Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organometallic Chemistry
(Structure, Reactivity, and Mechanisms)
Kiev-KPI-2023
2
Carbonylation: Chemistry Organic
Synthesis and Technology
3
Introduction to Carbon Monoxide (CO): Preparation
• Burning elemental carbon in restricted supply of oxygen gas
heat
C + O2 CO
• Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis;
• Hydroformylation;
• Production of Acetic Acid
Catalyst
H2 + CO CnHm + H2O
• Discovered in 1922
• Commercialized in 1928
• Heterogeneous catalysis
Fe and Co catalysts
• 200-300 oC and 10-60 bar
• Highly exothermic
• 6.5 Mt / yr by 1944 Prof. Franz Fischer Dr. Hans Tropsch
• Used as synthetic lubricants and
synthetic diesel/jet fuels
Housecroft and Sharpe. Inorganic Chemistry. Prentice Hall: England 2001. 5
9
Methanol Carbonylation
(Production of Acetic Acid)
11
CH3OH + CO CH3COOH
R.T. Eby, T.C. Singleton, in: B.E. Leach (Ed.), Applied Industrial Catalysts, vol. 1, Academic Press, 1983, p. 275;
N. von Kutepow, W. Himmele, H. Hohenschutz, Chem. Ing. Technol. 37 (1965) 297.
12
The Cobalt-based BASF Process
The first methanol-to-acetic acid carbonylation process was
commercialized in 1960 by BASF
It used an iodide-promoted cobalt catalyst and required very high pressures (600 atm) as well as high
temperatures (230oC), but gave acetic acid in ca. 90% selectivity. By-products are methane,
acetaldehyde, ethanol and ethers
R.T. Eby, T.C. Singleton, in: B.E. Leach (Ed.), Applied Industrial Catalysts, vol. 1, Academic Press, 1983, p. 275;
N. von Kutepow, W. Himmele, H. Hohenschutz, Chem. Ing. Technol. 37 (1965) 297.
13
Catalytic Cycle of the Cobalt-catalyzed Methanol
Carbonylation (BASF process)
F.E. Paulik, A. Hershman, W.R. Knox, J.F. Roth, Chem. Abstr. 72 (1970)
110807y; J.S. Kanel, S.J. Okrasinski, US Patent to Eastman (1999)
5900504. R.F. Heck, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85 (1963) 2013.
15
The Rhodium-based Monsanto Process
R.T. Eby, T.C. Singleton, in: B.E. Leach (Ed.), Applied Industrial Catalysts, vol. 1, Academic
Press, 1983, p. 275; N. von Kutepow, W. Himmele, H. Hohenschutz, Chem. Ing. Technol. 37
(1965) 297.
16
Catalytic Cycle of the Rhodium-catalyzed Methanol
Carbonylation (Monsanto process)
This occurs in parts of the plant where the CO pressure is lower, such as in the flash tank
and recycle loop. Water promotes reduction of the Rh(III) complex into the active Rh(I) form
via the water-gas shift reaction, and helps to minimize the proportion of the catalyst existing
as the problematic [Rh(CO)2I4]- , thus reducing precipitation.
R.T. Eby, T.C. Singleton, in: B.E. Leach (Ed.), Applied Industrial Catalysts, vol. 1, Academic Press, 1983, p. 275;
19
The iridium-based Cativa process
The production of acetic acid using the iridium catalyst system has been
commercialized in 1996 by BP-Amoco as the ‘Cativa TM ’ process
[Ir(CO)2I4] + CO [Ir(CO)3I3] + I
One of the major advantages of the iridium-based process was
the high stability of the iridium catalyst species
Although much more iridium is required to achieve an activity comparable to the rhodium
catalyst-based processes, the catalyst system is able to operate at reduced water levels (less
than 8 wt.% for the Cativa process versus 14-15 wt.% for the conventional Monsanto process)
D. Forster, Adv. Organometal. Chem. 17 (1979) 255. G.J. Sunley, D.J. Watson, Catal. Today 58 (2000) 293; J.H. Jones, Platinum Metal
Rev. 44 (2000) 94. K.E. Clode, D.J. Watson, C.J.E. Vercauteren, European Patent to BP Chemicals (1994) 616997.
20
Catalytic Cycle of the Iridium-catalyzed Methanol
Carbonylation (Cativa process)
J. Rankin, A.D. Poole, A.C. Benyei, D.J. Cole-Hamilton, Chem. Commun. 19 (1997) 1835. J. Rankin, A.C.
Benyei, A.D. Poole, D.J. Cole-Hamilton, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (1999) 3771.
23
Phosphine Ligands
The most important class of these rhodium complexes are those containing
simple phosphine ligands such as PEt3
CH3 C(O)CH3
OC PEt3 OC PEt3 OC PEt3
Rh Rh Rh
I PEt3 I PEt3 I PEt3
I I
In 1997, Ranking and coworkers reported a PEt3-rhodium-modified system, and when
employing this basic phosphine, the rate of oxidative addition of MeI to [RhI(CO)(PEt3)2]
is around 47 times higher than that reported for Monsanto catalyst at 25oC.
J. Rankin, A.D. Poole, A.C. Benyei, D.J. Cole-Hamilton, Chem. Commun. 19 (1997) 1835. J. Rankin, A.C.
Benyei, A.D. Poole, D.J. Cole-Hamilton, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (1999) 3771.
