Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.ajtr.org /ISSN:1943-8141/AJTR0124721
Original Article
Effects of early rehabilitation nursing intervention
on nerve function and daily living in
patients with stroke hemiplegia
Chunhua Yang1, Jingfei Zhao1, Hua Xie1, Hao Wang2, Xiaoting Liu1, Hua Liu3, Liang Liu4,5
Departments of 1Nursing, 2Neurosurgery, 3Neurology, 4Medical Institution, 5Stroke Center, Ningxiang People’s
Hospital, Ningxiang 410600, Hunan Province, China
Received October 22, 2020; Accepted December 15, 2020; Epub October 15, 2021; Published October 30, 2021
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effects of early rehabilitation nursing on the rehabilitation of stroke hemiplegia
patients. Methods: A total of 80 patients with stroke admitted to Ningxiang People’s Hospital were selected as the
research subjects for analysis. Among them, 40 patients received early rehabilitation nursing intervention after
admission and were enrolled in the observation group. The other 40 patients received only general nursing inter-
vention who were enrolled in the control group. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Ruminative
responses scale (RRS) were used to evaluate the nerve function of the two groups of patients before and after treat-
ment. Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment (FMA) was applied to evaluate their athletic ability, and activity of daily
living (ADL) score and Barthel index were utilized to evaluate their living ability. The adverse reactions and nursing
satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results: After treatment, NIHSS score and RRS score in the
observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). FMA score, ADL score and Barthel index
were higher in the observation group than those of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, NIHSS score and
RRS score were both lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), while FMA score, ADL score and Barthel index
were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions
between the two groups (P>0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the
control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Early rehabilitation nursing can effectively improve the nerve function, athletic
ability and living ability of stroke hemiplegia patients, which is worth popularizing in clinic.
Keywords: Early rehabilitation nursing, stroke hemiplegia, nerve function, living ability, athletic ability
ensure the standardization, continuity and diabetes, serious infection, serious heart dis-
effectiveness of rehabilitation nursing, help to ease, malignant hypertension, liver or kidney
improve the quality of life of patients, and insufficiency, hematopoietic system diseases,
enable patients to achieve the ultimate goal of psychosis, acquired immunodeficiency syn-
returning to family and society as soon as pos- drome, infectious diseases such as hepatitis
sible [10]. Although it has become a common and tuberculosis, acute abdominal issues,
clinical method to improve the treatment for acute peritonitis, abdominal cavity tumors and
better prognosis of patients through nursing extensive metastasis, or umbilical vein dilata-
intervention, the application effect of early tion caused by hepatosplenomegaly, patients
rehabilitation nursing in stroke hemiplegia has who had motor dysfunction in the past, such as
not been confirmed. If it can be demonstrated rheumatoid arthritis, joint deformity and neuro-
that early rehabilitation nursing can be applied muscular diseases which had a direct impact
to the recovery of stroke hemiplegia patients, a on limb motor function; patients who were com-
solid theoretical basis can be provided for the plicated with serious heart, liver or kidney sys-
clinical treatment of many neurological disor- tem diseases, malignant tumor or deep venous
ders, thus greatly reducing the risk of the dis- thrombosis of lower limbs. Criteria for patients
ease. In the face of increasingly high incidence being later excluded: After inclusion, patients
of stroke hemiplegia, finding reliable interven- that did not meet the inclusion criteria would be
tion measures as soon as possible is also an removed. Patients that did not meet the inclu-
extremely urgent clinical research hotspot. sion criteria due to various reasons or dropped
Hence, this study analyzed the impact of early out of the treatment were considered as lost
intervention nursing on the rehabilitation level from study cases. Termination criteria: In case
and quality of life of stroke patients with hemi- of a sudden change or deterioration of the dis-
plegia, hoping to provide reliable clinical guid- ease, serious complications or adverse reac-
ance for future clinical treatment. tions, or intolerance, the trial was terminated
immediately. Patients whose treatment exceed-
Materials and methods
ed three quarters of the total treatment dura-
Data of patients tion were included in the statistical analysis of
treatment efficacy.
