Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RELATIONS:
MUBINA
958-FSS/BSIR/F20
BS (International Relations)
Research Article:
Islam, Model and the Middle East: The New
Balance of Power.
Submitted To:
Ma’am Sania Zehra.
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
Table of Contents
Abstract 1
I. Introduction 2
1. Winds of Change: Unveiling the Arab Spring 3
2. The Domino Effect: Transformations Across the Middle East 4
3. The Arab Spring: A Transformative Epoch 4
4. A Chain Reaction of Transformative Events 4
5. The Role of Political Islam: Navigating New Realities 4
6. The Role of Political Islam: Navigating New Realities 4
7. Governance Models Post-Revolution: A Kaleidoscope of Responses 4
8. A Journey Through the Post-Arab Spring Middle East 4
9. Geopolitical Landscape: Scars of Conflicts in Syria and Yemen 4
10. Beyond Politics: Economic Challenges and Social Dynamics 4
11. Crafting a Comprehensive Understanding: 4
Hypothesis 6
Research Questions: 6
1
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
Conclusion 16
References 18
2
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
Keywords: Arab spring, Middle east, Islam, Political powers, Governance, Power dynamics,
Political islam, Democracy, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Geo political, Balance of power,
International involvement, Stability, Reginoal actors.
Introduction:
A wave of popular discontent characterized the Arab Spring, with people expressing their
demands in the streets, in public squares, and online. The winds demanded fundamental changes
and challenged accepted standards, bringing with them a spirit of empowerment. Given that
Tunisia gave rise to the Arab Spring, the country has come to represent the possibility of an
inclusive and democratic political future.
3
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
These winds did not, however, come without disturbance. The phrase "Winds of Change"
captures the contradiction that revolutionary movements always present: the hope for a fresh
start mixed with the difficulties of navigating political upheavals. The winds brought with them
promises for democratisation as well as the tumultuous problems of creating stable, inclusive
communities as the region struggled with the aftermath of the Arab Spring. The metaphor
highlights the long-lasting effects of a time that permanently changed the Middle East's political
landscape while also mirroring the spirit of shared goals.
As the first domino to fall, Tunisia rose to prominence as the model for a smooth political
transition. Its capacity to accept democracy and strike a balance between secular and Islamist
groups established a model for other countries struggling with similar issues of governance. But
as the dominoes fell after that, different things happened, and it became clear what special
chances and difficulties each country faced.
The symbolically significant epicentre of change, Tahrir Square in Egypt, saw the domino effect
in play. The toppling of Hosni Mubarak's regime prompted revolutions in Yemen, Syria, and
Libya as people tried to balance their hopes for democratic administration against the danger of
an authoritarian return.
Upon examining the spillover effects of the Arab Spring, this metaphor serves to both elucidate
the swift dissemination of revolutions and underscore the interdependence of the fortunes of the
surrounding nations. The story of the Arab Spring's dominoes endures as a powerful one,
reminding us that the quest for political change is frequently a shared journey characterized by
resiliency, common struggles, and the unwavering hope for a more just and democratic future.
4
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
5
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
The fragility of political transitions and the complexity of regional dynamics are further
highlighted by the geopolitical landscape, which has been marred by the crises in Yemen and
Syria.
The affluent elite and the oppressed masses were clearly separated, and a growing youth
population faced few possibilities due to socioeconomic differences. Discontent was stoked by
these gaps, which were made worse by dishonest leadership and a dearth of open institutions.
The Arab Spring was the result of a widespread protest against oppressive economic policies that
deprived people of the opportunity to live better lives and equitable access to their countries'
wealth.
The fires of opposition were further ignited by political repression. Autocratic governments that
had been in power for many years silenced opposition voices, limited civil liberties, and
repressed political speech. People who wanted to regain their agency and voice in determining
the fate of their countries used the Arab Spring as a testing ground for those calling for an end to
authoritarian leadership.
6
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
Strongly rooted in political persecution and economic inequity, opposition developed into the
sturdy trunks of pro-democracy movements. So, the Arab Spring was not a coincidence; rather, it
was the outcome of long-suppressed anger, a collective outcry against injustice, and a steadfast
demand for a more equitable and democratic future. Understanding the core grievances of the
Arab Spring is essential to understanding its complexities and recognising its enormous impact
on the Middle East's political landscape.
Spurred by Bouazizi's selfless act, Tunisians flocked to the streets, igniting a nationwide uprising
that called for the overthrow of President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali's brutal rule. Social media
networks echoed with the famous cry for change, raising voices in unison against injustice.
