Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Birgit Andrine Apenes Solem Dynamic Capabilities in
Birgit Andrine Apenes Solem Dynamic Capabilities in
https://www.emerald.com/insight/0959-0552.htm
omnichannel retailing
Birgit Andrine Apenes Solem 21
School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway–Campus Vestfold,
Tonsberg, Norway Received 21 December 2021
Revised 11 January 2022
Jan Ivar Fredriksen 9 June 2022
Accepted 13 July 2022
School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway–Campus Drammen,
Drammen, Norway, and
Øystein Sørebø
University of South-Eastern Norway–Campus Ringerike, Honefoss, Norway
Abstract
Purpose – Omnichannel retailing emphasises the interplay between channels to provide seamless customer
experiences across shopping journeys but is challenging for retailers to implement. This research explores the
necessary actions and dynamic capabilities needed of retailers to create, extend and modify the organisational
resource base required for realising omnichannel retailing.
Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative exploratory design with in-depth interviews of Generation
Z customers and retail firms was used to provide insights into the dynamic capabilities necessary for obtaining
omnichannel retailing.
Findings – This research elaborates on the dynamic capabilities needed for omnichannel solutions related to
(1) the underlying technology (i.e. develop an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system and online store), (2)
customer experience optimisation (i.e. develop product delivery, return routines, supply chain management,
curated exhibitions, showrooms and pop-up stores), (3) internal and external collaboration (i.e. collaborate
across business units, strengthening the core leadership team and collaborate and align with service ecosystem
partners and (4) overall omnichannel functionality (i.e. establish a customer-oriented retail culture, and
integrate marketing communication and customisation through data exploration).
Originality/value – This research enriches the retailing literature on omnichannel solutions and responds to
the need for theoretical anchoring by applying the dynamic capability perspective to address actions useful for
realising omnichannel retailing.
Keywords Omnichannel retailing, Dynamic capabilities, Retail firm activity, Channel management
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Digital technologies have broadened interactions between retail firms and their customers,
thereby blurring the boundaries between offline and online existence (Brynjolfsson et al., 2013;
Tueanrat et al., 2021). Since customers have become more experienced with digital technologies
(Immonen and Sintonen, 2015), they are no longer satisfied with companies that operate in
isolated channels, thus expecting their purchase experiences to be completely integrated across
channels (Piotrowicz and Cuthbertson, 2014; Barbosa and Casais, 2022). This phenomenon has
generated the concept of omnichannel retailing, which emphasises the interplay between
channels to provide customers with seamless experiences (Voorhees et al., 2017; Jocevski et al.,
2019; Chang and Li, 2022), often explained as an “all channels together” solution (Cui et al., 2021;
International Journal of Retail &
Picot-Coupey et al., 2016). The omnichannel solution provides a holistic purchase experience Distribution Management
(Quach et al., 2020), whether the customer enters a physical store, navigates through the website Vol. 51 No. 1, 2023
pp. 21-38
or uses the smartphone to search for products (Barbosa and Casais, 2022). Omnichannel © Emerald Publishing Limited
0959-0552
retailing allows customers to access, buy and receive products from all available and fully DOI 10.1108/IJRDM-12-2021-0599
IJRDM integrated channels (i.e. from brick-and-mortar stores to an array of digital channel solutions;
51,1 Verhoef et al., 2015). As such, online and offline channels complement each other, conveying a
sense of continuity, which is highly valued by the consumers, leading to satisfaction, loyalty
and favourable word of mouth recommendations (Kumar and Reinartz, 2016; Leroi-Werelds
et al., 2014; Quach et al., 2020; Barbosa and Casais, 2022).
Consumer’s expectations have increased the pressure on retail companies to integrate all
channels (Cook, 2014; Gallino and Moreno, 2014; Herhausen et al., 2015), with a need to move
22 from a multichannel solution towards an omnichannel solution (Beck and Rygl, 2015; Barbosa
and Casais, 2022). Realising omnichannel retailing is challenging for practitioners (Hajdas et al.,
2020) because of the need to develop appropriate actions, integrated systems of applied
platforms and digital solutions to facilitate seamless and interchangeable channel use (Hansen
and Sia, 2015). The operational perspective of omnichannel implementation has been limitedly
analysed in the literature (Galipoglu et al., 2018), except for the recent study by Barbosa and
Casais (2022). These authors point to barriers and demonstrate how retail companies overcome
these barriers through integration of information technology, accomplishment of organisational
changes and optimisation of customer feedback. As Barbosa and Casais’ (2022) study emerged
from Portuguese case studies of retail companies, studies from other countries are considered
useful and welcome because of the diversity of customer expectations, the maturity of digital
transformation and the stage of omnichannel implementation in each country.
