
Assoc 2016;147:372–80.
4. Hargreaves KM. Adding regenerative endodontics to the table of contents. J Endod 2016;42:1.
5. Shamszadeh S, Asgary S, Nosrat A. Regenerative endodontics: a scientometric and bibliometric
analysis. J Endod 2019;45:272–80.
6. Lovelace TW, Henry MA, Hargreaves KM, et al. Evaluation of the delivery of mesenchymal stem
cells into the root canal space of necrotic immature teeth after clinical regenerative endodontic
procedure. J Endod 2011;37:133–8.
7. Chrepa V, Henry MA, Daniel BJ, et al. Delivery of apical mesenchymal stem cells into root canals of
mature teeth. J Dent Res 2015;94:1653–9.
8. Ulusoy AT, Turedi I, Cimen M, et al. Evaluation of blood clot, platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich
fibrin, and platelet pellet as scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment: a prospective
randomized trial. J Endod 2019;45:560–6.
10. Martin G, Ricucci D, Gibbs JL, et al. Histological findings of revascularized/revitalized immature
permanent molar with apical periodontitis using platelet-rich plasma. J Endod 2013;39:138–44.
11. Torabinejad M, Milan M, Shabahang S, et al. Histologic examination of teeth with necrotic pulps
and periapical lesions treated with 2 scaffolds: an animal investigation. J Endod 2015;41:846–52.
12. Lin LM, Huang CT-J, Sigurdsson A, et al. Clinical cell-based versus cell-free regenerative
endodontics: clarification of concept and term. Int Endod J 2021;54:887–901.
13. Feitosa VP, Mota MNG, Vieira LV, et al. Dental pulp autotransplantation: a new modality of
endodontic regenerative therapy-follow-up of 3 clinical cases. J Endod 2021;47:1402–8.
14. Huang GT, Gronthos S, Shi S. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from
other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J Dent Res 2009;88:792–806.
15. American Association of Endodontists. AAE clinical considerations for a regenerative procedure
revised 5/18/2021. Available at: https://www.aae.org/specialty/clinical-resources/regenerative-
endodontics/. Accessed 6 December 2021.
16. Chrepa V, Joon R, Austah O, et al. Clinical outcomes of immature teeth treated with regenerative
endodontic procedures-a San Antonio study. J Endod 2020;46:1074–84.
17. Ong TK, Lim GS, Singh M, et al. Quantitative assessment of root development after regenerative
endodontic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2020;46:1856–1866.e2.
19. Chueh LH, Ho YC, Kuo TC, et al. Regenerative endodontic treatment for necrotic immature
permanent teeth. J Endod 2009;35:160–4.
20. Lin J, Zeng Q, Wei X, et al. Regenerative endodontics versus apexification in immature
permanent teeth with apical periodontitis: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Endod
2017;43:1821–7.
21. Torabinejad M, Nosrat A, Verma P, et al. Regenerative endodontic treatment or mineral trioxide
aggregate apical plug in teeth with necrotic pulps and open apices: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Endod 2017;43:1806–20.
22. €m A, Brundin M, Lopes MF, et al. What is the best long-term treatment modality for
Wikstro
immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent
2021;22:311–40.
23. Casey SM, Fox D, Duong W, et al. Patient centered outcomes among a cohort receiving
regenerative endodontic procedures or apexification treatments. J Endod 2021. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.joen.2021.11.013 [Epub ahead of print].
24. Huang Y, Tang X, Cehreli ZC, et al. Autologous transplantation of deciduous tooth pulp into
necrotic young permanent teeth for pulp regeneration in a dog model. J Int Med Res
2019;47:5094–105.
25. Kunimatsu R, Nakajima K, Awada T, et al. Comparative characterization of stem cells from
human exfoliated deciduous teeth, dental pulp, and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem
cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018;501:193–8.
26. Nishino Y, Yamada Y, Ebisawa K, et al. Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth
(SHED) enhance wound healing and the possibility of novel cell therapy. Cytotherapy
2011;13:598–605.
27. Mao JJ. Stem cells and the future of dental care. N Y State Dent J 2008;74:20–4.
28. Song M, Cao Y, Shin SJ, et al. Revascularization-associated intracanal calcification: assessment
of prevalence and contributing factors. J Endod 2017;43:2025–33.
29. Kumar S, Chandra S, Jaiswal JN. Pulp calcifications in primary teeth. J Endod 1990;16:218–20.
30. Chen MH, Chen KL, Chen CA, et al. Responses of immature permanent teeth with infected
necrotic pulp tissue and apical periodontitis/abscess to revascularization procedures. Int Endod
J 2012;45:294–305.
31. Nosrat A, Seifi A, Asgary S. Regenerative endodontic treatment (revascularization) for necrotic
immature permanent molars: a review and report of two cases with a new biomaterial. J Endod
2011;37:562–7.
32. Cehreli ZC, Isbitiren B, Sara S, Erbas G. Regenerative endodontic treatment (revascularization) of
immature necrotic molars medicated with calcium hydroxide: a case series. J Endod
2011;37:1327–30.
33. Ou-Yang LW, Chang PC, Chuang LC, et al. Treatment outcomes of pulpectomy in primary
maxillary incisors filled with ZOE and Metapex: a two-year retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent
2021;45:83–9.
34. Matalon V, Shmagin A, Tickotsky N, et al. Outcomes of calcium hydroxide with iodoform
pulpectomies in primary teeth. J Dent Child (Chic) 2021;88:46–51.
35. Yaylali IE, Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B. Ultrasonically activated irrigation to remove calcium
hydroxide from apical third of human root canal system: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J
Endod 2015;41:1589–99.
36. Ruparel NB, Teixeira FB, Ferraz CC, Diogenes A. Direct effect of intracanal medicaments on
survival of stem cells of the apical papilla. J Endod 2012;38(10):1372–5.
37. Nagendrababu V, Jacimovic J, Jakovljevic A, et al. A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-
cited case reports and case series in endodontic journals. Int Endod J 2022;55:185–218.
38. Diogenes AR, Ruparel NB, Teixeira FB, et al. Translational science in disinfection for regenerative
endodontics. J Endod 2014;40:S52–7.