Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PBL # 09
ME-346
Group Members:
➢ Hasham Ahmad Khawaja - 2021215
➢ Irtaza Ahamad – 2021245
➢ Jalal Ajmal Khan – 2021251
➢ Khadija Asim - 2021257
Faculty:
Submission Date:
29th Nov 2023
1|Page
Abstract:
The aim of this experiment is to compare the performance of Kaplan turbine with Pelton Turbine
at constant load and at constant head. The importance of this experiment is to observe the operation
of the turbines in different scenarios like vary head and vary load conditions and how it impacts
the overall efficiency of the turbine.
Two different types of hydraulic turbines were studied in this report, a Kaplan turbine, and a Pelton
turbine. In the first condition, the load was kept constant and the flow rate or the head was varied.
It was found that the efficiency of both the turbines increased with the increase of flow rate but for
the Pelton turbine once an optimum value for the efficiency was reached the efficiency started to
decrease with an increase in the flow rate.
While secondly the turbines were analyzed for constant flow rate or constant head while varying
the load conditions on the turbine. Similar trend was shown where it was found that the efficiency
of both the turbines increased with the increase of load on the turbines but for the Pelton turbine
once an optimum value for the efficiency was reached the efficiency started to decrease with an
increase in the load.
2|Page
Contents
Abstract: ...................................................................................................................................................... 2
Introduction: ............................................................................................................................................... 4
Literature Review ....................................................................................................................................... 4
Pelton Turbine......................................................................................................................................... 4
Kaplan Turbine ....................................................................................................................................... 6
Formulae used ............................................................................................................................................. 9
Data Processing: ........................................................................................................................................ 10
Kaplan Turbine ..................................................................................................................................... 10
Performance of Kaplan Turbine at constant load ......................................................................... 10
Performance of Kaplan Turbine at constant flow: ........................................................................ 12
Pelton Turbine....................................................................................................................................... 14
Performance of Pelton Turbine at constant load ........................................................................... 14
Performance of Pelton Turbine at constant flow: .......................................................................... 15
Conclusion: ................................................................................................................................................ 17
Applications of Pelton and Kaplan Turbines: ........................................................................................ 17
3|Page
Introduction:
Energy comes in different forms, and one of them is hydraulic energy found in fluids. It can be in
the form of kinetic, pressure, stored energy, stretching, or heat. Machines that work with fluids can
either turn hydraulic energy into kinetic or the other way around. They are split into two groups:
machines that make power, like turbines and motors, and machines that use power, like pumps and
fans. Another way to classify them is by how their moving parts work: some move continuously
(rotodynamic), and others move in set amounts (positive displacement).
Turbines, a type of continuous-moving machine, are essential for turning hydraulic energy into
useful power. There are several kinds of turbines, like the impulse turbines and reaction turbines.
Steam turbines, gas turbines, wind turbines, and water turbines are named based on the fluid they
work with.
Literature Review
Hydraulic turbines generate electricity by converting the energy from flowing water into a
mechanical energy which is then converted to electrical energy. These turbines serve as essential
elements in hydroelectric power stations, facilitating the utilization of waterpower for renewable
energy generation. Different hydraulic turbines are engineered to suit specific water flow
conditions. Pelton and Kaplan turbines are both types of hydraulic turbines used for generating
electrical power from the energy of flowing water. Each type is designed for specific conditions
and characteristics of water flow.
Pelton Turbine
The Pelton turbine operates on the principle of impulse, converting the potential energy of high-
pressure water into kinetic energy to generate electricity. In this hydraulic turbine system, water
from a high-altitude source flow through a penstock and is directed through a nozzle, creating
high-velocity jets. These jets strike the carefully designed buckets of a Pelton wheel, causing it to
rotate due to the change in momentum. Unlike reaction turbines, the Pelton turbine's efficient
design ensures that the direction of the water leaving the buckets minimizes any backward reaction,
optimizing energy transfer. The rotating Pelton wheel is connected to a generator, converting the
mechanical energy into electrical power, making it a widely used choice for high-head, low-flow
hydroelectric applications, particularly in mountainous terrains.
4|Page
Efficiency and Performance: Pelton turbines generally have high peak efficiencies, often
exceeding 90%, especially at their designed operating conditions. Their efficiency is optimized for
high-head scenarios, and they are known for stable performance within their specified head range.
The average efficiency of a Pelton turbine typically falls within the range of 85% to 92%.
Components of the Pelton turbine:
Runner with bucket: A runner (also named impeller) of Pelton turbine has a circular disc
surrounded by buckets that fill with the water and rotate.
Nozzle: To accelerate the water coming from the reservoir through the penstock, a nozzle is used.
It is basically a pipe with varying cross section and follows the principle of mass conservation.