There is still a need for research about how the transformation process of omnichannels
occurs (Barbosa and Casais, 2022; Hajdas et al., 2020). Chen et al. (2018) and Lehrer and Trenz
(2022) argue that more research is needed to explore the critical capabilities needed to achieve
omnichannel business from technological, organisational and market perspectives. In this
study, we contribute to the existing research by providing more insight into key factors in
overcoming omnichannel challenges and for implementing omnichannel solutions by
highlighting dynamic capabilities necessary for realisation.
Moreover, extant literature has to a certain extent focused on the customers’ perspective, e.g.
interests and expectations in obtaining online convenience (Duarte et al., 2018) and seamless
experiences (Gasparin et al., 2022; Li et al., 2018; Chang and Li, 2022), which inspired our research.
We conducted a two-phased study, first by interviewing Generation Z customers about their
current experiences with and expectations of seamless retail solutions. Second, by interviewing
retail business firm managers and consultant experts for their opinions on the abilities and
routines needed for obtaining omnichannel retailing and fulfilling the customers’ expectations.
Consequently, the present research contributes to a better understanding of the dynamic
capabilities that retailers must develop to overcome omnichannel challenges and fully realise
omnichannel solutions that meet customer expectations. Our paper addresses the following
research question: What dynamic capabilities are critical in realising omnichannel retailing?
The following sections outline the theoretical framework used to highlight the concept of
omnichannel retailing. Next, we introduce the dynamic capability perspective and offer an
overview of what constitutes dynamic capabilities and the principles for utilising these
capabilities in realising omnichannel retailing. We then explain our methodological approach
to our empirical studies, i.e. a preliminary and a primary exploratory study. Lastly, we
thoroughly discuss the results, elaborate on the implications of our two studies for
researchers and practitioners, and address both the limitations of our research and avenues
for future research on omnichannel retailing.
3. Methodology
3.1 Research setting, methods and case descriptions
An exploratory research design including a qualitative approach was applied to our two
studies (Kvale and Brinkmann, 2015). The preliminary study yielded insights from the
customer side, representing Generation Z (those born between the mid-to-late 1990s and the
early 2010s; Williams, 2015) and concentrated on expectations of omnichannel solutions
throughout the shopping journey, particularly which solutions facilitate seamless customer
experiences. Based on the findings from this study, we yielded useful insight into factors for
further elaboration in the primary multi-case study, from the retail provider’s perspective.
The primary study involved in-depth interviews with five retail firm managers from
experienced Norwegian retail firms and one expert from an IT consultant company. The main
criterion for selecting those retail firms was their experiences with well-planned omnichannel
strategies. The firms had to sell online and offline with the integration of channels to assure
omnichannel conceptualisation. Diverse retail areas were represented by the selected retail
firms, spanning from cosmetics to products for agriculture and gardening, branded clothing,
electronics and knitting and needlework. The cosmetics retailer is a chain with a global
presence, operating in 69 countries, with approximately 3,000 physical stores and 10,000
employees. The agriculture and gardening provider operates as a cooperative owned by
about 41 thousand farmers. The cooperative has about 104 physical stores throughout
Norway, serving farmers with technology and equipment. It is also present in Sweden as a
subsidiary, with 110 physical stores serving the same target group. The brand clothing store
provider originated in the USA and was established in 1949. It now operates as a multi- Realisation of
national retailer of clothes and accessories for men, women, teens and children. Today, the omnichannel
company operates in 70 countries and its products are available in 4,000 retailer- and 590
brand stores worldwide. The electronics retailer operates as a market leader in the Nordic
retailing
countries, with retail established in Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland, in addition to
franchise operators in Greenland, Iceland and the Faroe Islands. This electronics retailer
employs over 10,000 people in the Nordic countries and 4,000 in Norway, operating 140
physical stores in Norway. The provider of knitting and needlework is a national provider 25
through its online store, with one physical local store in a middle-size town of Norway, having
eight employees, including one responsible for the online store. As such, the multi-case study
contains both multinational, national and local retailers. All cases have both brick and click
stores, the possibility of returning online purchases in brick stores and social media pages on
Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. Four out of five retailers are also present on LinkedIn. All
of the retailers were considered to be at the maturity stage of implementing omnichannel
solutions; thus, they were able to reveal the barriers and opportunities for improvements in
their current implementation processes.
(Langley, 1999). In this process, we grouped conceptually linked data and reduced them to a
set of meaningful concepts (Glaser and Strauss, 1967). Customer expectations (from
Generation Z) based on first-order statements generated the analysis of second-order
categories of expectations towards retailers, on how they were expected to optimise
omnichannel retailing for seamless customer experiences. Contrasts and challenges reported
by retail managers and the IT consultant positioned in central roles yielded useful data based
on explanations of the status quo related to omnichannel strategies, implementation,
activities and experiences. Our research was based on a systematic search for meaning
(Savin-Baden and Major, 2013, p. 435). By combining open coding with pre-defined coding of
concepts and categories extracted from the literature, we developed first-order statements to
describe the informants’ experience with the omnichannel implementation process, barriers
perceived as challenging and abilities and routines necessary for sensing, seizing and
re-configuring new omnichannel opportunities. Then, based on the first-order statements,
axial coding was employed to derive insights, in turn leading us to aggregate a list of eight
second-order categories (Alvesson and Sk€oldberg, 2018) of underlying dynamic capabilities
needed for omnichannel optimisation.
