Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background: Antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid reduce operative blood loss and blood product transfusion re-
quirements in patients undergoing surgical correction of scoliosis. The factors involved in the unrelenting coagulopathy
seen in scoliosis surgery are not well understood. One potential contributor is activation of the fibrinolytic system during a
surgical procedure, likely related to clot dissolution and consumption of fibrinogen. The addition of tranexamic acid
during a surgical procedure may mitigate the coagulopathy by impeding the derangement in D-dimer and fibrinogen
kinetics.
Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who had undergone surgical correction of adult spinal de-
formity between January 2010 and July 2016 at our institution. Intraoperative hemostatic data, surgical time, estimated
blood loss, and transfusion records were analyzed for patients before and after the addition of tranexamic acid to our
protocol. Each patient who received tranexamic acid and met inclusion criteria was cohort-matched with a patient who
underwent a surgical procedure without tranexamic acid administration.
Results: There were 17 patients in the tranexamic acid cohort, with a mean age of 60.7 years, and 17 patients in the
control cohort, with a mean age of 60.9 years. Estimated blood loss (932 ± 539 mL compared with 1,800 ± 1,029 mL; p =
0.005) and packed red blood-cell transfusions (1.5 ± 1.6 units compared with 4.0 ± 2.1 units; p = 0.001) were
significantly lower in the tranexamic acid cohort. In all single-stage surgical procedures that met inclusion criteria, the rise
of D-dimer was attenuated from 8.3 ± 5.0 mg/mL in the control cohort to 3.3 ± 3.2 mg/mL for the tranexamic acid cohort
(p < 0.001). The consumption of fibrinogen was 98.4 ± 42.6 mg/dL in the control cohort but was reduced in the
tranexamic acid cohort to 60.6 ± 35.1 mg/dL (p = 0.004).
Conclusions: In patients undergoing spinal surgery, intravenous administration of tranexamic acid is effective at re-
ducing intraoperative blood loss. Monitoring of D-dimer and fibrinogen during spinal surgery suggests that tranexamic acid
impedes the fibrinolytic pathway by decreasing consumption of fibrinogen and clot dissolution as evidenced by the
reduced formation of D-dimer.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
C
omplications in adult spinal deformity surgery range as sustained during a corrective spinal fusion for idiopathic sco-
high as 80% in some series1-6, and intraoperative blood liosis7-12, and, more recently, with adult spinal deformity as
loss remains one of the largest contributing factors. The well13,14, particularly with the use of pedicle subtraction oste-
surgical literature contains several reports that document blood otomy. In 1 large series, 10.2% of intraoperative adverse events
loss exceeding a patient’s baseline total estimated blood volume occurred in cases in which estimated blood loss exceeded 5 L13.
Disclosure: There was no source of external funding for this study. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online
version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/E657).
TABLE I Patient Characteristics for Single-Stage Adult Deformity Surgery with and without Tranexamic Acid
No. of patients* 57 18
Male sex* 10 (17.5%) 3 (16.7%) >0.99
Age† (yr) 64.0 ± 13 61.4 ± 15 0.52
Surgical time† (min) 365 ± 60 363 ± 64 0.81
No. of levels fused† 8.9 ± 2.2 11 ± 3.2 0.002
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy* 3 5
Length of stay† (days) 7.6 ± 4.6 8.4 ± 5.1 0.51
BMI† (kg/m2) 27.9 ± 5.3 27.5 ± 6.5 0.76
Deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism* 3 1 >0.99
ASA score† 2.5 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.7 0.17
*The values are given as the number of patients, with or without the percentage in parentheses. †The values are given as the mean and the
standard deviation.
