Professional Documents
Culture Documents
secrets: The
5 key steps
to get the
perfect
ClinCheck
*Also works with Spark Approver
ALIGNER
SUN&FUN in Alicante
DOWNLOAD
¡Welcome to this e-book about
digital planning in invisible
orthodontics!
In this e-book you will find a simple method useful
to review your treatment planning as a true expert. Said
method is compatible with any software you use.
Extraoral references:
Midlines: Dental midlines position with regard to facial
midline is the first reference to be assessed, given its
aesthetic importance.
Fig.2. Patient with 100% overbite and adequate upper incisors exposure when smiling. The overbite is
corrected by lower intrusion for not reduce upper incisors exposure.
If lower incisors were extruded, even if the bite was closed, the
smile arc would worsen.
For this reason, in this case the use of an additional anchorage was
needed in order to achieve bite closure only by extruding upper
incisors and canines.
Fig.3. Patient with open bite without exposure of upper incisors when
smiling. Bite closure is panned by 85% upper teeth extrusion and 15% lower
teeth extrusion.
Intraoral references:
WALA ridge: At transverse level, the expansion that can be
performed will depend on the bone width of each patient.
Fig.4. Case with a severe dental compression in which the WALA ridge (dashed line)
and the negative torque of the posterior teeth allow a large expansion (about 2-3
mm per side) to be performed safely.
With this reference, it is possible to calculate approximately the
millimeters of expansion needed and request them to the
technician.
As we know that for the IMPA the norm is 90º and for the
Brustone, 110º, it is possible to determine the amount of
proclination or retroclination necessary in each patient.
Fig.5. Patient with gingival recessions and excessive proclination of the upper and lower incisors.
Increased overjet cannot be corrected using Class II elastics, as it would worsen the lower incisor
inclination. In this case, overjet reduction was done by extracting the upper premolars to retrude the
anterior teeth. In the lower arch, IPR and radiculolingual torque were planned in the lower central
incisors to improve the roots position.
With regard to these angles, it should be noted that they are not
assessed isolated, but together with the gingival biotype and the
level and thickness of the alveolar bone.
Fig.6. Examples of lateral cephalometric radiographs showing different widths of symphysis and
cortical bone. These characteristics are usually related to the facial pattern.
On ClinCheck®/ApproverTM, there are two ways to observe the
amount of expansion/proclination being performed.
Fig.9. Superimposition of the initial (blue) and final (white) position of the teeth in
two different plans.
Movement sequence
As discussed previously, the teeth movement
process is more important than the final
ClinCheck®/ApproverTM result.
Fig.10. Movement sequencing in a case with anterior open bite and posterior crossbite. First, the
teeth are aligned and the upper arch is expanded, and then the anterior teeth are extruded.
When the molars have finished their movement, the anterior teeth
begins to retract.
Fig.13. Graphic representation of the virtual jump of the fourth quadrant. The
superimposition between the initial (yellow) and final (white) positions shows
the mesialization of the fourth quadrant teeth. Planned expansion and IPR
allow this mesialization to be achieved without proclining the lower incisors.
Torque: The torque or tilt movement can be one of the most difficult
to achieve if not sequenced correctly. Sometimes, this movement is
planned by displacing the root palatally instead of making a buccal
movement of the crown.
The greater the root movement, the less predictable the movement
will be, since the force system generated is less efficient and the
aligners will loosen after a few weeks of starting treatment.
Once adequate torque has been achieved and with the roots inside
the cancellous bone, retrusion and/or intrusion movements can be
performed easily.
Movements coordination
If, for example, the movements of the lower arch are performed in
20 stages and those of the upper arch in 60 stages, interference
will likely appear between the teeth of both arches.
If there are 60 active aligners in the lower and in the upper arch,
even if the movement speed of lower teeth is reduced, the
technician will be able to adequately coordinate the movements
without increasing treatment time.
Fig.15. Class III patient in whom, due to inadequate planning (central image), interferences appear in
the anterior teeth. In the following planning (right image), it is requested to carry out the anterior
alignment without heavy contacts between the teeth of both arches.
If the mouth were a box, the upper arch would be the "lid" that
covers the lower arch. If this lid is not larger enough, if there is no
room created either by expanding or proclining the teeth, the
movements of the lower arch will be limited, since the upper teeth
will block these movements.