4. Study results
4.1 Preliminary study results
Our analysis revealed six categories of Generation Z expectations of future retailing and
retailers’ actions to deliver seamless customer experiences. The interviews showed that
customers expected future retailing to become modernised, with full channel integration as an
essential issue. They expected the delivery of several activities and retail solutions from the
supply side, such as hybrid stores. One interviewee also noted that dedicated customer
accounts (e.g. protected with online login) allow customers to view and save their shopping
history so they can continue to shop either online or in a brick-and-mortar store. Another
interviewee highlighted the importance of storing a digital shopping chart for later digital or
physical shopping. Yet another shared a negative experience that underscored the
importance of integrating channels and offering hybrid stores:
I was visiting an online store and recognised that there was one more product left. Then, when I came
to the physical store to pick it up, it was gone . . .
Expectations of channel integration included the integration of physically curated concepts Realisation of
with online store offerings. One interviewee emphasised the importance of arranging concept omnichannel
stores across brands and products, representing overarching themes and handpicked
products (e.g. fashion, beauty and homewares) and evoking a lifestyle appealing to their
retailing
interests as future retail customers.
Retail store availability is highly expected to become omnichannel, from the customer
perspective, thus, providing access to attractive products across channels. Further, one
interviewee mentioned the importance of easily finding online and physical stores through 27
online searches for products or brands. Another interviewee felt it important to access online
stores from social media (e.g. Facebook newsfeed).
From the customer viewpoint, integrated price policy is an important criterion for
becoming an omnichannel retail provider. Foremost, interviewees expected identical product
prices across channels with a price transparency system. When shopping on global retail
platforms or online stores, customers expect taxes and fees to be included in the stated price
or clearly communicated by retailers. Lastly, prices should be coordinated and updated
across channels.
The customers highlighted the importance of systems that save customer data securely and
reliably in predicting their future shopping patterns. They were inherently sceptical about
being monitored, about how their data were stored or shared and how retail firms used
cookies to direct later product offerings tailored to customers. Thus, they believed that
customer data should be stored only to facilitate their shopping, online or offline, not for other
purposes.
Several customers expected omnichannel retailers to ensure hassle-free solutions for
product delivery and product return, such as flexible delivery options and inexpensive or free
product returns. Moreover, optimal omnichannel retailers should permit customers to
exchange products bought online in physical stores if desirable.
Finally, optimal omnichannel suppliers should provide personal and targeted marketing
based on customers’ previous shopping history, thereby enhancing marketing relevance to
customers. One interviewee argued that exclusive memberships (e.g. customer clubs) with
offerings and services tailored to customers would be valuable. Another interviewee claimed
that, to be considered professional and trustworthy, omnichannel retailers should align
marketing communication to demonstrate a consistent brand voice across channels (e.g.
various social media channels).
5. Discussion
The data from Generation Z customers generated six categories of expectation concerning
future retailing and necessary actions to become an omnichannel retailer and thus, deliver
seamless customer experiences (cf. Section 4.1). Based on arguments by Chen et al. (2018) and
Lehrer and Trenz (2022) on the need for more knowledge on critical capabilities necessary for
omnichannel implementation, these customer perceived categories were subsequently used
to design the in-depth interviews focused on the resources and dynamic capabilities valuable
for retailers in implementing omnichannel solutions.
Eight dynamic capabilities were considered crucial for a retail firm to succeed in
omnichannel retailing (see Table 2).
The first two capabilities are related to the underlying technology dimension of
omnichannel retailing: (1) the ability to develop and implement an integrated digital ERP
system, and (2) the ability to develop and optimise the online store, solutions for mobile usage
and links from social media platforms and search engines.
IJRDM The first factor, developing and implementing an integrated digital ERP system, was
51,1 described by Hansen and Sia (2015) as one of the significant elements in Hummel’s successful
transformation to omnichannel retailing. One success factor that Hansen and Sia (2015)
pointed out was that the IT department must work closely with the digital business
department throughout the integration process. The digital business department should
decide on the digital business plan, such as the need for digital channels and “rich” product
data (e.g. videos, size guides and ratings). Accordingly, the digital business department
30 should focus on the front-end IT, which the customers see (e.g. web shops, social media), and
the IT department should be responsible for back-end IT (e.g. ERP), and oversee the
technological transformation (Hansen and Sia, 2015). As our study results highlight system
integration, they appear to align well with Hummel’s study, and advices described by Hansen
and Sia (2015). Further, the back-end IT and ERP can be used for big data analysis as a
capability in offering customers tailored solutions, supporting the studies of Mikalef et al.
