Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/293333056
CITATIONS READS
8 7,197
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Foad Faizi on 08 March 2016.
ABSTRACT
In recent years, the use of double skin façades has been common throughout the world,
because of their characteristics such as durability, easy circulation of fresh-air, use of
natural resources, transparency, and their capability to reduce energy consumption.
Double glass façade systems are performed increasingly in high buildings, designed by
famous Architects, and being touted as a praiseworthy “green” building strategy. This
paper present characteristics and classification of double skin facades, and their
advantages and disadvantages in order to clarify whether or not these systems represent a
valid approach to energy efficient and sustainability in building or are just an architectural
fad. Finally we conclude that double skin façade systems create transparency combining
indoor environment with decrease energy use, and they are initiate point to convert height
rise buildings into the sustainable architecture domain.
Key words: Double skin facade, Natural ventilation, sustainability, energy efficiency
1. Introduction
Generally the installed areas of windows and glass facades have increased in new
building in recent years. This may to some extent be an architectural fad, but it agrees with a
human need [1]. The use of double skin facades has acquired expanding popularity in recently
designed office buildings [2]. The essential concept of the Double Skin Façade was first
explored by Le Corbusier in the early 20th century. His idea, involved the insertion of
heating/cooling pipes between large layers of glass [3]. As indicated by the term "double-
skin" such a façade is a system in which two "skins" - two layers of glass - are separated by a
significant amount of air space, and a second glass façade is placed in front of the first.
Generally, Double skin facade supposed to be as a thermal buffer in buildings, Since Buffer
zone air temperature is higher than surroundings during most of the day which decrease heat
losses and DSF reduce the amount of solar radiations[12]. These two sheets of glass act as an
insulation between the outside and inside enabling the air to circulate in the cavity between
two facades skin, and providing good air circulation, to reduce energy use [4]. Further
reduction could be achieved by placing shading devices in the cavity space. Shading devices
2nd International Congress on Structure , Architecture
and Urban Development
16-18 December 2014, Tabriz , Iran
help in absorbing heat and liberating it within the cavity. The absorbed heat is transmitted to
the surrounding air and adjoining surface by means of radiation and convection. The position
of the shading devices plays a major role in the distribution of the heat gains [5]. The most
interesting systems are those designed in such a way that in addition to permitting natural air
circulation, they also use solar energy, converting it into electrical energy [4]. In this research
we introduce this systems and its classification. Moreover we clarify the advantages and
disadvantages of double skin façade to verify their capability to reduce energy consumption
and create sustainability in buildings.
Since air and surface temperature are specified by sun-shading device angle and air
flow rate as a second parameter, Thermal efficiency of DSF is directly related to the sun
shading device function. That’s why thermal view must be the main factor to determine sun-
shading device color and position in buffer zone. However, small value of variety in sun-
shading angle could be adapted by DSF without effect on energy efficiency. Sun-shading
device angle let interior spaces to use better daylighting. High glazed surface with bad effect
on thermal comfort and good effect on visual comfort can be controlled with sun-shading
device due to thermal aspect and access to natural light both together. [10]. Gavan investigate
the energy efficiency of sun-shading device in different angle in three air flow rate. This
coefficient is the amount of removed energy from the cell by three air flow imposed in the
DSF. However it is affected by the lower and upper ventilation opening air temperature too.
Table . Energy efficiency calculated from the energy removed by the DSF. [10]
Sun-shading Energy Energy Energy
device angle efficiency efficiency efficiency
(Qv 200) ( Qv 400) ( Qv 600)
0-20 0.25-0.28 3.08-3.32 4.15-4.42
20-40 0.28-3.07 3.32-3.5 4.42-4.36
40-60 3.07-3.08 3.5-3.37 4.36-3.84
60-80 3.08-3.02 3.37-3.22 3.84-3.69
80-90 3.02-2.99 3.22-3.14 3.69-3.62
Crisine research declare that since natural ventilation through the DSF(with blind
located in middle of cavity) is considered during most of the daily time average air
temperature in buffer zone is higher than the ambient temperature air flow is upward.
However during part of the early morning the temporal capacity of the façade which located
in the shade makes delay in temperature rise in cavity. This delay makes cavity temperature
lower than ambient temporarily which make downward flow in the cavity [12]. Depends on
climate condition and the DSF orientation this upward and downward flow can be managed to
use natural ventilation in building.
Control and operation strategies in DSF specially in heating season has important role
in efficiency of DSF. Research in Korea shows that 1% energy reduction estimated when
cavity heated air enters directly to the interior space by operable window in comparison to
using DSF as a thermal buffer space. Energy saving is significant between morning and
noontime but total energy saving is not noticeable compared to base model. But 41 %
reduction in heating energy consumption resulted when operation method of introducing the
heated air in buffer zone into outdoor air mixing box of the HAVC system had been used. Of
course, this reduction is in direct relation to the outdoor and indoor temperature differences
[15].
Fig. 3. Six ventilation modes and ten airflow regimes (blind slats not drawn for clarity).
[11]
aerodynamic loads. Pressure in short part of the L-shaped DSF in more than long part in these
angles [14].
So, cavity zone and external skin pressure are directly related to the 3 main factors: air
cavity width, wind incident and layout. In striped type equal pressure occurred in both inner
side of external skin and internal skin outside surface. However gap pressure was usually
more than net pressure of the external skin. But, L-shaped DSF conjunction pressure is
fluctuated [14]. Safety and good performance of double skin façade require deep initially
analysis of wind pressure.
5. Summaries
In this research, the characteristics and classification of double skin facades was
studied in order to find whether this system has efficiency to reduce energy use in buildings or
architects use it only for Aesthetic purpose. To sum up we conclude that based on the
capability of double skin façades to prepare natural ventilation and air condition, and
transparency in buildings, it undoubtedly can be a factor for sustainability in buildings. This
system can reduce thermal energy in summer by providing good ventilation through its cavity
(naturally or mechanically), and uses solar heat recovery for heating the building in winter,
besides it is a good acoustic insulation in busy areas. Moreover their efficiency can enrich by
investigating on some categories- that should be detected in future- like climate (solar
radiation, outdoor temperature, etc) in which they are used, use of building, site of the
building (latitude, outdoor condition, local day light availability) and so forth.
REFERENCES
[1] F. Faizi, M. Noorani, M. Mahdavinejad. Propose a kind of optimal intelligent window in tropical
region with an ability to reduce the input light and heat, and having enough visibility to outside.
International Conference on Intelligent Building and Management; 311-316. 2011.
2nd International Congress on Structure , Architecture
and Urban Development
16-18 December 2014, Tabriz , Iran
[2] O. Tenhunen, K. Lintula; T. Lehtinen. Double Skin Facades –Structures and Building Physics.
Helsinki University of Technology,P.O.BOX 2100, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland; 1-8. 2008.
[3] B, Harvey. Le Corbusier and the "Mur Neutralisant", An Early Experiment in Double Envelope
Construction. Proceedings of the Ninth International PLEA Conference; 257-62. 1991.
[4] http://www.glassonweb.com/articles/article/72/.
[5] O. et al. Double-Skin Facades, Prestel Verlag, London. 2001.
[6] X. Loncour; A. Deneyer. Ventilated Double Facades classification & illustration of façade concept;
6-14. 2004.
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-skin_facade
[8] Dr. Jochen Mignat. Energy saving and generation with modern glass facades, Intelligent Glass
Solution , PP: 21-25. 2008.
[9] T. Meyer Boake. The tectonics of the double skin: What are double skin façades and how do they
work? , University of Waterloo; 1-13. 2009.
[10] Valentin Gavan, Monika Woloszyn, Frederic kuznik, Jean-jacques Roux . Experimental study of
mechanically ventilated double_skin façade with venetian sun-shading device: A full-scale
investigation in controlled environment, Solar Energy (84); 183-195. 2010.
[11] Deuk-Woo Kim, Cheol-Soo Park. 2011. Difficulties and limitations in performance simulation of
a double skin façade, with EnergyPlus, Energy and Buildings (43);3635–3645. 2011.
[12] M. Crisinel, et al. Modeling and Simulation of the Double-Skin Façade System, Glass and
Interactive Building Envelope.(Eds.). IOS Press; 49-55. 2007.
(M.Crisinel, 2007,)
[13] M. De Carli, H. Elarga, A. Zarrella, M. Tonon, Evaluation of energy recovery of multiple skin
facades: the approach of Digithon, Energy and Buildings;in press
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.201 4.08.049. 2014.
[14] Wenjuan Loua, Mingfeng Huanga, Min Zhangb, Ning Linc. Experimental and zonal modeling for
wind pressures on double-skin facades of a tall building, Energy and Buildings (54); 179–191. 2012.
[15] Wonjun Choi1, Jaewan Joe1, Younghoon Kwak1, Jung-Ho Huh. Operation and control strategies
for multi-storey double skin facades during the heating season, Energy and Buildings (49); 454–465.
2012.
[16] Jaewan Joe1, Wonjun Choi1, Younghoon Kwak1, Jung-Ho Huh. Optimal design of a multi-story
double skin façade, Energy and Buildings (76); 143–150. 2014.
[17] Dr. Sam C. M. Hui, Mechanical and Natural Ventilation, Department of Mechanical
Engineering, The University of Hong Kong. 2011. http://engineering-ru.livejournal.com/17457.html