Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e first edition of this book, in 1965, was Miael Langford's first published
title. In its tenth edition, representing fiy years in print, Anna Fox and
Riard Sawdon Smith have brought his coverage of photography right up
to date with contributions from Andrew Bruce and Marie-Josiane Agossou.
is is a classic text and every photographer's bible.
Miael's original text has been expanded on and the spirit of the new
text ensures that his influence lives on, providing guidance to everyone who
shares a great passion for photography and wants to learn more.
Contents
Foreword
Introduction
Picture credits
1 WHAT IS PHOTOGRAPHY?
Why Photography?
How Photography Works
Picture Structuring
e Roles Photographs Play
Changing Aitudes Toward Photography
Personal Styles and Approaes
Measuring Success
2 LIGHT: HOW IMAGES ARE FORMED
Light Itself
Wavelengths and Colors
Shadows
When Light Reaes a Surface
Light Intensity and Distance
Making Light form Images
LENSES AND FILTERS:
3
CONTROLLING THE IMAGE
Photographic Lenses
Aperture and f-numbers
Depth of Field
How Depth of Field Works
Depth of Focus
Using Different Focal Length Lenses,
Camera Kits
Why Change Focal Length?
Lens Kits
Image Stabilization
Close-up Equipment
Lens Care
Essentials and Extras
Whi Kit Works for You?
Filters—How ey Work
4 CAMERAS
e Essential Components
Camera Types—Whi is Best?
Geing Started with Digital Cameras
Digital Cameras
Film Cameras
5 EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT
Factors that Determine What Exposure
to Give
Measuring Exposure for Continuous
Light
Practical Exposure Tips
Measuring Exposure for Flash
Practical Flash Exposure Tips
Exposing Different Film Types
6 ORGANIZING THE PICTURE
Noticing Subject Features
Structuring Pictures rough the Camera
Where Photographs Go
7 LIGHTING
Principles and Equipment
Basic Characteristics of Lighting
Lighting Equipment
Practical Lighting Problems
Special Subjects
8 DIGITAL WORKFLOW
Before Making your First Photographs
During the Shoot
Downloading your Images
Processing Raw Files
Digitizing Film
Filing for Output
Ariving
9 DIGITAL POSTPRODUCTION
Photoshop
Working with Color and Contrast
Color
Retouing Tools
e Crop Tool (C)
Panoramic Joiners with Photomerge
Actions
Useful Photoshop Shortcuts
10 FILM AND FILM PROCESSING
Silver Halide Emulsions
Features Common to all Films
Choosing Films for Bla and White
Films for Color Photography
Storing Film—Before and Aer Exposure
So Whi Film is "Best"?
Film Processing
Processing Bla and White (Silver Image)
Negatives
Processing Chromogenic (Color and Bla
and White) Negatives
Processing Color Slides and Transparencies
Permanence of Processed Results
BLACK AND WHITE PRINTING: TECHNIQUES,
11
EQUIPMENT, AND FACILITIES
Making a Print
Printing Papers
Safelighting and Printing Paper Sensitivity
Developing Prints
Making Contact Prints
"Straight" Enlarging
Controls During Enlarging
Common Print Faults
Variations
Chemical Aerwork
Retouing
Toning
Tinting
Eting
Image Reduction and Blea-Out
Permanence and Ariving
Darkroom Organization
Equipment: e Enlarger
12 MOVING IMAGE AND PHOTOGRAPHY
Introduction
Approaing Moving Images
Moving Image Essentials
Working for Offline and Online Screen Display
Capturing and Remapping Time with Time-lapse
Photography
Basic Time-Lapse Photography Production
Shooting DSLR Video
Animated GIFs and Derivatives
13 FINISHING AND PRESENTING WORK
e Permanence of Prints
Mounting Methods and Framing
Spoing/Retouing
Geing your Work Noticed
Pictures on the Internet
Building your Own Site
Appendices
Appendix A: Optical calculations
Appendix B: Camera movements
Appendix C: Expressing film response
Appendix D: Chemical formulae
Appendix E: Health and safety concerns
Appendix F: Digital notebook
Appendix G: Photography timeline
Glossary
Index
Foreword
Langford's Basic Photography is a fantastic introduction to a wonderful
subject. I can't see how my life could have been anywhere near as full or as
ri as it has been without photography. It's been everything to me, the
electricity in my life, the way to communicate with people, to fall in love, to
vent my displeasure at the world, to articulate every fiber of my feeling.