(2018), De Luca et al. (2020) and Barbosa and Casais (2022).
Concerning the second factor, developing and optimising the online store, solutions for
mobile usage and links from social media platforms and search engines, we argue that
optimising online stores deals primarily with functionality layout design, the retailing
atmosphere and customer experience. Wu et al. (2014) demonstrated the importance of these
elements, i.e. that choice of layout design (e.g. helpful signage) and atmosphere (e.g. lively and
bright colours) influences customer experience. Examples of design features that should receive
attention were addressed by Samuel et al. (2020) in offering virtual mannequins for “try on”
purposes, and easy-to-search product catalogues enabled by well-designed search algorithms.
As up to 97% of users are involved in various purchasing activities through mobile
devices, we argue that retail firms should optimise solutions for mobile usage, in line with
arguments made by Kaczorowska-Spychalsk (2017). Smartphones allow consumers to find
products and stores, compare prices, read reviews, check for availability and do many other
things “on the go.” Fuentes et al. (2017) found that these usage patterns were not the result of a
centrally orchestrated change programme but instead the consequence of the new and
unintended role acquired by smartphones as every day, multipurpose tools. Therefore, the
challenge for retailers is to seize the opportunity and integreate it with the ERP-system to
provide customers with helpful information through, e.g. an in-store companion (i.e. to find
product location) or a loyalty program app (i.e. to identify personalised offers). Recognising
and utilising such smartphone opportunities is likely one of the more forward-looking
dynamic capabilities in omnichannel shopping.
Ability to develop and Ability to develop Ability to collaborate Ability to establish and
implement an product delivery, return across business units maintain a customer-
integrated digital ERP routines and supply and by strengthening oriented retail culture
system chain management more the core leader team
effectively
Ability to develop and Ability to offer curated Ability to collaborate Ability to integrate
Table 2. optimise the online exhibitions, showrooms, with retail suppliers and marketing communication
The eight second-order store, solutions for and pop-up stores for partners in service and provide customisation
categories of dynamic mobile usage, and links physically anchored ecosystems through data exploitation
capabilities sorted from social media customer experiences
according to four platforms and search
aggregated dimensions engines
As a dynamic capability, the underlying technology dimension of linking social media and Realisation of
search engines to online stores and web shops is guided by the rationale that both search omnichannel
engines and social media represent critical touchpoints for consumers through their
omnichannel retail journeys. A recent study by Hallikainena et al. (2019) found that
retailing
conventional digital touchpoints with straightforward functionality, such as websites and
search engines, were the preferred touchpoints for customers when purchasing. Furthermore,
they claimed that social media was the most beneficial channels by which retail firms could
cultivate interest in their brands and products. 31
Another two dynamic capabilities under the aggregated dimension named customer
experience optimisation in Table 2, are (1) the ability to develop product delivery and return
routines and supply chain management more effectively, and (2) the ability to develop curated
exhibitions, showrooms and pop-up stores for physically anchored customer experiences. The
first of these deals with integrating online and in-store channels to provide a seamless front-end
customer interface, one that links them to the back-end system. Taylor et al. (2019) stated that
the core of omnichannel logistics is the integration of channels on the back end. They also
identified different omnichannel fulfilment strategies that have been described in previous
research. Example of such strategies includes BOPS (buy-online-pickup-in-store), BOSS (buy-
online-ship-from-store) and BORIS (buy-online-return-in-store). We argue that developing
appropriate product delivery and return routines and effective supply chain management
involves establishing the best mix of omnichannel fulfilment strategies in connection with a
preferred omnichannel retail solution of customers. Hajdas et al. (2020) pointed to potential
obstacles in realising a customer-friendly omnichannel infrastructure because of a lack of
transparency and comprehensive communication policies related to return options.
The second dynamic capability concerning customer experience optimisation is the ability
to develop curated exhibitions, showrooms and pop-up stores for physically anchored
customer experiences. Alexander and Alvarado (2017) stressed the importance of this
capability, claiming that omnichannel implementation focusses on digital channels and
consequently, fundamentally alters the form and functions of physical stores. Moreover, they
argued that physical stores, as a part of omnichannel retail, should offer spaces for
interactivity, socialisation and communication through atmospheric cues that appeal to the
senses. Curated exhibitions, showrooms and pop-up stores have the potential to realise these
three qualities by representing multi-functional hybrid retail spaces. These physically based
initiatives are expected to be supported by promotional activities (e.g. promotional codes or
special editions) and digital technology (e.g. smartphone apps) to facilitate an interactive,
event-based retail experience. In other words, curated exhibitions, showrooms and pop-up
stores can be considered complementary to digital channels. These multi-functional hybrid
retail spaces are enabling physical customer contact and positive experiences, thus,
supporting the sensing dimension of Teece (2007), thus, making them applicable
omnichannel capabilities.
