NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

Learner Name Muhammad Anza Lashari Date : 30-12-2023 Assessor Name

Learning Partner Name Bilal Consultancy Limited Words Count: Learner Result
Assessor’s Recommendations:
General Instructions

This is an open book Mock examination and only for the assessment purpose. You are free to use any learning resources to which you have access, e.g. your course notes, or a website, etc.

The answer must be in your own wording and must be entirely your own work. Knowingly claiming work to be your own when it is someone else’s work is malpractice, which carries severe penalties form
NEBOSH. This means that you must not collaborate with or copy work from others. Neither should you ‘cut and paste’ blocks of text from the Internet or other sources.

The examination begins with a realistic scenario to set the scene. You will then need to complete a series of tasks based on this scenario. Each task will consist of one or more questions.

Your responses to most of these tasks should wholly, or partly, draw on relevant information from the scenario. The task will clearly state the extent to which this is required.

The marks available are shown in brackets to the right of each question, or part of each question. This will help guide you to the amount of information required in your response. In general, one mark is
given for each correct technical point that is clearly demonstrated. Avoid writing too little as this will make it difficult for the Examiner to award marks. Single word answers or lists are unlikely to gain
marks as this would not normally be enough to show understanding or a connection with the scenario.

Please read below documents before attempting the actual NEBOSH OBE Exam and can download from NEBOSH website.

https://www.nebosh.org.uk/qualifications/international-general-certificate/#resources

You are not expected to write more than 3000 words in total.

Answer must be in below template

Distribute your time and word count proportionately across all tasks.

Please attempt ALL tasks.

Please read scenario carefully before your answers

Please email the completed mock exam to us or Upload it to your portal.

You must score to green zone as final to pass this mock exam after evaluation by assessor.

Page 1 of 9
 NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

SCENARIO

You have been newly recruited as a Health and Safety Advisor at a general industry, in which products or materials of all kinds and properties are processed, assembled and fabricated using machinery
and /or power. It includes workshops and service establishments and service industries.

Within the fabrication and welding workshop an overhead crane is used to move heavy steel structure into position. There are signs on this crane stating that only trained workers can operate it. Workers
understand that manual handling and mechanical lifting aids should be considered first, with the crane only used as a last resort.

You have observed hazards such as scrap metal in walkways. This sometimes forces workers to step into the path of the overhead crane, while walking through the workshop. Because of these obstructed
walkways workers often carry heavy objects instead of using mechanical aids. Workers inform you that there are frequent near misses, involving the overhead crane, when it is being operated by the
apprentices. You find an email from one of the supervisors to the manager requesting crane operation training for the apprentices, but this seems to have been ignored.

There is a large warehouse, where stocks of goods are arranged on racks of shelving. Warehouse workers use forklift trucks (FLTs) to move goods from warehouse into the delivery trucks.

Since you started your new job, you have seen a lot of examples of rule-breaking in the warehouse. For example, you have seen goods stacked in aisles and blocking designated walkways. Workers have to
avoid many obstacles as they walk through the warehouse, causing them to step into vehicle routes.

There are no written records of any of these near misses. Workers have told you that they have complained to the manager many times about the working conditions. You cannot find any written records of
such complaints.

The directors do not believe that health and safety is a full-time job, but they hope that you will improve the company’s health and safety performance, learn lessons from the recent serious accident and,
most importantly, improve the reputation of the company. They have told you that there is no budget for health and safety, but if something is needed, you should present an argument for how it will
improve profit.

You ask if any health and safety training is provided to staff and are advised that as far as training is concerned, a very brief induction consisting of a 2-minute video explaining the company values. You are
told that quite a lot of people have received first-aid training, but it was a long time ago and many of those trained have since left the organisation. Other than that, there is not much in the way of training,
because the directors feel it is wasting working time.

