Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal.
Some people, however, think that other
types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is believed that the development of an economy is
the most essential aim of government. Nevertheless,
there are people who share a view (the view) that
other spheres of development, namely international
affairs, are also necessary for a country. In my opinion,
though the importance of other types of progress
could benefit a country by assisting in the creation of
international organizations or lowering the risk of war
with other governments, however, economic
development plays a crucial role among other
development spheres since it ensures high quality of
life for residents and positively impacts country's
competitiveness on the global arena.
On the one hand, the view that economic progress is
the most essential for a country has several
arguments. Firstly, the improvement of the economy
would benefit the lives of the country’s residents. That
is to say, since the finances in a country grow, those
aspects such as average job salaries, number of
products in shops, infrastructure, and the quality of
life improve steadily. For instance, after the Second
World War, Japan remained a poor rural country with
low life expectancy and a huge rate of unemployment.
Nevertheless, after several economic reforms, the
general state of the country improved remarkably,
which allowed it to become one of the most
developed governments in the world. Secondly, a
stable economy would make a country preferable for
foreign investments and therefore would lead to the
emergence of great relations with other states. For
example, Singapore has numerous allies since
representatives of other governments can maintain
their business projects on its territory.
On the other hand, other types of development might
be beneficial for a country too. The improvement of
international affairs, for instance, would allow a
country to form stronger bonds with overseas
governments and therefore organize unions which
would assist in further development. For instance, the
strong partnership between Kazakhstan and Russia
allowed the former to participate in the trade union
with the latter, which therefore has led to economic
benefits for both states. Secondly, having great
relations with other governments might minimize the
risk of war in the future.
In my point of view, economic progress is way
preferable for a country that any other type of
progress. This is because the developed economy
itself might encourage other countries to form bonds
with the government. In addition, numerous spheres,
such as quality of life and employment, are strongly
related to the economic state of a country.
It is believed that the development of an economy is
the most essential aim of government. Nevertheless,
there are people who share the view that other
spheres of development, namely international affairs,
are also necessary for a country. In my opinion,
though other types of progress could benefit a
country by assisting in the creation of international
organizations or lowering the risk of war with other
governments, economic development plays a crucial
role among other development spheres since it
ensures a high quality of life for residents and
positively impacts a country's competitiveness on the
global arena.
On the one hand, the view that economic progress is
the most essential for a country has several
arguments. Firstly, the improvement of the economy
would benefit the lives of the country’s residents. That
is to say, since the finances in a country grow, aspects
such as average job salaries, the number of products
in shops, infrastructure, and the quality of life improve
steadily. For instance, after the Second World War,
Japan remained a poor rural country with a low life
expectancy and a huge rate of unemployment.
Nevertheless, after several economic reforms, the
general state of the country improved remarkably,
which allowed the country to become one of the most
developed governments in the world. Secondly, a
stable economy would make a country preferable for
foreign investments and therefore would lead to the
emergence of great relations with other states. For
example, Singapore has numerous allies since
representatives of other governments can maintain
their business projects on its territory.
On the other hand, other types of development might
be beneficial for a country too. The improvement of
international affairs, for instance, would allow a
country to form stronger bonds with overseas
governments and therefore organize unions, which
would assist in further development. For instance, the
strong partnership between Kazakhstan and Russia
allowed the former to participate in the trade union
with the latter, which has therefore led to economic
benefits for both states. Secondly, having great
relations with other governments might minimize the
risk of war in the future.
In my opinion, economic progress is by far preferable
for a country to any other type of progress. This is
because the developed economy itself might
encourage other countries to form bonds with the
government. In addition, numerous spheres, such as
quality of life and employment, are strongly related to
the economic state of a country.
In conclusion, though there are several advantages of
performing other types of development, economic
progress remains the most essential for a country
since it allows it to improve the inner state of the
government and benefit its international status.
In conclusion, though there are several advantages to
performing other types of development, economic
progress remains the most essential for a country
since it allows the country to improve the inner state
of the government and benefit its international status.