You are on page 1of 6

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, 2023, XX, 1–6

https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmad043
Advance access publication 19 October 2023
Research Paper

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jphsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jphsr/rmad043/7322040 by AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY user on 17 November 2023


Awareness and beliefs of community pharmacists on
disposal of unused and expired household medications in
Indonesia: a cross-sectional study
Sofa D. Alfian1,2,*, , Qisty A. Khoiry1, Mochammad A. A. Pratama2, Wawan Wahyudin3,
Irma M. Puspitasari1,2, Ivan S. Pradipta1,2, , Rizky Abdulah1,2
1
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno Km. 21 Jatinangor,
Indonesia
2
Drug Utilization and Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group, Centre of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas
Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno Km. 21 Jatinangor, Indonesia
3
Ciloto Health Training Centre, Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Puncak Ciloto, Km. 90 Cianjur, Indonesia
*
Correspondence: Sofa D. Alfian; Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Jatinangor, KM
21 Jatinangor—Sumedang, Indonesia. E-mail: sofa.alfian@unpad.ac.id

Abstract
Objective: To assess the awareness and beliefs of community pharmacists regarding the disposal of expired and unused household medications
in Indonesia.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted through convenience sampling. All pharmacists participating in a virtual training event
were invited to take part in a self-administer voluntary online survey. A translated and validated questionnaire was used to assess awareness
about the harm caused by improper disposal and the beliefs of the best location for collecting expired and unused household medications.
Subsequently, demographic data such as age, gender, education level, and work experience of pharmacists were obtained through self-reported
data. The characteristics of pharmacists and the outcomes were summarized using descriptive analysis. Correlation analysis was carried out to
determine the association between sociodemographic variables and outcomes.
Key findings: A total of 202 pharmacists completed the survey (response rate: 96.2%). The majority were female (83.2%) and the mean work
experience was 4.7 years. Approximately 86% of pharmacists were aware of the environmental harm caused by improper disposing of expired
and unused household medications, and 98% acknowledged their role in preventing such risks. Approximately 70%–80% of the respondents
believed that community pharmacies were the best location for the collection of expired and unused household medications. No significant
associations were found among age, gender, education level, and years of experience and the outcomes.
Conclusion: Almost all pharmacists were aware of the risk of improper disposal of expired and unused household medications and acknowl-
edged their responsibilities to protect the environment. The strong inclination of pharmacists to select pharmacies as collection points for
expired and unused medications strongly advocates for the implementation of medication take-back programs in Indonesia.
Keywords: community pharmacists; awareness; beliefs; disposal of household medications; unused medications; expired medications; Indonesia

Introduction to their potential risks to human health and ecotoxicological


The concerns surrounding pharmaceutical waste are escalating risks [10, 11]. A current study reported the presence of par-
in recent years [1]. This is due to factors such as patient non- acetamol residues in the waters of Muara Angke and Ancol
adherence to treatment, improvement in medical condition, Bay, Indonesia [12]. Additionally, previous studies identified
treatment changes, adverse effect experiences, and oversupply the presence of antibiotics in drinking water, with certain bac-
of medicines from multiple sources [2]. The high number of teria displaying resistance to commonly found antibiotics in
expired and unused medications at home [3] may increase these water sources [13, 14]. The detection of pharmaceutical
pharmaceutical waste disposal [2]. In developing nations such substances in drinking water at nanogram/liter concentrations
as Indonesia, the disposal of expired and unused medications underscores the insufficiency of household water treatment
is often carried out through improper methods, including plants in removing them [15, 16].
flushing down the toilet or discarding in regular garbage [4, 5, Pharmacists are accessible healthcare professionals
6, 7, 8]. This is possibly due to a lack of awareness regarding and play an important role in influencing both the com-
the risk of improper disposal of expired and unused household munity and the environment by promoting proper disposal
medications to both human health and the environment [9]. practices for expired and unused household medications.
Inappropriate disposal practices of expired and unused Although pharmacists possess satisfactory knowledge and
household medications can pose a threat to the ecosystem due attitudes regarding medication disposal [17], most do not

Received: 24 May 2023 Accepted: 27 September 2023


© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For
commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
2 Alfian et al.

proactively counsel patients about medication disposal ensuring their privacy and anonymity during data collec-
practices [18, 17]. In some developed countries, medication tion and analysis. This study adhered to Strengthening
take-back programs are well-established, with pharmacists the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
and pharmacies playing important roles in encouraging ap- (STROBE) guidelines for cross-sectional studies [24]
propriate medication disposal practices and acting as collec- (Supplementary Table S1).