is utilized, the estimated blood loss from the Cell Saver was underwent this procedure without tranexamic acid adminis-
calculated as previously described43. In April 2015, our team tration. Cohort matching was based on the following clinically
added intraoperative tranexamic acid to our standardized pro- relevant confounders: number of spine levels fused (within 3
tocol, with a bolus preoperative dose of 10 mg/kg followed by an levels), BMI (within 5 kg/m2 on the BMI scale), and age (within
intraoperative infusion at a rate of 1 mg/kg/hr. 5 years) at the time of procedure. Comparisons of the resultant
estimated blood loss, units of packed red blood cells transfused,
Statistical Analysis and units of thawed plasma transfused were performed using
All variables were reported as the mean and the standard case-control matching and the paired t test for continuous
deviation, and univariate analysis was performed using the variables, and significance was set at p £ 0.05. The time course
Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with significance defined as p £ 0.05. of the change in hematological parameters was plotted for all
To account for confounding variables, we statistically matched eligible cases before and after administration of tranexamic
patients who received tranexamic acid during a single-stage acid. Both STATA/IC version 13.1 for Windows (StataCorp)
adult spinal deformity surgical procedure with those who and SPSS Statistics 23 (IBM) were used for statistical analysis.
TABLE II Cohort-Matched Transfusion Data for Single-Stage Adult Deformity Surgery with and without Tranexamic Acid
No. of patients 17 17
Male sex* 1 (5.9%) 3 (17.7%) 0.601
Age† (yr) 60.9 ± 14.1 60.7 ± 15.7 0.840
Surgical time† (min) 376.7 ± 56.8 363.8 ± 67.3 0.487
No. of levels fused† 10.5 ± 3.0 10.8 ± 3.2 0.111
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy* 0 4
Length of stay† (days) 8.2 ± 6.0 8.2 ± 5.1 0.973
BMI† (kg/m2) 30.2 ± 4.4 27.8 ± 6.5 0.058
ASA score† 2.4 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.7 0.496
Estimated blood loss† (mL) 1,800.0 ± 1,029.3 932.35 ± 539.4 0.005
Packed red blood cells† (units) 4.00 ± 2.1 1.53 ± 1.6 0.001
Thawed plasma† (units) 3.71 ± 2.1 1.41 ± 1.8 0.001
*The values are given as the number of patients, with or without the percentage in parentheses. †The values are given as the mean and the
standard deviation.
761
TH E JO U R NA L O F B O N E & JO I N T SU RG E RY J B J S . O RG
d
T R A N E X A M I C A C I D E F F E C T O N B L O O D L O S S , D-D I M E R , AND
V O LU M E 100 -A N U M B E R 9 M AY 2, 2 018
d d
F I B R I N O G E N I N S P I N A L D E F O R M I T Y S U R G E RY
Fig. 2 Fig. 3
Fig. 2 Kinetics of platelets during the surgical course of a single-stage procedure without and with tranexamic acid (TXA). Error bars indicate the standard
error. Fig. 3 Kinetics of fibrinogen during the surgical course of a single-stage procedure without and with tranexamic acid (TXA). Error bars indicate the
standard error.
Results 60.7 ± 15.7 years). The addition of tranexamic acid decreased the
total estimated blood loss from 1,800 ± 1,029 mL in the control
O f 312 consecutive surgical procedures screened, 237 pa-
tients were excluded on the basis of our inclusion criteria,
allowing 75 surgical procedures for final analysis (Fig. 1). These
cohort to 932 ± 539 mL in the tranexamic acid cohort (p =
0.005). The reduction in estimated blood loss was mirrored by a
were completed in a single stage, with 18 patients (24%) receiving reduction in blood component transfusion, as the packed red
tranexamic acid and the remaining 57 (76%) undergoing a sur- blood-cell transfusions were 4.0 ± 2.1 units of blood in the
gical procedure without tranexamic acid administration. Patient control cohort and 1.5 ± 1.6 units of blood in the tranexamic
characteristics for all eligible cases are presented in Table I. In all acid cohort (p = 0.001). Thawed plasma transfusion saw a
single-stage surgical procedures, no significant differences were similar reduction, with 3.7 ± 2.1 units in the control cohort and
seen in age, sex, or surgical time when comparing patients with 1.4 ± 1.8 units in the tranexamic acid cohort (p = 0.001) (Table
and without intravenous tranexamic acid. II). These results further validated our initial findings presented
To account for clinically relevant confounding variables, in Table I.