Photographing has allowed me to express all of this and to make some sense
of it.
Photography's power is as a passport: it gives you permission to
participate in a whole series of situations in life that you wouldn't be
allowed in normally. Whether it's a car crash or a presidential election,
society immediately accepts you into this event because you are a
photographer. If you take away the camera you are just like everybody else.
Photography, like poetry or philosophy, enables you to spend a lot of time
scrutinizing the lile details of life. It becomes a reason to live in a broader
way.
Other people's pictures are enormously important as a way of solving
problems: how someone else dealt with expressing great energy in their
work, perhaps, or profound sadness. Photography is so accessible that it's
very easy to produce images that seem to look as good as or similar in style
or structure to existing work. What's slightly dangerous about this is that
people quily aieve these more or less adequate results and think 'I can
do this' and then remain at that level, aping others' styles. is is a false way
of rationalizing your own work, however. Photography is about yourself,
how you feel about what you see. Trying to express your perspective
through somebody else's feelings is a twisted way of communicating.
Equipment and image-manipulation don't maer in themselves; whi
camera or soware I use is no more interesting than whi pen a writer uses
or microphone a ro star sings from. But you need to know the scope of the
tenology. Without full knowledge of your equipment's ability to articulate
what you are trying to express, it's like trying to speak with a limited
vocabulary. Experimenting with photographic imagery is age-old. Look at
the work of Erwin Blumenfeld, the man who put his film in the freezer in
order to expose it through ice crystals during the 1940s, or Man Ray, who
toiled away in the darkroom during the 1930s, solarizing his prints. A huge
amount of historical imagery suggests that many photographers—past and
present—do not regard the point of image capture as the only creative
moment in image-making. e entire process—right from conception,
through construction and post-production to the moment of completion—is
important.
I can't believe that anybody can claim to be aware of every single square
centimeter of their photographs. My earliest pictures, done with a 35 mm
camera and bla and white film, were reportage shots of skinheads and
potentially violent events as they unfolded in front of me. I remember taking
pictures of two girls that I liked the look of who were standing against a
wall in a dance hall. Only aerwards, when I looked at the contact sheets,
did I notice that while one of them was holding a handbag, the other was
holding a broken bole.
Contrary to the principle of the 'decisive moment' that has dominated the
understanding of photography, a photographer just isn't aware of the full
image as it is taken. To describe the process, you force yourself into a
situation in order to get the shot; you're experiencing a crescendo of
heightened awareness, pushing and manipulating, doing whatever is
necessary to balance circumstances: lighting, relationships with the sier,
whatever it is. Finally, you sense a whole bun of energy flows converging,
whi is almost like a melody becoming pit perfect. You respond mu
quier than you ever thought you could, but the shuer goes down and the
flash goes off in response to the moment prior to capture. e moment
documented is not the moment that you see; therefore, it is the moment that
you don't see.
Unfortunately photography has recently been held to trial for its la of
representation of reality. My own view is that photography never lied, but
neither did it set out to tell the truth. It said, "You know nothing of this
situation. I'll give you some of my thoughts on it." A far more crucial issue is
that photographers have some moral responsibility for what they show us.
Visual imagery is a very powerful medium of expression and some image-
makers are guilty of firing it relessly, like a gun, without looking at the
impact of what they are doing. In a culture that can be so ri, we are so
poor with our imagery. ere is a whole range of people that just aren't
included in our visual representation of beauty—excluded for their size,
individuality, health, ethnicity, or sexuality. I believe it is our duty to use our
images to anowledge that the parameters we set for our image of society
are too narrow, and reflect that these people have every right to be held up
in adoration along with everybody else.
It is useful for all photographers to be shown that they are completely
capable of screwing up. On any shoot, the first pictures that come out are
almost certainly going to be a failure. Standing in front of someone who is
supposedly meant to be the most beautiful woman in the world and then the
initial shots aren't very good at all—that's a reasonably humbling experience.
