Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Felix Matthys
: If they have exactly the same payoff characteristics and risks, whouldn’t their price
(yields) have to be the same?
🤔
Felix Matthys & David Chesman Fixed Income ITAM 3 / 26
Green bond issuance
Historical Development:
• Corporate green bonds were
essentially inexistent prior to
2013 (total issuance of
corporate green bonds was
about $5B.)
• Since then, the issuance of
corporate green bonds has
skyrocketed!
• In 2018 alone, the corporate
sector issued green bonds
worth $95.7B.
Source: Climate bond Initiative Green Bond Pricing in the Primary Market
Jan-Jun 2021
: No need to issue a green bond in the first place (avoid costly green bond issuance
procedure)
: Results seem to suggest that there is indeed a financial benefit of being green!
Greenium: Definition
G(t, T ) := rng (t, T ) − rn (t, T ), where rng (t, T ) is the yield of a green bond
Source: Climate bond Initiative Green Bond Pricing in the Primary Market Jan-Jun 2021
Remarks:
• Green bonds exhibit very similar risk and return statistics compared to regular
bonds
Pz (t, T ) = NZ (t, T )
where r g (t, Ti ) is the yield on the green bond. In this setup, the greenium
G(t, Ti ) := r g (t, Ti ) − r(t, Ti ), is not constant and varies with the maturity Ti
• We can no longer derive an explicit expression for the greenium in the case the bonds pay
coupon
• Even if we use one single interest rate, i.e. the yield to maturity on these bonds, the
greenium can only be determined numerically
• The result stated above says that not all the zero rates on the green bonds r g (t, Ti ) have
to be smaller than their corresponding zero rates r g (t, Ti ) extracted using standard bonds
Felix Matthys & David Chesman Fixed Income ITAM 15 / 26
Equilibrium Analysis: Green vs. Standard Bonds
How can we rationalize the greenium in the data, i.e. model preferences of investors for
green bonds?
: Study supply and demand for bonds
Denote by X g the quantity of green bonds demanded, the demand and supply curves are
given by
• Supply: Pz (t, T ) = KS0 + KS1 X g , KS0 , KS1 > 0
• Demand: Pz (t, T ) = KD0 + g − KD1 X g , g ≥ 0, KD0 , KD1 > 0
where g is preference parameter for green bonds and
How is the equilibrium determined: Supply = Demand!
g + KD0 − KS0
X g∗ = ,
KD1 + KS1
where we require that KD0 > KS0 such that the quantity of green bonds remains
positive,
It is easy to see that investors with higher preferences for green bonds demand more of
them
: Higher price → lower yield for green bonds
80
60
40
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Quantity X
: There is no consensus
Felix Matthys & David Chesman Fixed Income ITAM 18 / 26
Is there really a Greenium in the data
: Green portfolio outperformed standard bond portfolio in the years 2018 and 2020
• Left figure (2018): In 8 weeks out of 13, the green portfolio has outperformed by
6 bps on average peaking at 14 bps in the midst of the 2018 crisis.
• Right figure (2020): during the first six weeks of the Covid-19 crisis that began in
mid-February, the green portfolio has outperformed 6 weeks out of 6 by 4.6 bps on
average peaking again at the height of the crisis.
: It appears that green bonds provide a hedge!
• Green bonds issued by firms with relative low credit ratings, exhibit a higher
greenium than when a firm with a very high credit rating issues green bonds
Key concepts:
X Green bonds: Bonds are called green when their proceeds are usedto fund
environmental projects, for instance renewable energy, green buildings, or
resource conservation
X Greenium: Empirical observation that green bonds tend to trade at a premium
relative to comparable standard bonds
X Investor preferences for green bonds: One possible explanation as to why green
bonds trade at a premium is because investors derive non pecuniary benefits from
holding green bonds
X Where can the greenium be found? It is still disputed as to whether a greenium
really exists. Certainly not in all fixed income markets