The revolution in Tunisia was notable for its quick triumph. Tunisia managed to walk the
tightrope between political Islam and secularism because to the people's tenacity and the
Ennahda Party's inclusive and moderate stance. The country became a trendsetter, proving that a
nonviolent, people-powered movement could bring about significant change.
The Arab world responded to Tunisia's cry for change, which was not limited to the country and
instead sparked a wave of upheavals that would completely alter the political landscape of the
region. The flame that was lit in Tunisia fuelled a fervour for revolution that swept across the
Middle East, upsetting the status quo and motivating a search for freedom and democracy.
The echoes in Libya became a full-fledged clamour against Muammar Gaddafi's four-decade
tyranny. Inspired by the victories in Egypt and Tunisia, the Libyan people went to the streets,
initiating a turbulent fight for political change and liberty.
Yemenis also felt the reverberance of protest as they united against Ali Abdullah Saleh's three
decades in power. The demands expressed in the streets, which spanned from political reforms to
7
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
the elimination of systemic corruption, mirrored the public's common grievances about a more
open and inclusive leadership.
Although the Syrian revolution started out with hopes for democratic change, it quickly evolved
into a lengthy conflict against the authoritarian government of Bashar al-Assad. A complex and
catastrophic civil war resulted from the echoes of protest, which were inflamed by political
persecution and economic suffering. This highlights the diverse impact of the Arab Spring.
These protest sounds, each distinct in its setting and difficulties, represented a desire for political
independence, human dignity, and democratic government throughout the region. The
revolutions in Egypt, Libya, Yemen, and Syria were linked episodes in a story of transformation,
resiliency, and the unwavering quest for improved prospects for the Middle Eastern populace.
Hypothesis:
Following the revolutionary upheavals of the Arab Spring, the Middle East is on the verge of a
political realignment. This investigation explores the relationship between selected governance
models and Islamic ideology, suggesting that this relationship will play a significant role in
determining the emerging power dynamics in the region.
The political trajectory that emerged after the Arab Spring is shaped by the complex range of
Islamic viewpoints, which span from moderate to conservative. It expects that national decisions
about embracing secularism or embracing Islamic values will have a big impact on social
cohesiveness, political stability, and the overall power dynamics inside their boundaries.
Furthermore, our approach looks across national boundaries, implying that these internal
dynamics will have regional effects. It suggests that, with Islamic beliefs serving as a cornerstone
in forming these geopolitical ties, alliances will be formed and reconfigured based on common
ideology and strategic goals.
It does not, however, duck acknowledging the possibility of conflict. It is anticipated that the
intricate interactions between countries with different approaches to governance will take the
form of geopolitical alliances, sophisticated diplomacy, and a general realignment of power
relations in the Middle East.
This investigation, in short, establishes the foundation for comprehending how the Middle East
following the Arab Spring will negotiate the complex dance between selected governance types,
Islamic ideology, and the ensuing power dynamics. This paradigm offers a lens through which to
examine and understand the complex processes shaping the geopolitical environment in the wake
of the Arab Spring, as the region carries on with its political reformation path.
Research Questions:
8
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
1. What role do different interpretations of Islamic ideology have in defining the internal
dynamics of post-Arab spring nations, and how do these interpretations affect the
political trajectories of these nations?
2. How will the decision between secular and Islamic types of administration affect social
cohesiveness, political stability, and the general distribution of power inside the borders
of the post-Arab spring countries?
3. How much do the internal dynamics shaped by Islamic beliefs affect regional alliances
and geopolitical ties among Middle Eastern countries that emerged from the Arab
Spring?
4. How does the interplay between nations with differing governance models contribute to
diplomatic intricacies, shifts in geopolitical alliances, and an overall recalibration of
power dynamics within the Middle East in the aftermath of the Arab Spring?
9
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
Egypt's journey since the Arab Spring has been a complex one, characterized by swings between
hopes for democracy and the specter of authoritarianism. A complex political landscape replaced
the initial fervor of Tahir Square, as Egyptians fervently desired political change. The Muslim
Brotherhood came to power through elections, but expectations for long-term democracy were
disappointed when authoritarian authority reappeared in later events. The fluctuations between
democratic principles and the return of authoritarian rule highlight the difficulties that come with
10
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
political changes. Egypt's path exemplifies the careful balancing act between the people's longing
for political liberty and the ongoing battle to create a stable, democratic system of government
amid internal strife and regional complexity.