This study was conducted with the approval of
Methods
the ethics Committee of our hospital. A total of
80 stroke patients admitted to Ningxiang
Observation group: 1. Establishment of multi-
People’s Hospital were selected as the research
disciplinary cooperation team: led by the
subjects for analysis. Among them, 40 patients
Nursing Department, a collaborative rehabilita-
received early rehabilitation nursing interven-
tion nursing team consisting of a rehabilitation
tion after admission that were enrolled in the
nurse practitioner, charge nurse, charge attend-
observation group. The other 40 patients
ing physician, rehabilitation therapist, psycho-
received only general nursing intervention who
logical counselor and dietary nutritionist, was
were enrolled in the control group. All patients
set up in the inpatient ward of the stroke unit
who were eventually enrolled in the study
of the hospital. Among them, a rehabilitation
signed an informed consent.
nurse practitioner was the team leader, and
Inclusion and exclusion criteria was responsible for the formulation of the team
work system, members’ responsibilities, com-
Inclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with munication, coordination and team manage-
stroke hemiplegia by transcranial brain CT or ment. 2. Early intervention time window of
MRI diagnosis; patients with mild to moderate rehabilitation: Patients with mild to moderate
stroke, showing no progression 24 hours after stroke received rehabilitation intervention 24
onset; patients with severe stroke who showed hours after onset. Patients with severe cerebral
stable vital signs, and their neurological impair- stroke received rehabilitation intervention on
ment was no longer advanced. Exclusion crite- the first day after their vital signs were stable
ria: pathients that did not meet the diagnostic and their neurological impairment no longer
criteria and inclusion criteria; patients who had progressed. 3. Establishment of early rehabili-
cognitive, mental or language disorders, severe tation nursing path and implementation of
rehabilitation center. The fourth task was for incidence of adverse reactions = number of
medical staff needed to do was to handover adverse reactions/total number × 100%. Nurs-
the patient. The fifth task was to complete the ing satisfaction: After treatment, a self-made
summary of discharge treatment. The sixth tasl questionnaire of our hospital was utilized for
was to make a record of course variation. evaluation, and the patients or their families
During the implementation of clinical rehabi- were allowed to score the nursing work. The
litation nursing path, the patient’s tolerance, total score of the questionnaire was 100 po-
progressive resistance training of muscles and ints, which were divided into four different
intensive training of interactive flexion and grades according to the total score: greatly sat-
extension muscles was paid attention to in isfied (not less than 90 points), satisfied (75-89
order to avoid overuse and misuse syndrome. points), generally satisfied (60-74 points) and
Control group: 1. Treatment mode: Charge dissatisfied (less than 60 points). Nursing
nurses followed the doctor’s advice to imple- satisfaction = (number of satisfied + number of
ment various treatment and nursing measures. great satisfied)/total number of cases × 100%.
2. Rehabilitation intervention time window:
During the convalescence period of patients Statistical methods
with stable vital signs and no further progress.
3. General rehabilitation nursing: Nurses fol- SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used to
lowed the doctor’s advice to monitor their con- analyze the data, and the difference was statis-
sciousness, pupils and vital signs of stroke tically significant when P<0.05. Chi-square test
hemiplegic patients, with diet guidance, medi- was used to compare the counting data such
cation, skin condition management and related as gender and incidence of adverse reactions.
complications management. The measurement data such as age and NIHSS
score were compared by independent sample t
Outcome measures test. Paired t test was used for comparison
before and after treatment in the same group.
Nerve function: Before and after treatment,
the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Results
(NIHSS) and Ruminative responses scale (RRS,
22-88 points in total, the results were divided Baseline data
into four different grades according to the
total score, with low level of 22-43 points, The general data of the two groups was com-
medium level of 44-65 points, and high level of pared, such as age, BMI, fasting blood glucose,
66-88 points) were used for the evaluation of serum creatinine, total cholesterol, triglycer-
nerve function of the two groups of patients. ides, gender, living environment, smoking and
Higher NIHSS score indicated more serious drinking, and there was no statistical difference
neurological deficit of patients, and higher RRS (P>0.05), suggesting that the two groups were
score indicated more serious rumination of comparable (Table 1).
patients. Motor function: Before and after treat- Comparison of nerve function
ment, the simplified Fugl-Meyer motor func-
tion assessment (FMA) was applied for the Comparison of nerve function between the two
evaluation of motor ability of the patients in the groups showed no difference in NIHSS score
two groups. The higher the FMA score was, and RRS score before treatment, and the two
the better the patient’s motor state was. Activity scores in the observation group were lower
of Daily Living (ADL) score and Barthel index than those in the control group after treatment
were utilized for patients’ living ability assess- (P<0.05). Besides, the two scores after treat-
ment before and after treatment. The ADL ment were both lower than those before treat-
score was positively correlated with the self- ment (P<0.05), as shown in Figure 1.
