Question Paper Code: 21528 B.E./B. Tech. DEGREE EXAMINATION, MAY/JUNE 2013. Fourth Semester Mechanical Engineering MA 2266/MA 42/MA 1254/10177 SN 401/080120014-- STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL METHODS (Regulation 2008/2010) (Common to PTMA 3266- Statistics and Numerical Methods for B.E. (Part-Time) Second Semester - Production Engineering " - Regulation 2009) Statistical tables may be permitted, Time: Three hours Maximum: 100 marks Answer ALL questions. PART A--(10 x 2= 20 marks) It has been found that 2% of the tools produced by a certain machine are defective. What is the probability that in a shipment of 400 such tools (a) 3% or more, (b) 2% or less will prove defective. A random sample of 200 tins of coconut oil gave an average weight of 4.95 kgs. With a standard deviation of 0.21 kg. Dowe accept that the net weight is 5 kgs per tin at 5% level? What do you understand by “Design of an experiment’’? Write down the ANOVA table for one way classification. Find the real positive root of 3x — cos x — 1 = 0 by Newton’s method correct to 6 decimal places. Solve the equations A + B + C = 6, 3A +3B+4C =20,2A+B + 3C = 13 using Gauss elimination method.7, Use Lagrange’s formula to fit a polynomial to the data and findy atx=1. xX -1 0 2 3 Y —8 3 1 12 8. Show that the divided difference of second order can be expressed as the quotient of two determinants of third order. 9. Using Taylor series method, find y at x = 0.1, 0.2 given 2 =x? - y, y(Q) = 1 (correct to4 decimal places), 10, Compute y at x y = 2xy, yO) = 0.25 by Modified Euler method given PART B--(5 x 16 = 80 marks) 11. (a)@ Random samples drawn from two countries gave the following data relating to the heights of adult males. Is the difference between standard deviation significant? (8) CountryA CountryB Mean height (in inches) 67.42 67.25 S.D (in inches) 2.58 2.50 Number in samples 1000 1200. 11, (a)(ii) 1000 students at college level were graded according to their 1.Q. and their economic conditions. What con- clusion can you draw from the following data: (8) Economic conditions LQ. Level High Low Rich 460 140 Poor 240 160(or) 11. (b)() The sales manager of a large company conducted a sample survey in states A and B taking 400 samples in each case. The results were in the following table. Test whether the average sales in the same in the 2 states at 1% level. 8) State A State B Average Sales Rs. 2,500 Rs. 2,200 S.D. Rs. 400 Rs. 550 11. (b)(ii) Find if there is any association between extravagance in fathers and extravagance in sons from the following data. Determine the coefficient of association also: (8) Extravagant father Miserly father Extrav. Sons Under 327 741 Miser. Sons 545 234 12. (a)(i) The following date represent the number of units of production per day tunred out by 5 different workers using 4 different types of machines. - (8) Machine Type A B Cc D Workers 1 44 38 47 36 46 40° 52 43 34 36 44 32 43 38 46 33 2 a 4 5 38 42 49 39.(1) Test whether the mean production is the same for the different machine types. (2) Test whether the S men differe with mean productivity. 