Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cooling Tower
Cooling Tower
Cooling tower reject heat through sheets of falling condenser water, at cost of $50-
100 installed per ton of heat reject. There energy consumption is typically only 10%
of total HVAC system
Their sizing and operation significantly affects the system energy use in three
principal ways.
Some cooling tower designs are more efficient. E.g. an efficient 300tonon
cooling tower with 5hp fan motor at 2/3rd of full volume can cut the fan power to
0.005kW/ton. While an in efficient tower may draw as much as 40 hP for the
same task, or 0.2kw/ton
Efficient tower include features such as oversized fill(big box), clean
aerodynamics (induced draft), efficient fans and motors (low speed motors),
adjustable speed drives, and reduced height to limit pumping lift.
Impact on chiller life : for chillers that can respond well to cooler condenser
water each 1 deg F reduction in condenser wter temperature typically cuts the
chiller energy by 1.3-1.8%. however since chiller is often the most efficient part
of the system, it may reduce the over all consumption to run the fan less hard
(saving fan energy) and increase the fan energy slightly.
more efficient tower, in general, reduces the approach temperature.
Impact of water chemistry: cooling tower water can scale and slime the
condenser water tube which may increase the chiller energy consumption.
New treatment like ozone water treatment offer effective water treatment with
low operating cost.
About 75% of the heat reject is by latent cooling / evaporation . 25% is by
sensible cooling .
Typical cooling tower circulates about 3gpm / ton of cooling and lose 1-2% of
water.
Evaporation losses amounts to 0.1% of circulating volume per def F of tower
range . so tower with 10deg range loses about 1 % to evaporation
Good design and operation can limit drift (water which is blown of splashed out
)to 0.2 % or less
Blow-down or bleed is the intentional drainage of tower water too prevent
mineral buildup. It depends on the the type of water treatment and the quality of
incoming makeup water. It ranges from 0.1-1%
Efficiency measured in fan horsepower /ton is only 0.03-0.05 hp/ton for induced
draft coolers. This can be improved to 0.015 to0.03 hp/ton by specifying cooling
towers with motors operating at motor speeds. ASDs can reduce the energy
consumption further. Induced draft towers can also be run with the fan shut off,
saving fan power during cold weather.
Forced draft cooling tower use centrifugal or axial fans located at lower end of the
tower to push up the air through the tower while water flows downwards through
the fill in counter flow pattern.
Typical cooling tower efficiency is 0.12hp/ton of forced draft towers, this can be
improved by specifying the motors operable at lower speeds or ASDs
Cooling Tower Efficiency: variables include fill material , size , and fan type
Fill: Simple splash bar/ film packing (cellular fill) /ceramic tile fill
o Cellular fill costs more than splash bar but combination of low pressure
drop and large heat exchange area make it an excellent fill choice.
Sizing: cooling towers are sized on assumption that one ton of cooling is
equivalent to 3gpm circulation of cooled water from 85deg F to 95deg F at a
nominal temp of 78deg F . just as the condenser are listed in the catalogues by
their capacity in condenser tons, the cooling tower is conveniently rated in
cooling tower tons of nominal 15000btu/h , 1/4 th more than chiller ton
(12000Btu/ton) on assumption that 25% extra heat to account for the compressor
and auxiliaries based on chiller COP of 4.0 (0.88kW/ton). For more efficient
chillers that reject less heat cooling tower will be some what oversized when this
thumb rule is used , this may improve system efficiency as the approach
temperature will be lesser.
o Remember that the sizing calculation primarily affects the systems operation at peak
conditions, for lower load or or cooler ambient temperature the towers will
automatically be oversized.
o In hot climate with many running hours at design condition sizing a tower for
approach as low as 3deg F-5deg F may be cost effective, specially if electricity rates
are high.
o It is important to specify a low horse power cooling tower fan, other wise the
additional tower energy consumption can increase the chiller saving
o It is important to find the that describe the tower’s actual microclimate as closely as
possible. Even a 1deg F error can be significant