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jphsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jphsr/rmad043/7322040 by AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY user on 17 November 2023


tion points [19, 20, 8]. This type of program allow patients
and the general population to return expired and unused Data collection
medications to pharmacies for appropriate disposal. This The self-administered online survey was distributed after
program has been reported effectively because a higher pro- the virtual training event to assess pharmacists’ awareness
portion of respondents in Sweden (43%) have returned their and beliefs regarding the disposal of expired and unused
medications to pharmacies [21]. household medications. The questionnaire was developed
Some pharmacies in Indonesia may offer medication based on previous studies [25, 26, 8]. Two independent
take-back programs at their own cost and time as part of translators from professional language services translated
their community’s social responsibility. However, official the questionnaire into Indonesian and then back to English.
guidelines for community pharmacies to accept expired The translated questionnaire was reviewed by two experts
and unused medications from the general population are from the pharmacoepidemiology and clinical pharmacy
lacking. The provisions mostly concern expired and unused fields. Subsequently, the opinion of these experts regarding
medications from healthcare facilities and pharmacies but the clarity of each item was considered before finalizing
not from household settings. In 2019, a campaign under the the questionnaire. A pilot study including 30 pharmacists
slogan “Let’s Dispose of Medication Properly” was launched assessed content and face validity. The questionnaire was
where 1000 pharmacies in Indonesia collaborated to dissem- shown to be valid and reliable based on the content va-
inate information to return expired and unused household lidity index and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.8 and 0.7,
medications to pharmacies [22]. However, the effectiveness respectively.
and sustainability of such a program are unknown because The validated questionnaire comprised four sections. The
very few Indonesian populations return their expired and first section consisted of questions about the demographic
unused medications to pharmacies [5]. Therefore, a system information of pharmacists, including age upon completing
should be developed to collect expired and unused household the questionnaire, sex (male and female), highest educa-
medications. tional level (registered pharmacists, master’s, Ph.D.), and
For a new system or service to be successfully and effec- experience in clinical practice (in years). The second section
tively implemented, acceptance plays a crucial role [23]. consisted of four questions designed to assess the awareness
Therefore, an early assessment of pharmacists’ aware- of pharmacists toward environmental damage (e.g. “How
ness and beliefs is important to measure their acceptance much damage will affect the environment if you, as an indi-
of such a service. This information is important for devel- vidual, had thrown away unused medications in the trash?”)
oping and implementing such a service. However, to date, using a 3-point Likert scale (e.g. no damage (0 points), uncer-
no study assessed the level of awareness and beliefs among tain (1 point), or damage (2 points)). A total score of <50%
pharmacists regarding the disposal practices of expired and was classified as unaware, while a total score of ≥50% was
unused household medications in any form within Indonesia. classified as aware.
Therefore, this study aimed to assess the awareness and The third section included three questions aimed at
beliefs of community pharmacists concerning the disposal of assessing the beliefs of pharmacists regarding the appro-
expired and unused household medications in Indonesia to priate place for collecting expired and unused household
better understand the development of effective interventions medications (e.g. “secure containers inside pharmacies within
to address the issue. community pharmacies”) using a 3-point Likert scale (e.g. not
a good idea (0 points), uncertain (1 point), or a good idea (2
points)). A total score of <50% was classified as poor beliefs,
Methods while a total score of ≥50% was classified as good beliefs.