17 patients (14 female patients and 3 male patients) who un- Hemostatic parameters were monitored during the sur-
derwent single-stage adult spinal deformity surgery were gical procedure. However, for 46 patients, hemostatic param-
matched with 17 patients who underwent this procedure with- eters were not captured because of shorter surgical time. Patient
out tranexamic acid (16 female patients and 1 male patient) characteristics for this group can be seen in the Appendix.
(Table II). The control cohort, compared with the study cohort, Measures of the INR to evaluate for coagulopathy showed
had a similar number of levels of fusion (10.5 ± 3.0 compared no difference with and without tranexamic acid administration,
with 10.8 ± 3.2 levels), surgical time (376.7 ± 56.8 compared with an INR at incision of 1.1 ± 0.08 in the tranexamic acid cohort
with 363.8 ± 67.3 minutes), and age (60.9 ± 14.1 compared with compared with 1.1 ± 0.06 (p = 0.7) in the control cohort and an
TABLE III Hemostatic Parameters During a Single-Stage Surgical Procedure with and without Tranexamic Acid*
*The values are given as the mean and the standard deviation.
762
TH E JO U R NA L O F B O N E & JO I N T SU RG E RY J B J S . O RG
d
T R A N E X A M I C A C I D E F F E C T O N B L O O D L O S S , D-D I M E R , AND
V O LU M E 100 -A N U M B E R 9 M AY 2, 2 018
d d
F I B R I N O G E N I N S P I N A L D E F O R M I T Y S U R G E RY
the team might consider staging the procedure, allowing the blood loss during a surgical procedure on a whiteboard in the
hemostatic system to recover, and then returning to the oper- operating room to summarize the physiologic state and help to
ating room at a future time. This use of the D-dimer cascade drive clinical decision-making; however, these data were un-
and its time course will require more study before such clinical available for review, as they are not routinely archived.
algorithms can be stated explicitly, but these initial data Despite these limitations, the results presented here are
suggest a promising approach. However, one confounder to novel in demonstrating the time course and magnitude of D-
this measure is the attenuation of the D-dimer cascade when dimer elevation during complex spine surgery. Activation of
operating with tranexamic acid present, as the reduction in the plasmin and subsequent clot lysis and generation of D-dimer
slope of the D-dimer rise may prevent the ability to determine are tempered by tranexamic acid and are associated with de-
the inflection point at which a DIC-like state has begun. creased estimated blood loss during these complex procedures.
Measuring the substrates of clotting, including fibrinogen Although the utility of monitoring D-dimer may be reduced
and platelets, in the presence or absence of tranexamic acid allows when using tranexamic acid, a knowledge of fibrinolytic
examination of the upstream effects that tranexamic acid had pathways and kinetics may allow us to provide more appro-
on the coagulation system. When tranexamic acid was utilized, the priate care for these difficult and high-blood-loss surgical
decrease in platelets was diminished, reaching significance in the procedures.
first stage of 2-stage surgical procedures. More impressive was
the reduction in fibrinogen, which was lessened in all of our groups Appendix
when tranexamic acid was added, indicating that less substrate A table showing patient characteristics for patients un-
was utilized to make a clot in the presence of the antifibrinolytic. dergoing adult spinal deformity surgery excluded because
INR, as a functional measure of substrates for coagulation, did of missing D-dimer or fibrinogen values is available with the
not demonstrate any changes in any of our groups, suggesting that online version of this article as a data supplement at jbjs.org
adequate coagulation factors were present in both surgical pro- (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/E658). n
cedures with and without tranexamic acid.
