EVSU-GS-024
Republic of the Philippines
PROGRAM: Master in Public Resource Management
COURSE CODE
COURSE TITLE
COURSE CREDIT
PREREQUISITE COURSE
COURSE DESCRIPTION
COURSE OUTCOMES
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
REFERENCES
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Understood and internalized Course Orientation and Introduction
the Mission and Vision of
EVSU, the goals and
objectives of the Graduate
School
Discuss and synthesize the Overview of Project Management
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Tacloban City
GRADUATE SCHOOL
COURSE SYLLABUS
PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT: Foundation ___Specialization/Major ___Elective ___
GSMPRM565.3
PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
3
NONE
This course deals with the theories and principles in the identification, planning, implementation, as well as evaluation and control of projects. It primary deals with the phases in
project management process and related component activities.
Write a Project Plan
Paper Analyses/Topic Module and Audio-Video Presentation/Term Test (Week 8&18)/Project Plan
Heagney, Joseph. (2012). Fundamental of project management. Fourth Edition. AMACOM.
Heerkens, Gary R. (2002) Project management. McGraw-Hill.
PMBOK Guide. Sixth Edition. 2017
Williams, Meri. (2008). The principles of project management. SitePoint Pty. Ltd.
LEARNING PLAN
ASSESSMENT
CONTENT TIME FRAME LEARNING ACTIVITIES RESOURCES
TOOLS
Week One Google Meeting Recitation Rubrics Bulletin of Information/
Recitation Fliers/
Student Handbook/
https://evsu.edu.ph
Week One Home Reading Rubrics for evaluation Heagney, Joseph. (2012).
 EVSU-GS-024
key project management
concept
Describe and define
projects and project
management
Identify the role, skills and
challenges of a project
manager
Find and define project(s) in Finding and Defining the Project
their respective organization
Identify the appropriate
organization for a particular
project
Demonstrate the ability to
use the tools in decision
making
Describe the process and
be able to write a project
plan
Assignment of paper Fundamental of project management.
Topic Synthesis Fourth Edition. AMACOM.
About Projects and Project Management Week One Home Reading Rubrics for evaluation Heerkens, Gary R. (2002) Project
Assignment management. McGraw-Hill.
Group Presentation
The Project Manager Week Two Home Reading Rubrics for evaluation Heerkens, Gary R. (2002) Project
Topic Presentation management. McGraw-Hill.
Paper Analysis: 7 Deadly https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/
Sins of Project docs/7-deadly-sins-of-project-
Management management.pdf
Week Two Home Reading Rubrics for evaluation Heerkens, Gary R. (2002) Project
Google Meeting management. McGraw-Hill.
Topic Presentation
Williams, Meri. (2008). The principles
of project management. SitePoint
Pty. Ltd.
Project Organization Week Two Home Reading Rubrics for evaluation Olaf Passenheim. (2009). Project
Topic Presentation Management. Olaf Passenheim &
Paper 1 on Organization Ventus Publishing ApS
Profile &
Issues/Opportunities
Decision Making Tools Week Three Topic Presentation Rubrics for evaluation https://www.wesharescience.com/
Paper 2 on Defining & na/guidebook/Section%203B.pdf
Selecting Alternative
Courses of Action https://www.fcps.net/cms/lib/
KY01807169/Centricity/Domain/
3962/Budget%20and%20Staffing/
decision_tools.pdf
Project Management Process: Initiation Week Four Topic Presentation Rubrics for evaluation Heerkens, Gary R. (2002) Project
Project Management Process: Planning Week Four Topic Presentation Rubrics for evaluation management. McGraw-Hill.
Project Management Process: Execution Week Five Topic Presentation Rubrics for evaluation
Project Management Process: Monitoring and Control Week Five Topic Presentation Rubrics for evaluation Williams, Meri. (2008). The principles
Paper 3 on Project of project management. SitePoint
Charter Pty. Ltd.
Project Management Process: Closure and Audit Week Five Topic Presentation Rubrics for evaluation
 EVSU-GS-024
Synthesize the different Knowledge Areas in Project Management: Week Six Paper Synthesis Rubrics for evaluation https://www.examspm.com/pmbok-
knowledge areas of project a. Project Integration Management 6th-edition-pdf/
management b. Project Scope Management
c. Project Time Management
d. Project Cost Management
e. Project Quality Management
f. Project Human Resource Management
g. Project Communications Management
h. Project Risk Management
i. Project Procurement Management
MIDTERM/FINAL EXAMINATION As scheduled
Case Study Critique https://www.pmi.org/business-
solutions/case-studies/astrazeneca-
case-study

