Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WHO Pharmaceuticals
NEWSLETTER No. 3
Pharmacovigilance, Contents
MHP/RPQ,
World Health Organization, Regulatory Matters
1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland,
E-mail address:
pvsupport@who.int Safety of Medicinal products
Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO
licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the
work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any
specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must
license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should
add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health
Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall
be the binding and authentic edition”.
Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the
World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules/).
Suggested citation. WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 3, 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. Licence:
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see https://www.who.int/publications/book-orders. To submit
requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see https://www.who.int/copyright.
Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or
images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the
copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely
with the user.
General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the
expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or
of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent
approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or
recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the
names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the
published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the
interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall WHO be liable for damages arising from its use.
Table of Contents
Regulatory Matters
Antitubercular agents ...............................................................................................4
Bosutinib ................................................................................................................4
Cephalosporins ........................................................................................................4
COVID-19 vaccine Janssen (Ad26.COV2-S) .................................................................5
Diazoxide ................................................................................................................5
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors .....................................................................................5
Losartan .................................................................................................................6
Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and immunosuppressants ...........................................................6
Opioids ...................................................................................................................7
Paracetamol ............................................................................................................7
Piperacillin ..............................................................................................................7
Piroxicam ................................................................................................................8
Propofol ..................................................................................................................8
Terlipressin .............................................................................................................8
Voriconazole ............................................................................................................9
Features
National Regulatory Authorities welcome to join Vaccine Safety Net....................... 17
All the previous issues of the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter can be accessed from our
website.
3
Regulatory Matters
4
Regulatory Matters
5
Regulatory Matters
6
Regulatory Matters
are advised to avoid use of persistent pain that relationship between them
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in requires an extended was found.
patients taking treatment period with a
Reference:
immunosuppressants when daily opioid pain medicine
Based on the
close monitoring of and for which alternative
communication from IPC,
immunosuppressant treatment options are
India, April 2023 (link to the
concentrations is not inadequate. source within ipc.gov.in)
feasible. If co-
The updates also include a
administered, dose
new warning about opioid-
adjustment, monitoring of
induced hyperalgesia (OIH) Piperacillin
concentrations and adverse
which is a condition where
reactions for levels of Risk of haemophagocytic
opioids cause an increase
immunosuppressants are lymphohistiocytosis
in pain (hyperalgesia) or an
recommended.
increased sensitivity to pain (HLH)
Reference: (allodynia).
Health Product InfoWatch: Malaysia. The National
This action is part of the
March 2023, Health Pharmaceutical Regulatory
implementation of FDA
Canada, (link to the source Agency (NPRA) has
Overdose Prevention
within www.hc-sc.gc.ca) announced that the product
Framework.
safety information for
Reference: piperacillin will be updated
Opioids CDER Statement, US FDA, to include a warning
13 April 2023 (link to the regarding the risk of
New safety label
source within www.fda.gov) haemophagocytic
changes lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).
United States. The US Piperacillin belongs to the
FDA is requiring several Paracetamol
ß-lactam antibiotics which
updates to the prescribing are active against a range
Risk of fixed drug
information for immediate- of gram-positive and gram-
release (IR) and extended-
eruption
negative aerobic and
release/long-acting (ER/LA) India. The CDSCO has anaerobic bacteria and
opioid analgesics. approved the often combined with a ß-
The required safety recommendation from the lactamase inhibitor such as
labelling changes include: National Coordination tazobactam to enhance the
• the risk of overdose Centre – Pharmacovigilance activity against many of
increases as the dosage Programme of India (NCC- those resistant organisms.
increases for all opioid PvPI), Indian
pain medicines Pharmacopoeia HLH is a life-threatening
• IR opioids should not be Commission (IPC) to revise syndrome caused by
used for an extended the prescribing information pathologic over-activation
period unless a patient’s leaflet (PIL) for of the immune system,
pain remains severe paracetamol to include with clinical features of
enough to require them fixed drug eruption as an extreme systemic
and alternative treatment adverse drug reaction. inflammation, such as
options continue to be fever, skin rashes,
Paracetamol is indicated for
inadequate hepatosplenomegaly,
the symptomatic treatment
• many acute pain cytopenias,
of pain and fever.
