You are on page 1of 7

R ES E A RC H

Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia


Risks and Postoperative Complications:
A Retrospective Study
J. Luke Akers, BSN, RN; Amanda C. Dupnick, BSN, RN; Elisa L. Hillman, BSN, RN;
Andrew G. Bauer, BSN, RN; Lauren M. Kinker, BSN, RN; Amy Hagedorn Wonder, PhD, RN

ABSTRACT
Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is a widely known patient condition that is associated with postoperative
complications. This retrospective comparative study of 298 surgical patients was conducted at a single hospital
site in the midwestern United States. Our aims were to describe risk factors and outcomes associated with periop­
erative hypothermia. We compared the type and frequency of patient factors, clinical factors, and postoperative
complications during the inpatient stay of the sample patients to determine whether there were factors or compli­
cations associated with perioperative hypothermia. Significant factors associated with the occurrence of periop­
erative hypothermia included older age and type of surgery. Hypothermia in patients was associated with a higher
rate of postoperative complications when compared with normothermic patients. Nurses and perioperative leaders
should understand the risk factors and complications associated with perioperative hypothermia to collaboratively
develop and test evidence-­based initiatives, improve care, and promote optimal patient outcomes.

Key words: perioperative hypothermia, postoperative complications, temperature monitoring, normothermia.

M any patients experience hypothermia during


their surgical procedures. Perioperative hypo­
thermia has been documented in patients
during various procedures (eg, total hip arthroplasty, colo­
rectal surgeries) with incidence rates ranging from 17.0%
and demographic features of a sample of surgical patients.
Then we compared the type and frequency of these
patients’ postoperative complications during their inpa­
tient stays to determine whether the complications were
associated with perioperative hypothermia.
to 88.6% depending on the type of surgery.1-3

SIGNIFICANCE TO NURSING
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Nurses can help reduce the occurrence of perioperative
We designed our study to support the goal of develop­ hypothermia by using a comprehensive approach that
ing structures (eg, education, policies) for more effec­ begins during the preassessment for surgery and ends at
tive perioperative processes (eg, nursing assessment, discharge. Nurses should be aware of demographic (eg,
interventions, documentation) and promoting optimal age, sex) and surgery-­related factors (eg, type of surgery)
outcomes for patients (eg, reduced incidence of periop­ that place patients at a higher risk for inadvertent perioper­
erative hypothermia and its complications). Initially, we ative hypothermia. After identifying at-­risk patients, nurs­
described the factors associated with the occurrence of es can make informed decisions about the frequency and
perioperative hypothermia by reviewing specific clinical method of temperature monitoring and determine which

http://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12696
© AORN, Inc, 2019
AORN Journal  741  
Akers et al June 2019, Vol. 109, No. 6