Two dynamic capabilities related to the dimension of internal and external collaboration in
Table 2 are (1) the ability to collaborate across business units and strengthening the core
leadership team, and (2) the ability to collaborate and align with retail suppliers and partners
in service ecosystems. The first of these can be divided into two sub-elements: (a)
collaborating across business units and (b) strengthening the core leadership team.
Collaboration across business units requires spanning capabilities, i.e. internal work
processes and routines that support collaboration and communication across different
functional areas (e.g. Helfat, 2007; Mirsch et al., 2016). The core of collaboration and
communication across business units is “to build and maintain a data-rich, 360-degree profile
of each customer” (Stone et al., 2002, p. 49). The purpose of such profiles is to “be able to
provide up-to-date consumer information, ideally in real-time to personalise the relevant
channel and create a seamless customer experience across all channels” (Mirsch et al., 2016,
IJRDM p. 8). It is thus necessary to strengthen the core leadership team, especially their omnichannel
51,1 management competence, to realise 360-degree customer profiles. This competence includes
knowing the genuine aspects of an omnichannel concept, which means understanding the
importance of suggesting goals of total sales over channels and how to integrate channels for
seamless retail experiences, as well as how to optimise digital services (web, app, etc.) and
mass communication (TV, radio, etc.) customer touchpoints (Verhoef et al., 2015). To illustrate
how the core leadership teams’ competence can be strengthened, e.g. through a better
32 understanding of how to achieve seamless retail experiences, we refer to Chang and Li’s
(2022), recent demonstration that a seamless experience consists of six different dimensions:
availability of links, consistency of sale strategies, information visibility, simplicity of
payment, flexibility of fulfilment and convenience of sharing.
The second dimension associated with the dynamic capability dimension of internal and
external collaboration is having the capacity to collaborate and align with retail suppliers and
partners in service ecosystems (Koskela-Huotari et al., 2016). Interdependencies amongst
supply, merchandising and customer experiences require such collaborative capacity. The
objective of collaborating with, e.g. suppliers in service ecosystems, is to leverage real-time
inventory information from different nodes in the retailer’s network for effective order
fulfilment. A critical step here is to realise the digital transformation process of digital supply
chains established by more or less disjointed business entities within the retail enterprise. A
successful digital transformation implements the logic of the service ecosystem to provide
digitally enabled capabilities that create opportunities for data sharing and, thus, better
operational supply chain performance and improved customer experience along the customer
journey (Ishfaq et al., 2021). Hence, having the dynamic capability to share data across
retailers and enhance collaboration amongst organisational entities in the digital service
ecosystem is well aligned with the reconfiguring dimension (i.e. embracing open innovation)
introduced by Teece (2007), and thus, critical to ensure a seamless customer experience across
all channels.
Two dynamic capabilities related to the aggregated dimension of overall omnichannel
functionality in Table 2 are (1) the ability to develop and maintain a customer-oriented retail
culture, and (2) the ability to integrate marketing communication and provide customisation
through data exploitation. The first deals with the movement towards a retail culture—or,
more precisely, an omnichannel retail culture that are customer-oriented. Wirtz (2017) claimed
that retailers with the ambition to deliver an external omnichannel experience should create
an internal omnichannel culture. However, what it means to create this type of culture
remains unclear. We believe that an omnichannel retail culture is related to the practical
meaning of an omnichannel such as, e.g. integrated touchpoints (i.e. media and social and
conventional channels), uncompromising delivery and simultaneously updated information
on behalf of the customer (Akter et al., 2021), and as such, becoming more customer-oriented.
Hence, a customer-oriented retail culture should be based on employees who strongly focus
on value creation together with customers, value delivery and unified commerce as dynamic
capabilities. This means a cultural transition from a product focus to a customer and service
focus, from a traditional selling culture to a value delivery culture and from a high/low pricing
strategy to a holistic customer value creation focus.
The last capability related to overall omnichannel functionality deals with two elements,
namely (a) the ability to integrate marketing communication across channels, and (b) the
ability to provide customisation through data exploitation. The first of these concerns the
integration of communication across social media, mass media and conventional channels.
We support the study by Verhoef et al. (2015), which stressed that all communications
through social media and mass media should be integrated with traditional channels within
omnichannel management. Verhoef et al. (2015) further explained that the notion of one-way
and two-way communication is becoming less apparent from an omnichannel perspective in
contrast to the multi-channel perspective. In practice, this means that customers can Realisation of
communicate with a service avatar, through a digital touch-screen kiosk within the physical omnichannel
store, and with advertisers through mobile apps while watching television advertisements,
thus, challenging the competence of the retail firm to develop such kind of solutions.
retailing
The capability to provide customisation through data exploitation concerns the analysis
of structured (e.g. sales data) and unstructured (e.g. textual data from social media) data to
identify product segments and customer behaviour patterns (Wulf et al., 2017). In practice, a
competent retailer can use customer data to customise offerings, e.g. products, services, 33
promotions and replacement offers (Hoberg and Alicke, 2016), by themselves or in
collaboration with other retailers in the service ecosystem.