Our study had several limitations. Our retrospective
study design, with the addition of tranexamic acid in 2015
delineating our 2 populations, could have led to a time bias, as Ryan P. Pong, MD1
other parts of the surgical procedure may have evolved over Jean-Christophe A. Leveque, MD1
time, which could have altered the surgical course and blood Alicia Edwards, MBA2
loss. This date coincided with the increased utilization of ex- Vijay Yanamadala, MD3
treme lateral interbody fusion. We attempted to limit the effect Anna K. Wright, PhD1
of the ever-evolving surgical technique by removing staged Megan Herodes, BS, CSP1
Rajiv K. Sethi, MD1
procedures from our study, introducing a more even distri-
bution of patients treated with pedicle subtraction osteotomy 1Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
in the single-stage group, and controlling for surgical time in a
matched cohort analysis. Our responses to the change in D- 2ChicagoMedical School, Rosalind Franklin University,
dimer were also not fully standardized over time in terms of North Chicago, Illinois
transfusion of blood products. Patients typically underwent 3Department
transfusion on the basis of total estimated blood loss during the of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Boston, Massachusetts
surgical procedure, but, to characterize this more effectively,
more discrimination in our data as to the hourly blood loss that E-mail address for R.P. Pong: ryan.pong@virginiamason.org
was associated with the elevation in D-dimer would have been
useful. We do chart real-time hourly laboratory values and ORCID iD for R.P. Pong: 0000-0003-2459-0677
References
1. Barrey C, Perrin G, Michel F, Vital JM, Obeid I. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in 6. Uribe JS, Deukmedjian AR, Mummaneni PV, Fu KM, Mundis GM Jr, Okonkwo DO,
the lumbar spine: indications, technical aspects, results and complications. Eur J Kanter AS, Eastlack R, Wang MY, Anand N, Fessler RG, La Marca F, Park P, Lafage V,
Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Jul;24(Suppl 1):S21-30. Epub 2014 May 7. Deviren V, Bess S, Shaffrey CI; International Spine Study Group. Complications in
2. Berjano P, Bassani R, Casero G, Sinigaglia A, Cecchinato R, Lamartina C. Failures adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open
and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure. surgical techniques. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May;36(5):E15.
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(Suppl 6):S853-8. Epub 2013 Sep 24. 7. Guay J, Haig M, Lortie L, Guertin MC, Poitras B. Predicting blood loss in surgery for
3. Daubs MD, Brodke DS, Annis P, Lawrence BD. Perioperative complications of pedicle idiopathic scoliosis. Can J Anaesth. 1994 Sep;41(9):775-81.
subtraction osteotomy. Global Spine J. 2016 Nov;6(7):630-5. Epub 2015 Dec 15. 8. Guay J, Reinberg C, Poitras B, David M, Mathews S, Lortie L, Rivard GE. A trial of
4. Dickson DD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Koester LA. Risk factors for and assessment of desmopressin to reduce blood loss in patients undergoing spinal fusion for idio-
symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal pathic scoliosis. Anesth Analg. 1992 Sep;75(3):405-10.
deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 1;39(15):1190-5. 9. Kim YH, Li R. Minimizing blood loss in major spinal surgery: a review of the current
5. Ames CP, Barry JJ, Keshavarzi S, Dede O, Weber MH, Deviren V. Perioperative literature. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Dec;39(12):E130-4.
outcomes and complications of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in cases with single 10. Phillips WA, Hensinger RN. Control of blood loss during scoliosis surgery. Clin
versus two attending surgeons. Spine Deform. 2013 Jan;1(1):51-8. Epub 2013 Jan 3. Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Apr;229:88-93.
764
TH E JO U R NA L O F B O N E & JO I N T SU RG E RY J B J S . O RG
d
T R A N E X A M I C A C I D E F F E C T O N B L O O D L O S S , D-D I M E R , AND
V O LU M E 100 -A N U M B E R 9 M AY 2, 2 018
d d
F I B R I N O G E N I N S P I N A L D E F O R M I T Y S U R G E RY
11. Raphael BG, Lackner H, Engler GL. Disseminated intravascular coagulation 30. MacGillivray RG, Tarabichi SB, Hawari MF, Raoof NT. Tranexamic acid to reduce
during surgery for scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Jan-Feb;162:41-6. blood loss after bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized double
12. Udén A, Nilsson IM, Willner S. Collagen-induced platelet aggregation and blind study. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jan;26(1):24-8. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
bleeding time in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980 Oct;51 31. Maniar RN, Kumar G, Singhi T, Nayak RM, Maniar PR. Most effective regimen
(5):773-7. of tranexamic acid in knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study
13. Rampersaud YR, Moro ER, Neary MA, White K, Lewis SJ, Massicotte EM, in 240 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep;470(9):2605-12. Epub 2012
Fehlings MG. Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications Mar 15.
