Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vierge'
Author(s): Rosemary Walker
Source: Music Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 1/2 (Mar. - Jul., 1989), pp. 159-168
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/854329
Accessed: 25-06-2016 10:04 UTC
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/854329?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Wiley is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music Analysis
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ROSEMARY WALKER
The following discussion concerns the relations between tonal, modal and
chromatic elements in the eleventh movement of Vingt Regards sur l'Enfant-
Jfsus. 'The Virgin's First Communion' is a descriptive piece representing
various aspects of the Annunciation and the Nativity and apparently inspired by
a painting showing the Virgin kneeling in contemplation. The overall layout of
the eighty-bar movement is straightforward: a contemplative opening section
based on a fragment of the Th me de Dieu (the God-theme), a series of variations
on the theme, and a coda which returns to the opening material. The chordal
God-theme is the principal cyclic element in Vingt Regards; in No. 11, only the
first four chords of the theme are used. Messiaen articulates the music
unambiguously by the traditional compositional means of varied tempo,
register, contour, dynamic and rhythm. Fortunately, therefore, one of the most
problematic aspects of pitch-class set analysis is avoided, for I consider my
segmentations to be uncontroversial.
Major/minor tonality makes a number of appearances in Vingt Regards, not
least in the eleventh movement, where a Bb major triad seems to be prolonged
throughout and the composer resorts to a dominant-to-tonic cadence (see Ex. 1).
However, the actual pitch array in 'Premiere communion', as in all the other
movements of the Vingt Regards that sound more or less 'tonal', is mostly
derived from one of the Modes of Limited Transposition. Messiaen has
affirmed that his system of modes was among the first elements of his harmonic
language to develop (Samuel 1976: 23); the modes and the harmonies derived
from them were codified in Technique de mon langage musical, published shortly
before the completion of the Vingt Regards in 1944. As is well known, Messiaen
specifies seven modes in all; the first of these is the whole-tone scale, the second
the octatonic collection. The term 'limited transposition' is the composer's own,
applying to the symmetrical properties of each mode in which the original pitch-
class content is replicated if the mode is transposed beyond the limiting levels
which characterize it. The initial pitches are not intended to be 'tonics' or
'finals': no pitch class takes precedence over any other in this respect, and the
modes can begin on any degree or their pitch classes appear in any order.
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ROSEMARY WALKER
Example 2 shows Mode 2 in its three possible transpositions. For Messiaen, one
of the prime attractions of the modes (particularly Modes 2, 3, 4 and 6) is that
they enable him to work with a rich palette of sonorities that have colour
associations entirely personal to him (see Bernard 1986: 45-7). Keys themselves
do not seem to correspond to specific colours in his theory, which is quite
forthright about the extent to which tonality and modality interact, as the
following quotation shows: 'There are tonal passages in my works but they are
precisely blended with these modes which colour them and finally they have
little importance' (Samuel 1976: 23).
The piece to be examined here is mostly in Mode 2. In this mode, Bb , F and
D occur together only in the second transposition, which must therefore be the
transposition of choice for a Bb tonality. If the matter were as simple as that,
there would of course be no further need for theorizing about the pitch content.
However, Messiaen's pitch arrays are often modally impure. 'Premiere
communion' exhibits a variety of material within its pitch structure: there is
material based entirely on one transposition of Mode 2; but there are also
passages in which non-modal pitches appear, as well as a contrasting section at a
noticeably quicker tempo than the rest of the movement in which the mode
becomes indiscernible because of the degree of chromatic saturation. I propose
to employ the apparatus of pitch-class set theory to examine the modal and non-
modal pitch collections, exploring the possibility of association between the two
with the intention of explaining the extra pitches that are introduced at certain
points in the piece.The suffixing of the symbols A and B to certain sets follows
the approach of Larry Solomon, in which separate labels denote inversions, thus
allowing inversion between sets to be treated as a relation rather than an
equivalence (Solomon 1982). Major chords, for example, can be distinguished
from minor, as can the dominant seventh from the so-called 'half-diminished'
chord. Those collections which are not suffixed with A or B (8-28, for instance)
are inversionally symmetrical.
Ex. 1 ,s.
kvs
dimil. ?9d
dim
8a bassa----------------------------8a bassa_
d im?. __ _ __ _ __ _
s ---
8 ,1bas sa_- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MODES AND PITCH-CLASS SETS IN MESSIAEN
Ex. 1 cont.
?2 1?4
s.