Study design, setting, and participants Sample size calculation


A cross-sectional survey was performed using conven- The minimum sample size was calculated for the cross-sec-
ience sampling. All registered pharmacists working in the tional survey by considering an expected proportion of
Community Health Centers who participated in the virtual participants at 50%, an absolute error at 5%, and a conven-
training event in September 2022 were invited to a self- tional normal variate of type 1 error at 5%. This indicates
administered voluntary online survey. The virtual training that at least 192 participants are needed.
event was organized by the Ciloto Health Training Center of
the Ministry of Health, Indonesia, and was attended by 210 Data analysis
representatives of pharmacists from 29 provinces in Indonesia. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistics to
The virtual training event was free, and the schedule included show the characteristics of pharmacists. The Spearman’s
lectures and workshops regarding pharmaceutical care for rank correlation coefficient was performed to assess the as-
patients. The topic of medication disposal was not included sociation between the characteristics of pharmacists and their
in this virtual training event. awareness and beliefs on the disposal practices of expired
The Health Research Ethics Committee of Universitas and unused household medications. Correlation coefficients
Padjadjaran, Indonesia, approved this study (No. 671/UN6. of <0.49, <0.69, and ≥0.70 indicated weak, moderate, and
KEP/EC/2022). Consent was obtained from all participating strong correlations, respectively (27). A P-value of <0.05 was
pharmacists through an online checkbox in the survey, deemed statistically significant. All statistical analyses were
Awareness and beliefs of community pharmacists 3

performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences are the most appropriate locations for collecting expired and
(version 27.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). unused household medications (Table 3).

Correlations of sociodemographic factors to the


Results respective knowledge and beliefs

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jphsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jphsr/rmad043/7322040 by AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY user on 17 November 2023


Characteristics of participants No significant associations were found among the age,
The self-administered online survey was delivered to 210 gender, educational level, and years of experience of
pharmacists attending the event, and 202 pharmacists (re- pharmacists and their awareness of the risk of improper
sponse rate: 96.2%) completed the survey. The majority were disposal of expired and unused household medications in
female (83.2%), the average age was 29.9 years and were the environment or the beliefs about the appropriate place
relatively new as pharmacists (mean work experience of 4.7 to collect expired and unused household medications (P >
years) (Table 1). 0.05) (Tables 4 and 5).

Awareness and beliefs on the appropriate place Discussion


for disposal of expired and unused household The majority of pharmacists were aware that improperly
medications disposed of expired and unused household medications may
Half of pharmacists were aware of the environmental hazards harm the environment, and they agreed on their responsibility
of unused and expired household medication disposal to prevent such risks. A high number of pharmacists believe
(58.4%) (Table 1). A very high number of pharmacists (98%) that community pharmacies as the appropriate place for the
agreed that one of their responsibilities is to protect the envi- collection of expired and unused household medications.
ronment (Table 2). Subsequently, no significant associations were observed be-
Regarding beliefs on appropriate disposal locations, about tween pharmacists’ age, gender, education level, and years
67.3% of pharmacists held strong beliefs in suitable collection of experience with the awareness of the risk of improper
sites for expired and unused household medications (Table disposal of expired and unused household medications on
1). The majority of pharmacists believed that community the environment or the beliefs about the appropriate place
pharmacies and pharmacies of private and public hospitals to collect expired and unused household medications.
In comparison to pharmacists in Saudi Arabia [26] and
Kuwait [25] using a similar instrument, pharmacists in this
Table 1. Characteristics of pharmacists (N = 202). study showed higher awareness levels regarding improper
medication disposal risks on the environment. Furthermore,
Characteristics N (%) the majority of pharmacists agreed that the environment
Age in years, mean (SD) 29.9 (4.6)
can be harmed when expired and unused medications are
disposed of in either the sink or the trash. Subsequently,
Gender Male 34 16.8
expired and unused medications disposal, either through
Female 168 83.2 household waste, the toilet, or the sink, may be an important
Educational level Registered 198 98.0 route that enables pharmaceutical waste to get into the en-
pharmacists
vironment ([28]). The Food and Drug Administration in the
Master 4 2.0 United States recommends disposing of medication in house-
Work experience in years, mean (SD) 4.7 (3.3) hold garbage for certain medications (29), but this method is
Awareness Aware 118 58.4 suggested only in the settings when a medication take-back
Unaware 84 41.6 program is not established. These guidelines suggested mixing
Beliefs Good 136 67.3 the medication with unpalatable materials and placing it in a
Poor 66 32.7
sealed plastic container. However, a small amount of this mix-
ture may escape this confinement eventually and contaminate

Table 2. Awareness among community pharmacists of environmental hazards of unused and expired household medication disposal (N = 202).

