Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Trait Theory Comparisons
Trait Theory Comparisons
Focus Emphasized the biological basis of personality. Centered on a trait-based theory of personality.
Three primary dimensions: Psychoticism, 16 primary factors (source traits) derived through
Structure Extraversion, Neuroticism. factor analysis.
Stressed the enduring stability of traits over Highlighted the consistent and enduring nature of
Trait Stability time. personality traits.
Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) was Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF)
Assessment Tools developed to measure traits. designed to assess 16 primary factors.
Hierarchical structure with three higher-order Hierarchical arrangement with 16 primary factors
Hierarchical Models traits and lower-level facets. and nested sub-factors.
Influential in the realms of research and clinical Significant impact in various areas of psychology,
Impact on Psychology psychology. education, and personnel selection.
Approaches in Factor Eysenck used factor analysis to identify broader Cattell employed factor analysis extensively to
Analysis dimensions influenced by genetics. derive specific primary factors in his theory.
Integration of Eysenck associated his dimensions with Cattell's theory did not explicitly address
Personality with psychopathology, linking neuroticism to personality dimensions within the context of
Aspect Eysenck's Theory Cattell's Theory
While both aimed for cross-cultural applicability, Cattell's 16PF theory also aimed for cross-cultural
Cross-Cultural Eysenck's later emphasis on biological factors applicability but focused more on identifying
Implications might not universally apply across cultures. universal personality traits.
Cattell stressed trait stability, proposing that Eysenck recognized stability but also
Perception on Trait personality traits remain relatively consistent acknowledged the potential for change,
Stability throughout an individual's life. particularly in response to life experiences.
Eysenck's model initially focused on three Cattell's approach resulted in a larger number of
Precision in Trait dimensions but later converged into two higher- primary factors, offering a more detailed
Dimensions order factors based on empirical findings. breakdown of personality traits.
Eysenck's model highlighted the predictive Cattell's 16PF theory aimed for a comprehensive
power of extraversion and neuroticism in description of personality without specific
Predictive Value of understanding behavior, especially concerning emphasis on predicting behavior based on primary
Traits biological predispositions. factors.
Development of Cattell's theory led to the creation of the widely Cattell's focus was on measuring specific traits,
Assessment used 16PF Questionnaire, while Eysenck devised while Eysenck's assessment tools aimed at
Instruments the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). capturing broader dimensions.
Aspect Eysenck's Three-Dimension Model McCrae and Costa's Five Factor Model (Big Five)
Number of Three major dimensions: Psychoticism, Five primary factors: Openness, Conscientiousness,
Factors Extraversion, Neuroticism. Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism.
Hierarchical model with three main dimensions Hierarchical model featuring five broad factors and
Structure and lower-level facets. specific traits nested within each factor.
Traits Psychoticism: Aggressiveness, Tough- Openness: Imagination, Creativity;
Aspect Eysenck's Three-Dimension Model McCrae and Costa's Five Factor Model (Big Five)
Conscientiousness: Organization, Industriousness;
Mindedness; Extraversion: Sociability, Extraversion: Assertiveness, Sociability;
Assertiveness; Neuroticism: Emotional Agreeableness: Altruism, Cooperation;
Represented Stability/Instability. Neuroticism: Emotional Stability/Instability.
Emphasized genetic impact, particularly in Acknowledged genetic influence on personality traits
Genetic Influence extraversion and neuroticism. within the Big Five framework.
Cross-Cultural Originally proposed universal dimensions of The Big Five has been extensively studied for cross-
Applicability personality. cultural applicability and universality.
Stability Over Stressed the enduring stability of traits over The Big Five traits have shown stability across
Time time. different life stages and over time.
Hierarchical A hierarchical structure with three higher-order Features a hierarchical arrangement with five broad
Arrangement traits and lower-level facets. factors and nested specific traits.
Extensively utilized in various fields including
Practical Widely used in research and clinical psychology, psychology, personality assessment, and social
Applications though not as prevalent as the Big Five. sciences.
Eysenck's model was influential but has seen
Historical less widespread adoption compared to the Big McCrae and Costa's Big Five model has become a
Significance Five. dominant paradigm in personality psychology.
Factor Developed through factor analysis of personality
Development Derived through factor analysis and theoretical traits and lexical studies across languages and
Process considerations. cultures.
Represented Trait Focuses on key aspects of personality linked to Broadly represents major domains of personality
Domains psychopathology and behavioral tendencies. encompassing various traits and behaviors.
Complexity of Initially focused on three major dimensions but Features five broad factors, offering a more
Traits later refined into two higher-order factors. comprehensive breakdown of personality traits.
Practical Utility Has been employed in personality assessment The Big Five has inspired numerous assessment tools
and Assessment tools such as the Eysenck Personality Inventory like the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) and Big
Tools (EPI). Five Inventory (BFI).
The Big Five has implications for various life
Psychological Linked dimensions to behavioral dispositions outcomes, including social, occupational, and health-
Implications and psychiatric conditions. related aspects.
Degree of Eysenck's dimensions might have less cross- The Big Five traits have demonstrated some degree
Universality cultural applicability compared to the Big Five. of universality across diverse cultures.
Widely employed in diverse research areas like
Research Used in studies examining behavioral personality psychology, social sciences, and health-
Applications tendencies and psychological disorders. related studies.
Psychoanalytical Behavioristic
Humanistic (Rogers (Freud, Jung, (Skinner & Cognitive Genetics (Allport, Cattell,
Aspect & Maslow) Adler, Erikson) Bandura) (George Kelly) Eysenck, McCrae & Costa)
Self-actualization, Unconscious Observable Perception,
personal growth, processes, dreams, behavior, interpretation, Personality traits, genetic
empathy, self- early childhood conditioning, personal predispositions,
Focus concept experiences reinforcement constructs temperament, heritability
Focuses on
Emphasizes personal unconscious drives External Cognitive
growth and shaped by both environment's processes Interaction between
Nature vs environment's role in innate factors and influence on influenced by both genetic predispositions and
Nurture fostering it experiences behavior nature and nurture environmental factors
Psychoanalytical Behavioristic
Humanistic (Rogers (Freud, Jung, (Skinner & Cognitive Genetics (Allport, Cattell,
Aspect & Maslow) Adler, Erikson) Bandura) (George Kelly) Eysenck, McCrae & Costa)
Focuses on early
childhood
Views development experiences and Behavior shaped Personal constructs Genetic factors and
as a continuous unconscious by environmental evolve over time environmental influences
Developmental process, striving for conflicts shaping stimuli, rewards, through contribute to personality
Theory self-actualization personality and punishments experiences development
Primarily on traits and factors influencing Centered on the study of traits and the uniqueness of
Focus of Study behavior. individuals.
Cattell: Developed a hierarchical model with Allport: Organized traits into levels but emphasized
global traits at the top and specific traits below. their uniqueness and individual relevance, rather
Trait Structure These traits were interconnected. than a hierarchical structure.
Criticism Criticized for overemphasis on traits and Criticized for the lack of empirical evidence for some
Aspect of Comparison Cattell's Theory Allport's Theory
neglecting the influence of situations on concepts and for being more descriptive than
behavior. explanatory in understanding personality.