Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Non-Institutional Corrections
Non-Institutional Corrections
CORRECTIONS
LYEN CAREL T. GARCIA, RCRIM
TOP 1
CLE JUNE 2022
NON-INSTITUTIONAL
CORRECTION/COMMUNITY-BASED
CORRECTIONAL
Refer to that method of correcting sentenced offenders
without having to go to prison
Transportation
➢this was developed from an ancient practice of banishment and
flourished for more than two hundred years as a principal method of
disposing offenders. It served mainly as cheap source of supplying
labor to the colonies of England.
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF
PROBATION IN ENGLAND
ENGLAND - It is where probation started in a form of suspending
judgment and releasing offender on his own Recognizance (ROR)
Killets Case
➢This decision led to the passing of the National Probation Act of 1925,
thereby, allowing courts to suspend the imposition of incarceration and
place an offender on probation
✓signed by President Calvin Coolidge
✓the U.S. Federal Probation Service was established.
HISTORY OF PROBATION IN THE PHILIPPINES
ACT NO. 4221
➢enacted by the Philippine legislature on August 07, 1935 and which created a
Probation Offices under the Department of Justice led by a Chief Probation
Officer appointed by the American Governor General with the advice and
consent of the United States.
➢This Law provided probation for the first time offenders, eighteen years of age
and over, convicted of a certain crime.
➢Lasts for only 2 years. The act subsequently declared unconstitutional by the
Supreme Court on Nov. 16, 1937 in People vs. Vera
ISSUE: Whether or not:
1. Encroaches upon the pardoning power of executive.
2. Constitute on undue delegation of legislative power.
3. Denies the equal protection of the law.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF PROBATION IN THE
PHILIPPINES
In People vs. Vera (37 O.G. 164), the constitutionality of Act 4221 was
challenged because of the following grounds:
a) The said act encroaches upon the pardoning power of the
executive;
b) That it constitutes an undue delegation of legislative power; and
c) It denies the equal protection of the laws.
• In 1972, House Bill No. 393 was filed in Congress by
Teudolo C. Natividad and Ramon D. Bagatsing which
would establish a probation system in the Philippines.
This bill avoided the objectionable features of Act 4221
that struck down the 1935 law as unconstitutional.
• The bill was passed by the House of Representatives but
was pending in the Senate when Martial Law was declared
and Congress was abolished.
• On 24 July 1976, Presidential Decree No. 968, also
known as Adult Probation Law of 1976 was signed into
Law by the President of the Philippines.
• The probation system started to operate on 3 January
1978.
AMENDATORY LAWS TO PD 968
PD 1257 – It took effect on 01 December 1977; it amended the
period within which application for probation must be made.
BP 76 – It took efect on 13 June 1980; it amended the maximum
penalty for qualification for probation
PD 1990 - It took efect on 15 January 1986; it amended BP 76
back to original form and made probation and appeal exclusive
remedies.
RA 10707 – New Probation Law of 2015S
TEODULO C. NATIVIDAD
➢He is the Father of Probation in the Philippines. He headed the committee
(IDCCP) primarily tasked with the drafting of the adult probation law.
➢First Administrator of the Parole and Probation Administration which
attached to the DOJ
➢First Filipino Vice President of the United Nations Congress, Geneva
Switzerland
➢Former NAPOLCOM commissioner
➢Former Congressman of Bulacan
➢Introduced House Bill No. 393 in collaboration with former Congressman
RAMON D. BAGATSING
The measure was passed in the Lower House and was pending in the
senate when Martial Law was proclaimed in 1972.
E.O 292 Administrative Code Of 1987
➢Renamed Probation Administration (968) to Parole and Probation
Administration
During such initial interview, the Probation Officer on case or CPPO shall require
the petitioner to accomplish and sign a Post Sentence Investigation Work Sheet
(PPA Form 1) as well as PPA Form 2. The IO shall conduct further investigation
based on the information contained therein.
c) If the petitioner remains unlocated despite due diligence, one shall be declared
as an absconding petitioner hence a recommendation for denial shall be
submitted to the court for appropriate action.
Collateral Information - During the conduct of the PSI, collateral
information must be gathered from those persons who have
direct personal knowledge of the petitioner, offended party family
members, and/or their relatives, including barangay officials and
disinterested persons.
POST-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT
Purpose — The PSIR aims to enable the trial court to determine whether
or not the ends of justice and primarily the best interest of the public,
as well as that of the petitioner, would be served by the grant or denial of the
application.