Items Responses

No damage, Damage, N Uncertain,


N (%) (%) N (%)

Disregarding what others are doing, how much damage will affect the environment if you, as 2 (1.0) 199 (98.5) 1 (0.5)
an individual, had thrown away unused medications in the trash?
Disregarding what others are doing, what extent of damage on the environment if you, as 24 (11.9) 175 (86.6) 3 (1.5)
an individual, dispose of unused medications by throwing them away in the sink or toilet
(sewage)?
Disagree, Agree, Uncertain,
N (%) N (%) N (%)
It is my responsibility to protect the environment even if others are unconcerned or irrespon- 1 (0.5) 200 (99.0) 1 (0.5)
sible.
It is my responsibility to ensure the safety of other living species on earth. 1 (0.5) 199 (98.6) 2 (1.0)
4 Alfian et al.

Table 3. Beliefs of community pharmacists about the appropriate location for collecting unused and expired household medications (N = 202).

Item Response

Good idea, N (%) Not a good idea, N (%) Uncertain, N (%)

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jphsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jphsr/rmad043/7322040 by AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY user on 17 November 2023


Secure containers inside pharmacies within community pharmacies 163 (80.7) 17 (8.4) 22 (10.9)
Secure containers inside pharmacies within government hospitals 163 (80.7) 16 (7.9) 23 (11.4)
Secure containers inside pharmacies within private hospitals 143 (70.8) 15 (7.4) 44 (21.8)

There were no significant associations observed among the


Table 4. Correlation of sociodemographic factors with awareness of age, gender, education level, and experience of pharmacists
disposal of unused and expired medications (N = 202).
and their awareness of the environmental risks related to
improper medication disposal or their beliefs about appro-
Characteristics Awareness priate collection locations. This is similar to conflicting results
rhoa P value about the sociodemographics of pharmacists in previous
studies [25, 26, 17]. In general, it seems that pharmacists’
Age 0.025 0.729 awareness and beliefs regarding the disposal of expired and
Gender −0.031 0.666 unused household medications are not influenced by their
Education level 0.048 0.499 sociodemographic factors.
Work experience 0.025 0.723 These results strongly support the initiation of medica-
tion take-back programs within community pharmacies in
Indonesia. The appropriate collection and disposal of expired
a
Spearman rank correlation coefficient.
and unused household medications through a well-established
collection program and disposal system are paramount to
Table 5. Correlations of sociodemographic factors with beliefs of guarantee the safety of human health and the natural environ-
disposal of unused and expired medications (N = 202). ment. Subsequently, policies should be developed to govern
the collection of returned medications through pharmacies,
Characteristics Beliefs using pharmacists’ positive environmental awareness and
rhoa P value willingness to participate. An official policy for the disposal
of expired and unused household medications has a positive
Age 0.075 0.289 effect on how the general population dispose of them [30].
Gender 0.110 0.120 Therefore, close collaboration between governmental sectors
Education level −0.053 0.458 and national awareness of public and health care providers is
Work experience 0.064 0.362 necessary to develop and initiate an effective medication take-
back program at the national level.
This study is likely the first to assess the awareness and
a
Spearman rank correlation coefficient.
beliefs of Indonesian pharmacists regarding the disposal
practices of expired and unused household medications.
the environment. Additionally, the majority of pharmacists However, several limitations should be acknowledged. Similar
indicated their responsibility to protect the environment to any self-reported survey, the potential effects of social de-
from such risks. This is an encouraging finding in which sirability bias in the responses remain a threat to internal
pharmacists indicate high awareness and good responsibility validity. Additionally, response bias might be present since
to protect the environment from improper disposal of expired pharmacists who chose to complete the survey could differ in
and unused household medications. their responses from non-participants, a common occurrence
Most of pharmacists in this study believed that community in voluntary surveys. Pharmacists were recruited by conven-
pharmacies were an appropriate place for the collection of ience sampling that may reduce the cost and time needed
expired and unused household medications from the public but with limited generalizability. Particularly, pharmacists
and they are willing to designate their pharmacies as a col- attending the virtual training event might not represent non-
lection site for expired and unused household medications. attendees, and, therefore, these results cannot be generalized
However, the percentage of these beliefs was lower compared to a greater population. Future studies, particularly using a
to beliefs among pharmacists in Saudi Arabia [26] and Kuwait mixed-methods study design, are needed to further explore
[25] using a similar instrument. This willingness reflects the perception, willingness, and barriers toward medication
their awareness and sense of responsibility in reducing the disposal programs among pharmacists on a national level in
risk of improper disposal of expired and unused household Indonesia.
medications. This inclination also mirrors patient preferences
in Indonesia, where returning medications through gov-
ernment health centers was the favored method ([2] [5]). Conclusions
Therefore, there is a need to develop a policy that would Almost all pharmacists were aware of the risk of improper dis-
allow pharmacists to accept returned expired and unused posal of expired and unused household medications and ac-
medications from the general population and subsequently knowledged their responsibilities to protect the environment.
guide pharmacists on the appropriate disposal practices to re- The beliefs among pharmacists in designating pharmacies
place their voluntary efforts. for collecting expired and unused household medications
Awareness and beliefs of community pharmacists 5