in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based 32. Patel JN, Spanyer JM, Smith LS, Huang J, Yakkanti MR, Malkani AL. Comparison of
protocols. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 1;31(13):1503-10. intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective
14. Elgafy H, Bransford RJ, McGuire RA, Dettori JR, Fischer D. Blood loss in major randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Aug;29(8):1528-31. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
spine surgery: are there effective measures to decrease massive hemorrhage in major 33. Sa-Ngasoongsong P, Channoom T, Kawinwonggowit V, Woratanarat P, Chan-
spine fusion surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9)(Suppl):S47-56. plakorn P, Wibulpolprasert B, Wongsak S, Udomsubpayakul U, Wechmongkolgorn S,
15. Williamson KR, Taswell HF. Intraoperative blood salvage: a review. Transfusion. Lekpittaya N. Postoperative blood loss reduction in computer-assisted surgery total
1991 Sep;31(7):662-75. knee replacement by low dose intra-articular tranexamic acid injection together with
16. Mannucci PM, Levi M. Prevention and treatment of major blood loss. N Engl J 2-hour clamp drain: a prospective triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. Orthop
Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2301-11. Rev (Pavia). 2011;3(2):e12. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
17. Theusinger OM, Spahn DR. Perioperative blood conservation strategies for 34. Sa-Ngasoongsong P, Wongsak S, Chanplakorn P, Woratanarat P, Wechmong-
major spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;30(1):41-52. Epub kolgorn S, Wibulpolprasert B, Mulpruek P, Kawinwonggowit V. Efficacy of low-dose
2015 Nov 28. intra-articular tranexamic acid in total knee replacement; a prospective triple-blinded
18. Binz S, McCollester J, Thomas S, Miller J, Pohlman T, Waxman D, Shariff F, Tracy R, randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Dec 5;14:340.
Walsh M. CRASH-2 study of tranexamic acid to treat bleeding in trauma patients: a 35. Shen PF, Hou WL, Chen JB, Wang B, Qu YX. Effectiveness and safety of tra-
controversy fueled by science and social media. J Blood Transfus. 2015;2015:874920. nexamic acid for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Epub 2015 Sep 7. Med Sci Monit. 2015 Feb 22;21:576-81.
19. Roberts I, Shakur H, Afolabi A, Brohi K, Coats T, Dewan Y, Gando S, Guyatt G, 36. Shinde A, Sobti A, Maniar S, Mishra A, Gite R, Shetty V. Tranexamic acid reduces
Hunt BJ, Morales C, Perel P, Prieto-Merino D, Woolley T; CRASH-2 Collaborators. The blood loss and need of blood transfusion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective,
importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an randomized, double-blind study in Indian population. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015 Jul-
exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Mar Dec;9(2):168-72.
26;377(9771):1096-101: 1101.e1-2. 37. Wang H, Shen B, Zeng Y. Comparison of topical versus intravenous tranexamic
20. Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, Caballero J, Coats T, Dewan Y, El-Sayed H, acid in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled and
Gogichaishvili T, Gupta S, Herrera J, Hunt B, Iribhogbe P, Izurieta M, Khamis H, Ko- prospective cohort trials. Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):987-93. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
molafe E, Marrero MA, Mejı́a-Mantilla J, Miranda J, Morales C, Olaomi O, Olldashi F, 38. Myles PS, Smith JA, Painter T. Tranexamic acid in patients undergoing coronary-
Perel P, Peto R, Ramana PV, Ravi RR, Yutthakasemsunt S; CRASH-2 Trial Collabora- artery surgery. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1893.
tors. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood 39. Winter SF, Santaguida C, Wong J, Fehlings MG. Systemic and topical use of
transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2016 May;6
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Jul 3;376(9734):23-32. Epub 2010 Jun 14. (3):284-95. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
21. Guerriero C, Cairns J, Perel P, Shakur H, Roberts I; CRASH 2 trial collaborators. 40. Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other
Cost-effectiveness analysis of administering tranexamic acid to bleeding trauma indications. Drugs. 1999 Jun;57(6):1005-32.