interventions should be used to help these patients main­ procedures,4,14 total knee arthroplasties,10 and total hip
tain normothermia (eg, warm blankets, warming devices). arthroplasties.3,10. Research indicates other independent
predictors of perioperative hypothermia include severe ill­
ness upon admission to the hospital, neurologic disorders
LITERATURE REVIEW
(eg, Alzheimer disease), and anemia.7
Perioperative hypothermia commonly is defined as a body
temperature less than or equal to 36.0° C (≤96.8° F) during
the perioperative continuum of care.4-6 Multiple studies STUDY DESIGN
describe negative outcomes associated with inadvertent
We used Donabedian’s quality improvement frame­
hypothermia, including surgical site infection, coagulation
work—which shows the importance of good organiza­
dysfunction, increased intraoperative blood loss, sepsis, and
tional structures to improve processes and, ultimately,
mortality.3,7-10 Although the seriousness of postoperative
outcomes—to structure this project.15 We conducted a
complications varies, one research group found that mor­
descriptive, retrospective, comparative study at a large
tality increased fourfold in patients who had experienced
(≤500 beds) academic hospital in the midwestern Uni­
perioperative hypothermia.7 To help minimize the risk of
ted States. This hospital has received the American
negative patient outcomes, perioperative nurses should
Nurses Credentialing Center’s Magnet Recognition. We
• be aware of factors associated with higher risk for obtained approval from hospital administrators at the
developing perioperative hypothermia, study site and an institutional review board associated
with the facility before collecting data via retrospective
• use intraoperative warming techniques to prevent
chart review in the summer of 2017. We used a stratified
perioperative hypothermia,
random sampling method to select 300 closed patient
• assist anesthesia professionals with intraoperative charts. We conducted a power analysis using G*power
patient temperature monitoring, and (version 3.1), which determined that we needed a sam­
• communicate the plan to minimize patient postop­ ple size of at least 300 for the planned nonparametric
erative hypothermia to the postanesthesia care unit analyses. We included patients 18 years of age and older
(PACU) nurses to help reduce the risk of postoperative who underwent a hysterectomy, laparoscopic cholecys­
complication resulting from hypothermia.11 tectomy, colectomy, hernia repair, total knee arthroplas­
ty, or total hip arthroplasty during a three-­month period
in 2017. We excluded two patients who did not meet
Demographic Factors
the age requirement and included the remaining 298
Studies consistently show that patients 60 to 65 years of patients in our analyses.
age and older are at greater risk for perioperative hypo­
thermia.6,7 The higher incidence of perioperative hypother­
mia may be related to decreased thermoregulation in METHODS
older adults.12 Some studies have shown a ­significantly
We developed a 20-­item data collection form using infor­
higher ­incidence of perioperative hypothermia in female pa­
mation in the literature regarding factors that may be
tients;3,13 others show a higher incidence in male patients.7
associated with perioperative hypothermia and input from
leaders at the study site. We created the form in REDCap
(Research Electronic Data Capture), a secure, web-­based
Studies consistently show that patients 60 to application. We used the form to capture
65 years of age and older are at greater risk for
• demographic factors (ie, age, sex),
perioperative hypothermia.
• surgery-related factors (eg, type of surgery, length of
time in surgery, type of anesthesia), and
• postoperative complications (eg, required blood trans­
Surgery-­Related Factors fusion, low hemoglobin, low hematocrit, surgical site
A greater incidence of perioperative hypothermia is infection, sepsis, pneumonia, mortality) that occurred
associated with open and laparoscopic abdominal during the inpatient stay.

