12
Confronting Class in the Classroom
‘And even if we enter accepting the reality of cas differences,
lieve knowledge will he meted out in fair and
ly privileged backgrosnd, from
acutely aware of class,vm Ting Tage
When I received notice of my acceptance at Stanford Uni-
versity, the fist question that was raised in my household was
how Lwou ndersiood that I had been
awarded schol wed to take out loans, but they
laughter were deemed unaccepral
pions of lassoom social order. These traits were also
beinga member ofthe lower classes, one was
ce clas group, adopting a demeanor similar
to that of the group could help one to adva
«students to assimilate bourgeois val
deemed acceptable,
Bourgeois
in the classroom ereate a barrier, blocking
ty of confrontation and conflict, warding off dis
‘Cntronang Cass v~
of clas values that teach them to maintain ovder at all costs
When the obse aining order is coupled withthe
fear of losing fae,” of not being thought wel of by on
fessor and peers, all possibilty of constructive d
1 ih mi
processis only one way bourgeois vales overde-
the classroom the
experience in|
“Outsiders,” Kash,
under
Students who enter the academy
‘question the assumptions and values held by privileged classes
tend tobe silenced, deemed troublemakers.
fof censorship in contemporary
“university settings often suggest chat the absence of construc~
lencing, takes place asa by-product of
jon canonical knowledge, critique
progressive efforts to qu
Felations of domination, or subvert bourgeois
‘Thes
jon ofthe way in which190 “eching to Taras
+ of those from materially privileged clases are
everyone via binsed pedagogical strategies. Re-
oice of subject mat
wed, these bi
his esay Karl Andersor
pressive aspect of middle-class
porary feminist move=
le its inital presence felt in the academy there was
both an ongoing eritique of Jassroom dyn
and an attempt to create alternative pedagogical strateg
ke Womer
tors and peers would respect,
However, as feminist
there was shiftin perspective.
lass difference. The focus was
fences are structed i
tion. Yer the focus
‘often meant
nolaship. Underlying
jon that receiving
leged class experience (
rm that not only set
ngrclass backgrounds apart but effective:
privileged backgrou
Of course
would enhaspect of our vernacular culture could
be voiced in elite settings. This was especially the case with ver-
nacular language of a fist language t ot English. To
Insist on speaking in any manner that di not conform to priv
Teged class ideals and mannerisms placed one always in the
position of interloper.
Demand viduals from class backgrounds deemed
undesirable surrender all vestiges of their past create psychic
grounds
ent and failure,
‘Those of usin the academy from working-class backgrounds
are empowered when we recognize our own agency, our capac:
lty to be active participants in the pedagogical process. This
process is not simple or eas it takes courage to embrace a
Vision of wholeness of being that does not reinforce the capita-
ise version that suggests that one must always give something upthinking, fr
ialectical exchange
classrooms learning comm
be heard, their presence recognized and valued.
(of Strangers in Paradise ent
Jane Ellen Wilson shares the way an
ng which have really emphasize
focus emerged as central, precisely because it was $0
we, sex, and ela
dents more than others, grat
move thanry Teaching co Tangrent
shallow emphasis on
Toud talk or
‘mean that anything can
10 irelevant to classroom sibjek mater,aching Fanaa
fear of losing control shapes and informs the professorial ped-
agogical process to the exten
any constructive gra
Sometimes students wha want professors to grapple with
las differences often simply desire th
rivleged backgrounds he given center stage so that
version of hierarchical structures takes place, not a dis
viduals from les
tadents
from working-class backgrounds attended a course I taught on
Aircan American women writers. They arrived hoping I would
|
|
lss hierarchy, Jake Ryan and Charles Sackrey emphasize
Ino matter what the polities or ideolo
idual professor, of what the content of