Professional Documents
Culture Documents
employer’s behaviour forced you to leave your employment. In this situation the termination of your
employment may be at the initiative of the employer.
If your employer tells you that you have been dismissed, it is very clear that the termination of your
employment was at the initiative of the employer. However, in some cases an employer may not say
‘you’re sacked’, but may still force an employee to leave because of the things the employer does or fails
to do. That is, an employer may treat an employee so badly that their conduct fundamentally breaches
the employment contract between the employer and the employee, leaving the employee with no
reasonable option but to leave their employment. This is what is known as a ‘constructive dismissal.’
A constructive dismissal arises if you can show, on the balance of probabilities, that you did not leave
your employment voluntarily but that you were forced to leave because of your employer’s conduct.
The reason for leaving your job must be serious. Some examples include:
A serious breach of your contract (such as not paying you or demoting you for no reason)
Forcing you to accept unreasonable changes to your conditions of employment without your
agreement (for example changing your shift pattern)
Allowing colleagues to bully or harass you at work where this behaviour goes unchecked by
your employer
Making you work in dangerous conditions
Making false accusations against you, such as fraud or misconduct
You should only resign as a last resort after using all other available options to resolve the problem.
If you feel you are being forced to leave your job because of your employer's actions, you should
raise this with your employer as soon as possible. Give your employer an opportunity to discuss the
issue and try to resolve it.
If you cannot resolve the issue with your employer and you feel you have no choice but to resign, you
may claim you were constructively dismissed.
You must have 12 months' continuous service with your employer to bring a claim for constructive
dismissal. However, in certain cases the requirement of 12 month’s service does not apply.
You must bring your claim within 6 months from the date your job ended. This time limit may be
extended to 12 months where there are exceptional circumstances that prevented you from making a
claim within 6 months.
Constructive Dismissal
UPDATED FOR 2022 – This practical guide is all about constructive dismissal – what it means, case
examples and the core elements an employment tribunal will assess when deciding whether a claim
should succeed.
The definition of constructive dismissal is when an employee resigns within a reasonable period of time,
in response to the employer’s fundamental breach of an express or implied term of the employment
contract.
There are four key elements to a constructive dismissal. (See below). It’s about how an employee can
sue their employer and claim constructive dismissal – where the employee is forced to resign because
the employer has committed a serious breach of the employment contract. The employer’s breach must
be an effective cause of the employee’s resignation.
An employee must resign within a reasonable amount of time after the employer’s breach. There is not
set time-limit for when the employee must resign – it will depend on the circumstances.
But if an employee leaves it a long time before they resign, it may look like they had in fact accepted the
situation and things weren’t really so bad that they felt they had to leave. The longer things go on ‘as
normal’ the more likely it is this will happen. It makes sense when you think about the situation the other
way around. For example, where an employee commits an serious act of gross misconduct that would
give the employer the right to dismiss them. If the employer doesn’t take action pretty quickly and leaves
the employee to carry on working most employees would say it’s too late to start taking action months
later.
It’s pretty much the same way with constructive dismissal. The employee needs to decide, or make their
election, as to whether they are going to carry on or leave.
In cases where there is a single breach (one things goes wrong), like an unlawful suspension or non-
payment of a contractual bonus, an employee is more likely to be expected to make their mind up
reasonably quickly.
In more complex cases, for example where an employer suddenly insists an employee takes on a load
of new duties, the employee may be able to argue he’s entitled to a little more time to assess the new
duties and their impact.
Where an employee has made it clear they do not accept the breach (of their contract) and they are
working under protest, while a grievance process is taking place, the employee will have a better chance
of arguing they have not waited too long by seeing out the grievance procedure.
And an employee on sick leave may be argue it would be reasonable to have more time to decide
whether to resign.
There may also be cases where there are continuing or fresh breaches which on their own (or when
added together with past breaches) give the employee longer to decide whether to resign and treat
themselves as constructively dismissed.
However, in summary, waiting too long will prejudice an otherwise potentially good claim.
Express Terms
An express term is agreed by the employer and employee and is usually contained in a written
employment contract but may also be agreed verbally.
The employer must fundamentally breach the employment contract – this is called a repudiatory breach.
This requires more than an employer acting unreasonably. The breach has to be pretty serious.
There are many clear-cut examples of how employers breaching the employment contract, like an
employer unilaterally reducing an employee’s pay or changing the employee’s duties, where it has no
contractual right to do those things. But there other situations where the breach is not sufficiently
serious.
Example – Let’s take an express term in the employment contract about pay. Most people would agree
how much they get paid is fundamental. If the employer imposes a reduction in your pay (i.e. without
your consent or the contractual right to do so) that will usually be a good ground for constructive
dismissal. But an employer that fails to pay wages on time as per the contract may be in breach of an
express term but this may not be sufficiently serious to entitle an employee to resign and claim
constructive dismissal.
Implied Terms
Many constructive dismissal claims are based on a breach of an implied term, such as the duty of
implied trust and confidence or the duty. Implied terms form part of the employment contract
automatically by law – they do not need to be expressly agreed. Case law has developed this area of the
law and we cover examples of constructive dismissal involving breaches of express and implied terms
below.