742  AORN Journal 
June 2019, Vol. 109, No. 6 Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia

We used the study site’s criteria for low hemoglobin and temperatures were recorded on one (n = 4), two (n = 1),
low hematocrit (ie, hemoglobin <12 g/deciliter, hemato­ and three (n = 2) occasions in the PACU with results as
crit <35%). We performed retrospective chart reviews low as 32.8° C (91.0° F).
that spanned preoperative care to discharge, looking for
documentation of blood transfusions, diagnosis of postop­
erative complications (eg, surgical site infection, pneumo­ Demographic and Surgery-­Related Risk Factors
nia, sepsis), length of time in surgery (≤60 minutes or >60 for Perioperative Hypothermia
minutes), type of anesthesia, and mortality. To promote The mean (M) age of patients with perioperative hypo­
consistency in data collection, our research team outlined thermia (Wilcoxon U statistic = 1,587; P = .02; M = 72.9
and discussed the process and collected data together years, SD = 15.9) was significantly higher than those with
on the first day (initially reviewing the same chart at the normothermia (M = 58.6 years, SD = 15.6). There were no
same time and then reviewing various charts at the same significant differences in sex, race, or ethnicity between
time). The lead researcher audited the collected data and the hypothermic and normothermic groups (P > .05).
found an interrater reliability of 97% among the five team
members.
The type of surgery performed on the patients signifi­
cantly differed between the hypothermic and normother­
Data Analysis mic groups (Fisher exact test table probability <  .0001;
P  <  .004). Perioperative hypothermia was noted in
We analyzed the data using SAS (Version 9.4) and used
patients who underwent colectomy (n = 4), hysterectomy
descriptive statistics for demographic and surgery-­related
(n = 1), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 1), and hernia
factors. We summarized the categorical variables by fre­
repair (n = 1) procedures. None of the patients in our study
quency and percentage of patients who experienced
who underwent either total knee arthroplasty or total hip
either hypothermia or normothermia, and summarized
arthroplasty experienced hypothermia.
the continuous variables by mean, standard deviation,
median, minimum, and maximum. We tested for differ­
ences in means and proportions between hypothermic
and normothermic groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum Perioperative hypothermia was noted
test and Fisher exact test. We set significance at P < .05. in patients who underwent colectomy
(n = 4), hysterectomy (n = 1), laparoscopic
RESULTS cholecystectomy (n = 1), and hernia repair
We reviewed and analyzed 298 closed patient records. (n = 1) procedures.
Patients were primarily female (n = 178, 59.7%) and white
(n = 286, 96.0%). The mean age of the patients was 59
years (standard deviation [SD] = 15.7, range  =  20 to 93
years). Surgical procedures included hysterectomy (n = The type of anesthesia did not significantly differ between
39), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 58), colectomy (n = the hypothermic and normothermic groups. Although
24), hernia repair (n = 49), total knee arthroplasty (n = 93), multiple combinations of anesthesia (eg, general anesthe­
and total hip arthroplasty (n = 35). sia used in conjunction with spinal anesthesia) were noted
in the total sample, general anesthesia was used exclusive­
We found seven instances in which patients had doc­ ly for most procedures (n = 294, 98.7%). All seven patients
umented temperatures below 36° C (96.8° F). All who experienced perioperative hypothermia received
hypothermic temperatures initially were documented general anesthesia only.
by nursing staff members during the immediate post­
operative period in the PACU. The mean temperature
when hypothermia was first documented was 35.3° C Postoperative Complications Associated With
(SD = 0.8° C, range = 34.1° to 35.9° C), which is equiv­ Perioperative Hypothermia
alent to 95.5° F (SD = 1.4° F, range = 93.4° to 96.6° Our study showed that during the inpatient stay, a sig­
F). Of the seven incidents of hypothermia, hypothermic nificantly greater percentage of hypothermic patients

AORN Journal  743  
Akers et al June 2019, Vol. 109, No. 6

experienced complications than the normothermic pa­ A growing body of evidence shows a positive correlation
tients. Of the complications our study identified, the between length of time in surgery while under anesthesia
hypothermic patients experienced low hemoglobin and and the risk for perioperative hypothermia.4,6,13 However,
low hematocrit the most, and several of the patients who our findings did not corroborate this evidence (P = .5997).
experienced these two complications required a blood Other studies show that combining multiple types of anes­
transfusion. Table  1 shows the occurrence and signifi­ thesia increases the risk for perioperative hypothermia,6,13
cance of the association between the two study groups suggesting that this approach reduces the body’s natural
and each complication. ability to regulate core body temperature.13 However, our
findings did not support this given that all seven patients
with hypothermia received general anesthesia only.
DISCUSSION
Our results show that older adults (ie, more than 60 years We compared the frequency of postoperative complica­
old) were at greater risk for perioperative hypothermia. tions that occurred during the inpatient stays of the hypo­
Our finding that older age is a risk factor for hypother­ thermic and normothermic study patients. The occurrence
mia is consistent with previous studies that have shown a of low hemoglobin and hematocrit during the postoperative
greater incidence of perioperative hypothermia in adults inpatient stay in all patients with hypothermia is a signifi­
60 to 65 years of age and older.6,7 cant concern. Although this was regarded as a complication,
previous research has shown that preoperative anemia is a
The significant difference in types of surgical procedures predictor for perioperative hypothermia.7 In our study, the
in the hypothermia and normothermia groups warrants lack of preprocedure laboratory test results precluded our
consideration when identifying patients at higher risk. Our ability to gauge whether patients’ hemoglobin and hemat­
finding is consistent with other studies that have shown ocrit test results were low before surgery (placing patients
greater risk for hypothermia with abdominal procedures at higher risk for hypothermia) or normal before surgery
than other procedures.4,8 Nurses also should consider and became low after the procedure. Similarly, our finding
how inadvertent hypothermia affects patients postoper­ regarding the frequency of blood transfusions in the hypo­
atively. One study identified a correlation between the thermic group is consistent with prior findings that patients
improvement of a patient’s temperature during abdomi­ who experience perioperative hypothermia tend to have
nal surgery and the length of stay in the intensive care higher rates of coagulation complications and increased
unit.16 The study showed that for patients with an intra­ bleeding during procedures.4 Our finding of an increased
operative temperature between 34.2°  C (93.5° F) and incidence of sepsis in hypothermic patients was consistent
36.9° C (98.4° F), each one-degree centigrade increase with earlier research.7 Our result that showed periopera­
in temperature resulted in 31% less time in the intensive tive hypothermia was associated with increased mortality
care unit.16 also was consistent with evidence in the literature.7

