Revision

FORM OF REVISION
In the High Court of Delhi (Under its revisional jurisdiction) Civil Revision
No. ________
Name and particulars of party ……….petition/Defendant……….
Vs.
Name and particulars of party ……….Respondent/plaintiff……….
Revision under sec.115 of the code of civil procedure against the impugned
order passed by it District, Judge of ………….. on date …………..
………….. in suit No. …………..
The petitioner submits as follows :
1. The respondent had instituted suit bearing No. ………….. in the court of
District judge, Delhi. The courts decreed the said suit of the respondent
on………….. and order the petitioner to execute the decree the
respondent.
2. the petition being aggrieved by the said decree and judgment prefers this
application an the following among other ground:
a. That the decree and judgment passed by the learned judge is illegal and
inoperative. b. That the learned judge has erred in law by passing the said
decree on the grounds of c. That the Id. Judge erred in law by not
appreciating the petitioner's application for producing material document.
d. That in doing so, the learned. Judge in the exercise of the jurisdiction
has acted with an illegality and a material irregularity.
e. The said judgment and decree is against justice, equity and good
conscience; and hence not
sustainable in this court.
3. In the aforesaid circumstances, the applicant submits that the Hon'ble
court be pleased to call for the records of the trial court and revise its
judgment and decree its judgment and decree in the interest of justice.
Dated: Sd/-
Place: advocate for the petitioner.
If a court tries a suit for which it has no jurisdiction to try having regard to its
local limit, or the subject matter
thereof, it is an exercise of a jurisdiction not vested in it by law. Like wise,
where a court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit, or to execute a decree, or
to review its judgment, but refuses to do so on the ground that it has no
jurisdiction, it is a case of failure to exercise jurisdiction vested in it by law.
Similarly, it is an illegality, or a material irregularity in the exercise of
jurisdiction vested in a court, if it passes a decree on order against a
person without hearing him at all.