Spear: The spear is a conical shaped needle that rotates in a certain axial direction and is operated
either by a hand wheel or automatically. The volume flow rate of the water entering the turbine
can be controlled by the spear in the nozzle.
Casing: To prevent splashing and the spread of the water, the casing is used. It is made up of cast
iron or steel plate.
Breaking jet: After completely cutting off the water supply using the spear, the turbine wheel
still rotates due to inertia. The breaking jet basically blows air in the opposite direction to the wheel
to stop the wheel from rotating further. The breaking jet is the jet of water through a small nozzle,
directed to the back of buckets.
Governing mechanism: The speed of the turbine runner is required to be maintained constant so
that the electric generator can be coupled directly to the turbine. Therefore, a device called a
governor is used to measure and regulate the speed of the turbine runner.
5|Page
Kaplan Turbine
Kaplan turbines are a type of axial-flow water turbine that is widely used for hydroelectric power
generation, an evolution of the Francis Turbine. They are known for their adjustable blades,
allowing them to efficiently operate across a wide range of water flow and head conditions.
Design and Operation:
Kaplan turbines are characterized by their adjustable blades, which can be rotated to optimize
performance under varying flow and head conditions. This design flexibility makes Kaplan
turbines suitable for low to medium-head hydropower applications.
The Kaplan turbine is an inward flow reaction turbine, meaning the working fluid changes pressure
as it moves through the turbine, giving up energy on the way. Output power depends on the
hydrostatic head and from the kinetic energy of the flowing water. The design combines features
of radial and axial turbines.
Water enters through the inlet which is a scroll-shaped tube that wraps around the turbine's wicket
gate. It is directed tangentially through the wicket gate and spirals on to a propeller shaped runner,
causing it to spin.
The water exits the turbine at the outlet which is a specially shaped draft tube that helps decelerate
the water and recover kinetic energy.
The advantage of this turbine is that it does not need to be at the lowest point of water flow as long
as the draft tube stays full of water irrespective of time. A higher turbine location, however,
increases the suction that is imparted on the turbine blades by the draft tube. The resulting pressure
drop may lead to cavitation.
Efficiency and Performance: Kaplan turbines are known for their high efficiency and the ability
to operate effectively at partial load conditions. The adjustable blades allow for better control of
the flow, which contributes to the turbine's efficiency. A double-regulated Kaplan turbine offers a
full discharge at 15%–100% efficiency, whereas a single-regulated Kaplan turbine shows
maximum discharge at 30%–100% efficiency.
6|Page
Components of the Kaplan turbine:
7|Page
The difference between Pelton and Kaplan turbine has been discussed below:
1. Design:
Pelton Turbine: The Pelton turbine, categorized as an impulse turbine, operates on impulse
principles, and features distinctive spoon-shaped buckets or cups attached to the wheel. Rotation
is induced as water is directed onto these buckets in a high-speed jet, harnessing the impulse of the
water.
Kaplan Turbine: Operating as a reaction turbine, the Kaplan turbine has a propeller-like design
with adjustable blades. Functioning on both impulse and reaction principles, water flows over the
blades, and their adjustability allows for optimized performance under varying flow conditions.
2. Operating Head:
Pelton Turbine: Excelling in high head applications, typically within the range of 300 to 1,800
meters (approximately 1,000 to 6,000 feet), Pelton turbines are particularly effective when a high-
velocity water jet can be directed onto the turbine blades.
Kaplan Turbine: Designed for low to medium-head applications, typically ranging from 3 to 70
meters (around 10 to 230 feet), Kaplan turbines are adaptable to variable flow conditions and find
utility in locations with a broad spectrum of water flow rates.
3. Flow Regulation:
Pelton Turbine: Pelton turbines exhibit less adaptability to varying flow conditions, often
operating at a constant speed, with efficiency optimized for specific flow rates.
Kaplan Turbine: Featuring adjustable blades, Kaplan turbines offer enhanced adaptability to
changes in flow conditions. The blade angle can be modified to optimize efficiency across a range
of flow rates.