Table 1. Postoperative Complications and Their Significance in Patients With and Without Hypothermia (N = 298)

Postoperative Complications Hypothermic Patients (n = 7) Normothermic Patients (n = 291) Fisher Test Statistica P

Required blood transfusion 4 (57.1%) 6 (2.1%) <0.0001 <.0001

Low hemoglobin 7 (100%) 162 (55.7%) 0.0179 .0205

Low hematocrit 7 (100%) 158 (54.3%) 0.0151 .0183

Surgical site infection 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.7%) 0.9535 .9999

Sepsis 1 (14.3%) 1 (0.3%) 0.0460 .0465

Pneumonia 1 (14.3%) 2 (0.7%) 0.0676 .0691

Mortality 2 (28.6%) 3 (1.0%) 0.0045 .0046


a
 Table probability from Fisher exact tests.

744  AORN Journal 
June 2019, Vol. 109, No. 6 Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia

Key Takeaways
◆ Many patients experience inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, commonly defined as a body tempera-
ture less than or equal to 36.0° C (≤96.8° F). Negative outcomes associated with inadvertent hypothermia
include surgical site infection, coagulation dysfunction, increased intraoperative blood loss, sepsis, and
mortality.

◆ This retrospective comparative study of 298 surgical patients at a single hospital site in the midwest-
ern United States was conducted to describe risk factors and outcomes associated with perioperative
hypothermia.

◆ Study results showed that older adults (ie, more than 60 years old) were significantly more likely to experi-
ence hypothermia and that abdominal procedures posed a greater risk for hypothermia than other proce-
dures. In addition, perioperative hypothermia was significantly associated with postoperative anemia, sepsis,
and mortality.

◆ Nurses should be aware of demographic and surgery-related factors that place patients at a higher risk for
inadvertent perioperative hypothermia.

LIMITATIONS administration of acetaminophen-containing products


A larger national study of perioperative hypothermia risk or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and
factors and associated complications is needed to increase • no data collected on the development of complications
generalizability of results in other settings and popula­ after discharge.
tions. We randomly selected the study sample from closed
patient charts, which resulted in unequal group sizes.
We found great variability in the frequency of tempera­ RECOMMENDATIONS
ture assessed and documented in both intraoperative and Our results support the idea that perioperative nurses
PACU settings. Therefore, additional patients may have need to be aware of the risk of perioperative hypother­
experienced hypothermia that was undetected or was mia. Perioperative leaders and nurses should collabora­
detected and treated but not documented. tively develop policies and procedures that address