conditions treated in the hyperferritinaemia,
outpatient setting require The NCC-PvPI, IPC hypertriglyceridaemia,
no more than a few days reviewed 480 Individual hypofibrinogenaemia, and
of an opioid pain medicine Case Safety Reports haemophagocytosis.
• it is recommended to (ICSRs) of paracetamol
reserve ER/LA opioid pain associated fixed drug The NPRA has reviewed the
medicines for severe and eruption and a causal available information on
7
Regulatory Matters
8
Regulatory Matters
patients with liver cirrhosis Newsletter No.1, 2023: terlipressin may be required to check
and risks of respiratory failure,
(scarring of the liver) and that the medicines are still
sepsis in Europe)
ascites (fluid accumulation having the desired effect.
in the abdomen)). The
Reference:
advice in this article relates
only to use of terlipressin Voriconazole PRAC recommendations on
for type 1 hepatorenal signals, EMA, 11 April 2023
syndrome. Drug interaction with (link to the source within
www.ema.europa.eu)
flucloxacillin leading to
A recent European
subtherapeutic
review into the benefits
and risks of terlipressin voriconazole levels
treatment, which was
Europe. The PRAC of the
triggered by the CONFIRM
EMA has recommended a
trial findings, concluded
change to the product
that new measures were
information for
required to reduce the risk
voriconazole to include
of respiratory failure and
drug interaction with
sepsis when terlipressin is
flucloxacillin leading to
used in patients with type 1
subtherapeutic
hepatorenal syndrome. The
voriconazole levels.
Pharmacovigilance Expert
Advisory Group of the The PRAC has considered
UK’s Commission on the evidence from the
Human Medicines agreed literature, the responses
with the recommendations, from the MAH and has
while also highlighting the agreed that the MAHs for
benefits of terlipressin voriconazole and
treatment when an flucloxacillin-containing
appropriate assessment of medicinal products should
the benefits and risks has submit a variation to
been made. Changes will amend the product
be made to the product information as described
information for terlipressin below: Flucloxacillin has
medicines authorized for been reported to
type 1 hepatorenal significantly decrease
syndrome to note the plasma voriconazole
individual benefits and risks concentrations. If
when initiating terlipressin concomitant administration
treatment, especially for of flucloxacillin with
those with severe renal or voriconazole cannot be
hepatic impairment and avoided, monitor for
monitor all patients closely potential loss of
during terlipressin voriconazole effectiveness
treatment. A Direct (e.g., by therapeutic drug
Healthcare Professional monitoring); increasing the
Communication letter has dose of voriconazole may
also been sent to UK be needed.
health-care professionals.
Patients are advised to
Reference: inform their doctor if they
Drug Safety Update, MHRA, are taking medicinal
23 March 2023 (link to the products containing
source within voriconazole and
www.gov.uk/mhra) flucloxacillin, as a dose
(See also WHO Pharmaceuticals adjustment or monitoring
9
Safety of Medicinal Products
10
Safety of Medicinal Products
11
Safety of Medicinal Products
report of pruritus. The the SFDA reviewed all the pulmonary and hepatic
SFDA looked into the evidence available on the adverse drug reactions and
VigiBase and found 340 association between them. advise patients to be
ICSRs internationally. The The SFDA found one local vigilant for the signs and
SFDA has extracted the top case and 857 international symptoms in need of
30 cases with cases in VigiBase and further investigation.
completeness score of 1.0 applied WHO-UMC causality
Nitrofurantoin is a broad-
in order to apply the assessment criteria on
spectrum antibacterial
causality assessment ICSRs with completeness
agent, which has been
criteria on them. As a score 1.0 (n=30). Among
available since the 1950s.