Notes
1. Data were collected as part of a Master Thesis conducted by Jørgensen and Radic (2020), at the
University of South-Eastern Norway, School of Business.
2. Etic coding refers to language and concepts that are not necessarily those of the interviewed people
but that seem appropriate to us within the scholarly field of interest (Belk et al., 2012, p. 141).
References
Ailawadi, K.L. and Farris, P.W. (2017), “Managing multi-and omni-channel distribution: metrics and
research directions”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 93 No. 1, pp. 120-135.
Akter, S., Tasnim, M., Hossain, T. and Strong, C. (2021), “What omnichannel really means?”, Journal of
Strategic Marketing, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 567-573.
Alexander, B. and Alvarado, D.O. (2017), “Convergence of physical and virtual retail spaces: the
influence of technology on consumer in-store experience”, Advanced Fashion Technology and
Operations Management, IGI Global, Vol. 1, pp. 191-219.
Alvesson, M. and Sk€oldberg, K. (2018), Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, 3rd
ed., Sage Publications, London.
Augier, M. and Teece, D.J. (2009), “Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy
and economic performance”, Organization Science, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 410-421.
Barann, B., Hermann, A., Heuchert, M. and Becker, J. (2020), “Can’t touch this? Conceptualizing the
customer touchpoint in the context of omni-channel retailing”, Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, Vol. 65, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102269.
Barbosa, J. and Casais, B. (2022), “The transformative and evolutionary approach of omnichannel in Realisation of
retail companies: insights from multi-case studies in Portugal”, International Journal of Retail
and Distribution Management, Vol. 50 No. 7, pp. 799-810, doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-12-2020-0498. omnichannel
Barney, J.B. (1996), “The resource-based theory of the firm”, Organization Science, Vol. 5, p. 469.
retailing
Beck, N. and Rygl, D. (2015), “Categorisation of multiple channel retailing in multi-, cross-, and omni-channel
retailing for retailers and retailing”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 27, pp. 170-178.
Belk, R., Fischer, E. and Kozinets, R.V. (2012), Qualitative Consumer and Marketing Research, Sage 35
Publications, London.
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. and Rahman, M. (2013), Competing in the Age of Omnichannel Retailing, MIT
Sloan Management Review, MIT, Cambridge, pp. 1-7.
Cai, Y.J. and Lo, C.K. (2020), “Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: a systematic review
and future research agenda”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 229, 107729.
Cao, L. (2019), “Implementation of omnichannel strategy in the US retail: evolutionary approach”, in Piotrowicz,
W. and Cuthbertson, R. (Eds), Exploring Omnichannel Retailing, Springer, Vol. 1, pp. 47-70.
Cennamo, C., Ozalp, H. and Kretschmer, T. (2018), “Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of
multihoming complements”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 461-478.
Chang, Y.P. and Li, J. (2022), “Seamless experience in the context of omnichannel shopping: scale
development and empirical validation”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 64, doi:
10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102800.
Chen, Y., Cheung, C.M. and Tan, C.W. (2018), “Omnichannel business research: opportunities and
challenges”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 109, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2018.03.007.
Cook, G. (2014), “Customer experience in the omni-channel world and the challenges and opportunities
this presents”, Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 262-266.
Cui, T.H., Ghose, A., Halaburda, H., Iyengar, R., Pauwels, K., Sriram, S., Tucker, C. and Venkataraman,
S. (2021), “Informational challenges in omnichannel marketing: remedies and future research”,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 85 No. 1, pp. 103-120.
Cusumano, M.A., Yoffie, D.B. and Gawer, A. (2020), “The future of platforms”, MIT Sloan
Management Review, Vol. 61 No. 3, pp. 46-54.
De Luca, L.M., Herhausen, D., Troilo, G. and Rossi, A. (2020), “How and when do big data investments
pay off? The role of marketing affordances and service innovation”, Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science, Vol. 49, pp. 790-810, doi: 10.1007/s11747-020-00739-x.
Duarte, P., e Silva, S.C. and Ferreira, M.B. (2018), “How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping
convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM”, Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, Vol. 44, pp. 161-169.
Edwards, R. and Holland, J. (2013), What is Qualitative Interviewing? A&C Black, Bloomsbury, London.
Fuentes, C., B€ackstr€om, K. and Svingstedt, A. (2017), “Smartphones and the reconfiguration of
retailscapes: stores, shopping, and digitalisation”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
Vol. 39, pp. 270-278.
Galipoglu, E., Kotzab, H., Teller, C., H€ €
useyinoglu, I.O.Y. and P€oppelbuß, J. (2018), “Omni-channel
retailing research–state of the art and intellectual foundation”, International Journal of Physical
Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 365-390.