Period to Resolve the Petition for Probation - The petition for probation
shall be resolved by the Trial Court not later than fifteen (15) days from the
date of its receipt of the PSIR.
In the event that the probationer does not report for initial
supervision within seventy- two (72) hours upon receipt of the
Probation Order or when his/her whereabouts are unknown, the
Probation Officer shall exert due diligence to find him/her and conduct
such field inquiry as is necessary within five (5) days, before
considering the fact that the probationer has absconded amounting to
a violation of a probation condition, requiring the preparation and
submission of a Violation Report (PPA Form 8) to the Trial Court.
OUTSIDE TRAVEL (OLD)
(a) A Probation Officer may authorize a probationer to travel outside
his area of operational/territorial jurisdiction for a period of more
than ten (10) days but not exceeding thirty (30) days.
(b) A Probationer who seeks to travel for up to thirty (30) days outside
the operational/territorial jurisdiction of the Probation Office shall file
at least five (5) days before the intended travel schedule a Request for
Outside Travel (PPA Form 7) with said Office properly recommended by
the Supervising Probation Officer on case and approved by the CPPO.
(c) If the requested outside travel is for more than thirty (30) days, said
request shall be recommended by the CPPO and submitted to the Trial
Court for approval.
(d) Outside travel for a cumulative duration of more than thirty (30)
days within a period of six (6) months shall be considered as a
courtesy supervision.
OUTSIDE TRAVEL. (NEW)
a)The SO may authorize a probationer to travel outside
his/her area of operation/territorial jurisdiction for a period of
not more than ten (10) days. However, if it exceeds 10
days but not more than thirty (30) days, approval of the
CPPO is required. Accordingly, a Request for Outside Travel
(PPA Form 7) with said Office, properly recommended by
the SO, should be duly accomplished.
b) If the requested outside travel is for more than thirty (30)
days said request shall be recommended by the CPPO
and submitted to the Trial Court for approval.
c) Outside travel for a cumulative duration of more than
thirty (30) days within a period of six (6) months shall be
considered as a courtesy supervision.
ABSCONDING PROBATIONER
a) A probationer who has not reported for initial supervision within
the prescribed period and/or whose whereabouts could not be
located or determined despite best diligent efforts within
reasonable period of time shall be declared by the proper Office
as an absconding probationer.
b) Thereafter said Office shall file with the proper court a Violation
Report (PPA Form 8), containing its findings and
recommendation, duly prepared and signed by the SO and
approved by the CPPO.
CHANGE OF RESIDENCE: TRANSFER OF
SUPERVISION
a) A Probationer may file a Request for Change of Residence
(PPA Form 24) with the Probation Office, citing the reason(s)
therefore. This request shall be submitted by the CPPO/OIC for
the approval of the Trial Court.
b) Upon approval, the supervision and control over the
probationer shall be transferred to the concerned Executive
Judge of the RTC, having jurisdiction and control over said
probationer, and under the supervision of Probation Office in the
place to which he/she transferred.
Thereafter, the Executive Judge of the Regional Trial
Court to whom jurisdiction over the probationer is
transferred shall have the jurisdiction and control with
respect to him/her which was previously possessed by the court
which granted probation.
VIOLATION OF PROBATION CONDITION
Fact-Finding Investigation. — Based on reasonable cause reported
by a reliable informant or on his/her own findings, the SO concerned
or the CPPO himself/herself shall conduct or require the SO to
immediately conduct a fact-finding investigation on any alleged or
reported violation of probation condition(s) to determine the veracity
and truthfulness of the allegation.
Report: Violation of Condition. —After the completion of the fact-
finding investigation, the SO shall prepare a violation report thereon
containing his/her findings and recommendations and submit the
same to the CPPO for review and approval.
Thereafter, said Probation Office shall file with the Trial Court a
Violation Report (PPA Form 8), containing its findings and
recommendation, duly prepared and signed by the SO concerned and
duly approved by the CPPO for the court's resolution.
Arrest of Erring Probationer. — After having duly considered the
nature and gravity of such reported violation based on the submitted
Report, the Trial Court may issue a warrant for the arrest of the
probationer for serious violation of his/her probation condition.
(b) In the event of such approval, the supervision and control over the
probationer shall be transferred to the concerned Executive Judge
of the RTC, having jurisdiction and control over said probationer, and
under the supervision of the City or Provincial Parole and Probation
Office in the place to which he transferred.