strongly supported the initiation of medication take-back 5. Insani WN, Qonita NA, Jannah SS et al. Improper disposal prac-
programs in Indonesia. tice of unused and expired pharmaceutical products in Indonesian
households. Heliyon 2020;6:e04551–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
heliyon.2020.e04551
Supplementary Material 6. Kassahun H, Tesfaye D. Disposal practices of unused medications
among patients in public health centers of Dessie Town,

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jphsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jphsr/rmad043/7322040 by AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY user on 17 November 2023


Supplementary data are available at Journal of Pharmaceutical Northeast Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Current Drug Safety
Health Services Research online. 2020;15:105–10. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886315666200331
140400
7. Marwa KJ, Mcharo G, Mwita S et al. Disposal practices of expired
Acknowledgment and unused medications among households in Mwanza, Tanzania.
We thank all respondents for their effort and contributions. PLoS One 2021;16:e0246418–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0246418
8. Tong AYC, Peake BM, Braund R. Disposal practices for unused
medications around the world. Environ Int 2011;37:292–8. https://
Author contributions
doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.10.002
S.D.A., Q.A.K., I.M.P., and I.S.P. were involved in protocol 9. Alfian SD, Insani WN, Halimah E et al. Lack of awareness of the im-
development; S.D.A. and Q.A.K. were involved in gaining pact of improperly disposed of medications and associated factors:
ethical approval; S.D.A., Q.A.K., M.A.A.P., W.Y., I.M.P., a cross-sectional survey in Indonesian households. Front Pharmacol
I.S.P., and R.A. were involved in patient recruitment and data 2021;12:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.630434
analysis. S.D.A. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All 10. Cui G, Lü F, Zhang H et al. Critical insight into the fate of antibiotic
resistance genes during biological treatment of typical biowastes.
authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the
Bioresour Technol 2020;317:123974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
final version of the manuscript. biortech.2020.123974
11. Praveena SM, Shaifuddin SNM, Sukiman S et al. Pharmaceuticals
residues in selected tropical surface water bodies from Selangor
Conflict of interest (Malaysia): occurrence and potential risk assessments. Sci
The author(s) declare that there are no conflicts of interest. Total Environ 2018;642:230–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
scitotenv.2018.06.058
12. Koagouw W, Arifin Z, Olivier GWJ et al. High concentrations of
Funding paracetamol in effluent dominated waters of Jakarta Bay, Indo-
nesia. Mar Pollut Bull 2021;169:112558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
This study was supported by a grant-in-aid from Universitas marpolbul.2021.112558
Padjadjaran, Indonesia (No. 2203/UN6.3.1/PT.00/2022). 13. Fernando DM, Tun HM, Poole J et al. Detection of antibiotic resist-
This funding body did not have any role in designing the ance genes in source and drinking water samples from a first nations
study, writing this article, and deciding to submit it for pub- community in Canada. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016;82:4767–75.
lication. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00798-16
14. Voigt AM, Ciorba P, Döhla M et al. The investigation of antibi-
otic residues, antibiotic resistance genes and antibiotic-resistant
Data availability organisms in a drinking water reservoir system in Germany. Int J
Hyg Environ Health 2020;224:113449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
The data that support the findings of this study are available ijheh.2020.113449
from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. 15. Massoud MA, Chami G, Al-Hindi M et al. Assessment of house-
hold disposal of pharmaceuticals in Lebanon: management
options to protect water quality and public health. Environ
Ethics approval Manage 2016;57:1125–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-
The study was approved by the Health Research Ethics 0666-6
Committee of Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia (No. 671/ 16. Stoddard KI, Hodge V, Maxey G et al. Investigating research gaps of
pharmaceutical take back events: an analysis of take back program
UN6.KEP/EC/2022). All participants provided their con-
participants’ socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic char-
sent to participate by selecting a checkbox in the online acteristics and the public health benefits of take back programs.
survey. Environ Manage 2017;59:871–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00267-017-0834-3
17. Low BY, Ting KN, Lee MK. Knowledge, attitude and practice
References of community pharmacists towards household pharmaceutical
1. Daughton CG. Pharmaceuticals and the Environment (PiE): evolu- waste disposal. Int J Pharm Practice 2022;31:261–5. https://doi.
tion and impact of the published literature revealed by bibliometric org/10.1093/ijpp/riac101
analysis. Sci Total Environ 2016;562:391–426. https://doi. 18. Jankie S, Stuart AV, Barsatee N et al. Pharmacists knowledge, per-
org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.109 ception and practice regarding medication disposal. Exploratory
2. Makki M, Hassali MA, Awaisu A et al. The prevalence of un- Res Clin Social Pharm 2022;8:100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
used medications in homes. Pharmacy 2019;7:61. https://doi. rcsop.2022.100202
org/10.3390/pharmacy7020061 19. Bettington E, Spinks J, Kelly F et al. Returning unwanted
3. Kristina SA, Wiedyaningsih C, Cahyadi A et al. A survey on med- medicines to pharmacies: prescribing to reduce waste. Aus-
icine disposal practice among households in Yogyakarta. Asian J tralian Prescriber 2018;41:78–81. https://doi.org/10.18773/
Pharmaceut 2018;12:S955–8. austprescr.2018.015
4. Azmi Hassali M, Shakeel S. Unused and expired medications 20. Cyclamed. (2020). Cyclamed: French drug take back System.
disposal practices among the General Public in Selangor, Ma- https://circabc.europa.eu/ (28 March 2023, date last accessed)
laysia. Pharmacy 2020;8:196. https://doi.org/10.3390/phar- 21. Persson M, Sabelström E, Gunnarsson B. Handling of unused pre-
macy8040196 scription drugs--knowledge, behaviour and attitude among Swedish
6 Alfian et al.