care ability of patients, and Barthel index was
negatively correlated with self-care ability of Comparison of motor function
patients. Adverse reactions: adverse events
such as joint pain, tendon joint injury, muscle By comparing the motor function between the
spasms and elevated blood pressure caused two groups, it was seen that there was no dif-
by drugs and rehabilitation training during reha- ference in FMA score between the two groups
bilitation treatment were recorded, and the before treatment, and the FMA score in the
Figure 1. Comparison of NIHSS score and RRS score before and after treatment. A. Comparison of NIHSS scores
before and after treatment between the two groups. B. Comparison of rumination scores before and after treatment
between the two groups. *represents the comparison with that of the same group before treatment, #represents
comparison with the observation group after treatment, P<0.05.
Figure 3. Comparison of living ability between two groups before and after treatment. A. Comparison of ADL scores
before and after treatment between the two groups. B. Comparison of Barthel index before and after treatment
between the two groups. *represents the comparison with that of the same group before treatment, #represents
comparison with the observation group after treatment, P<0.05.
Table 2. Comparison of adverse reactions between the two their families can ensure the
groups [n (%)] continuity and effectiveness of
Observation Control
rehabilitation nursing and bet-
χ2 p ter meet the needs of patients.
group (n=40) group (n=40)
In addition, we found no differ-
Joint pain 2 (5.00) 0 (0.00)
ence between the two groups
Muscle spasm 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
in the adverse reactions during
Elevation of blood pressure 1 (2.50) 3 (7.50) the intervention, suggesting
Drug allergy 1 (2.50) 1 (2.50) the feasibility of early rehabili-
Infectious diseases 0 (0.00) 3 (7.50) 0.949 0.330 tation nursing for stroke hemi-
Total incidence rate 10.00% 17.50% plegia patients. However, it
might also result from the small
number of subjects included in
this study and the contingency in statistical
analysis. Finally, we investigated the nursing
satisfaction of the two groups of patients, and
found that the nursing satisfaction of the
observation group was significantly higher than
that of the control group. On the one hand, the
patient’s condition was better improved after
early rehabilitation nursing, and on the other
hand, early rehabilitation nursing paid more
attention to the communication between doc-
tors and patients, which reduced patients’ fear
and resistance to hospitals and medical staff,
and improved the doctor-patient relationship
and patients’ trust in hospitals.
systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil [17] Halland M, Pandolfino J and Barba E. Diagno-
2018; 99: 1011-1022, e1011. sis and treatment of rumination syndrome.
[13] Lautenschläger S, Muser J and Müller E; und Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1549-
weitere Mitglieder der Arbeitsgruppe. Applica- 1555.
bility of the therapeutic nursing theory in neu- [18] Sirota NA, Moskovchenko DV, Yaltonsky VM,
rological (early-) rehabilitation into nursing Makarova IA and Yaltonskaya AV. Cognitive
practice-a case study. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) therapy of depressive rumination. Zh Nevrol
2018; 57: 100-107. Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2019; 119: 62-68.
[14] Højskov IE, Moons P, Egerod I, Olsen PS, Thy- [19] Kobylanska M, Kowalska J, Neustein J, Mazur-
gesen LC, Hansen NV, La Cour S, Bech KH, Bor- ek J, Wojcik B, Belza M, Cichosz M and Szcze-
regaard B, Gluud C, Winkel P, Lindschou J and panska-Gieracha J. The role of biopsychosocial
Kikkenborg Berg S. Early physical and psycho- factors in the rehabilitation process of individ-
educational rehabilitation in patients with cor- uals with a stroke. Work 2018; 61: 523-535.
onary artery bypass grafting: a randomized [20] Sosnowski K, Lin F, Mitchell ML and White H.
controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 136- Early rehabilitation in the intensive care unit:
143. an integrative literature review. Aust Crit Care
[15] Chen Y, Zhou H, Jin T, Ye T and Xie W. Clinical 2015; 28: 216-225.
observation of the phased acupuncture for [21] Pohl M and Bertram M. Efficacy of early ne-
ischemic stroke hemiplegia. Zhongguo Zhen urological and neurosurgical rehabilitation:
Jiu 2018; 38: 1027-1034. evidence-based treatment, outcome and
[16] Ubogu EE. Biology of the human blood-nerve prognostic factors. Nervenarzt 2016; 87:
barrier in health and disease. Exp Neurol 1043-1050.
2020; 328: 113272.