All temperatures at the study site were documented as • accurate identification of at-risk patients;
axillary. Evidence shows there are inaccuracies associat­ • frequency, method, and documentation of temperature
ed with axillary measures17,18 and the significantly larger assessment; and
standard deviations compared with other methods of tem­ • perioperative warming methods that reflect applica­
perature assessment.17 We found no preprocedure labo­ ble guidelines from national organizations (eg, AORN,
ratory results in the hypothermic patients’ charts, which American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses).
hindered our ability to identify when anemia had occurred
(ie, preoperatively, intraoperatively, postoperatively) and Future research could focus on describing other factors
specific factors associated with its occurrence (eg, antibi­ that were not included in this study that may contrib­
otic administration, hemodilution with crystalloid use). We ute to the incidence of perioperative hypothermia (eg,
identified additional limitations associated with our meth­ comorbidities, preoperative and intraoperative antipyret­
ods, including ic administration of acetaminophen-­containing prod­­ucts
or nonsteroidal anti-­inflammatory drugs) and normo­
• no expert panel or pilot study to validate the data col­ thermia (eg, use of specific medications, fluids, warming
lection form; devices). Future research also could focus on the con­
• no assessment of confounding variables, including tribution of anemia to hypothermia and complications
preoperative and intraoperative warming, comorbid­ of hypothermia and other possible contributing factors
ities, and preoperative and intraoperative antipyretic (eg, antibiotic administration, crystalloid administration).

AORN Journal  745  
Akers et al June 2019, Vol. 109, No. 6

Researchers also should investigate the causes of post­ 3. Frisch NB, Pepper AM, Rooney E, Silverton C.
operative mortality in patients with hypothermia. Add­i­ Intraoperative hypothermia in total hip and knee
tional research is needed to determine the best methods arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2017;40(1):56‐63.
to measure temperature in all phases of perioperative 4. Pu Y, Cen G, Sun J, et al. Warming with an underbody
patient care. Finally, future studies should track the warming system reduces intraoperative hypothermia
recovery of patients with perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal
after discharge. surgery: a randomized controlled study. Int J Nurs
Stud. 2014;51(2):181‐189.
CONCLUSION 5. Edis H. IPH and the role of patient warming. Br J
This retrospective chart review sought to determine Healthc Manag. 2017;23(8):372‐376.
factors that are associated with perioperative hypother­ 6. Torossian A, Bräuer A, Höcker J, Bein B, Wulf H, Horn
mia and to investigate its complications. We found that EP. Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypother­
older patients were significantly more likely to experi­ mia. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(10):166‐172.
ence hypothermia. Further, we found that postoperative 7. Billeter AT, Hohmann SF, Druen D, Cannon R, Polk HC
anemia, sepsis, and mortality were significantly associ­ Jr. Unintentional perioperative hypothermia is associ­
ated with hypothermia. Nurses should be aware of this ated with severe complications and high mortality in
condition and be diligent in preventing hypothermia elective operations. Surgery. 2014;156(5):1245‐1252.
and monitoring temperature to prevent postoperative
8. Tsuchida T, Takesue Y, Ichiki K, et al. Influence of
complications.
peri-­operative hypothermia on surgical site infection
in prolonged gastroenterological surgery. Surg Infect
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Indiana University
(Larchmt). 2016;17(5):570‐576.
(IU) School of Nursing for supporting this research project
and the baccalaureate honors program. The authors also 9. Mason SE, Kinross JM, Hendricks J, Arulampalam TH.
thank the following individuals: Susan Ofner, MS, biostatis- Postoperative hypothermia and surgical site infection
tician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine, following peritoneal insufflation with warm, humidi­
Indianapolis, for her statistical support through all phases of fied carbon dioxide during laparoscopic colorectal
the project; and Ryan Cook, MPH, data manager II, Depart­­ surgery: a cohort study with cost-­effectiveness anal­
ment of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, for ysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(4):1923‐1929.
creating an electronic form of the instrument for data col- 10. Williams M, El-Houdiri Y. Inadvertent hypothermia
lection and training the research team on secure, web-­based in hip and knee total joint arthroplasty. J Orthop.
data entry. 2018;15(1):151‐158.
11. Guideline for prevention of unplanned patient hypo­
Editor’s notes: ANCC Magnet Recognition is a registered
thermia. In: Guidelines for Perioperative Practice.
trademark of the American Nurses Credentialing Center,
Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2019:345‐370.
Silver  Spring, MD. REDCap is a registered trademark of
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. SAS is a registered 12. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Turri C, Bertinieri G, Dell’Oro
trademark of SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC. R, Mancia G. Impairment of thermoregulatory con­
trol of skin sympathetic nerve traffic in the elderly.
Circulation. 2003;108(6):729‐735.
REFERENCES 13. Prado CBC, Barichello E, Pires PS, Haas VJ, Barbosa
1. Moola S, Lockwood C. Effectiveness of strategies for MH. Occurrence and factors associated with hypo­
the management and/or prevention of hypothermia thermia during elective abdominal surgery. Acta Paul
within the adult perioperative environment. Int J Evid Enferm. 2015;28(5):475‐481.
Based Healthc. 2011;9(4):337‐345. 14. Horn EP, Bein B, Broch O, et al. Warming before
2. Frisch NB, Pepper AM, Jildeh TR, Shaw J, Guthrie and after epidural block before general anaesthesia
T, Silverton C. Intraoperative hypothermia during for major abdominal surgery prevents perioperative
surgical fixation of hip fractures. Orthopedics. hypothermia: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J
2016;39(6):e1170‐e1177. Anaesthesiol. 2016;33(5):334‐340.