12. (a)(ii) The following is a Latin square of a design when 4 varieties of seeds are being tested. Set up the analysis of variance table and state your conclusion. You may carry out suitable change of origin and scale. (8) A 105 B 95 C 125 D 115 c& 6 D 125 A 105 B 105 D 115 Cc 95. °B 105 A 115 B 95 A 135 D 95 pe is (or) 12. (b)(i), Compare and contrast the Latin square Design with the Randomised Block Design. (8) 12, (b) (ii) Analyse the following of Latin square experiment. (8) Column Row 1 2 3 4 1 A(12) D@0) C16) BCI) 3 D(18) A(14) B(11) C(14) 3 B(i2) CIS) D9) A(13) 4 c(16) B(1) A(15) D(20) 13. (ai) Solve the system of equations by Gauss - Jordan method X+ytZe@et; &k-y+taw-w = - 5; x + 2y 432.4 du = 74-2 -32+20=5. ©)13. (a)(ii) Solve by Gauss — Seidal method the following system : 28x + 4y — z = 32; x+3y + 10z = 24; 2x + 17y + 4z = 35. (8) (or) 13. (b)(i)_ Solve by Gauss- Elimination method 3x + 4y + 5z = 18; 2x — y + 8z = 13; 5x - 2y + 7z = 20. (8) 13. (b)(ii) Using power method, find all the eigen values of 5 01 Az=|0 -2° 01. (8) 1 05 14, (a)(i) By dividing the range into ten equal parts, evaluate x J sin x dx by Trapezoidal and Simpson’s rule. Verify 0 your answer with integration. 14. Gi) UF fix) = 4, show that fly, x) -- 3,) = where r is any positive integer. rn (:)) (or) 14. (b) (i) The population of a certain town is given below. Find the rate of growth of the population in 1931, 1941, 1961 and 1971. (8) Year (x) 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 Populationin 40.62 60.80 79.95 103.56 132.65 thousands (y).14. (b)(ii) Using Newton’s divided difference formula, find the values of f(2), f(8) and f(15) given the following table. (8) x 4.5 7 10 41 13 f(x) 48 100 294 900 1210 2028. 15. (aj) Solve y, , 5 — Wy, — 8%, = H@ -— 12”. 15. (a)(ii) Using Runge-Kutta method of fourth-order, solve 2 2 4 = re given y(0) = Lat x = 0.2, 0.4. ®) (or) 15.(b) Given y’ + xy + y = 0, yO) =1, y (0) =, find the value of y(0.1) by using Runge- Kutta method of fourth order. (16)Question Paper Code: 21528 B.E./B. Tech. DEGREE EXAMINATION, MAY/JUNE 2013. Fourth Semester Mechanical Engineering MA 2266/MA 42/MA 1254/10177 SN 401/080120014-- STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL METHODS (Regulation 2008/2010) (Commonto PTMA 3266- Statistics and Numerical Methods for B.E. (Part-Time) Second Semester - Production Engineering - Regulation 2009) Statistical tables may be permitted. Time: Three hours Maximum : 100 marks Answer ALL questions, PART A--(10 x 2 = 20 marks) 1. It has been found that 2% of the tools produced by a certain machine are defective. What is the probability that in a shipment of 400 such tools (a) 3% or more, (b) 2% or less will prove defective. Ans: Given 4 = p= 0.02. ona ee w/.20) 0.58) 5 O07. X denote the number of detective produced by tools Zax o When X=3% = z7q = 0.08 » Z = 207 0.02 When X=0.03 Z= 1,43. When X = 2% = 409 = 0.02 = Z=0.(a) P(X > 3%) = P(X > 0.03) = P(Z > 1.43) =0.5-P(0< Z < 1.43) = 0.5 - 0.4236 = 0.0764. (b) P(X = 1.96. Hence null hypothesis. Ho is rejected at 5% level of significance. 