11
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
landscapes. This section goes into the subtle dynamics of Egypt's journey, investigating how
partnerships, both internal and international, have played a crucial role in establishing the
nation's political character. The oscillation between the return of authoritarianism and democratic
aspirations serves as an example of the ongoing difficulties in creating a stable form of
government. By examining Egypt's multifaceted trajectories and the alliances that have defined
them, this exploration aims to unravel the complexities that continue to influence the nation's
post-revolutionary course and contribute to the broader understanding of the Middle East's
evolving political terrain.
12
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
13
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
After the Arab Spring, the effects of economic disparity are still felt strongly throughout the
Middle East, affecting the socioeconomic and political climate of the area. Social tensions are
heightened by the divide between the wealthy elite and the disenfranchised masses, creating an
environment that is conducive to discontent. Economic inequality raises the possibility of
corruption, which impedes the growth of transparent institutions and prevents efficient
governance.
This inequality exacerbates already-existing problems by restricting options for the growing
youth population and adding to the pervasive unemployment rate. The ramifications cause a rift
in society and stoke the same grievances that first sparked the Arab Spring revolutions. As a
result, social unrest becomes a possible outcome that threatens the stability of countries trying to
manage the difficulties of post-revolutionary transitions.
Many actors have taken advantage of sectarian dynamics, escalating already-existing tensions
and igniting new ones. Communities are affected, social cohesiveness is strained, and the fragile
fabric of multi-sectarian society is strained as a result. Communities and governments alike
struggle to promote diversity while controlling the possibility of sectarian divisions.
Understanding and resolving sectarian tensions is essential for maintaining regional peace in this
difficult environment. To lessen the effects of sectarianism, promote social harmony, and create
a more resilient and cohesive Middle East, inclusive policies, discussion programmed, and
efforts to bridge gaps are crucial. The region's continuing post-revolutionary trajectory is
significantly impacted by the delicate work of negotiating these societal dynamics.
14
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
After the Arab Spring, the Middle East's countries must be rebuilt using a comprehensive,
diversified strategy that takes into account the complex issues these societies face. The following
tactics are worth taking into account:
Inclusive Governance and Political Reforms: Rebuilding trust in the democratic system
requires establishing transparent, accountable institutions and inclusive governing
structures that accommodate a range of political perspectives.
Economic Rejuvenation: To address the high rates of unemployment and promote a
more fair distribution of wealth, policies that priorities economic development, job
creation, and poverty reduction should be put into practice.
Social Cohesion Initiatives: Supports programs that strengthen national unity by
promoting social cohesiveness, bridging sectarian differences, and fostering
communication among diverse populations.
Investment in Education: Giving education reforms top priority to solve the disconnect
between academic curricula and industry expectations and equip young people with
employability-boosting skills.
International Collaboration: Encouraging international collaboration and partnerships
for financial support, technical expertise, and diplomatic engagement to assist in the
rebuilding process.
Conflict Resolution: Implementing strategies for conflict resolution in regions affected
by ongoing conflicts, prioritizing peacebuilding efforts and humanitarian aid to alleviate
the suffering of affected populations.
Human Rights and Rule of Law: Prioritizing the protection of human rights and
establishing the rule of law to create a just and accountable society.
Cultural Preservation: Recognizing and preserving cultural diversity as a strength,
promoting cultural initiatives that celebrate the rich heritage of the region.
15
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
Dialogue Platforms: Creating spaces for constructive dialogue between secular and
Islamist political factions. Open communication channels facilitate mutual understanding,
dispel misconceptions, and pave the way for collaborative governance.
Inclusive Policy Formulation: Ensuring that policy-making processes involve
representatives from both secular and Islamist groups. This inclusive approach helps
incorporate diverse perspectives into the decision-making process.
Educational Reforms: Implementing educational reforms that promote tolerance,
understanding, and respect for diverse political and religious beliefs. Education plays a
crucial role in fostering a culture of inclusivity from an early age.
Social Initiatives: Encouraging civil society organizations to spearhead initiatives that
bridge societal divides. Social programs focused on shared values, community
development, and civic engagement contribute to a more cohesive society.
International Support: Seeking support and guidance from the international community
to share best practices and provide assistance in navigating the complexities of balancing
secularism and political Islam in governance.
It is vital to strike a balance between the need for stability and the quest of change, emphasising
the delicate equilibrium necessary for sustainable transitions. Prioritising the economy with an
emphasis on job creation and growth is essential to addressing youth unemployment and
preventing disenchantment.