https://www.pmsolutions.com/
casestudies/
CaseStudy_Transformative_Leaders
hip_Sets_Financial_Services_EPMO
_on_Fast_Track_to_Strategic_Value.
pdf
Course Req’ts & Grade Percentage:

Papers (Assignments, Synthesis, Paper analyses) - 20%

Module & AVP/PPT - 15%
Topic Presentation - 10%
Case Critique - 15%
Midterm/Final Examinations - 40%

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved:

ROSE ANNA L. REFUERZO, DM GABINO P. PETILOS, Ph.D. LYDIA M. MORANTE, DA

Subject Professor Dean, Graduate School Vice President for Academic Affairs
EVSU-GS-024

Grading Rubrics Criteria and Weight

Criteria / Weight 1-1.5 1.6-2.0 2.1-2.5 2.6-3.0

(excellent)
Formatting/structure/referencing Demonstrates thorough and
15% thoughtful editing with proper
referencing and follows the
prescribed format.
Content/substance/critical analysis Demonstrates mastery and
70% completeness of concepts covered
in the assignment.
Displays complexities of arguments
in its analysis.
Manner/skill of presentation Displays confidence and unique
15% critical analysis.
Style of presentation fits the content
and the audience.
(satisfactory)
Demonstrates and follows
formatting, editing and referencing
but needs further development.
Demonstrates understanding of
concepts covered in the assignment
but does not sufficiently illustrates
coherence of ideas.
Presents good argument, clearly
articulated though might need
refining.
Displays confidence with clear
analysis of content.
Style of presentation is conscious of
the content and the audience.
(developing)
Minor formatting, editing and
referencing errors and needs
minimal revisions
Demonstrates limited understanding
of concepts covered in the
assignment and are presented in a
superficial way.
Inadequate and weak argument and
is too general in perspective.
Displays awkwardness or monotony
in the delivery of the analysis.
Style is inappropriate for the content
and the audience.
(unsatisfactory)
Non-compliance to formatting and
referencing requirements and needs
major revision and editing.
The work illustrates a serious lack of
understanding of the core concepts
from the course material and does
not respond to the assignment.
No identifiable argument or is too
vague.
Lacking confidence and critical
analysis of the assignment.
Style did not consider the content
and the audience.

REMINDERS:

Module Format - Title Page, Table of Contents, Learning Objectives, Pre-Learning Activity, Content (topic discussion), Post-Learning Activity, References

PPT Format - Title Page, Learning Objectives, Pre-Learning Activity, Content (topic discussion), Post-Learning Activity, References

Case Study – please visit this site for uniformity of presentation (https://papersowl.com/blog/how-to-write-a-case-study-analysis)
EVSU-GS-024
A. Paper 1 Format (Organizational Profile & Defining Issues/Opportunities in Organization:
I. Cover Page
II. Brief History of Organization
III. Organizational Mandate/Vision/Mission/Goals
IV. Organizational Structure
V. Issues/Opportunities of the Organization
VI. Identification of most pressing issue/best opportunity
VII. References

B. Paper 2 Format (Defining and Selecting Alternative Courses of Action):

I. Cover Page
II. Issue/Opportunity in Organization
III. Proposed alternative Courses of Action with descriptions
IV. Best alternative course of action

C. Project Charter:
I. Project Charter
II. Action Plan
III. References

D. Module
i. Title page
ii. Topic outline
iii. Learning objectives
iv. Pre-learning activity
v. Topic content/discussion
vi. Post-learning activity
vii. References