3. What do you understand by ‘“‘Design of an experiment”’? Ans: Design of experiment (DOE) is a powerful tool that can be used in variety of experimental situation. DOE allows for multiple input factors to be manipulated determining their effect on desired output. DOE can also be used to comfirm suspected input/output relationships and to develop a predictive equation suitable for performing what if analysis.4. Write down the ANOVA table for one way classification. Ans: Source of Sum of | Degree of | Mean Sum | Variance Variation Squares | Freedom | of Squares Ratio SV) (S.S) (af) (M.S) ® QQ, Qh -1) Between Classes} Q, | h-1 GH | a7N=hH (or) a Qa, OQ/N-h Within Classes Q, | N-k NH a= 1 [Total Q | N=-T = = mere Q=3522-L, T= where Q= 2lty N? = Z2Xy 7 A= 2a -N Q2.=Q-Q. 5. Find the real positive root of 3x — cos x — 1 = 0 by Newton’s method correct to 6 decimal places. Ans: Let f(x) = 3x — cos x —1 FO) = - 2 (- ve) f01) =3 — cos 1 —1 = 1.4598 (+ ve) .. Arootlies between 0 and 1, fx) = 3 # sin x,Newton’s iterative formula fe),) &, =x, - > 1 nei” on” Fe) (3x, — cos x, — 1] =~ + sin x) x, sinx, + cosx +1 n in n 3+ sin x, Take xp = 0.5 _ x9 sin x9 + cos xo + 1 _ (0.5) sin(0.5) + cos(0.5) + 1 a= 3 + sin xp = 3 + sin(@.5) = 0.608518649 x1 sin x1 + cos xy + 1 2°" “yaaa m 0.607101878 x2 sin x2 +.¢0s x2 + 1 x3 = 345, at 0.607101648. .'. The root x = 0.607102 correct to 6 decimal places. 6. Solve the equations A + B + C = 6, 3A +3B+4C = 20,2A+B+ 3C = 13 using Gauss elimination method. 111 6 3.3.4 20 Ans: Augmental matrix (A, B) = 2 4 3 13 R, = R,-3R,; R, > R,-2R, 1 11.6 wlio 0 1°2 0°41 11 Ro Ry1 1°1 6 = |O -1 1 2 0 012 12 bl 6 ~|0 1 -1 -2| R+R,x(-1). oo 1 2 ® Now we get, C22 woul) B-C=-2 w+ (ii) At+B+C=6 ++ (iii) by back Substitution method. Substituting (i) in (ii) = B=0. Substituting C = 2, B = Oin (iii) A=4 Solution: A = 4; B = 0 andC = 2. 7. Use Lagrange’s formula to fit a polymomial to the data and findy atx=1, x -1 0 2 3 Y -8 3 1 12 Ans: Given x) = — 1; 4, = 05 X, = 2; x,=3 Vy = — 83 yy, = 35 YQ = di yg = 12, Lagrange formula _ (+0) (2) (#=3) (= 8) , @#1) (2-2) (&-3) GB) O="EDEDEN * MEVED (+1) @e=0) (#3) (1) 5 +1) 0) (2) (12) 3B) QD 4) 3) @)= FDS - Sx 4 oy + FOP a 4x 46) =e 25? ~ 3x) + tea = 2x) (x) = 2x9 - 6x? + 3x +3 8. Show that the divided difference of second order can be expressed as the quotient of two determinants of third order. Ans: We know that, SX Fe) flty 1%) - Gay @—%) * & eH) Gps) fry) fe (X= Xp) Oy — x) (i — x) flag) + Gp ~ Xp) fly) + - %) foxy) Gig = Fy) By Fy) 9 — Bq) (1 ~ Xp) fg) + (%q — Xp) fly) + Oy — 4%) flay) — Oy = X4) Oy = XQ) Ay — XQ) foxy) fle) fer,) X% x X 1 1 1 Hence proved,9. Using ai series method, find y at x = 0.1, 0.2 given = =x? - y, y(0) = 1 (correct to 4 decimal places). Ans: Given y =x A Ys %q = 0; Yy = 1. x, = 0.1, x, =0.2; h=01 4 3 2 2 2 YS Yymig 9g = yl =2x-y; yp = 2x) - yy =1 A. yl =2-ys yy =2-H By Taylor series method 2. 2 he i 1 =O.) + 71% + Brot 3% * =1+ O01 (- 14 Oa? a+ oe Wit x y(0.1) = 0.9052. yy it yi = — 0.8952 yy = 2x — yy = 1.0952 yy = 2 - yy = 0.9048. his Be Fo» y= yOMNant qt gt apy te 'y(0.2) = 0.8213.10. Compute y at x = 0.25 by Modified Euler method given y = 2xy, y@) = 1. Ans: Given y = 2xy; x) =0; yy = 1; x, = 0.25 fix, y) = 2xy; h = 0.25. Modified Euler formula h h \ Yn+t=¥nt glen +a Int Tien vo} ‘ h h Yi = y0.25) = yo + hi {ro +5 Yo + 9 fxo, vo) = 1 + (0.25) f(0.125, 1 + 0.125 f@, 1)) = 1 + (0.25) f(0.125, 1) y (0.25) = 1.125. PART B--(5 x 16 = 80 marks) 11.