I IT I f b i11 1 - 1I
1 1 r" i_ ,_RM
I t , i ' -- I 1 1 l ! -"
(Embrassenment int~rieur)5 -5
@ ~T,-e lent (2 5023-- ......4
(E m ra seren i tereu )
(i6 1ti eu ri
T- T)-I
2~izca I 3'Y
p7
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ROSEMARY WALKER
Ex. 2
Mode 2i
Mode 2ii
Mode 2iii
d6 1,11 all
W" o a n lb --LoI -
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MODES AND PITCH-CLASS SETS IN MESSIAEN
Ex. 3
Mf
p I Mode 2ii
n mf mf_ bilio: , o
-6
I I
(a) W II-M
I i i
In applying set theory here, it becomes obvious that Messiaen is working not
only with the master set 8-28 but with various other large sets too: in particular,
7-31, 10-3 and 11-1, all of which are sub- or supersets of 8-28. The harmonic
repertoire is littered with trichords, particularly 3-11B, but these are bound to
appear. This also applies to most tetrads and pentads in the piece. Moreover,
collections of cardinal 6 are so rare in Messiaen that the issue of hexachordal
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ROSEMARY WALKER
Ex. 4
Tris F
lent ( =50)
8;
#?" I 5 2
A 2. VA 6-:17 -1 1 m
(interieur) 8-28
(Theme de Dieu)
connectedness, crucial in classic Fortean theory, does not arise, nor can the
possibility of a 'nexus' set. Rather, the fact that Messiaen tends actually to use
large pitch collections enforces an analytical focus on sets of cardinality 7 and
above. There is no case for discussing sets in terms of their complements, for
absolute pitch remains a crucial factor within the pitch organization: although
Messiaen deliberately uses invertible pc collections, for him the function of
absolute pitch in defining colour is comparable to its function in defining key.
Set 7-31 has an important role to play in this movement, not least because it is
the largest octatonic subset. It first appears in b.2 (Ex. 5a). The justification
Ex. 5
b)) 2~~db_
5.--7 -1
-17-31A
c))
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MODES AND PITCH-CLASS SETS IN MESSIAEN
for taking this collection in isolation is that Messiaen himself does so at the end
of the piece (Ex. 5b). Transformations of 7-31A and B also appear horizontally
in the cadenza-type passages (Ex. 5c), and the inverted form generates the total
pitch content of bs 39-41 (Ex. 6). Why Messiaen should present Mode 2 (in
second transposition) minus one pitch (G) in this segment cannot be regarded as
an arbitrary question. All the subcollections of this pre-ecstatic passage are
triads and dominant sevenths. This overall sonority cannot be achieved by a
partitioning of the complete eight-note mode, but only by the exclusion of one
pitch to form the largest subset (the smallest superset of 8-28, 9-10, does not
have a high profile anywhere in the music).
Ex. 6
of cresc.
Rall. 8--
cresc. molto
One of the most opaque passages from the point of view of pitch is bs 43-72,
which abandon the serenity of Bb major and modal sonorities in favour of dense
chromatic collections (see Ex. 7). This kind of juxtaposition of modal and non-
modal material in Vingt Regards has provoked criticism, not least from Boulez,
who only recently remarked of the work:
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ROSEMARY WALKER
The pitch structures from b.43 seem to be designed for maximum variety of
sonority. Sets of cardinal 8 are prolific: the upper D is harmonized variously in
8-21, 8-12A and so on. Parsing the non-modal section in pitch-class sets enables
associations with earlier modal material to be revealed; for instance, 4-18, 3-5
and 4-Z29A, the only subsets of 8-28 here, are highlighted in self-evident ways.
Of the six possible sets of cardinal 10, there is only one noteworthy example in
Ex. 7
Mod6r6 (?=12) 4-
-- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - ------ -
3-54-29
A..s,6 ,<
,4-'Ts
_r- _ms
I
f f r Sf <- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
l Elm
8-21.=1
9--AIl
bassa B Sabssa--------
4 ,Leur-de
9-9 f s -1Len0!,00_del_-
>- W-2 9 3_de '13fa5)
f=1 1-1L.NM
A ,6,6L
I.I.-L.
6 .6 Igo
, . II L
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MODES AND PITCH-CLASS SETS IN MESSIAEN
this piece. Significantly, it appears in the non-modal passage, at b.53, where the
pitch-change is suspended for four bars to emphasize a rhythmic device. The
combination of the two verticals forms set 10-3, echoed at pitch in b.61. The
missing pitches are C# and E, but the C# is reintroduced directly at b.57 and
both CQ and E are the boundary notes at the start of b.59. The fact that 10-3 is a
superset of 8-28 and of no other colour mode is of the essence here; for although
10-3 appears within a section that overtly disregards modal sonorities, the
underlying control of 8-28 is unmistakable, and this demonstrates the
explanatory force of interpreting the near-aggregate, not as a mode with
randomly 'borrowed' additional pitches, but as a superset with explicit and
unique modal content.
In his brief notes to the work, Messiaen discusses his 'chords of transposed
inversions' in the chromatic passage. This indicates their general importance to
him, but their specific formations are revealed by examining set relations. In a
three-bar segment (bs 58-60), collections of 7-20A and 8-20 alternate, the
combinations in each bar forming larger sets of 10-3 (b.58), 11-1 (b.60) and the
total chromatic (b.59) (see Ex. 7). There is a clear link between this three-bar
segment and the horizontal aggregate in b.42 - not least because the first seven
notes in b.42 are a transformation of 7-20A (see Ex. 8):
Ex. 8
12-1
Rubato Pressez
7-20A
In the eleventh movement of Vingt Regards there is a clear interaction not only
between modal and tonal elements but also between the modes and chromatic
structures. The application of a rather simple set classification can account for
pitch collections that do not conform to the exclusive Mode 2 presentations.
Messiaen is a most meticulous composer, and without doubt there are no
random gestures in his control of pitch organization: every detail counts. This is
why any exploration of pitch structure in his music, particularly those pitch
components outside the modes, is so inherently compelling.
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ROSEMARY WALKER
REFERENCES
This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:04:22 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms