Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 PM MachineSafety FranciosXavierHenneau

    Uploaded by

    pomsarexnb
    9 views19 pages
    1) The document discusses safety standards for machinery and evaluates whether a standard PLC can be used to achieve safety requirements. 2) It outlines the risk assessment and risk reduction process according to ISO 12100, including defining safety measures using the 3-level method. 3) It provides examples of machine architectures that can meet categories from B to 2 using standard or well-tried components, and examines whether a standard PLC can achieve a low safety integrity level for an emergency stop application.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    5_PM_MachineSafety_FranciosXavierHenneau

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) The document discusses safety standards for machinery and evaluates whether a standard PLC can be used to achieve safety requirements. 2) It outlines the risk assessment and risk reduction process according to ISO 12100, including defining safety measures using the 3-level method. 3) It provides examples of machine architectures that can meet categories from B to 2 using standard or well-tried components, and examines whether a standard PLC can achieve a low safety integrity level for an emergency stop application.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views19 pages

    5 PM MachineSafety FranciosXavierHenneau

    Uploaded by

    pomsarexnb
    1) The document discusses safety standards for machinery and evaluates whether a standard PLC can be used to achieve safety requirements. 2) It outlines the risk assessment and risk reduction process according to ISO 12100, including defining safety measures using the 3-level method. 3) It provides examples of machine architectures that can meet categories from B to 2 using standard or well-tried components, and examines whether a standard PLC can achieve a low safety integrity level for an emergency stop application.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 19

    Safety with or without

    standard PLC ?

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016 siemens.com/simatic-safety


    Agenda

    1 What the standards says

    2 The result of a risk analysis

    3 Some examples with standard components

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    DF FA S MP PLC 2
    Risk assessment / risk reduction according to ISO 12100

    Risk assessment Describe the machine Identify the hazards Evaluate the risks

    Define and
    evaluate Design the architecture Implement a safety concept and
    Risk reduction the safety measures of the safety functions put it into operation
    (3-level method)

    Prove compliance with the


    Document the
    Proof measures
    Carry out a validation directive
    Affix the CE marking

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    Define and evaluate the safety measures
    The 3-level method according to EN ISO 12100 Ch. 6

    Risk reduction
    START

    1 Safe mechanical design

    YES No PLC
    Risk reduced appropriately?
    NO
    needed
    2 Technical measures

    YES
    Risk reduced appropriately?
    NO

    3 User information about residual risks

    YES
    Risk reduced appropriately?
    NO

    Renewed risk assessment END

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    Relation of PL and Cat

    PL a
    Standard MTTFd

    components PL b low
    medium
    high

    WELL tried PL c

    components !!
    PL d

    PL e

    Cat. B Cat. 1 Cat. 2 Cat. 3 Cat. 4


    DCavg= 0 0 low medium low medium high
    CCF >= 65 pts

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    Possible architectures according to ISO 13849-1
    Categories from B to 2

    Standard
    components

    WELL tried
    components !!

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    Requirements starting from category 1

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    What are well tried components ?

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    Safety Evaluation Tool
    Safety loop with standard components PLb

    Detection Evaluation Reaction

    Standard CPU Switchgear


    E-STOP
    Well proven Well proven

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    SRP-CS E-STOP

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    DF FA S MP PLC 2
    SRP-CS Contactor

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    DF FA S MP PLC 2
    SRP-CS: standard PLC??

    ??
    Intern © Siemens AG 2016
    DF FA S MP PLC 2
    With Sistema PL can be calculated

    STD CPU
    STD DI
    STD DO

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    DF FA S MP PLC 2
    Result : a low PL is reached

    Detection Evaluation Reaction

    Standard CPU Switchgear


    E-STOP
    Well proven Well proven

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    DF FA S MP PLC 2
    Differentiation of the use of IEC 62061 – ISO 13849

    IEC 62061
    • applicable for all electrical and electronical systems with any architecture.
    • SIL 1 up to 3
    • programmable logic controller (PLC etc) have to fulfil IEC 61508

    EN ISO 13849-1
    • applicable for hydraulic, pneumatic and electromechanical systems without
    restrictions.
    • applicable for programmable electronic only with restrictions
    • certain architecture
    • up to PL d resp. SIL 2
    • programmable logic controller for PL e (SPS etc) have to fulfil
    IEC 61508
    • calculation concept of ISO 13849-1 based on predefined architectures

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    Safety Evaluation Tool
    With certified components

    Detection Evaluation Reaction

    3SE6315 CPU 1500F 2x 3RT switchgears


    RFID safety switches With F-DI and F-DO
    Ple PFH 2,7e-10

    Ple PFH 1e-9


    Ple PFH 2e-9
    Ple PFH 2e-9

    Ple PFH 2e-8


    TOTAL = Ple PFH 2,52e-8

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    Safety switch off of voltage on standard components

    1. The safety system is Ple


    2. The feedback of the contactors is taken in
    consideration
    3. The MTTFd of each module and each contactor
    has to be taken in consideration.

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    DF FA S MP PLC 2
    SIMATIC Safety Integrated
    … System Solutions for Safety-Related Automation

    + Integrated product portfolio


    Detection – evaluation – responding
    Consistent product Functional Safety siemens.com/safety-integrated-products
    portfolio
    services & training
    + Support and Consulting
    by Siemens safety experts
    http///support.industry.siemens.com

    Consulting + Prefabricated solutions on the basis


    Safety Evaluation of practice-oriented functional examples
    Tool SET siemens.com/safety-functional-examples

    + SET for the assessment of your machine's safety


    functions
    Function siemens.com/safety-evaluation-tool
    examples + Training and support regarding standards, risk
    assessment
    siemens.be/sitrain

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    Thank you very much for your attention

    François-Xavier Henneau
    Promotor Safety
    DF FA
    Demeurslaan, 132
    1654 Huizingen
    Francois-xavier.henneau@siemens.com
    Tel 0476 / 46 83 56

    siemens.com/simatic-safety

    Intern © Siemens AG 2016


    DF FA S MP PLC 2

    You might also like