Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategies and 1. Your strategies were not 1. You used an 1. You chose appropriate, 1. You chose innovative and
oversimplified approach to
Reasoning appropriate for the efficient strategies for insightful strategies for solving
problem. the problem. solving the problem. the problem.
2. You didn’t seem to know where 2. You offered little or no 2. You justified each step of 2. You proved that your
Key Question: Is explanation of your strategies.
there evidence that to begin. your work. solution was correct and that
3. Your reasoning did not 3. Some of your representations 3. Your representation(s) fit your approach was valid.
the student accurately depicted aspects of
proceeded from a support your work. the task. 3. You provided examples
4. There was no apparent the problem. 4. The logic of your solution and/or counterexamples to
plan, applied 4. You sometimes made leaps in
appropriate relationship between your was apparent. support your solution.
representations and the your logic that were hard to 5. Your process would lead to 4. You used a sophisticated
strategies, and follow.
followed a logical task a complete, correct solution approach to solve the problem.
5. There was no apparent logic 5. Your process led to a of the problem.
and verifiable partially complete solution.
process toward a to your solution.
solution? 6. Your approach to the
problem would not lead to a
correct solution.
Communication 1. I couldn’t follow your thinking. 1. Your solution was hard to follow 1. I understood what you did 1. Your explanation was clear
2. Your explanation seemed in places. and why you did it. and concise.
Key Question: Was to ramble. 2. I had to make inferences about 2. Your solution was well 2. You communicated
I able to easily 3. You gave no explanation for what you meant in places. organized and easy to concepts with precision.
understand the your work. 3. You weren’t able to sustain follow. 3. Your mathematical
student’s thinking 4. You did not seem to have a your good beginning. 3. Your solution flowed representations expanded
or did I have to sense of what your audience 4. Your explanation was redundant logically from one step to the on your solution.
make inferences needed to know. in places. next. 4. You gave an in-depth
and guesses about 5. Your mathematical 5. Your mathematical representations 4. You used an effective explanation of your reasoning.
what they were representations did not help were somewhat helpful in format for communicating.
trying to do? clarify your thinking. clarifying your thinking. 5. Your mathematical
representations helped
clarify your solution.
© 2000
http://www.nwrel.org/
Insights 1. You were unable to 1. You recognized some patterns 1. You recognized important 1. You created a general rule
recognize patterns and and relationships. patterns and relationships or formula for solving
Key Question: Does relationships. 2. You found multiple solutions but in the problem. related problems.
the student grasp 2. You found a solution and not all were correct. 2. You found multiple solutions 2. You related the
the deeper structure then stopped. 3. Your solution hinted at a using different interpretations underlying structure of the
of the problem and 3. You found no connections to connection to an application or of the problem. problem to other similar
see how the process other disciplines or another area of mathematics. 3. You connected your problems.
used to solve this mathematical concepts. solution process to other 3. You noted possible sources
problem connects it problems, areas of of error or ambiguity in the
to other problems mathematics or applications. problem.
or “real-world” 4. Your connection to a real-
applications? life application was accurate
and realistic.
© 2000
http://www.nwrel.org/