Gallino, S. and Moreno, A. (2014), “Integration of online and offline channels in retail: the impact of sharing
reliable inventory availability information”, Management Science, Vol. 60 No. 6, pp. 1434-1451.
Gasparin, I., Panina, E., Becker, L., Yrj€ol€a, M., Jaakkola, E. and Pizzutti, C. (2022), “Challenging the
‘integration imperative’: a customer perspective on omnichannel journeys”, Journal of Retailing
and Consumer Services, Vol. 64, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102829.
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative
Research, Aldine, Chicago Illinois.
IJRDM Hajdas, M., Radomska, J. and Silva, S.C. (2020), “The omni-channel approach: a utopia for companies?”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 65, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102131.
51,1
Hallikainen, H., Alam€aki, A. and Laukkanen, T. (2019), “Individual preferences of digital touchpoints:
a latent class analysis”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 50, pp. 386-393.
Hansen, R. and Sia, S.S. (2015), “Hummel’s digital transformation toward omnichannel retailing: key
lessons learned”, MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 14 No. 2, p. 3.
36 Helfat, C.E. (2007), “Stylised facts, empirical research and theory development in management”,
Strategic Organization, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 185-192.
Herhausen, D., Binder, J., Schoegel, M. and Herrmann, A. (2015), “Integrating bricks with clicks:
retailer-level and channel-level outcomes of online–offline channel integration”, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 91 No. 2, pp. 309-325.
Hoberg, K. and Alicke, K. (2016), “The customer experience”, Supply Chain Management Review,
Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 28-37.
ubner, A., Wollenburg, J. and Holzapfel, A. (2016), “Retail logistics in the transition from
H€
multichannel to omni-channel”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics
Management, Vol. 46 Nos 6/7, pp. 562-583.
ubner, A., Holzapfel, A. and Kuhn, H. (2016a), “Distribution systems in omni-channel retailing”,
H€
Business Research, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 255-296.
Immonen, M. and Sintonen, S. (2015), “Evolution of technology perceptions over time”, Information
Technology and People, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 589-606.
Ishfaq, R., Davis-Sramek, B. and Gibson, B. (2021), “Digital supply chains in omnichannel retail: a
conceptual framework”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 43, pp. 169-188, doi: 10.1111/
jbl.12277.
Jørgensen, N. and Radic, L. (2020), “Omnikanal handel/markedsføring: hvilke utfordringer har
bedrifter ved implementering?”, Master thesis, University of South-Eastern Norway, available
at: USNOpenArchive:Omnikanalhandel/markedsføring:Hvilkeutfordringerharbedriftervedimple
mentering? (accessed 24 November 2021).
Jocevski, M., Arvidsson, N., Miragliotta, G., Ghezzi, A. and Mangiaracina, R. (2019), “Transitions
towards omni-channel retailing strategies: a business model perspective”, International Journal
of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 78-93.
Kaczorowska-Spychalsk, D. (2017), “Consumer perspective of omnichannel commerce”, Management,
Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 95-108.
Koskela-Huotari, K., Edvardsson, B., Jonas, J.M., S€orhammar, D. and Witell, L. (2016), “Innovation in
service ecosystems: breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource
integration”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68 No. 8, pp. 2964-2971.
Kumar, V. and Reinartz, W. (2016), “Creating enduring customer value”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 80
No. 6, pp. 36-68.
Kurtmollaiev, S. (2020), “Dynamic capabilities and where to find them”, Journal of Management
Inquiry, Vol. 29, pp. 3-16.
Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2015), Det Kvalitative Forskningsintervju, 3rd ed., Gyldendal Norsk
Forlag, Oslo.
Langley, A. (1999), “Strategies for theorising from process data”, Academy of Management Review,
Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 691-710.
Larke, R., Kilgour, M. and O’Connor, H. (2018), “Build touchpoints and they will come: transitioning to
omnichannel retailing”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics
Management, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 465-483.
Lehrer, C. and Trenz, M. (2022), “Omnichannel business”, Electronic Markets, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1007/
s12525-021-00511-1.
Leroi-Werelds, S., Streukens, S., Brady, M.K. and Swinnen, G. (2014), “Assessing the value of Realisation of
commonly used methods for measuring customer value: a multi-setting empirical study”,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 430-451. omnichannel
Li, Y., Liu, H., Lim, E.T.K., Goh, J.M., Yang, F. and Lee, M.K.O. (2018), “Customer’s reaction to cross-
retailing
channel integration in omnichannel retailing: the mediating roles of retailer uncertainty,
identity attractiveness, and switching costs”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 109, pp. 50-60.
March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (2005), “Cognitive limits on rationality”, in Bazerman, M.H. (Ed.),
Negotiation, Decision Making and Conflict Management, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, 37
Vols 1-3, pp. 201-237.
Mikalef, P., Pappas, I.O., Krogstie, J. and Giannakos, M. (2018), “Big data analytics capabilities: a
systematic literature review and research agenda”, Information Systems and e-Business
Management, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 547-578.