people. Environ Int 2009;35:771–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 26. Alghadeer S, Al-Arifi MN. Community pharmacists’ practice,
envint.2008.10.002 awareness, and beliefs about drug disposal in Saudi Arabia. Health-
22. BPOM. Badan POM Canangkan “Ayo Buang Sampah Obat- care 2021;9:823. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070823
Gerakan Waspada Obat Ilegal.” Badan Pengawas Obat Dan 27. Ali K, Al-Hameed A. Spearman’s correlation coefficient in sta-
Makanan, 2019. tistical analysis. Int J Nonlinear Anal Appl 2022;13:2008–6822.
23. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user ac- https://doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2022.6079

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jphsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jphsr/rmad043/7322040 by AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY user on 17 November 2023


ceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:319– 28. Bound JP, Voulvoulis N. Household disposal of pharmaceuticals as
39. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 a pathway for aquatic contamination in the United Kingdom. En-
24. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al. The Strengthening the viron Health Perspect 2005;113:1705–11. https://doi.org/10.1289/
Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) ehp.8315
statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. 29. Where and How to Dispose of Unused Medicines | FDA. (n.d.).
J Clin Epidemiol 2008;18:800–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/where-and-
ede.0b013e3181577654 how-dispose-unused-medicines (28 March 2023, date last
25. Abahussain E, Waheedi M, Koshy S. Practice, awareness and accessed).
opinion of pharmacists toward disposal of unwanted medications 30. Tong AY, Peake BM, Braund R. Disposal practices for unused
in Kuwait. Saudi Pharmaceut J 2012;20:195–201. https://doi. medications in New Zealand. Environ Int 2009;35:952–5. https://
org/10.1016/j.jsps.2012.04.001 doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.04.003

You might also like