result, most of the them, 29 cases were either
It is indicated in adults,
assessed cases provides probably or possibly
children and infants over
positive linkage to associated with
three months old for the
Lactulose (14 probable, 11 levofloxacin. Evidence from
treatment and prophylaxis
possible, and five unlikely literature found that
of acute or recurrent
cases). support the signal, as the
uncomplicated urinary tract
risk of dry mouth was
The SFDA’s investigation infections (UTIs) and acute
reported in a published
concluded that the current or recurrent uncomplicated
randomized double-blind
available evidence from pyelitis. The potential for
controlled trial of
assessment of the ICSRs acute pulmonary damage
levofloxacin.
might support a with nitrofurantoin is well-
relationship between of documented in the product
The SFDA’s investigation
lactulose and pruritus. This information.
concluded that the current
signal needs further
available evidence from The MHRA has advised
investigation to confirm the
assessment of the ICSRs health-care professionals
risk, and health-care
and literature might as follows:
professionals should be
support a relationship
aware of this potential • patients and caregivers to
between levofloxacin and
adverse reaction. be vigilant for new or
dry mouth. This signal
needs further investigation worsening respiratory
Reference:
to confirm the risk, and symptoms while taking
Safety Alert, SFDA, 1
health-care professionals nitrofurantoin and
March 2023 (link to the
source within www.sfda.gov.sa) should be aware of this promptly investigate any
potential adverse reaction. symptoms that may
indicate a pulmonary
Reference: adverse reaction.
Levofloxacin Safety Alert, SFDA, 21 • immediately discontinue
March 2023 (link to the nitrofurantoin on the
Potential risk of dry source within occurrence of new or
mouth www.sfda.gov.sa) worsening symptoms
Saudi Arabia. The SFDA indicative of pulmonary
has released a safety signal damage.
concerning levofloxacin and
Nitrofurantoin • be vigilant for symptoms
its potential risk of dry and signs of liver
mouth. dysfunction in patients
Risks of pulmonary and
hepatic adverse drug taking nitrofurantoin for
Levofloxacin is a broad- any duration, but
reactions
spectrum, third-generation particularly with long-
fluoroquinolone antibiotic United Kingdom. The term use, and monitor
used to treat bacterial MHRA has reminded patients periodically for
infections. healthcare professionals signs of hepatitis and for
that prescribing changes in biochemical
In 2023, the SFDA detected
nitrofurantoin should be tests that would indicate
a signal of levofloxacin and
alert to the risks of hepatitis or liver injury.
dry mouth. Furthermore,
12
Safety of Medicinal Products
13
Safety of Medicinal Products
assessable + two cases them. The SFDA found one of medication errors of
were unlikely). Data local case and 1037 administration of
mining of this drug/ADR international cases in scopolamine instead of
has been estimated using VigiBase. The SFDA applied butylscopolamine resulting
Information component WHO-UMC causality in serious adverse
(IC= 0.6) which showed a assessment criteria on reactions.
positive statistical ICSRs with completeness
The Spanish
association for the score 1.0 (n=30). Twenty
Pharmacovigilance System
drug/ADR combination. cases provided positive
(SEFV-H) has received five
association (one probable
cases of serious adverse
The SFDA’s investigation and nineteen possible
reactions related to the
concluded that the current cases). Eight cases were
erroneous administration of
available evidence from unlikely and two cases
scopolamine instead of
assessment of the ICSRs were not assessable. Data
butylscopolamine. The
might support a mining of this drug/ADR
affected patients required
relationship between was estimated using
medical assistance. The
prednisolone and Information component
errors detected indicate
hypomagnesaemia. This (IC= 4.0), which showed a
that confusion may occur in
signal needs further strong positive statistical
the prescription, dispensing
investigation to confirm the association for the
and administration of the
risk, and health-care drug/ADR combination.