Finally, you ask where the health and safety documentation is kept but they say that they do not know, and suggest you ask the shift manager on duty. You find several completed risk assessments, but
they are very out of date. You ask to see the accident and near miss records, but the shift manager advises that accidents do not happen often, so there is no need to keep a manual record. However, you
have heard from the other workers that accidents and near misses frequently occur, but that they are not formally reported.

You ask where the inspection and maintenance documentation for the machinery is kept. Shift manager explains that they do not keep a record of inspections and maintenance other than in their work
diary, and that they can see when a machine was last used from that diary.

There was need to modify the large storage tank and contractors were working on it. Prior to commencing the work, a permit-to-work is issued to the contractors carrying out the tank modification. The
permit-to-work includes an explanation about the associated risk assessment and how the plant has been safely prepared for this non-routine modification. The contract workers accept the permit-to-work
with the necessary precautions, including wearing of specified personal protective equipment. Precautions listed on the permit-to-work are also communicated to all contractors and other plant workers who
may be affected. The permit-to-work explains that precautions will be enforced, along with any other site rules, by active monitoring. This will be done while you carry out routine plant checks and
simultaneously check on the progress of the modification.

There have been many injuries recorded over the years. Most recently, a repeat of a more serious collision occurred involving a young FLT driver. The brakes were applied too late, as the driver was
distracted by their mobile phone, the FLT skidded on an oil spillage and knocked goods over onto a passing worker.

Page 2 of 9
 NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

On this occasion the worker’s leg was broken, which required urgent hospital treatment. The worker is expected to be off work for six weeks to recover from the injury. The injured worker is seeking legal
advice in order to make a claim for compensation.

As a result of the recent FLT collision, you were visited by a labour Inspector who has made a formal order that requires workplace changes to improve the health and safety of the workers. The Inspector
thinks it is only a matter of time before workers are more seriously injured or even killed. The Inspector also observed that the written risk assessments are out dated and do not reflect the actual risks.
The Inspector wants to see a more effective health and safety management system at their next visit.

You have discussed with the Inspector possible improvements to health and safety in the warehouse. The proposed solution involves segregating FLTs and workers with barriers, pedestrian walkways,
designated crossing places and separate entrances for workers and FLTs. In addition, you tell the Inspector that you will review health and safety performance, internally and externally, in order to make
comparisons.

Page 3 of 9
 NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

Task 1: Financial arguments for the manager to improve health and safety
Question 1
Based on the scenario only, what financial arguments could you use to convince the director that health and safety needs to be improved? (15)
Learner Answer:
Based on the scenario, we can use several financial arguments to convince the managers or directors that health and safety needs improvement in the organization:

1. Improved Productivity and Efficiency: We can convenience the top management by providing the examples of how a safer workplace increases output, productivity and efficiency.Because
fewer accidents occur in safer workplaces, there is less downtime from absences due to injuries. Stress that effective and secure work processes lead to greater production in the long run by
decreasing operational interruptions and increasing efficiency.

2. Reduced Cost of Accidents: We can highlight the financial burden associated with workplace accidents and incidents.Provide data regarding the costs associated with injuries, including lost
productivity, medical expenditures, compensation claims, and possible legal costs.Reiterate that spending money on enhanced health and safety precautions will lessen the financial toll that
accidents take and the likelihood of compensation claims.For instance, the recent collision resulting in a worker's leg injury is indicative of potential compensation costs that could be avoided with
better safety measures.

3. Enhanced Reputation and Customer Confidence: Discuss about how a company's reputation for health and safety affects customer confidence and the company's overall image. Stress that a
solid reputation for health and safety can draw in additional customers and business alliances, which can boost sales. On the other hand, bad press brought on by mishaps or reckless behavior
can damage the company's standing and even result in losses of money.

4. Insurance Cost: Talk about the possible effect on insurance rates of better health and safety procedures. Stress that a solid record of health and safety could result in lower insurance costs,
which would save the business money.