TERMINATION OF THE PROBATION
SUPERVISION CASE (PPA Omnibus Rules on
Probation Methods and Procedures)
Grounds. — The probation supervision period may be
terminated on any of the following grounds:
a) Successful completion of probation;
b) Probation revocation for cause under Section 49a(i-iii) of these
Rules;
c) Death of the probationer;
d) Early termination of probation; or
e) Other analogous cause(s) or reason(s) on a case-to-case
basis as recommended by the Probation Office and approved by
the Trial Court.
Termination Report. — The Probation Office shall submit to the
Trial Court a Probation Officer's Final Report (PPA Form 9) five
(5) days before the expiration of the period of probation (NEW)
4 Members
Sociologist - Clergyman/Educator – Psychiatrist - Woman
Appointing Authority:
President of Philippines
Consent from COA
Term: 6yrs
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 154, S. 2002
CHAIRMAN: Secretary of Justice or his representative (full-time)
6 members: (full-time)
The Administrator of the Parole and Probation Administration
as ex-officio member
a sociologist,
a clergyman,
an educator,
a person with training and experience in correction work,
and a member of the Philippine Bar;
Provided, that one of them is a woman.
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 868, S. 2010
HEAD: CHAIRMAN (Rank: Undersecretary)
Assisted by 7 members: (Rank: Privileges as an Assistant Secretary)
sociologist,
a clergyman,
an educator,
a person with training and expertise in correction work,
a member of the Philippine Bar,
a retired member of the Judiciary,
and the Administrator of the Parole and Probation Administration, as ex-
officio member,
NOTE:
The Municipal, City, District and Provincial Jail Wardens have the
obligation to transmit to the Director of Prisons all pertinent
records of prisoners in jails 30 days before the expiration of such
prisoner’s minimum sentence. The Director of Prisons shall
submit to the Board for its consideration within 15 days after
receipt of aforestated records.
REFERRAL OF PETITION FOR EXECUTIVE
CLEMENCY/PAROLE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT
AGENCIES
A petition for executive clemency shall be referred by the Board to the
Secretary of National Defense for comment and recommendation
if the crime committed by the petitioner is against national security or
public order or law of nations. In case of violation of election laws,
rules and regulations, a petition for executive clemency/parole shall be
referred to the Commission on Elections for favorable
recommendation, provided, however, that regardless of the crime
committed, a petition for executive clemency/parole may be
referred for a pre-parole/executive clemency investigation to a
Probation and Parole Officer who shall submit a report on the
behavior, character antecedents, mental and physical condition
of the petitioner within thirty (30) days from receipt of referral, to
include the results of the National Bureau of Investigation records
check. In case of an alien, the petition shall be referred to the
Department of Foreign Affairs for comment and recommendation.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD
Interview of Prisoners. — Any Board member or government
official authorized by the Board may interview prisoners confined
in prison or jail to determine whether or not they may be released
on parole or recommended for executive clemency.
Factors to be Considered in Petition for Conditional Pardon,
Commutation of Sentence or Parole. — The following factors
may be considered by the Board in the grant of conditional
pardon, commutation of sentence or parole:
a. the age of the petitioner, the gravity of the offense and the
manner in which it was committed, and the institutional behavior
or conduct and previous criminal record, if any;
b. evidence that petitioner will be legitimately employed upon
release;
c. a showing that the petitioner has a place where he will reside;
d. availability of after-care services for the petitioner who is old,
seriously ill or suffering from a physical disability;
e. attitude towards the offense and the degree of remorse; and,
f. the risk to other persons, including the victim, his witnesses, his
family and friends, or the community in general, the possibility of
retaliation by the victim, his family and friends.
Special Factors. — The Board may give special consideration to the
recommendation for commutation of sentence or conditional pardon
whenever any of the following circumstances are present:
a. youthful offenders;
b. prisoners who are sixty (60) years old and above;
c. physical disability such as when the prisoner is bedridden, a deaf
mute, a leper, a cripple or is blind or similar disabilities;
d. serious illness and other life-threatening disease as certified by a
government physician;
e. those prisoners recommended for the grant of executive clemency
by the trial/appellate court as stated in the decision;
f. alien prisoners where diplomatic considerations and amity between
nations necessitate review; g. circumstances which show that his
continued imprisonment will be inhuman or will pose a grave danger to
the life of the prisoner or his co-inmates; and,
h. such other similar or analogous circumstances whenever the
interest of justice will be served thereby.
Meetings. — The Board shall meet in executive session regularly
or upon the call of the Chairman.