746  AORN Journal 
June 2019, Vol. 109, No. 6 Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia

15. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be that could be perceived as posing a potential conflict of inter-
assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743‐1748. est in the publication of this article.
16. Jeyadoss J, Thiruvenkatarajan V, Watts RW, Sullivan
Elisa L. Hillman, BSN, RN, is a staff nurse on the
T, van Wijk RM. Intraoperative hypothermia is
Cardiovascular Surgery Intensive Care Unit at the Cleve­
associated with an increased intensive care unit
land Clinic, OH. She was a student at Indiana University
length-­of-­stay in patients undergoing elective open
School of Nursing, Bloomington, at the time this article
abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a retrospective
was written. Ms Hillman has no declared affiliation that could
cohort study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013;41(6):
be perceived as posing a potential conflict of interest in the
759‐764.
publication of this article.
17. Mason TM, Reich RR, Carroll ME, Lalau J, Smith S,
Boyington AR. Equivalence of temperature measure­ Andrew G. Bauer, BSN, RN, is a staff nurse on the
ment methods in the adult hematology/oncology Progressive Care Unit at The Ohio State University
population. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2015;19(2):E36‐40. Wexner Medical Center, Columbus. He was a student at
18. Sund-Levander M, Grodzinsky E. Assessment of Indiana University School of Nursing, Bloomington, at the
body temperature measurement options. Br J Nurs. time this article was written. Mr Bauer has no declared affil-
2013;22(16):942‐950. iation that could be perceived as posing a potential conflict of
interest in the publication of this article.

Lauren M. Kinker, BSN, RN, is a staff nurse on the


Coronary Intensive Care Unit at the Cleveland Clinic
J. Luke Akers, BSN, RN, is a staff nurse on the
Heart and Vascular Institute, OH. She was a student at
Cardiovascular Recovery Intensive Care Unit at Indiana
Indiana University School of Nursing, Bloomington, at the
University Health, Bloomington. He was a student at
time this article was written. Ms Kinker has no declared
Indiana University School of Nursing, Bloomington, at the
­affiliation that could be perceived as posing a potential con-
time this article was written. Mr Akers has no declared affil-
flict of interest in the publication of this article.
iation that could be perceived as posing a potential conflict of
interest in the publication of this article. Amy Hagedorn Wonder, PhD, RN, is an associate
professor at the Indiana University School of Nursing,
Amanda C. Dupnick, BSN, RN, is a staff nurse at the
Bloomington. Dr Hagedorn Wonder has no declared affilia-
Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center at Riley Hospital
tion that could be perceived as posing a potential conflict of
for Children, Indianapolis, IN. She was a student at Indiana
interest in the publication of this article.
University School of Nursing, Bloomington, at the time this
article was written. Ms Dupnick has no declared affiliation

AORN Journal  747  

You might also like