It tends to force photographers into repeated paerns of behavior, like: "Last
time I did it this way, or that works; so playing this music and using this
lens, talking a particular way to the model or using that light, et cetera, will
aieve the same results." ose confidence tris aren't ways of
understanding what is happening in front of you; they are ways of
reassuring yourself. You should be metaphorically naked in front of your
subject, out of your comfort zone and fighting for a new vision that you've
never previously imagined. If you can see it already, there is no point in
taking the picture.
Ni Knight
Photographer
Introduction
"e camera is my tool. rough it I give reason to everything around me."
André Kertész
Basic Photography is an introductory textbook that has for the last fiy
years covered the varied skills that lie behind photographic practice. It is
intended for students of all ages and, beginning at square one, assumes that
you have no theoretical knowledge of photography, or any scientific
baground. e book explains equipment and teniques, provides
information on both digital and analog photography: shooting and image
manipulation, materials, and processes. At the same time, the importance of
visual content and meaning in photographs is also discussed with reference
to many significant contemporary and historical photographers. In short,
Basic Photography is planned as a primer to interest and inform
professionals, students, and amateurs alike.
"Photography" (Literally translated as "drawing with light") is essentially
a combination of tenique and visual observation: it is a magical invention
that creates 2D illusions of the 3D world. In order to make successful
photographs you need to combine the development of your tenical skills
together with exploring your creative visual style—you learn a lot from
looking at contemporary photographic work and the history of photography
and finding photographers whose work you admire to start developing your
own way of seeing. Learning the tenical aspects of photography takes time
and should be done step by step: once you have aieved a certain level, you
are ready to put these skills into use creatively. Interesting photographs need
to be built on interesting ideas as well as having strong visual content and
tenical flair, and looking at other photographers' work is an excellent way
of thinking about ideas for photographs. Tenical knowledge to the
photographer is a means to a visual end, something that allows beer
control and self-confidence in aieving what you want to say.
Basic Photography opens with a broad look at photography—puing it in
context as a versatile and important medium. en it goes on to show how
photography's components, procedures, and processes fit together. e
apters are laid out in the same order as image production, starting with
apters on light and lenses, and proceeding through cameras, subject
lighting, and composition. (ese "front end" aspects remain valid whether
you use digital image capture or traditional photographic materials.) e
book continues with films, exposure, processing, printing, and finishing.
Many students may begin photography using digital cameras, to build up
confidence in camera-handling and picture composition before progressing
to more tenical aspects of darkroom work. Others begin with bla and
white photography, processing the results themselves and learning the
analog cra skills right from the start. Reflecting both approaes, Basic
Photography covers camera aspects of digital and analog photography as
well as the use of both color and bla and white materials, color film
processing, and bla and white processing and printing. (Color printing will
be found in the companion volume, Advanced Photography, the history of
tenical and stylistic movements in photography is described in Story of
Photography, also published by Focal Press.)
is tenth edition of Basic Photography represents over fiy years in print
for this publication, whi is brought right up to date with extended
information on recent developments in digital photography. Resear and
development are still moving rapidly ahead and industry standards are
being constantly updated. e use of computers to digitally manipulate
pictures is now well established, and many photographers never go near a
darkroom, preferring digital printing teniques even when using film.
Digital imagery has largely taken over from traditional emical-based
procedures. at said, the older processes will still be practiced for their own
particular qualities, just as bla and white continues to be used alongside
color.
e text remains in a form that we hope is the most useful for students—
either for "dip-in" study or sequential reading. You will find the summaries
at the end of ea apter a good way of eing contents, and revising.
e Glossary and appendices at the ba of the book are also very useful.
1.2
Making a comment on the number of images being constantly consumed by us on various social
media sites Erik Kessels filled a gallery with thousands and thousands of images to represent twenty-
four hours of Flir uploads.
Why Photography?
Although it has been said that there are just two types of photographers,
those that go out into the world to record it and those that photograph to
project out into the world, there are still multiple reasons why we might use
photography. In the book Photography Changes Everything (2012) nearly a
hundred people, from artists to filmmakers, from scientists to garden
photographers, talk about why photography is so important to them.
