Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LESSON 4
TOPIC: POSITION PAPER (ARGUMENTS IN MANIFESTOES) How to Analyze an Argument?
To analyze an author’s argument, take it one step at a time:
1. Briefly note the main assertion (what does the writer want me to believe or do?)
What is Position Paper? 2. Make a note of the first reason the author makes to support his/her
Position paper is the writing of one’s stand on a particular issue. The topic should be conclusion.
arguable. It discusses an issue, which the writer will take a stand (agree/disagree), the 3. Write down every other reason.
purpose is to convince the reader to take his or her stand. 4. Underline the most important reason.
Main assertion: (what does the writer want me to believe or do?)
What Contains a Position Paper?
What is a Manifesto?
1. Issue - is the topic being argued upon in the paper. The writer will choose his/her
side. He may take it negative or positive. According to Merriam Webster dictionary, a manifesto is a statement in which
Example: Topic: Haircut someone makes his or her intentions or views easy for people to ascertain.
On the other hand, Encyclopedia Britannica defines manifesto as a document publicly (A teacher to a student)
declaring the position or program of its issuer. A manifesto advances a set of ideas, I will not allow you to go to the comfort room because you might fall on the stairs, and
opinions, or views, but it can also lay out a plan of action. While it can address any topic, if you fell on the stairs your parents will complain, and if they complained, a case will
it most often concerns art, literature, or politics. Manifestos are generally written in the be filed against me. Therefore, you cannot go to the comfort room.
name of a group sharing a common perspective, ideology, or purpose rather than in the
name of a single individual. Example: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’s The Communist 6. Burden of proof- It is saying that the burden of proof lies not with the person
Manifesto (see/read on the internet), is a good and famous example of a manifesto making the claim, but with someone else to disprove.
regarding politics. If you cannot prove that I was the one who stole your bag, therefore, I wasn’t the one
who stole it.
7. Composition Division-It is assuming that what’s true about one part of something
Here is one example of their manifestos.
has to be applied to all or other parts of it.
The students in Hogwarts High School are lazy. Luna Lovegod is a student in
I believe that every child has potential. Regardless of race, socio-economic class, or IQ,
Hogwarts High School. Therefore, Luna Lovegod is lazy.
every child has the ability to contribute to our world. It can be intellectual-- the next
8. Bandwagon- It is appealing to popularity or the fact that many people do
brilliant math or physics theorem, the next great poem of our time-- it can be athletic--
something as an attempt of validation.
representing fair play and competition-- it can be artistic-- a song, a dance, a play. Every
child has potential. No child is confined by where they live, who their parents are, what 9. Appeal to Emotion-It is manipulating an emotional response in place of a valid or
compelling argument.
society expects of them. Every
I remember my grandmother told me that if I will let rice fall on the table while eating,
child can contribute something beautiful to our world. It can be a smile, a laugh, or one
the rice will cry, so I shouldn’t let these rice fall on the table while eating.
good thought. That is all it
takes to change someone's life. Arguments as we have discussed in the previous module is the attempt to
prove a point using evidence and reasoning.
- Katie Sipiora
Evidence is the concrete facts used to support a claim. Ideally, evidence is
LESSON 5 something everyone agrees on, or something that anyone could, with
TOPIC: POSITION PAPER (ARGUMENTS AND FACTUAL EVIDENCES) sufficient training and equipment, verify for themselves.
What is Fallacy? Evidence is one of the two basic ingredients of argument (the other is reasoning),
A fallacy is reasoning that comes to a conclusion without the evidence to support it and so a great deal of effort goes into ensuring its quality, and challenging the
(Merriam Webster dictionary). quality of evidence in arguments we disagree with.