Fig.16. Case of lower second molar uprighting by distal crown tilting to open a space for placing an
implant after orthodontic treatment. The software shows the heavy contacts that will appear during
the movement of the piece and that can make uprighting difficult.
In certain cases, such as crossbites or Class II and Class III, it can
not be avoided that, due to the type of teeth movement,
interferences or punctual hypercontacts appear.
Fig.17. Case of upper sequential distalization in which heavy contacts appear between the molars of
the upper and lower arches. Occlusal adjustments to eliminate these contacts during revisions will
help improve the predictability of distalization.
Fig.18. Before and after a case with severe compression and asymmetric lower arch. The expansion
planned using a parabolic arch shape as a reference (right image) creates enough space to solve
crowding and retrude the lower incisors.
To quantify the expansion, we go back to the first point,
where the transverse width of the basal bone was discussed. By
looking at the WALA ridge and the torque of the posterior teeth, it
is possible to roughly estimate the number of millimeters of
expansion needed on each side of the mouth.
Fig.19. Expansion performed by coronobuccal tilting of the posterior sectors until 0º torque is
achieved.
Amount of expansion: Based on the intend of
achieving a parabolic arch shape, there are several
ways to request the technician the desired expansion.
Fig.20. Superimpositions of the upper (left) and lower (right) arches showing the
anchorage provided by the second and third molars in the expansion of the teeth
anterior to them.
Starting off with the diagnosis, all the relevant factors have been
analyzed to achieve a logical planning that is compatible with the
biological limits of the patient. In this last section, the accessory
elements that facilitate the achievement of all the aforementioned
movements, will be addressed.
Their shape and size will depend on the function they fulfill. If
attachments were not placed, the smooth surface of the teeth
would make some movements impossible to achieve, such as
extrusion or root tipping.
Fig.21. Patient with mixed dentition who had horizontal attachments placed on all primary teeth to
increase aligner retention.
Fig.22. Diagram of the forces applied by the aligner in the rotation of the incisors.
Fig.23. Diagram of a premolar rotation. The bevel is in the opposite direction to the force, which
increases the contact surface between the attachment and the aligner.
Extrusion: All pure extrusion moves need attachments to
occur. As it is a movement carried out in the vertical plane, the
necessary attachment will be horizontal. The direction of the
bevel will change depending on whether the extrusion is on
anterior or posterior teeth.
Fig.24. Diagram of the extrusion of the upper incisors. Horizontal gingival beveled attachments allow
the aligner to apply an effective extrusion force.
Fig.26. Diagram of the intrusion of a maxillary first molar assisted by the attachments placed on the
adjacent teeth.
Expansion: Depending on the posterior teeth torque, the
expansion can be performed whether by a coronobuccal
tilting movement, by an en masse movement (if there is a 0º
torque at the beginning), or by a combination of both.
Fig.27. Scheme of the force system applied to prevent the molars from “flaring” during the buccal
movement.
Increased overbite
Class II
Crossbite (anterior or posterior)
Posterior open bite
Bruxism
Fig.28. In the first picture (left) we can see how the increased overjet makes the bite ramps
functionless. In the image on the right, on the contrary, the lower teeth contact the bite ramps of the
upper incisors.
Crowding:
When these two therapeutic strategies are not enough to align the
teeth, IPR will be also planned. IPR, as a general rule, is performed
on the anterior teeth, where the crowding is usually found. This
provides a number of advantages:
Fig.29. Planned IPR in the lower anterior area to correct crowding without proclining the lower
incisors.
Bolton discrepancy:
Fig.30. Case in which asymmetric IPR is planned to correct the Bolton discrepancy between the
upper and lower arches and between the left and right sides of the lower arch.
In short, the success of planning lies in an orderly review of
the different treatment aspects, carrying out this review "from
outside to inside", starting off with an adequate diagnosis and
avoiding the temptation to start moving the teeth on the
ClinCheck®/ApproverTM without clear references.
We hope that this book serve as a basis for you to start planning
treatments with invisible orthodontics. At least, an overview on
how to review a ClinCheck®/ApproverTM is provided.
We can only provide some ingredients for you to get the recipe
for success. The rest is up to you!