The document discusses consumer choice models involving endowments of goods. It describes a model where a consumer has endowments of two goods, coconuts and apples, which generate income that can be used to purchase goods for consumption. The consumer aims to maximize utility subject to their budget constraint. The document also discusses models of labor supply where consumers divide their time endowment between leisure and labor. It examines how changes in the wage rate affect labor supply and leisure.
The document discusses consumer choice models involving endowments of goods. It describes a model where a consumer has endowments of two goods, coconuts and apples, which generate income that can be used to purchase goods for consumption. The consumer aims to maximize utility subject to their budget constraint. The document also discusses models of labor supply where consumers divide their time endowment between leisure and labor. It examines how changes in the wage rate affect labor supply and leisure.
The document discusses consumer choice models involving endowments of goods. It describes a model where a consumer has endowments of two goods, coconuts and apples, which generate income that can be used to purchase goods for consumption. The consumer aims to maximize utility subject to their budget constraint. The document also discusses models of labor supply where consumers divide their time endowment between leisure and labor. It examines how changes in the wage rate affect labor supply and leisure.
Goods A. Banerji Endowments of Goods • In the utility maximization problem, where does income 𝑚 come from? • Wage income from supplying labor from my time endowment • Income from ownership of endowments of assets
• Extend the consumer model with exogenous 𝑚 to think about:
• How much labor time should I supply?
• How much should I save and invest in assets to get income later? • Model equilibrium in the economy as a whole: where I demand goods as a consumer but also work as a producer 11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics 2-good world • I have coconut trees (good 1) and an apple orchard (good 2) and my endowment is 𝑤 , 𝑤 units: this is how many of these fruits drop from the trees. • Market prices are 𝑝 , 𝑝 . I can sell my endowment, get income 𝑚 𝑝 𝑤 𝑝 𝑤 , and buy amounts of these goods to consume. • I choose amounts 𝑥 , 𝑥 to consume to maximize my monotone utility • 𝑢 𝑥 , 𝑥 subject to 𝑝 𝑥 𝑝 𝑥 𝑝 𝑤 𝑝 𝑤 • Now, the Marshallian demand functions are 𝑥 ∗ 𝑝 , 𝑝 , 𝑤 , 𝑤 , 𝑗 1,2. • This will be the same as 𝑥 ∗ 𝑝 , 𝑝 , 𝑚 , 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚 𝑝 𝑤 𝑝 𝑤 .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
2-good endowment • It may be more reasonable to rewrite 𝑝 𝑥 𝑝 𝑥 𝑝 𝑤 𝑝 𝑤 as • 𝑝 𝜉 𝑝 𝜉 0, 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝜉 ≡ 𝑥 𝑤 , 𝑗 1,2, is the excess demand for good 𝑗. If 𝜉 0, I consume 𝑥 from my endowment, and sell 𝑤 𝑥 on the market; if it is positive, I buy an excess of 𝑥 𝑤 of good 𝑗 over and above my endowment 𝑤 from the market. • This form of the budget constraint also says that the total market value of my excess demands is zero.
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
2-good endowment • Since 𝑤 , 𝑤 generates income 𝑚 ∑ 𝑝 𝑤 and with this amount of income, you can buy 𝑤 , 𝑤 , this point is on the budget line; and the slope is . • Clearly, utility will typically not be maxed at this endowment point; so I will trade some of one of my endowments and buy more of the other good.
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Slutsky Equation • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Slutsky Equation • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Slutsky Equation • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Slutsky Equation • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Slutsky equation • We have: , , ∗ ∗ , , ∗ • Δ𝑥 Δp • Dividing by Δ𝑝 and taking limits we get ∗ , , ∗ ∗ , , • • In the diagram, it was the higher income from the higher value of 𝑤 that is leading to the move to higher utility, when the price of good 1 increases: in the exogenous income 𝑚 model that we were using earlier, this effect would be absent.
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Example • Maximize 𝑢 𝑥 , 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 subject to 𝑝 𝑥 𝑝 𝑥 𝑝 𝑤 𝑝 𝑤 • From our knowledge of Cobb-Douglas utility, and setting 𝑝 𝑤 𝑝 𝑤 𝑚 • We have • 𝑥∗ • So, in the endowment model, even in the Cobb-Douglas case, the demand for good 𝑗 depends on the price of good 𝑖 as well: because there is an effect on income/wealth through the endowment.
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply • A person has 𝑇 units of time to divide up between leisure 𝑥 and labor 𝐿. • He/she gets a wage 𝑤 per unit of of labor supplied: so wage income equals 𝑤𝐿 𝑤 𝑇 𝑥 . • She also has some exogenous, other income 𝑚. • So, working for 𝐿 hours gives total income = 𝑤 𝑇 𝑥 𝑚, where 𝑥 is the amount of leisure that is then consumed. • Consuming leisure gives positive utility; working does not give any direct utility. • The person can also buy another good, good 2, at price 𝑝 1 (just a normalization of this price; note that the `price’ of leisure = w).
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply • The person’s utility function is 𝑢 𝑥 , 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 which he/she wishes to maximize subject to the budget constraint 𝑥 𝑤 𝑇 𝑥 𝑚 • Let us rewrite the budget constraint as • 𝑤𝑥 𝑥 𝑤𝑇 𝑚 ; as if the person is selling all her time endowment and then buying back 𝑥 units at 𝑤 per unit. • Writing this in this expenditure equals income form, we can straightaway write down the U max without cranking through a substitution or a Lagrangian. • 𝑥∗ , 𝑥∗ • Cobb Douglas demands are total income divided by own price, times exponent share from utility function
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply: effect of change in wage rate • Effect on leisure: ∗ • • For the Cobb-Douglas, higher wage increases labor supply, decreases leisure. • If you write down a Slutsky equation, you find that the higher price of leisure reduces leisure (substitution effect), but the higher wage implies a higher endowment income effect which tends to increase leisure: but the substitution effect dominates. ∗ • : in the no endowment model, the wage would be just a price of leisure, and with Cobb-Douglas utility, the demand for good 2 would depend only on its own price 𝑝 . But here, the wage increase has an endowment income effect on 𝑥 ∗ . 11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics Labor Supply • The way we solved this problem, we ignored a constraint: Namely, that leisure 𝑥 can at most equal 𝑇. • We assumed this constraint, 𝑥 𝑇, would hold with ‘<‘ at the U max. • Stated in full, the problem is to find 𝑥 , 𝑥 to • Maximize 𝑢 𝑥 , 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 • Subject to 0 𝑥 𝑇, 𝑥 0, 𝑥 𝑤 𝑇 𝑥 𝑚 • Or, making a substitution, • Choose 𝑥 ∈ 0, 𝑇 to Maximize 𝑥 𝑤 𝑇 𝑥 𝑚 . • We gave the solution for the interior max.
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor supply curve • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Labor Supply • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Intertemporal Consumption: 2-period (Fisher) model • Let’s say there is only 1 good, a consumption good, available to consume in each period 𝑡 1,2.
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
2-period model • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
2-period model • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
2-period model • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
2-period model • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
2-period model • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
2-period model: Present Value • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Present Value • .
11/17/2023 A. Banerji: Microeconomics
Present Value • Typically, if I invest a sum of money for a longer duration, I can get a higher rate of interest. We will come to this when we discuss yield curves, and how to calculate interest rates for different durations if we look at bonds floated by RBI or in general floated by the Treasuries of countries that have no risk of default. • We now go back to the 2-period utility maximization model. • .