An employee usually needs at least two years qualifying service to bring a constructive unfair dismissal
claim. However, some reasons are deemed automatically unfair in which case non minimal service is
needed.
There is no minimum service requirement for a contractual claim of constructive wrongful dismissal.
Generally speaking, however, an employee would only be able to recover damages for loss of notice
pay and benefits for this kind of claim.
Do I need to resign immediately?
Applying basic contract law principles, an employee faced with their employer’s repudiatory breach
should resign immediately without notice. However, an employee can bring a statutory claim of unfair
dismissal where “the employee terminates the contract under which he is employed (with or without
notice) in circumstances in which he is entitled to terminate it without notice by reason of the employer’s
conduct.” (Section 95 (1) (c) ERA 1996).
So, serving and working contractual notice is not automatically fatal to a constructive unfair dismissal
claim but where the notice period is long (or where the employee serves more notice than he is required)
the employee may be deemed to have affirmed the contract and lose the right to claim constructive
unfair dismissal.
In many situations an employee will resign with immediate effect because the situation is intolerable –
and serving notice would undermine how serious the issue is.
But in law both scenarios end up in a dismissal. So if an employee is constructively dismissed he will
usually also have an unfair dismissal (subject to qualifying for the right to bring an unfair dismissal
claim). So that’s where we get the phrase ‘constructive unfair dismissal’.
1. General fairness of the procedure is not relevant but if the employer breaches its own procedures, for
example a disciplinary procedure, that form part of the employment contract, that will result in a breach
of contract and become relevant. Similarly, case law has developed the implied right of an employee to
have a grievance considered, so an employer’s failure to respond to a grievance may result in a breach
of contract.
2. The implied term of trust and confidence is pretty close the idea that employers and employees
should treat each other reasonably.
3. A failure to follow the ACAS Code on grievance procedures may result in any award being increased
or decreased.
If an employer has reasonable and proper cause to explain its actions, it won’t breach the
implied term of trust and confidence.
An employer must do worse than act unreasonably.
The employers conduct must be so serious it is likely to destroy or seriously damage the
relationship.
This means only serious conduct will be likely to entitle an employee to say enough is
enough, and treat themselves as constructively dismissed.
The employee’s subjective view is not relevant. There will be no breach and the claim will
fail unless objectively, the conduct meets the above test.
The employer’s conduct does not necessarily need to be directed specifically at the
employee. For example, in one case the employer’s corrupt and dishonest running of its
business was sufficient to destroy the relationship.
Examples of constructive dismissal
An employee may be able to rely on an act of discrimination to resign and claim constructive dismissal.
Such a claim would usually be based on a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
However, a breach of a statutory law, such as discrimination legislation, will not automatically mean the
employer has committed a repudiatory breach of the employment contract. Whether the statutory breach
of the Equality Act 2010 (i.e. the discriminatory behaviour) amounts to a repudiatory breach of the
employment contract will depend on the severity and nature of the discrimination.
An example of case where an act of disability discrimination, specifically a ‘serious’ failure to make
reasonable adjustments, entitled the employee to resign and claim constructive dismissal, is Greenhof v
Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2006] IRLR 98.
“It seems to us in this case that the Employment Tribunal found unequivocally that there had been a
serious breach of the obligation on the part of the Respondent over a period of time to make reasonable
adjustments as it was obliged to do under the Disability Discrimination Act.
It follows, in our opinion, that that was almost bound to be a breach of the implied term of trust and
confidence which Mr Greenhof would be entitled to treat as being a repudiatory breach of contract, as
he purported to do. Now, it may be that there are circumstances in which there can be a breach of the
obligation to make reasonable adjustments which might not be regarded as repudiatory, but we do not
see how, having made the finding it did in the present case, there was any way in which the
Respondent’s conduct could be regarded as anything other than repudiatory” (Para 10, EAT Judgment,
Greenhof).
An employee who is demoted may be able to claim constructive dismissal, if the demotion is imposed
and the employment contract does not allow the demotion.
Tips:
Check the employment contract – it may give the employer flexibility to do change your
role.
If you have been demoted as an alternative to dismissal following a disciplinary check if the
contract / handbook to see if the employer has a right to demote.
If you’ve been seconded or promoted the contract may give the employer a right to
demote.
If the alternative role is offered as an alternative to redundancy, you should be given a
choice whether to accept.
What do you do if your employer is trying to make you quit?
Consider how you can best gather evidence to show what’s going on.
If you want to fight for your job, raising a concern to with your manager informally first, or via HR, may be
the best option, to give your employer a chance to find a solution.
Alternatively, getting out with a settlement agreement and finding a new job may be your preferred
option. This may involve raising a grievance and speaking to HR about a severance package. This is
where instructing a solicitor to help you frame your grievance and negotiate an exit package may help
you to get a better outcome.
If the situation is intolerable you could resign but this will, of course, have financial implications if you
don’t have another job to go to. Once you resign, you then either have to walk away completely and lose
out financially or fight for compensation via the tribunal system, if you can’t negotiate a fair settlement
agreement.