8|Page
Formulae used
𝑃𝑖𝑛 = 𝜌𝑔𝑄𝐻
𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡 = 𝑇𝜔
𝑃𝑖𝑛 = 𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑡 + 𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡
2𝜋𝑁
𝜔=
60
𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑇𝜔
𝜂= =
𝑃𝑖𝑛 𝜌𝑔𝑄𝐻
Where:
9|Page
Data Processing:
Kaplan Turbine
Performance of Kaplan Turbine at constant load
In the first experiment we analyzed the effect of increasing volume flow rate of the fluid on the
efficiency of the Kaplan turbine, whilst keeping the load constant. Increasing the pump's angular
speed, increased the volume flow rate of the turbine. The results for low, medium, and high loads
were recorded. The ranges for these loads were:
Low: 0.01 - 0.02 N
Medium: 0.2 - 0.5 N
High: 2.12 - 4.17 N
Below are the results from the experiment:
S. Pump Torque Q/ P1/ bar Head/ Load/ Shaft Power Power Efficiency/ %
No. Speed /rpm / N.m lit/min m N Speed/ rpm Input/ W Output/ W
1 1500 0.001 142.4 0.052 0.533 0.02 1032 12.4 0.1 0.7
2 1700 0.002 163.9 0.071 0.725 0.02 1416 19.4 0.3 1.3
3 1900 0.001 182.5 0.092 0.939 0.02 1800 28 0.5 1.8
4 2100 0.001 205.9 0.113 1.156 0.02 2136 38.9 1.1 2.8
Table 1: Kaplan Turbine, Low Constant Load Readings
S. Pump Torque Q/ P1/ bar Head/ Load/ Shaft Power Power Efficiency/
No. Speed /rpm / N.m lit/min m N Speed/ rpm Input/ W Output/ W %
1 1500 0.009 143.1 0.056 0.572 0.21 936 13.4 0.9 6.5
2 1700 0.014 169 0.072 0.732 0.32 1368 20.2 2 9.8
3 1900 0.017 191.4 0.093 0.95 0.4 1776 29.7 3.2 10.8
4 2100 0.02 197.1 0.113 1.156 0.46 2112 37.3 4.4 11.8
Table 2: Kaplin Turbine, Medium Constant Load Readings
1 1500 0.091 145.6 0.083 0.85 2.12 288 20.2 2.7 13.6
2 1700 1.083 165.9 0.106 1.083 3 428 29.4 5.8 19.7
3 1900 0.18 183.3 0.133 1.358 4.17 556 40.7 10.4 25.7
4 2100 0.222 196.9 0.162 1.648 5.15 720 53.1 16.7 31.5
Table 3: Kaplan Turbine, High Constant Load Readings
10 | P a g e
Efficiency Vs Flow rate
35
30
Efficiency/% 25
20
15
10
5
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Q/𝑚^3/s
Figure 5: Graph of Efficiency v/s Flow Rate for Kaplan Turbine at Constant Load
Figure [5] shows a general increase in the efficiency of the turbine with the increase in the volume
flow rate. The highest efficiency of 31.5% was observed when the pump's angular speed was 2100
rpm, and the volume flow rate was 196.9 m3/s. When the applied load was high, the efficiency
increased with a higher rate, as compared to medium and low loads. This is clearly reflected in the
comparison of the gradients of the graphs of different loads. Thus, maximum efficiency will be
observed in a Kaplan turbine when both the load on the shaft as well as the volume flow rate is
high.
There are various reasons for this increase in efficiency of the Kaplan turbine:
1) The potential energy of the fluid increases with an increase of fluid head, thus increasing
the angular speed of the output shaft. More potential energy is converted to mechanical
energy, making the turbine more efficient.
2) The torque produced by the turbine is proportional to the head. A higher torque resulting
from high angular speed means that the turbine generates more power thus becoming more
efficient.
3) The amount of power generated by the turbine depends upon the amount of energy losses.
A higher head will result in a more streamlined water flow, thus reducing hydraulic losses
through turbulence and friction. Since more power is generated, the turbine will be more
efficient.
11 | P a g e
Performance of Kaplan Turbine at constant flow:
In the second experiment we analyzed the effect of increasing the load of the shaft on the efficiency
of the Kaplan turbine, whilst keeping Q constant. This was recorded at two different angular speeds
of the pump, 2000 and 2700 rpm.
Efficiency Vs Load
50
40
Efficiency/%
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Load/N
Figure 6: Efficiency v/s Load for Kaplan Turbine with constant rpm of the pump
Figure[6] shows a general exponential increase in the efficiency of the turbine with the increase in the
load on the output shaft. The highest efficiency recorded at 8.33N was 43.4%, when the angular speed
of the pump was 2700 rpm.
12 | P a g e
There are various explanations for the trend observed in Figure[6]:
1) The output torque is proportional to the load applied on the output shaft of the Kaplan turbine.
With an increase in load, the torque would increase thus increasing the power output, making
the turbine more efficient.
2) Turbines are often designed to achieve peak efficiency at specific operating conditions, and
adjusting the load to align with these conditions enhances the overall efficiency.
13 | P a g e
Pelton Turbine
Performance of Pelton Turbine at constant load
In this experiment we analyzed the effect of increasing the head or the flow rate for a constant load
on the efficiency of the Pelton turbine. In this case, the load was kept constant having F1 = 2.75 N
and F2 = 1.25 N giving a net force of 1.5 N.