(a)() Random samples drawn from two countries gave the following data relating to the heights of adult males. Is the difference between standard deviation significant? (8) Country A CountryB Mean height (in inches) 67.42 67.25 S.D (in inches) 2.58 2.50 Number in samples 1000 1200. Ans: Given n, = 1000 x, = 1200 x, = 67.42 x, = 67.25 S, = 2.58 S, = 2.5.Null Hypothesis Ho : 0) = 02 H, 10, # (two tail test). Si — S2 The test statistic Z = V3 8 Bay * Thy 2.58 - 2.5 = 5 7 = 1.03. 2.58)", 2.5) 7000 * 2400 Here calculated Z value = 1.03 (less than) Z = 1.96 at 5% level of significance. Hence null Hypothesis is accepted. .". The Sample Standard deviation do not differ significantly. 11.(a)(ii) 100 students at college level were graded according to their 1.Q. and their economic conditions, What con- clusion can you draw from the following data: (8) Economic conditions 1.Q. Level High Low Rich 460 140 Poor 240 160 Ans: Null Hypothesis Hp : The given attributes are independent. H, : The given attributes are not independent.| Economic | 1-Q Level Total Condition | High | Low Rich 460 | 140 | 600 Poor 240 | 160 400 Total 700 | 300 1000 2 0, E, (0, -E) 460 £00 709 420 1600 140 ee = 180 1600 | 8.88 240 400 = 700 = 280 1600 | 5.71 400 x 300 : 3 160 a = 120 1600 | 13.33 (O,-E)” f= Ue HI Bi Degree of freedom d.f(m - 1)(n- 1) =(2-1)(2-1)=1. Tabulated y” value at 5% evel of significance for d.f (1) boos Y = 1) = 3.841. Here calculate x7 = 31.73 > (greater than) Tabulate 76 95(1) = 3.841. Hence Null hypothesis is rejected i.c., the attributes 1.Q as economic conditions are not independent.11.(b)(@) The sales manager of a large company conducted a sample survey in states A and B taking 400 samples in each case. The results were in the following table. Test whether the average sales in the same in the 2 states at 1% level. (8) State A State B Average Sales Rs. 2,500 Rs, 2,200 S.D. Rs. 400 Rs, 550 Ans: Given ay = 400; x = 2500; S, = 400 n= 400; x= 2200; Ss, = 550. Hy My = My There is no significant difference between State A and State B. Hy ty # Hy (two tail test). Hits 22 The test statistic Z = 2 2 St | Sz my * 2500 — 2200 _ 300 Ze= = 34.003 Vv (400) (550) 400 400 Z = 8.82. _ Here 1Z1 = 8.82 > 2.58. So Null hypothesis is rejected at 1% level of significance i.e., The average sales within two states differ significantly.11.(b)Gi) Find if there is any association between extravagance in fathers and extravagance in sons from the following data. Determine the coefficient-of association also. (8) Extravagantfather Miserly father Extray, Sons Under 327 741 Miser. Sons 545 234 Ans: Extravagant Miserly Total Father Father Extravagant Son 327 741 1068 Miserly Son 545 234 779 Total 872 | 975 1847 9, E, 1068 x 872 327 Tea = 504 62.16 1068 x 975 . TAL Sag 564 : 55:55 779 x 872 545 “Tear = 368 85.13 779. x 915 234 —TR47—== 411 76.23 (0,-E,? E, =279,07Hy: There is no significant between extravagance in fathers and extravagance in sons, Degree of freedom (d.f) =(n-1)(m-1)=(2-1)2@-1) #1. Fromy” table os (1) = 3.841. Here calculated y” = 279.07 > (greater than) Tabulated yg js = 3.841. Hence Null hypothesis is rejected. Hence there is an association between extravagance in fathers and extravagance in sons. . ad—be __ 327330 ad + bc ~ ~ 480363 = — 0.6814, 12. (a)(i) The following date represent the number of units of production per day tunred out by 5 different workers Coefficient of attributes using 4 different types of machines. (8) Machine Type A B Cc D Workers 1 44 38 a7 36 2 46 40 52 43 3 34 36 44 32 4 43 38 46 33 5 38 42 a9 39 (1) Test whether the mean production is the same for the - different machine types (2) . Test whether the 5 men differe with mean productivity,Ans: [Refer: Question Paper Code: 11395, MA 2266 — Statistics and Numerical Methods, April/May 2011, Ques- tion Number: 12.(a)(ii)]. 12.(a)(ii) The following is a Latin square of a design when 4 varieties of seeds are being tested, Set up the analysis of variance table and state your conclusion. You may carry out suitable change of origin and scale. (8) A 105 B 95 C= 125 D 5 c 115 D125 «A 105 B 105 D 115 Cc 95 B 105 A 15 B95 A135 D 99 °C 15 ; 34 7 100 Ans: Take Vy N dog 2 3 4 t m = vi J 1 Al B=] C5. D3 8 16 + 36 2 Co] DS Al Bi 10 25} 36 3 D3 Cc-1 Bl A3 6 9} 20 4 B-1 A7 D-1, C3 8 16] 60 T; 6 10 6 10 |T=32 | T=66 ies : 22 yy Tr sr 9 25 9 25 68 =—+ —M isu <<] 20 6 28 28 152 = 55 %yRe-arranging the data according to the letters. 7 Letter] Yq Ty = A 1 1 3 a 2 36 B |-1 1 1° -1 0 0 ec 1's 3 -1 3 10 25 D]3 5 3 -1 10 25 Ty Total ‘ ST, = 32 | 86= La Qe = 152-64 =88 2 Q=1sH-p= 66 -64=2 gesa - 7 -e-a- Q4=Q- 01 - Q2- O3 = 60.ANOVA Table Source of Sum of | Degree of -| Mean | Variance { Variation Squares | Freedom | Square Ratio (S.¥) (S.S) @.p (™.S) ® Between rows Q,=2 [n-1=3 10.6667 | Fp=14.999 Between columns} Q, = 4. |n-1=3 |1.3333 | Fo = 7.5 Between letters | Q, = 22 Jn-1=3 |7.3333 |F, = 1.3636 Residual Q, = 60) (n-1) (n-2)=6 10 - Total Q= 88 n7-1)=15] = = From F-table, Fsog (6, 3) = 8.94. @ Fp = 14.999 > Fo 4¢ (6, 3) = 8.94. Hence there is significant difference between rows. (ii) Fg = 7.5 < Fy 95 (6, 3) = 8.94. ‘There is no significant difference between columns. Gil) F,, = 1.3636 < Fo 9. (6, 3) = 8.94. There is no significant difference between letters (treatments). (or) 12. (b)(i) Compare and contrast the Latin square Design with the Randomised Block Design. (8)Ans: Randomised Block Design (RBD): Let us consider an agricultural experiment using which we wish to test the effect of k fertilizing treatments on the yield of a crop. We assume that we know some information about the soil fertility of the plots. Then we divide the plots into ‘h’ blocks, according to the soil fertility, each block containing k plots. Thus the plots in each block will be of homogeneous fertility as far as possible. Within each block, the k treatments are given to the k plots in a perfectly random manner, such that each treatment occurs only once in any block. But the same