Mirsch, T., Lehrer, C. and Jung, R. (2016), “Channel integration towards omnichannel management: a
literature review”, available at: Channelintegrationtowardsomnichannelmanagementaliterature
submitted for publicationpdf(unisg.ch) (accessed 23 November 2021).
Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N. and Hoagwood, K. (2015),
“Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method
implementation research”, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health
Services Research, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 533-544.
Pedersen, P.E., Solem, B.A.A. and Kristiansen, E. (2018), Digitalisringens P
avirkning P
a Varehandel:
En Litteraturstudie, Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge, available at: USNOpenArchive:
Digitaliseringensp
avirkningp
avarehandel:Enlitteraturstudie (accessed 23 November 2021).
Picot-Coupey, K., Hure, E. and Piveteau, L. (2016), “Channel design to enrich customers’ shopping
experiences: synchronising clicks with bricks in an omni-channel perspective-the Direct Optic
case”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 336-368.
Piotrowicz, W. and Cuthbertson, R. (2014), “Introduction to the special issue information technology in retail:
toward omnichannel retailing”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 5-16.
Quach, S., Barari, M., Moudry, D.V. and Quach, K. (2020), “Service integration in omnichannel retailing
and its impact on customer experience”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Supp. 102267,
doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102267.
Rapp, A., Baker, T.L., Bachrach, D.G., Ogilvie, J. and Beitelspacher, L.S. (2015), “Perceived customer
showrooming behavior and the effect on retail salesperson self-efficacy and performance”,
Journal of Retailing, Vol. 91 No. 2, pp. 358-369.
Rigby, D. (2011), “The future of shopping”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89 No. 12, pp. 65-76.
Samuel, J., Zheng, Z.E. and Xie, Y. (2020), “Value of local showrooms to online competitors”, MIS
Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 1073-1106.
Savin-Baden, M. and Major, C.H. (2013), Qualititative Research: the Essential Guide to Theory and
Practice, Routledge, London.
Schrey€ogg, G. and Kliesch-Eberl, M. (2007), “How dynamic can organisational capabilities be?
Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamisation”, Strategic Management Journal,
Vol. 28 No. 9, pp. 913-933.
Stone, M., Hobbs, M. and Khaleeli, M. (2002), “Multichannel customer management: the benefits and
challenges”, The Journal of Database Marketing, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 39-52.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990), Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory, Sage Publications, London.
Taylor, D., Brockhaus, S., Knemeyer, A.M. and Murphy, P. (2019), “Omnichannel fulfillment: defining
the concept and building an agenda for future inquiry”, International Journal of Logistics
Management, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 863-891.
Teece, D.J. (2007), “Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable)
enterprise performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 13, pp. 1319-1350.
IJRDM Teece, D.J. (2012), “Dynamic capabilities: routines versus entrepreneurial action”, Journal of
Management Studies, Vol. 49 No. 8, pp. 1395-1401.
51,1
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”,
Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 509-533.
Tueanrat, Y., Papagiannidis, S. and Alamanos, E. (2021), “A conceptual framework of the antecedents
of customer journey satisfaction in omnichannel retailing”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer
Services, Vol. 61, 102550.
38
Van Nguyen, A.T., McClelland, R. and Thuan, N.H. (2022), “Exploring customer experience during
channel switching in omnichannel retailing context: a qualitative assessment”, Journal of
Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 64 Supp. 102803, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102803.
Verhoef, P.C., Kannan, P.K. and Inman, J.J. (2015), “From multichannel retailing to omni-channel
retailing: introduction to the special issue on multichannel retailing”, Journal of Retailing,
Vol. 91 No. 2, pp. 174-181.
Voorhees, C.M., Fombelle, P.W., Gregoire, Y., Bone, S., Gustafsson, A., Sousa, R. and Walkowiak, T.
(2017), “Service encounters, experiences and the customer journey: defining the field and a call
to expand our lens”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 79, pp. 269-280.
Williams, A. (2015), Move over, Millennials, Here Comes Generation Z, The New York Times, New
York (accessed 15 April 2021).
Wirtz, J. (2017), Winning in Service Markets. Success through People, Technology and Strategy, World
Scientific Publishinng, Hackensack.
Wu, W.Y., Lee, C.L., Fu, C.S. and Wang, H.C. (2014), “How can online store layout design and
atmosphere influence consumer shopping intention on a website?”, International Journal of
Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 4-24.
Wulf, J., Mettler, T. and Brenner, W. (2017), “Using a digital services capability model to assess
readiness for the digital consumer”, MIS Quarterly executive, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 171-195.
Xu, J. and Cao, L. (2019), “Optimal in-store inventory policy for omnichannel retailers in franchising
networks”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 47 No. 12,
pp. 1251-1265.
Corresponding author
Birgit Andrine Apenes Solem can be contacted at: birgit.a.solem@usn.no
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com