5. Cost of Reactive Measures vs. Proactive Investment: Describe the comparative cost-benefit analysis of proactive and reactive health and safety interventions. Emphasize that spending
money on preventive measures—like appropriate training, upkeep, and safety gear is a more economical decision than addressing the fallout from mishaps or breaking the law.

Through the presentation of these financial justifications, the directors will be able to comprehend the real benefits of giving health and safety improvements top priority not merely for compliance
purposes, but also as a calculated investment in the long-term viability and financial health of the company.
References Used:RRc books.
Assessor Comments:

Task 2: Influencing health and safety culture

Question 2
What are the negative indicators of health and safety culture at the organisation? (15)
Learner Answer:
The scenario reflecting several negative indicators of the health and safety culture within the organization:

 Rule-Breaking of Safety Procedures: Observations of rule-breaking behavior within the warehouse,such as when things are stacked in aisles and designated paths are blocked,it is evident
that safety procedures and requirements are not being followed. When workers obstruct vehicle lanes and walkways, they appear to be disrespecting established safety protocols.

Page 4 of 9
 NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

 Near Misses: One major risk is the availability of scrap metal in walkways, which forces workers to step into the overhead crane's path. Frequent near-misses with the crane draw attention to a
major safety issue, particularly when they are operated by apprentices. These near-misses and impediments point to a possible serious accident and a disregard for keeping open pathways.

 Outdated Risk Assessments: The labor inspector found that there were out-of-date risk assessments and insufficient documentation, which indicates a serious weakness in the organization's
risk management strategy. Outdated documentation does not enable well-informed decision-making for safety enhancements and does not appropriately reflect current risks.

 Lack of Reporting and Documentation: Despite workers reporting regular accidents and unsafe conditions, there are no written records of near misses or worker complaints, which indicates a
lack of a reporting culture. Insufficient documentation of occurrences, accidents, or complaints leaves a lack of evidence that can be used to properly address and rectify safety concerns.

 Ignoring Training Needs: The management's perception that training is a waste of time at work, along with the staff's meagre training of a quick video induction and out-of-date first-aid
instruction, point to a lack of emphasis on ongoing education and skill development in health and safety procedures.

 Insufficient Records and Maintenance of Machinery: Concerns of guaranteeing equipment safety and adherence to maintenance schedules arise from the shift manager's work diary being
the only official record for machinery inspections and maintenance.

All of these negative indicators point to a negative health and safety culture within the company, which is characterized by a lack of communication, poor training,out-of-date paperwork, and a lack of
reaction to previous incidents. These factors all combine to create a dangerous work environment.
References Used:RRC Books, Ilo website.
Assessor Comments:

Task 3: Working within a health and safety management system

Question 3

Based on the scenario only, what are the likely benefits to the organisation of having the formal safety management system? (10)

Learner Answer:

Establishing a formal safety management system can provide the following advantages to the company:

 Reduced accidents and incidents: A more secure workplace is achieved by the identification and mitigation of dangers through the use of a structured safety management system. The
technology may be able to lower accidents and incidents, which would result in fewer injuries and related expenses, by actively mitigating hazards.

 Enhanced Risk management: Better risk detection and management are made possible by the system through comprehensive risk assessments and current documentation. This proactive
strategy aids in foreseeing such threats and implementing precautions.

 Improved Compliance: An official safety management system guarantees that the company complies with applicable laws and industry norms. By creating guidelines, processes, and records
that meet legal requirements, it facilitates regulatory compliance.

 Involvement of Employees: Employee involvement in safety-related procedures, including as risk assessments and reporting, is common in formal safety management systems. Employee
ownership and accountability for safety procedures are fostered by this involvement.

Page 5 of 9
 NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

 Risk Assessment and Prevention (ILO Code of Practice on Recording and Notification of Occupational Accidents and Diseases) : Having a structured safety management system
allows for systematic risk assessments and hazard identification. This helps prevent accidents by addressing risks before they cause harm to workers.

