Interrupts and polling are two approaches for handling events in computer systems. Interrupts suspend the current task when an external device requires attention to service the event efficiently. Polling involves the processor actively checking device status at regular intervals. Interrupts are generally more efficient for sporadic events, while polling may be simpler for frequent, regular events. Examples of interrupt-driven systems include Linux and Windows, while embedded and real-time systems often use polling. References for further information include operating system textbooks by Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne and Tanenbaum as well as research papers on specific operating systems.
Interrupts and polling are two approaches for handling events in computer systems. Interrupts suspend the current task when an external device requires attention to service the event efficiently. Polling involves the processor actively checking device status at regular intervals. Interrupts are generally more efficient for sporadic events, while polling may be simpler for frequent, regular events. Examples of interrupt-driven systems include Linux and Windows, while embedded and real-time systems often use polling. References for further information include operating system textbooks by Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne and Tanenbaum as well as research papers on specific operating systems.
Interrupts and polling are two approaches for handling events in computer systems. Interrupts suspend the current task when an external device requires attention to service the event efficiently. Polling involves the processor actively checking device status at regular intervals. Interrupts are generally more efficient for sporadic events, while polling may be simpler for frequent, regular events. Examples of interrupt-driven systems include Linux and Windows, while embedded and real-time systems often use polling. References for further information include operating system textbooks by Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne and Tanenbaum as well as research papers on specific operating systems.
Q.What is the difference between interrupt and polling? Which
one is better and give examples of different operating systems using these techniques. Justify your answer with some authentic reference papers by citations?
Interrupts and polling are two different approaches to handling events
in computer systems, especially in the context of input/output (I/O) operations. Let's explore the differences between them and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. 1. Interrupts: In the interrupt-driven approach, the processor is interrupted when an external device requires attention. This interruption suspends the current task, and the processor transfers control to an interrupt service routine (ISR) to handle the event. Interrupts are more event-driven and efficient, as the processor can continue its work while waiting for external events to occur. 2. Polling: Polling involves the processor actively checking the status of a device at regular intervals. It repeatedly checks whether the device is ready or has new data, and if so, it performs the necessary actions. Polling is a more continuous and active approach compared to interrupts. It can be simpler to implement in some cases but may be less efficient as it ties up the CPU in constant checks. Which one is better? The choice between interrupts and polling depends on the specific requirements of the system. Generally, interrupts are more efficient and responsive for handling sporadic events, while polling might be simpler in scenarios where events occur frequently and regularly. Examples of Operating Systems: Interrupts:
for devices such as keyboards, mice, and network
interfaces. For example, Linux and Windows both heavily rely on interrupt-driven I/O mechanisms. Polling: Polling is often used in embedded systems and real-time applications where the system has strict timing requirements. An example could be a simple microcontroller-based system that polls sensors at regular intervals. References: Unfortunately, as of my last training cut-off in January 2022, I don't have direct access to databases or the internet to provide specific references or citations. However, you can find information on interrupts and polling in operating system textbooks and research papers. Here are some classic references: 1. Operating System Concepts by Abraham Silberschatz, Peter B. Galvin, and Greg Gagne: This widely-used textbook covers the fundamental concepts of operating systems and includes information on interrupts and polling. 2. Modern Operating Systems by Andrew S. Tanenbaum: Another well-known textbook in the field of operating systems, Tanenbaum's book provides insights into different I/O handling mechanisms. 3. Research papers on specific operating systems: For more in- depth analysis and specific examples, you might want to explore research papers on operating systems, particularly those related to I/O handling. Platforms like IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library are good places to search for such papers. When researching, ensure that you refer to the most recent and relevant sources to get the latest insights into operating system design and implementation.