patients using evidence from the CRASH-2 trial. PLoS One. 2011 May 3;6(5): 41. Bosch P, Kenkre TS, Londino JA, Cassara A, Yang C, Waters JH. Coagulation
e18987. profile of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal
22. Jennings JD, Solarz MK, Haydel C. Application of tranexamic acid in trauma and fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 19;98(20):e88.
orthopedic surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jan;47(1):137-43. 42. Sethi RK, Pong RP, Leveque JC, Dean TC, Olivar SJ, Rupp SM. The Seattle Spine
23. Wafaisade A, Lefering R, Bouillon B, Böhmer AB, Gäßler M, Ruppert M; Trau- Team approach to adult deformity surgery: a systems-based approach to perioper-
maRegister DGU. Prehospital administration of tranexamic acid in trauma patients. ative care and subsequent reduction in perioperative complication rates. Spine
Crit Care. 2016 May 12;20(1):143. Deform. 2014 Mar;2(2):95-103. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
24. Bidolegui F, Arce G, Lugones A, Pereira S, Vindver G. Tranexamic acid reduces 43. Drummond JC, Petrovitch CT. Intraoperative blood salvage: fluid replacement
blood loss and transfusion in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty without calculations. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):645-9.
tourniquet: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Open Orthop J. 2014 Jul 44. Alam A, Lin Y, Lima A, Hansen M, Callum JL. The prevention of transfusion-
11;8:250-4. associated circulatory overload. Transfus Med Rev. 2013 Apr;27(2):105-12. Epub
25. Chareancholvanich K, Siriwattanasakul P, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C. 2013 Mar 1.
Temporary clamping of drain combined with tranexamic acid reduce blood loss after 45. Kleinman S, Caulfield T, Chan P, Davenport R, McFarland J, McPhedran S,
total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Meade M, Morrison D, Pinsent T, Robillard P, Slinger P. Toward an understanding of
Disord. 2012 Jul 20;13:124. transfusion-related acute lung injury: statement of a consensus panel. Transfusion.
26. Huang Z, Ma J, Shen B, Pei F. Combination of intravenous and topical appli- 2004 Dec;44(12):1774-89.
cation of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective random- 46. Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA. Transfusion-related mortality: the ongoing risks
ized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Dec;29(12):2342-6. Epub 2014 Jun 5. of allogeneic blood transfusion and the available strategies for their prevention.
27. Karaaslan F, Karaoğlu S, Mermerkaya MU, Baktir A. Reducing blood loss in Blood. 2009 Apr 9;113(15):3406-17. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: combined intravenous-intra-articular 47. Schietroma M, Carlei F, Mownah A, Franchi L, Mazzotta C, Sozio A, Amicucci G.
tranexamic acid administration. A prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee. Changes in the blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, and cytokine profile during laparo-
2015 Mar;22(2):131-5. Epub 2014 Dec 13. scopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1090-6. Epub
28. Lee SH, Cho KY, Khurana S, Kim KI. Less blood loss under concomitant ad- 2004 May 12.
ministration of tranexamic acid and indirect factor Xa inhibitor following total knee 48. Burleson A, Guler N, Banos A, Syed D, Wanderling C, Hoppensteadt D, Rees H,
arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Fareed J, Hopkinson W. Perioperative factors and their effect on the fibrinolytic
Arthrosc. 2013 Nov;21(11):2611-7. Epub 2012 Oct 2. system in arthroplasty patients. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2016 Apr;22(3):274-9.
29. Levine BR, Haughom BD, Belkin MN, Goldstein ZH. Weighted versus uniform Epub 2015 Oct 11.
dose of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing primary, elective knee arthroplasty: a 49. Whitten CW, Greilich PE, Ivy R, Burkhardt D, Allison PM. D-dimer formation
prospective randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9)(Suppl):186- during cardiac and noncardiac thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jun;88
8. Epub 2014 May 27. (6):1226-31.