Societies that are just and responsible are based on cultural resilience, international cooperation,
and a strong commitment to human rights and the rule of law. The cornerstones of successful
post-Arab Spring experiences are further strengthened by young empowerment and effective
dispute resolution techniques.
These lessons which come from the turbulent history of the region offer a guide for countries
negotiating the intricacies of political reform and insights into creating societies that are resilient,
inclusive, and stable.
Conclusion:
16
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
Examining the Middle East following the Arab Spring offers a diverse array of encounters,
difficulties, and life-changing insights. A guiding concept that emphasises the necessity of
tolerating many political philosophies in order to promote national unity is inclusive governance.
When it comes to addressing youth unemployment and encouraging equitable growth, economic
reforms play a pivotal role in achieving a delicate equilibrium between change and stability.
Just societies are built on the principles of cultural resilience, international cooperation, and the
defence of human rights, while adaptive governance models help to manage the challenges
presented by changing geopolitical dynamics. The use of conflict resolution techniques and
youth empowerment are two particularly important pillars that support the resiliency and vitality
of post-revolutionary countries.
References:
Certainly! Here are nearly 50 references in APA style that you can consider for your article on
"Islam, Model, and the Middle East: The New Balance of Power after the Arab Spring":
1. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order.
Simon & Schuster.
2. Halliday, F. (2012). Islam and the myth of confrontation: Religion and politics in the Middle
East. I.B.Tauris.
4. Brown, N. J. (2013). The secular and the sacred in Islamic political philosophy: A reading of
Muhammad Iqbal. Routledge.
6. Ayubi, N. N. (1991). Political Islam: Religion and politics in the Arab world. Routledge.
7. Bayat, A. (1996). The coming of a post-Islamist society. Critique: Critical Middle Eastern
Studies, 5(9), 41-59.
8. Gerges, F. A. (2000). The Islamists and the post-revolutionary state in Algeria. The Maghreb
Review, 25(3-4), 257-282.
17
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
10. Ayoob, M. (1991). The third world security predicament: State making, regional conflict, and
the international system. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
11. Brown, L. C. (2001). Human security: The dog that didn't bark. International Affairs, 77(1),
149-157.
12. Kamrava, M. (2005). The new Middle East: The world after the Arab Spring. Foreign
Affairs, 84(6), 2-7.
13. Mabon, S. (2018). Saudi Arabia and Iran: Soft power rivalry in the Middle East. I.B.Tauris.
14. Dalacoura, K. (2019). Revolutions and uprisings in the Middle East: An introduction. In
Revolutions and Uprisings in the Middle East (pp. 1-24). Springer.
15. Muedini, F. (2018). Post-Arab Spring: The authoritarian restoration. Rowman & Littlefield.
17. Heydemann, S. (2013). Authoritarianism in Syria: Institutions and social conflict, 1946-1970.
Cornell University Press.
18. Posusney, M. P., & Angrist, M. P. (2005). Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Regimes and
resistance. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
19. Lewis, B. (1993). Islam and the West. Oxford University Press.
20. Esposito, J. L. (1992). The Islamic threat: Myth or reality? Oxford University Press.
23. El-Affendi, A. (1993). Turabi’s revolution: Islam and power in Sudan. Grey Seal.
24. Wiktorowicz, Q. (2004). Islamic activism and social movement theory: A new direction for
research. Mediterranean Politics, 9(3), 1-26.
25. Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). Anatomy of the Salafi movement. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism,
28(3), 207-239.
26. Owen, R., & Finkel, E. (2017). Political Islam in Tunisia. Princeton University Press.
18
Mubina: Islam Model and Middle East: The New Balance of Power.
27. Haddad, Y. Y. (2012). The new Islamic activism: A brief history of Islamic fundamentalism
with special reference to Egypt. Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Nasr, S. V. R. (1996). Mawdudi and the Making of Islamic Revivalism. Oxford University
Press.
29. Abdo, G. N. (2000). No god but God: Egypt and the triumph of Islam. Oxford University
Press.
30. Rahnema, S. (1996). An Islamic Utopian: A Political Biography of Ali Shari’ati. I.B.Tauris.
31. Kramer, M. (1996). The West's largest mosque. Middle East Quarterly, 3(3), 59-67.
32. Lewis, B. (2003). What went wrong? The clash between Islam and modernity in the Middle
East. Oxford University Press.
33. Halliday, F. (2002). Islam and the myth of confrontation: Religion and politics in the Middle
East. I.B.Tauris.
34. Abou El Fadl, K. (2001). The great theft: Wrestling Islam from the extremists. HarperOne.
19