24
S. Burger, B. Therrien, G. Süss-Fink, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2005, 88, 478–486. C.M. Thomas, G. Süss-Fink, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2003, 243, 125–142. C.M. Thomas, R. Mafia, B. Therrien, E. Rusanov, H. Stœckli-Evans, G. Süss-
Fink, Chem. Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3343–3352.
Comparison of Process Parameters for Methanol 28
Carbonylation Process
BASF (Co) Monsanto (Rh) Cativa (Ir)
1960 1970 1995
Metal concentration, 10-1 10-3 10-4
mole/liter of metal
Temperature, oC 250 150-200 180
Pressure (atm) 500-700 30-60 30-40
Selectivity (%) based on
Methanol
CO 90 99 99,5
70 90 94
Byproducts CH4, CO2, EtOH, MeCHO, CH4, CO2, H2, EtCOOH traces
EtCOOH
29
Synthesis of Acetic Anhydride
In many applications acetic acid is used as the anhydride and the synthesis of the latter is
therefore equally important. In the 1970’s Halcon (now Eastman) and Hoechst (now Celanese)
developed a process for the conversion of methylacetate and carbon monoxide to acetic
anhydride. The process has been on stream since 1983 and with an annual production of several
100,000 tons, together with some 10–20% acetic acid. The reaction is carried out under similar
conditions as the Monsanto process, and also uses methyl iodide as the "activator" for the methyl
group
Dekleva, T. W.; Forster, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1985, 107, 3565. Forster, D.; Dekleva, T. W. J. Chem. Educ., 1986, 63,
204.
32
O
R5 R6
CO (gas) R1 C C
R1 C C R2 + R3 C C R
C R6 Co2(CO)8 catalyst 5
C C R
R4 4
R2 R3
This implies the formation of three new bonds and one or two cycles in the
intermolecular or intramolecular versions, respectively
W. J. Kerr, M. McLaughlin, P. L. Pauson and S. M. Robertson, J. Organomet. Chem., 2001, 630, 104.
36
One of the first examples of the CPKR employing a
continuous supply of ethyne (Pauson and co-workers)
I. U. Khand, G. R. Knox, P. L. Pauson, W. E. Watts, J. Chem. Soc. D, 1971, 36. I. U. Khand, G. R. Knox, P. L.
Pauson, W. E. Watts, M. I. Foreman, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 1973, 977.
Tuning the Reaction Conditions 37
V. Rautenstrauch, P. Megard, J. Conesa, W. Kuster, Angew. Chem. 1990, 102, 1441; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 1413.
D. B. Belanger, D. J. R. O. 'Mahony, T. Livinghouse, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7637. B. L. Pagenkopf, D. B. Belanger, D. J. R. O’Mahony, T.
Livinghouse, Synthesis, 2000, 7, 1009.
38
Generation of Cobalt(0) In Situ
Problems associated with the very labile [Co2(CO)8] have led to the
development of catalytic variants of the reaction that generate the active
catalyst in situ from Co(I) or Co(II) precursors
B. Y. Lee, Y. K. Chung, N. Jeong, Y. Lee, S. H. Hwang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 8793.
More Stable Sources of 39
D. B. Belanger, T. Livinghouse, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7641. M. E. Krafft, C. Hirosawa, L. V. R. Bonaga,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 9177. T. Sugihara, M. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10782; T. Sugihara, M.
Yamaguchi, M. Nishizawa, Chem. Eur. J., 2001, 7, 1589.
Mechanism of the Pauson–Khand Reaction 40
S. C. Berk, R. B. Grossman, S. L.
Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
4912; S. C. Berk, R. B. Grossman, S. L.
Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
8593. F. A. Hicks, S. C. Berk, S. L.
Buchwald, J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2713.
F. A. Hicks, N. M. Kablaoui, S. L.
Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
9450; F. A. Hicks, N. M. Kablaoui, S. L.
Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
5881.
Towards Different Metals 42
Rhutenium
The [Ru3(CO)12]-catalyzed PKR (Murai and co-workers and Mitsudo
and co-workers)
Rhodium
Rhodium-catalyzed PKR (Narasaka and co-workers). Note that this
example employs an electron-deficient alkyne
T. Kobayashi, Y. Koga, K.
Narasaka, J. Organomet. Chem.
2001, 624, 73
44
Substrate Compatibility
1. The PKR of enynes with terminal alkyne groups is more favorable under Co or Rh
catalysis than under Ti catalysis. Enynes with disubstituted alkyne groups are
annelated better by Ti and Rh systems than by Co, Ru, and Ir systems.
2. Enynes with a disubstituted alkyne group and a substituted alkene function react
well with Ti-based catalysts, but give poorer results with Co, Rh, and Ru catalysts
3. Oxygen-containing enynes cyclize well in the presence of Ti-, Rh-, and Ru-based
systems, but not with Co catalysts
4. Nitrogen-containing enynes react well under Rh and Ru catalysis, but not under Ti
and Ir catalysis
5. As a general trend, polar functionalities are tolerated better by late-transition-metal
complexes (cobalt and rhodium) than by titanium complexes.
6. Enynes containing electron-withdrawing groups, either on the alkyne or on the
alkene moiety, have been successfully cyclized only by Rh complexes under a
particular set of conditions.
7. Intermolecular substrates have only really been examined with Co systems; in
these cases, they show greater limitations than intramolecular substrates.
45