1.

Joojle, an internet search engine service provider is owned by an important member

of the “Y” political party. Joojle has removed or banned any content or information
on the Internet that says negative things about the “Y” party. Can Joojle do that? Is
attempting against any Internet rule or principle? Elaborate your answer.
He can not do it as he is violating the right to information, and it being accurate and
true.
Lidia’s answer: he can not do that, because it’s attempting the right to freedom of
expression, right to information and net neutrality (no operator can interfere in the
network).

2. In a news website they post an article about inclusive societies. In the reader’s
comments part one user writes: “If you are not a straight white male, you are not a
human being”. The website immediately removes the comment, could the user sue
the website for attempting against his freedom of expression?
Lidia’s answer: The website has the right to remove it because this comment is
attempting against human dignity, and it is hate speech. And freedom of expression
has a limit on attempting human dignity or hate speech, but they should indicate
that they would delete any kind of bad comment as they are a private web.

3. Company “B” is an internet service provider, set in US. In order to offer better
services in Europe they have opened a new branch in Spain, where they process all
data collected in Europe. Must the new branch in Spain be compliant with GDPR?
And the “B” headquarters set in US? Elaborate your answer
Lidia’s answer: Yes, because the processor is in the EU, and the second is also
compliant because when they send the data from Spain to the US they must be
compliant because Spain is sending it outside the EU because they are binding
corporate rules.

4. You get into an ecommerce website and this message pops up. When you try to click
on “aquí” there is no link, so you cannot read or do anything but continue surfing. Is
it compliant? Elaborate your answer
 No, users need to have access to private policy. They must have the option to reject.

5. You are preparing a marketing campaign and you download a picture form the
internet that contains this label . Is it undder any licence? Can you use it for your
campaign? Can you manipulate the imatge an use it for your assignment at
University ? Indicate what you can/must do when using with this image, according
each symbol.

License creative commons

- NC: only use these image for non commercial
- ND: not modify image
- BY: credit the author
Lo puedes usar en la uni porque no es comercial

6. This advertising appears in an online magazine website. Indicate if it is compliant or

may be considered unfair. Why or why not? Elaborate your answer (20 points)

- Unclear information (its not giving the hole information from the product)
- Is not clear (its ends january 31st but they are laying to “lock todays price”,
when i have until the 31st to buy it at this price
- If it's an ad that affects your health, we need scientific evidence, and there is
no evidence on this one.
7. Indicate if the marketing campaign on social media and the information on website
may be considered compliant or unfair. Examine all legal aspects on advertising and
Intellectual Property. (30p.)

B) lo de flash ofert sería ilegal si no diuen fins quan es a flash offer i si després del dia
segueix sent fass offer.
C) similar to dior, no por dit “dior”, porque te aprovechas de la marca, dor ha puesto
mucho dinero y esfuerzo y tu te estás aprovechando de su trabajo.