This document discusses perspectives on foreign trade and trade liberalization. It notes that a global consensus supports free trade, though import-competing firms see threats from increased competition. Evidence shows that trade liberalization benefits countries that seize opportunities in global markets, as gains outweigh adjustment costs, while protectionism proves counterproductive. Currently, the major debate focuses not on free trade versus protection, but on ensuring fair trading rules between developed and developing nations.
This document discusses perspectives on foreign trade and trade liberalization. It notes that a global consensus supports free trade, though import-competing firms see threats from increased competition. Evidence shows that trade liberalization benefits countries that seize opportunities in global markets, as gains outweigh adjustment costs, while protectionism proves counterproductive. Currently, the major debate focuses not on free trade versus protection, but on ensuring fair trading rules between developed and developing nations.
This document discusses perspectives on foreign trade and trade liberalization. It notes that a global consensus supports free trade, though import-competing firms see threats from increased competition. Evidence shows that trade liberalization benefits countries that seize opportunities in global markets, as gains outweigh adjustment costs, while protectionism proves counterproductive. Currently, the major debate focuses not on free trade versus protection, but on ensuring fair trading rules between developed and developing nations.
A worldwide consensus in favour of free trade has taken hold of economic
opinion. Notwithstanding setbacks such as the failed Seattle and Cancun trade summits and the disruptive effects of the 2003 Iraq war, the consensus has remained firm. Political considerations played a key part in the development of this consensus, motivated by the desire to avoid trade wars and to promote faster growth. Business has supported free trade through its representative organisations, though the reaction ‘on the ground’ depends greatly on whether the particular enterprise is export- or home market-oriented. Export industries tend to be enthusiastic proponents of the merits of trade liberalisation. To them, freer trade means easier access to foreign markets, profitable investment opportunities and a greater spread of fixed costs. Import-competing firms in ‘sensitive’ sectors of the economy tend to see things differently. To them freer trade means the erosion of domestic market shares and the danger of job losses. The views of the pro-trade group have clearly prevailed. There is growing evidence that trade liberalisation brings benefits to those countries ready to grasp the opportunities of global markets. The resultant gains outweigh the losses caused by adjustment to freer trade. Efforts to close the domestic market to foreign competition have proved both unavailing and counter-productive. Free trade versus protection is no longer the main issue in international trade. The conditions under which liberalised trade is conducted – the maintenance of ‘level playing fields’ and fair trading rules among developed economies, but in particular between developed and developing countries – have become the major subject of debate. Economics concludes that foreign trade brings major benefits, but the reasoning behind this conclusion sometimes appears counter-intuitive, or just wrong. What many businesses might consider a ‘bad’ thing – cheaper imports, pressure on domestic market shares and job losses in industries which compete with imports – appear in economic models as a ‘good’ thing: an expression of the gains that accrue to society from trade. According to the economist’s view, a country sells exports only in order to enjoy more consumption of imports. Higher exports are not a gain in the true sense. They imply that goods produced at home are