Perhaps you are drawn into photography mainly because it appears to be a
qui, convenient, and seemingly truthful way of recording something. All
the importance lies in the subject itself, and you want to show objectively
what it is, or what is going on (a ild's first steps or a scrat on a car for
insurance purposes). In this instance, photography is thought of as evidence,
identification, a kind of diagram of a happening. e camera is your visual
notebook.
Yet photography does mu more than just record the world; it shapes
and anges every aspect of our experience of it. e opposite aribute of
photography is where it is used to manipulate or interpret reality, so that
pictures push some "angle," belief, or aitude of your own. You set up
situations (as in advertising) or oose to photograph some aspect of an
event but not others (as in politically biased news reporting). Photography is
a powerful medium of persuasion and propaganda. It has that ring of truth
when all the time it can make any statement the photographer ooses.
Consider the family album for a moment: what pictures are represented here
—all of family life and experiences or just the good moments?
Another reason for taking up photography is that you want a means of
personal self-expression to explore your own ideas, concerns, or issue-based
themes, projecting out into the world. It seems odd that something so
apparently objective as photography can be used to express, say, issues of
desire, identity, race, or gender (Figure 1.3), or metaphor and fantasy. A
photograph can intrigue through its posing of questions, keeping the viewer
returning to read new things from the image, a way of capturing and
interpreting the world. Sometimes it is just the everyday and the mundane
that people find interesting but with a desire to reveal or highlight what is
oen overlooked. We have all probably seen images "in" other things, like
reading meanings into cloud formations, shadows, or peeling paint that can
make an intriguing image once photographed. So mu can also be done by
a qui ange of viewpoint, or oice of a different moment in time. e
way it is presented too may be just as important as the subject maer. e
camera is a kind of time maine, whi freezes any person, place, or
situation you oose. It seems to give the user power and purpose. Other
photographers simply seek out beauty as in sunsets and landscapes, whi
they express in their own "picturesque" style, as a conscious work of art or
the simple enjoyment of the visual structuring of photographs. ere is real
pleasure to be had from designing pictures as su—the "geometry" of lines
and shapes, balance of tone, the cropping and framing of scenes-whatever
the subject content actually happens to be.
1.3
Even in the twenty-first century a simple bla and white portrait can still have the power to captivate
the viewers gaze Something so apparently objective as photography can be used to express issues of
desire identity race or gender, as in this image "Mayita Tamangani, Harare Zimbabwe" (2011) by
Zaneie Muholi, part of a series on African lesbians.
1.4
Terri Weifenba's photographs are careful observations of overlooked spaces and stolen moments–
bayard gardens, a bee suspended in midair, the house across the street, open fields. rough her use
of saturated color and by the very photographic nature of selective focus/depth of field we rediscover
the wonder and lushness of nature
You need a viewfinder, electronic viewing or focusing screen for aiming
the camera and composing, and a light-measuring device, usually built in, to
meter the brightness of ea subject. e meter takes into account the light
sensitivity of the material on whi you are recording the image and reads
out or automatically sets an appropriate combination of lens aperture and
shuer speed. With knowledge and skill you can override these seings to
aieve osen effects or compensate for conditions whi will fool the
meter.
1.5
e basic digital route from subject to final image Camera cards for image storage can be reused.
Images may also be digitized from results shot on film, via a film scanner, or from prints via a flatbed
scanner.
Color films, papers, and emical processes are more complex than bla
and white (Figure 1.6). is is why it was almost a hundred years aer the
invention of photography before reliable color print processes appeared.
Even then they were expensive and laborious to use, so that until the 1970s
photographers mostly learned their cra in bla and white and worked up
to color; there are of course many exceptions to the rule su as Tony Ray-
Jones (Figure 1.7).
1.7
e British photographer Tony Ray-Jones originally went to America to study graphic art in 1961.
ere he learnt to be a photographer, all the time taking color photographs alongside his more famous
bla and white work. 'At the time color was considered vulgar and not the medium of serious
photography but for Ray-Jones it expressed the excitement of America in a way that bla and white
could not."
1.8
Pictures for business magazines do not have to be dull Care over camera and figure positioning gives
an eye-cating image of great simplicity. Mu of Brian Griffins work was for Management Today
magazine
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.