Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
List of Tables _____________________________________________________
Initiation phase
This is the first stage of the African Union Vaccine Development Project (AUVDP). This
is a short pre-project phase which enables African Union and other stakeholders to confirm the
need for the project. Under this phase, development of project charter, current situation and
problem statement, identification of goals and objectives, development of strategies and plans,
financial analysis and cost estimate, risks identification, strategic options and recommendations
and clinical research are considered.
Planning phase
This phase is the second phase of the project. Here, the African Union and other
stakeholders design and develop a task list and also communicate plans, budget and schedules of
the project. The basic activities under this stage include integration management, scope
management, human management, cost management, quality management, communication
management, risk management, procurement management and stakeholder management.
Execution phase
When planning has been done successfully, the next thing to do is to execute the plans as
depicted. Here, the African Union and other stakeholders carry out the details of the project
charter with the aim to deliver the proposed vaccine. All the tasks and deliverables are put into
action in this stage. The main responsibilities of the African Union and the project team are to
gather requirement, analyse requirement, discuss partnership, draft Memorandum of
Understanding, approve Memorandum of Understanding, draft vaccine specification and approve
vaccine specification.
Evaluation phase
This is the penultimate stage of the project. In this stage, the African Union embark on a
systematic programme to assess how well it has achieved the set goals. Under this stage, clinical
evaluation, laboratory test, clinical trials in humans and approval of trials are to be carried out.
The main purpose of this evaluation is to determine the vaccine’s safety, purity, potency and
efficacy. Also, where there are lapses, the evaluation process will indicate what could be
improved on.
Closure phase
This is the last phase of the project. When the vaccine specification has been approved at
the evaluation, the next step is to confirm completion of the project deliverables to the
satisfaction of the sponsors. The major activities that take place in this stage are meeting sign off
and close project.
Initiation
Planning
Execution
Closure
The Grant Chart above depicts the project schedule for the African Union Vaccine
Development Project (AUVDP). It is shown that the African Union Vaccine Development
Project (AUVDP) will take a period of four months. In this first month of the project, the
stakeholders are to initiate the project and come up with suitable scope statement which can
further be used for planning. The planning processes also started in the first month and ended at
the beginning of the second month. Immediately after the planning stage is completed, it is
scheduled that the execution begins. As shown on the Grant Chart, the execution of the African
Union Vaccine Development Project (AUVDP) starts at the beginning of the third month and
span to last day of the third month. However, while the execution is still on-going, the evaluation
process begins in the third month of the project. The evaluation process will take place till mid of
the last of the month of the project, while the last two week of April is scheduled for project
closure.
S/ Control plans
N
1. It is ensured that stakeholders follow the project plan.
2. Project sponsors were reminded of the project timeline.
3. Daily reminders were sent to all team members, stakeholders and sponsors.
4. All legal actions were taken when the needs be.
5. All team members were made to follow standards.
5.0 STAKEHOLDERS
Today, we hardly see any project that does not take place in a context where stakeholders
play vital role in both the implementation and accomplishment (Karlsen, 2002). Project
stakeholders represent those individuals, teams or institutions affected by a project (Juliano,
1995). They are the individuals whose interests are likely to affect the results of a project. They
are typically the initiators of a project, project managers, sponsors, customers and end users. For
the African Union Vaccine Development Project (AUVDP), the stakeholders and their roles are
as follows in the below table 6. (See Appendix 3 for stakeholder matrix).
Table 6: Stakeholders and their roles
Stakeholders Roles
African Union The African Union is the first initiator of the AUVDP. It
role is to develop and coordinate the project plan.
Africa Centre for Disease Control The Africa CDC is the second initiator of the AUVDP. It is
and Prevention (Africa CDC) responsible for communicating the project status by
preparing status reports and conducting progress review
meetings.
Pasteur Institute The Pasteur Institute is Western biotech company. It is in
partnership with both African Union and Africa CDC. It
offers information necessary to develop the proposed
vaccine.
State Authorities The state authorities are the major sponsors of the project.
This comprises of all members of the African Union.
Consultants/advisers These are bodies of experts who give advices on any
potential risk, budgeting and spending funds.
Press Media Press media include television stations, newspaper outlets
and radio stations that are responsible for creating public
awareness on the project and public safety.
Health practitioners These are health workers who are responsible for
evaluation, especially clinical evaluation.
Suppliers/Contractors These are the bodies of individuals, groups or companies
that supply equipment and materials necessary for the
project.
End users The end users are the citizens who will make use of the or
consume the vaccines.
References
Besner, C., and Hobbs, B. (2008). Project management praction, generic or contextual: a reality
check. Project Management Journal, 39(1), 16-33.
Burke, R. (1993) Project Management: Planning and Control, Management Press.
Clements, J, C and Gido, J. (2006). Effective project Management. Canada. Thomson, South
Western.
Gantt, H. (1919). Organizing for work: Harcourt, Brace and Howe.
Geraldi, J., and Lechler, T. (2012). Gantt Charts revisited: A critical analysis of its roots and
implications to the management of projects today. International Journal of Managing
Projects in Business, 5(4), 578-594.
James, P.L (2000). Project Planning, Scheduling and Control. McGraw-Hill. Montgomery, IL.
USA.
Martin E. (1996) A Professional's Guide to Systems Analysis, Modell, 2nd. Ed. McGraw Hill.
Mishra, R, C and Soota, T. (2005). Modern Project Management. New Dehli (India). New Age
International.
Nathalie, P., Salah, E.B and Robert, P. (2018). The core processes of project control: A network
analysis. International Conference on Project MANagement / HCist - International
Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies,
CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist 2018
Wren, D. (1987). Management history: issues and ideas for teaching and research. Journal of
Management, 13(2), 339.
Youg, T. L. (1993) Planning Projects, The Industrial Society. 1 (2).
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Risk Assessment Matrix
Stakeholders Matrix
African Union
Pasteur Suppliers/
institute Contractors
AUVPD