Professional Documents
Culture Documents
130
R = 0.882
120
110
foster IQ
100
90
80
70
(a) H0 : b0 = 0; HA : b0 , 0
(b) H0 : 0 = 0; HA : 0 ,0
(c) H0 : b1 = 0; HA : b1 , 0
(d) H0 : 1 = 0; HA : 1 ,0
Testing for the slope
(a) H0 : b0 = 0; HA : b0 , 0
(b) H0 : 0 = 0; HA : 0 ,0
(c) H0 : b1 = 0; HA : b1 , 0
(d) H0 : 1 = 0; HA : 1 ,0
The least squares line
ŷ = 0 + 1x
Notation:
• Intercept:
• Parameter: 0
• Point estimate: b0
• Slope:
• Parameter: 1
• Point estimate: b1
Testing for the slope (cont.)
0.9014 0
T = = 9.36
0.0963
Testing for the slope (cont.)
0.9014 0
T = = 9.36
0.0963
df = 27 2 = 25
Testing for the slope (cont.)
0.9014 0
T = = 9.36
0.0963
df = 27 2 = 25
p value = P(|T| > 9.36) < 0.01
% College graduate vs. % Hispanic in LA
What can you say about the relationship between % college gradu-
ate and % Hispanic in a sample of 100 zip code areas in LA?
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
Freeways Freeways
No data No data
0.0 0.0
% College educated vs. % Hispanic in LA - another look
What can you say about the relationship between of % college grad-
uate and % Hispanic in a sample of 100 zip code areas in LA?
100%
% College graduate
75%
50%
25%
0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
% Hispanic
% College educated vs. % Hispanic in LA - linear model
How reliable is this p-value if these zip code areas are not randomly
selected?
% College educated vs. % Hispanic in LA - linear model
Yes, the p-value for % Hispanic is low, indicating that the data
provide convincing evidence that the slope parameter is different
than 0.
How reliable is this p-value if these zip code areas are not randomly
selected?
% College educated vs. % Hispanic in LA - linear model
Yes, the p-value for % Hispanic is low, indicating that the data
provide convincing evidence that the slope parameter is different
than 0.
How reliable is this p-value if these zip code areas are not randomly
selected?
Not very...
Confidence interval for the slope
n = 27 df = 27 2 = 25
(a) 9.2076 ± 1.65 ⇥ 9.2999
(b) 0.9014 ± 2.06 ⇥ 0.0963
(c) 0.9014 ± 1.96 ⇥ 0.0963
(d) 9.2076 ± 1.96 ⇥ 0.0963
Confidence interval for the slope
n = 27 df = 27 2 = 25
(a) 9.2076 ± 1.65 ⇥ 9.2999
?
95% : t25 = 2.06
(b) 0.9014 ± 2.06 ⇥ 0.0963
(c) 0.9014 ± 1.96 ⇥ 0.0963
(d) 9.2076 ± 1.96 ⇥ 0.0963
Confidence interval for the slope
n = 27 df = 27 2 = 25
(a) 9.2076 ± 1.65 ⇥ 9.2999
?
95% : t25 = 2.06
(b) 0.9014 ± 2.06 ⇥ 0.0963
0.9014 ± 2.06 ⇥ 0.0963
(c) 0.9014 ± 1.96 ⇥ 0.0963
(d) 9.2076 ± 1.96 ⇥ 0.0963
Confidence interval for the slope
n = 27 df = 27 2 = 25
(a) 9.2076 ± 1.65 ⇥ 9.2999
?
95% : t25 = 2.06
(b) 0.9014 ± 2.06 ⇥ 0.0963
0.9014 ± 2.06 ⇥ 0.0963
(c) 0.9014 ± 1.96 ⇥ 0.0963
(0.7 , 1.1)
(d) 9.2076 ± 1.96 ⇥ 0.0963
Recap
• Confidence interval:
?
b1 ± tdf =n 2 SEb1
Recap
• Confidence interval:
?
b1 ± tdf =n 2 SEb1
• The null value is often 0 since we are usually checking for any
relationship between the explanatory and the response
variable.
Recap
• Confidence interval:
?
b1 ± tdf =n 2 SEb1
• The null value is often 0 since we are usually checking for any
relationship between the explanatory and the response
variable.
• The regression output gives b1 , SEb1 , and two-tailed p-value
for the t-test for the slope where the null value is 0.
Recap
• Confidence interval:
?
b1 ± tdf =n 2 SEb1
• The null value is often 0 since we are usually checking for any
relationship between the explanatory and the response
variable.
• The regression output gives b1 , SEb1 , and two-tailed p-value
for the t-test for the slope where the null value is 0.
• We rarely do inference on the intercept, so we’ll be focusing
on the estimates and inference for the slope.
Caution