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004 0.0005 0.0006
Flow Rate (m^3/s)
Figure 7: Pelton Turbine, Graph of Flow Rate v/s Efficiency for Constant Load
When the load was kept constant for a Pelton turbine and the flow rate was varied, the efficiency
of the Pelton turbine increased with the increase in the flow rate and reached a maximum efficiency
of 45.9% and after the maximum value the efficiency of the turbine began to decrease with the
increase in the flow rate of water.
14 | P a g e
This could be due to several reasons as initially the flow rate is small; the jet velocity would be
small which would produce a less power output resulting in lower efficiency. Once the flow rate
is increased, the jet velocity increases which in turn increases the power output, hence resulting in
increase in the efficiency of the turbine. But the decrease after the maximum value could be due
to the higher jet velocities which causes turbulence and inefficient energy transfer resulting in a
net decrease in the efficiency of the turbine.
The efficiency also depends on the bucket fill factor, higher the bucket fill factor, higher the
efficiency. However, increasing the flow rate would make the bucket fill factor reach an optimum
value beyond which the water from bucket would spill and reduce the efficiency. Turbines are also
designed in such a way that they are to operate in a certain region of flow rates and heads, moving
away from these regions may result in efficiency losses.
Performance of Pelton Turbine at constant flow:
Here we have analyzed the effect of keeping the head or the flow rate constant for a varying load
on the efficiency of the Pelton turbine. The head was first kept constant at spear position 3 and the
load was varied (Table [8]) and then the head was kept constant at the spear position 6 (Table [10])
F1 - F2 (N) Flow Rate, Ang. Velocity Torque, T Pin Pout Efficiency Efficiency
Q (m3/s) 𝜔(rad/s) (N.m) (W) (W) %
2.25 0.000341 73.68533 0.0675 9.514716 4.97376 0.522744 52.27439
3.25 0.000341 55.578 0.0975 9.687514 5.418855 0.559365 55.93649
4.25 0.000341 31.92333 0.1275 9.687514 4.070225 0.420152 42.01516
4.5 0.000341 13.816 0.135 9.687514 1.86516 0.192532 19.25324
Table 9: Pelton Turbine, Constant Head Readings at Spear Position 3 (from Table 8)
15 | P a g e
F1 - F2 (N) Flow Rate, Ang. Velocity Torque, T Pin Pout Efficiency Efficiency
Q (m3/s) 𝜔(rad/s) (N.m) (W) (W) %
2.75 0.000296 129.7867 0.0825 18.88401 10.7074 0.567009 56.70089
3.25 0.000296 110.3187 0.0975 18.88401 10.75607 0.569586 56.95862
4 0.000296 88.96667 0.12 18.88401 10.676 0.565346 56.53461
5 0.000296 40.82 0.15 18.88401 6.123 0.324243 32.42426
Table 11: Pelton Turbine, Constant Head Readings at Spear Position 6 (from Table 10)
60
50
Efficiency %
40
30 Spear Position 3
20 Spear Postion 6
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Load
Figure 8: Pelton Turbine, Graph of Load v/s Efficiency at spear position 3 and 6
When the head was kept constant for a Pelton turbine and the load was varied, the efficiency of the
Pelton turbine increased with the increase in the load applied and reached a maximum efficiency of
55.9% at a spear position 3 of head 2.9m and 56.9% at a spear position 6 of head 6.5m and after the
maximum value the efficiency of the turbine began to decrease with the increase in the load. Also,
Pelton turbine has higher efficiencies at higher head values.
When the load is increased, the water jet may deviate from the optimal angle for energy transfer which
can lead to energy losses and reduced efficiency. Also, when the load is increased, the rotor speed may
decrease due to the increased resistance. This would result in lower rotor speeds which would lead to
higher friction losses and reduce the efficiency of the turbine. The turbine may not be designed to
support higher loads which could lead to decrease in efficiency of the turbine since it is moving away
from its optimal conditions.
16 | P a g e
Conclusion:
The experiment was designed to calculate the efficiency of the Pelton and Kaplan turbine by
manipulating the flow rate and load. The efficiency of the Pelton and Kaplan turbine increases
with the variation of load and flow rate but there is an optimal point beyond which further increases
in flow rate may not proportionally improve efficiency thus this could increase the turbulence and
reduce the life of the turbine. Higher loads can lead to a reduction in efficiency due to increased
frictional losses, lower rotational speed, and changes in the balance between kinetic energy
extraction and power delivery.
A comparative analysis revealed the complementary strengths of Pelton and Kaplan turbines.
Pelton turbines excelled in scenarios of high head and low flow, while Kaplan turbines showcased
versatility in applications with variable flow rates.
17 | P a g e