NO.
Raising a grievance might be a good idea but it is not essential to raise a grievance. The law recognises
that if an employer has committed a repudiatory breach an employee does not have to wait around.
Rather the employee may resign immediately.
BUT
If your claim of constructive dismissal succeeds, an employment tribunal can reduce compensation
where an employee has unreasonably failed to raise a grievance. And if the employee’s objective is to
remain in work, raising a grievance gives the employer a chance to address the employees concerns
and put things right. There may also be tactical considerations as to whether for negotiating purposes it
is better to resign immediately or raise a grievance. This is one area where advice from an employment
solicitor can really help.
How do you write a resignation letter?
Generally speaking, if you’re thinking of bringing a constructive dismissal claim your resignation letter
should clearly and succinctly summarise why you feel you had no choice but to resign.
Often, a short letter (no more than a page) has more impact.
Don’t
waffle or exaggerate
write pages and pages
say how wonderful it’s been to work for your employer
thank your employer for the ‘opportunity’
forget that to succeed with a claim your employer’s breach needs to be an effective cause
of your resignation.
Do
be honest
be concise
be professional
state your reasons for resigning / feeling your position has become intolerable
summarise the most serious and recent conduct that has led to your decision.
if there is a long history summarise it in a few paragraphs at most. Remember that this isn’t
a witness statement, it’s a resignation letter.
don’t be scared to say how your employer’s actions have made your feel.
How to prove constructive dismissal?
The burden of proof is on you to convince a tribunal your employer committed a breach of contract
sufficient to entitle you to treat yourself as constructively dismissed.
How you prove that will depend on the nature of the breach.
Step 1 – You need to identify contractual term and prove it exists. If the breach involves an express
term, you will offer as an example the document containing the relevant term. Usually this will be the
written employment contract, bonus scheme, job description or handbook. If you are relying on the
implied term of trust this is accepted to exist in every employment contract.
Step 3 – You need to show you have responded to the breach within a reasonable period of time.
This will mean producing evidence of when the breaches occurred and when you resigned.
offer letter
employment contract
job description
relevant emails and letters between you and your employer
emails between managers and/or HR
Diary entries / contemporaneous notes of incidents
Witness statements from colleagues
Notes and documents collated by your employer / HR team during internal investigations,
disciplinary procedures and grievances
Securing evidence to prove you have been treated as you alleged can be difficult. One way of securing
documents about you is to make a subject access request to your employer under the Data Protection
Act 2018.
A Basic Award is based on a formula that uses your length of service (in complete years + your age +
your weekly gross pay (subject to a maximum cap). It’s the same formula used to calculate a statutory
redundancy pay entitlement.
A tribunal will also make a Compensatory Award – which as the name suggests, is intended to
compensate you (not punish the employer) for any loss of earnings or benefits you have suffered.
Generally speaking a Compensatory Award is subject to a maximum of one years pay, or the current
capped figure for the relevant year (£86,444, for dismissals from 6 April 2019).
You will need to raise a claim with ACAS and then lodge a claim with the employment tribunal.
Settling a constructive dismissal case rather than going to a tribunal has some major advantages, in
terms of managing risk, avoiding delay and stress associated with bringing a claim. It also allows you to
move on and focus on your future career. Bringing a tribunal claim can end up forcing you to relive
negative experiences you’d rather forget.
Many employees make the mistake of overplaying their case and overvaluing their claim, assuming an
employer will settle to avoid the legal costs of defending your claim. In reality, the biggest lever you have
is to demonstrate to your employer you have a strong case and the evidence to back it up. A good
employment solicitor will help you to identify your strong points, focus on those to maximum effect and
achieve the best possible outcome.
In light of the Coronavirus shutdown, the British Government has introduced a subsidy for employers to
help pay employee wages. To qualify for this subsidy the employer must designate an an employee as
having furloughed status.
This is a completely new concept in UK employment law – it means the employee is put on leave and
doesn’t have to do any work.
Once an employee is ‘furloughed’ the employer can claim from the Government up to 80% of their
wages (capped at £2,500). Because this is a completely new thing employers are very unlikely to have a
right to place you on furlough, without your approval. But employees will need to think carefully before
refusing, as the alternative may be your employer will look to lay them off without pay, or make them
redundant.
Some employers will top-up the government’s contribution so you will continue to receive your full-pay
during the furloughed period. If your employer refuses to top up and imposes furlough you may have
claims for breach of contract, unlawful deduction of wages and potentially, for constructive unfair
dismissal. But resigning is risky and it is likely that most employees will prefer to have up to 80% of their
wages rather than resign. It also seems reasonable to expect that an employment tribunal will have
significant sympathy for businesses trying to get through this difficult time.
If you really do object to being furloughed on 80% (capped at £2,500) speak to your employer about it.
They may agree you can work from home, or offer you a redundancy package / settlement agreement.
Tip: Check whether your employer has a clause in your employment contract entitling your employer to
lay you off without pay.