All things considered, an organization's overall safety performance, worker wellbeing, operational effectiveness, and financial stability can all be greatly enhanced by a well-designed and successfully
executed safety management system.

References Used:Ilo code of practice,RRC Books

Assessor Comments:

Task 4: Management failures

Question 4
Based on the scenario only, what management failures are likely to have contributed to this accident? (10)
Learner Answer:
In analyzing the scenario presented, several management failures can be identified that likely contributed to the accident:

1. Lack of Training and Supervision: There were signs stating that only trained personnel could operate the overhead crane, but it seemed that the apprentices weren't getting the training they
needed. Ignoring the supervisor's request for training in crane operation implies inadequate supervision and a failure to attend to the training requirements of less experienced employees.

2. Poor housekeeping and Hazard management: Scrap metal blocking pathways and pushing workers into the overhead crane's path is an indication of inadequate housekeeping and ineffective
hazard control. Accidents and near misses become more likely as a result of management's failure to handle these risks.

3. Inadequate Record-Keeping and Reporting: When worker complaints, accident reports, or near misses are not documented in writing, there is a systemic record-keeping breakdown.
Ignoring employee concerns and failing to keep accident reports show a lack of dedication to accurate incident reporting and analysis.

4. Non-compliance with Legal Requirements: There is evidence of non-compliance with legal norms and regulations in the form of outdated risk assessments, a failure to maintain inspection
and maintenance records, and a lack of documentation about near miss incidents as mentioned in the scenario. This noncompliance shows a lack of dedication to following the law's requirements
for health and safety.

5. Poor Safety culture: The management's general disdain for health and safety is demonstrated by their perception that these issues are not full-time responsibilities and by their lack of
budgetary support. These actions highlight a fundamental failure to prioritize safety as an essential component of the organizational culture.

These management failures collectively contributed to the accident by creating an environment where safety procedures were not adequately enforced, hazards were not properly managed, and there
was a general lack of commitment to ensuring a safe working environment for employees.
References Used: RRC Books
Assessor Comments:

Page 6 of 9
 NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

Task 5: Determining individual factors influencing behaviour at work

Question 5
Based on the scenario only, what individual human factors might have negatively influenced the behaviour of the injured worker? (15)
Learner Answer:
Several individual human factors might have influenced the behavior of the injured worker in the scenario:

 Distraction: One potential primary factor is the worker's use of a mobile phone while operating the FLT. Using a mobile device while focusing on a task might lead to a break in concentration and
a reduction in situational awareness.

 Complacency and Overconfidence: Constantly using a phone while at work indicates a lack of confidence or complacency; the employee may have grown too accustomed to the action and
disregarded the possible risks associated with using the FLT.

 Fatigue or stress, either from personal circumstances, job-related demands, or overload, may have impairing the employee's concentration on the task at hand and impairing their judgment.

 Work pressure: Due to expectations or deadlines at work, the employee may have been under pressure to complete duties fast, which caused them to rush and neglect safety procedures.

 Lack of training: It's possible that the employee was not completely aware of the dangers or repercussions of using a phone while operating the FLT, particularly in light of the lack of
comprehensive safety training.

These individual human factors, either individually or in combination, might have influenced the behavior of the injured worker and contributed to the incident
References Used: Ilo website,RRC Books.
Assessor Comments:

Task 6: Induction Training

Question 6
What health and safety induction information is the manager likely to give to the contractors before they are allowed to start their work? (10)
Learner Answer:
The manager, before allowing the contractors to start their work, is likely to provide the following health and safety induction information:

1. Site-Specific Hazards and Risks: A thorough explanation of all the risks and hazards they could face while working there including any identified dangers associated with their work area or
tasks they will be performing.

2. Emergency Procedures: Comprehensive instructions on evacuation routes, assembly locations, emergency procedures, and how to handle different emergency scenarios like spills, fires, and
accidents.