drug.
professionals should be
aware of this potential The SFDA’s investigation The very similar name of
adverse reaction. concluded that the current the two active ingredients
available evidence from makes them susceptible to
Reference:
assessment of the ICSRs confusion. However, their
Safety Alert, SFDA, 30 April
and data mining might indications and dosage are
2023 (link to the source within
indicate a relationship very different. Butyl-
www.sfda.gov.sa) between prednisone and scopolamine bromide
osteonecrosis. This signal (formerly called
needs further investigation scopolamine butylbromide),
Prednisone to confirm the risk, and because of its chemical
health-care professionals structure as a quaternary
Potential risk of should be aware of this ammonium salt, does not
osteonecrosis potential adverse reaction. cross the blood-brain
barrier. It is indicated for
Saudi Arabia. The SFDA Reference: the treatment of acute
has released a safety signal Safety Alert, SFDA, 21 spasms of the
concerning prednisone and March 2023 (link to the gastrointestinal, biliary and
its potential risk of source within www.sfda.gov.sa)
genitourinary tracts.
osteonecrosis. Scopolamine
Prednisone is a synthetic, hydrobromide, on the other
Scopolamine and hand, has a tertiary amine
anti-inflammatory
structure so it crosses the
glucocorticoid that derives butylscopolamine
from cortisone. blood-brain barrier and is
Risk of medication errors indicated as a
Osteonecrosis is the death
of bone cells due to premedication in
resulting in serious
decreased blood flow. anesthesia to reduce
adverse reactions
excessive salivation and
In 2023, the SFDA has secretions from the
detected a signal of Spain. The Spanish Agency respiratory tract.
prednisone and for Medicines and Health
osteonecrosis and reviewed Products (AEMPS) is The administration by
all the evidence available alerting health-care mistake of scopolamine at
on the association between professionals about the risk doses of butylscopolamine
14
Safety of Medicinal Products
15
Safety of Medicinal Products
All submissions will be reviewed for relevance and subject to the WHO internal selection,
editorial review, and clearance process.
16
Features
Background information
The Vaccine Safety Net (VSN) is a global network of websites, established by the World Health
Organization, that provide reliable information on vaccine safety.
Due to the success of immunization, some diseases are no longer perceived as a threat. Certain
groups have even questioned the utility of vaccination despite its proven success in controlling
disease. In recent years, several websites providing unbalanced, misleading and alarming vaccine
safety information have been established, which can lead to undue fears, particularly among parents
and patients.
Acknowledging the above-mentioned issues and urged by governments, key non-governmental
organizations and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), WHO initiated, in 2003, the Vaccine
Safety Net Project (VSN).
A key player in the Project is the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), established
by WHO in 1999, to respond promptly, efficiently, and with scientific rigor to vaccine safety issues of
potential global importance.
VSN criteria
GACVS developed four categories of criteria for good information practices - regarding credibility,
content, accessibility and design to which digital resources providing information on vaccine safety
should adhere. The WHO Pharmacovigilance (PVG) team uses the criteria to evaluate candidate
websites and to re-evaluate existing VSN member websites. There are 44 formal assessment criteria,
divided into 4 broad categories. Each category is designated as mandatory or desired. The criteria
are grouped as follows:
The network is continuously expanding. To date, 104 websites, from 44 countries provide
information in 36 languages.
National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs)’ websites are welcome to apply for VSN membership to
ensure that reliable, understandable, evidence-based information on the safety of vaccines is
available to the public.
If you feel that your site meets the GACVS criteria outlined above, please kindly send a request for a
site evaluation to pvsupport@who.int. The WHO PVG team will then conduct an assessment of your
website and will send you feedback regarding any areas that require clarification or improvements in
order to meet the GACVS criteria as well as a set of recommendations to assist you in meeting these
criteria. Once the identified issues have been addressed to the satisfaction of the evaluators, WHO
will add your website to the list of VSN members.
17