Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 2250-3153
I. INTRODUCTION
he rapid development of wireless communication urges the
T need of wide and dualband antennas. Microstrip patch
antennas (MSA) have found wide spread application in
wireless communication industry due to their various advantages
such as low cost ease fabrication, linearly and circularly
polarization. Due to these advantages, many researchers worked
on MSA; firstly, it was reported by Deschamp [1] while first
experimental MSA was reported by Howell [2], and till now
rapid development have been reported in the field of MSA.
(a)
Further several designs of microstrip patch antennas are reported
in this field, Deshmukh and Ray reported Analysis of Broadband S-Shape Patch
Psi (Ψ)-Shaped Microstrip Antennas[3], Simulated and measured
results for a S-shaped monopole patch antenna on a
Dielectric Substrate
h
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 11, November 2013 2
ISSN 2250-3153
QT
R1 L C
C1 (1)
1 R1 L1
L1 C1
C1 2
(2)
ZN
0 e LW y0 L C
C1 cos 2 ( )
2h L (3) (b)
where L, W is the length and width of the rectangular patch ZN ZP
respectively. y0 = feed point location, h= thickness of the
substrate material. LM
c e
QT
4 fh (5) CM
where c= velocity of light, f=the design frequency, e is
effective permittivity of the medium which is given by [14] (c)
r 1 r 1 10h 12 Figure 2. (a) Equivalent circuit of patch
e (1 ) (b) Equivalent circuit of notch
2 2 W (6) (c) Equivalent circuit of coupled S-Shape notch loaded patch antenna
where r is relative permittivity of the substrate material.
Therefore, the impedance of the rectangular patch can be The total input impedance of the S-shape notch loaded patch
calculated from Fig. 2(a) as Z Z
1 Z Z M P
ZP T N Z Z
(10)
1 1 M P
( jC1 )
R1 j L1 (7) III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this rectangular patch two notches ( Ln Wn ) are loaded, Figure 3(a) shows the comparison between theoretical and
which cause the flow of two currents in the patch, one is the simulated results for S-shape antenna and they are found in close
normal patch current which causes the antenna to resonate at the agreement. Figure 3(b) shows the variation of reflection
design of frequency of the initial patch; however, the other coefficient with frequency for different length (Ln) of S-shape
current flows around the notch resulting into second resonance antenna. On increasing the length of notch from 32 to 40 mm
frequency. Discontinues due to notch incorporated in the patch lower and higher resonance frequencies shift towards lower side.
are considered in terms of an additional series inductance ( L ) Figure 3(c) shows the variation of reflection coefficient with
and series capacitance ( C ) that modify the equivalent circuit frequency for different width of notch. On increasing the width
from 6 to 8 mm, wideband is obtained and frequencies are shifted
of the RMSA as shown in Fig. 2(b), in which L and C can be to lower resonance side, while for the notch width 7 mm to 7.5
calculated as [15]-[16] mm lower and higher resonance frequencies having no
L2 L1 2L (8)
significant change.
Figure 3(d) shows the variation of reflection coefficient with
C1C 2
frequency for different height (h) of the substrate of S shape
C2
C 2 2C1C (9)
antenna. On increasing the height (h) of the substrate from 10.5
to 13.5 mm lower frequencies shifted towards lower side and
The value of the R1 after cutting the notch is calculated by [17]. higher resonance frequencies shifted towards higher side. Figure
It may be noted that the two resonant circuits, rectangular patch 3(e) shows the gain plot with frequency. The maximum gain of
and notch loaded patch are coupled through mutual inductance the antenna is obtained at center frequency 2.62 GHz is 8.1 dBi
(LM) and mutual capacitance (CM). Thus the notch loaded patch and 8.2 dBi theoretical and simulated values respectively. Which
can be considered as fig 2(c). are found in close agreement with each other. Figure 3(f) shows
the efficiency plot with frequency, it is found that theoretical and
simulated maximum efficiency is 91.75 and 92.04 %
R1 L1 C1 respectively, which is obtained at center frequency 2.62 GHz.
ZP
(a)
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 11, November 2013 3
ISSN 2250-3153
0 0
-5
-5
-10
-10
-15
Return Loss (dB)
-15
-20
S11(dB)
-20 -25
-25 -30
-40
2 2.5 3 3.5 -50
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz)
Fig. 3(a) Comparative plot of theoretical and simulated results for antenna Fig. 3(d) Variation of reflection coefficient with frequency for different height of
the substrate (h)
10
-5
-10 8
-15 6
-20
4
S11(dB)
Gain(dBi)
-25
2
-30
0
-35
Ln = 32 mm
Ln = 34 mm Theoretical
-40 -2
Ln = 36 mm Simulated
Ln = 38mm
-45 Ln = 40 mm -4
-50
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 -6
Frequency(GHz) 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Frequency(GHz)
Fig. 3(b) Variation of reflection coefficient with frequency for different length of Fig. 3(e) Comparative plot of gain with frequency
notch (Ln)
100
0 90
-5 80
-10 70
Antenna Efficiency(%)
-15 60
-20 Wn = 8.0 mm 50
Wn = 7.5 mm
S11(dB)
-25 Wn = 7.0 mm 40
Wn = 6.5 mm
-30 Wn = 6.0 mm 30
Theoretical
-35 20 Simulated
-40 10
-45 0
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Frequency(GHz)
-50
2 2.5 3 3.5
Frequency(GHz) Fig. 3(f) Comparative plot of antenna efficiency vs frequency
Fig. 3(c) Variation of reflection coefficient with frequency for different width of
notch (Wn)
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 11, November 2013 4
ISSN 2250-3153
www.ijsrp.org