3. Permit to work system: A summary of the permit-to-work system, stressing the significance of securing permissions before beginning any work and the need of adhering to site-specific safety
protocols.

Page 7 of 9
 NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

4. Health and safety policy: A description of the company's health and safety policies, guidelines, and practices with a focus on policy compliance and the significance of following safety
procedures.

5. Documentation and Compliance: Guidelines on the need to abide by business rules, health and safety laws, and the need of reading and comprehending pertinent documents, such as safety
procedures and risk assessments.

These are some induction information the manager should give to the contractors before they are allowed to start their work.
References Used: RRC Books.
Assessor Comments:

Task 7: First aid and Emergency procedures

Question 7
What do you need to consider so that first-aid needs are realistic and proportionate for all the workers? (15)
Learner Answer:
To ensure that first-aid needs are realistic and proportionate for all workers, several considerations need to be taken into account:

 Workplace Risk Assessment: To identify potential hazards and determine the degree of risk associated with different tasks and work settings, do a thorough risk assessment. The kinds of
injuries that are most likely to happen and the probable incident's severity will be ascertained by this assessment.

 Take into account the quantity of employees, their responsibilities, the type of work they do, and any unique health issues or vulnerabilities that could need to be attended to right away in
the event of an emergency.

 Workplace Layout: In order to guarantee that there is an adequate supply of first-aid facilities, equipment, and trained workers depending on the accessibility of these regions, evaluate the
workplace layout, including distant areas or high-risk zones.

 Response Time: Evaluate how quickly emergency services or trained medical assistance will respond. In the event of a serious incident, take into account the emergency services' proximity and
response time.

 First-Aid Equipment and Facilities: Make sure there are enough first-aid kits, supplies, and facilities available at all times in the workplace. These ought to be properly stocked, quickly
accessible, and suitable for any potential injury.

By taking these factors into consideration, a realistic and proportionate first-aid provision can be established to adequately meet the health and safety needs of all workers within the organization.
References Used:RRC Books.
Assessor Comments:

Task 8: Risk assessment

Page 8 of 9
 NEBOSH OBE MOCK ASSESSMENT EXAM

Question 8
Based on the scenario only, what is negative about the management approach to assessing health and safety risks in the organisation? (10)
Learner Answer:
The negative aspects of the management approach to assessing health and safety risks in the organization based on the scenario include:

 Outdated Risk Assessments: The risk assessments that were discovered were determined to be quite outdated, indicating that safety procedures were not routinely reviewed and updated in
response to incidents or shifting workplace conditions.

 Failure to Record Near Misses and Incidents: Although employees have reported several mishaps and near misses, there is no official log of these instances. This lack of documentation
suggests that safety issues are not being proactively addressed and that lessons from previous occurrences have not been used.

 Limited Health and Safety Training: The management takes a very low-key approach to health and safety training, investing little on skill or knowledge updates and just offering a brief
induction. This shows that continuous safety education is not prioritized.

 Absence of Formal Complaint Records: Undocumented worker accusations regarding poor working conditions exist. The absence of complaints on file implies that management might not be
paying attention to or adequately handling worker concerns.

 Ignored Requests for Training: There is proof that despite many near-misses involving the crane when operated by novice workers, the management disregarded calls for apprentices to
receive crane operation training. The lack of proactive safety measures is indicated by this failure to address training demands.

 Disregard for Budgeting Health and Safety: The management’s perception that there is no funding for health and safety suggests a lack of commitment to spending money on initiatives that
guarantee the security and welfare of employees, which could jeopardize the efficacy of safety precautions.

 Limited Employee Involvement: Employee participation in health and safety decision-making appears to be lacking in the management. This lack of worker participation may cause important
insights from people who are closest to occupational hazards to be overlooked.

In general, the management strategy lacks a thorough and up-to-date system for risk assessment, event recording, and proactive safety actions, making it appear reactive rather than proactive.
References Used:RRC Books, Ilo website.
Assessor Comments:

Page 9 of 9