k treatments are repeated from block to block. This design is called RBD. Latin Square Design (LSD): Consider an agricultural experiment, in which nr? plots are taken and arranged in the form of.an n x n square. Such that the plots in each row will be homogeneous as far as possible with tespect to one factor of classification. Say, soil fertility and plots in each column will be homogeneous as far as possible with respect to another factor of classification, say, seed quality. Then n treatments are given to these plots such that each treatment occurs only once in each row and only once in each column. The various possible arrangements obtained in this manner are known as Latin Squares of order n. This design of experiment is called the Latin Square Design. The number of replications of each treatment is equal to the number of treatments in LSD, whereas there is no such restrictions on treatments and replication in RBD. LSD can be performed on a square field, while RBD can be performed either on a square field or a rectangular field. LSD is known to be suitable for the case when the number of treatments is between 5 an 12, Where as RBD can be used for any number of treatments.12.(b)(ii) Analyse the following of Latin square experiment. (8) Column Row 1 2 3 4 1 A(Q2) D20) C16) B10) 2 DU8) Ad4) Ba) cca) 3 BZ) CU5) D9) Ad3) 4 cae) B11) A(15) D0) Ans: Subtract 12 from the given values and work out with the new values yy = Xy ~ 12 iI i i 2 3 4 T; Toa 5 7 “ ij 1 | A@) Ds) C4) B-2)}_— 10 | 25 84 2 | DY) A) B(-1)_ C2) 9 | 20.25] 45 3 | BO) cB) DE AQ) 11 | 30.25] 59 4 | cl) BE-1) AG) DEB) 14] 49 | 90 T; | 10 Rp 2B 9 |r-44| 124.5 | 278 Te = | 25 36.42.25 20.25} 123.5Rearranging the data according to the letters Q4 = Q —Q; — Qn - Q3 = 6.5. Ty Letter] Ye T, = Alo 2 1 3 6 9 Be «4 0 =i!) <4 4 c]4 2 3 4 13 42.25 Dis 6 7 8 | 29 | 210.2 T 44(= 7) | 265.5 =.5 2 2 T 44 O = S39} - Fp = 278 - = 278-121 Q= 157 1 ne Q1= SD - = i245 - 121 = 3.5 1 Te Q2 = FLT - y= 123.5 - 121 = 2.5 1 7 Q3 = 5, STE - Py = 265.5 - 121 = 144.5ANOVA Table Source of Sum of Degree of Mean Variance Variation Squares Freedom | Square Ratio .V) | 6s) @f | ats, ©) Between rows Q,=3.5 | a-1 =3 | 1.6667 W we Between columns Q,=2.5 | n-1 0.8333 | F, Between letters Q,=144.9 n-1 = 3 148.1667 | F, =44.463 Residual Q,=6.5 | @-1) (n-2)=6 | 1.0833 = Total Q= 157 —— = - From table, Fy 95(3, 6) = 4.76 & F, 'n.qg(6> 3)/= 8.94. Between Rows: Here calculated F value = 1.0768 (less than) ‘Tabulated F value F(3,6) = 4.76 Hence null hypothesis these is no significant difference between row is accepted. Between Columns: Here calculated F value = 1.30 (less than) - Tabulated Fp 95(6,3) = 8.94 Null Hypothesis Ho :.(There is no significant difference between Column) is accepted.Between Letters: Here calculated F value = 44.463 (greater than) Tabulated Fo 95(3,6) = 4.76. Hence Null hypothesis Hg : (There is no significant difference between letters) is rejected. 13.(a)(i) Solve the system of equations by Gauss - Jordan method xtyt+2+o2h xk -yt+we—-o= — 5 3x + 2y + 32 + do =73x-2y-32+2w=5. (8) Ans: Augmented matrix 1101 1 B=i 28° =1, =5 AAR ls 2 8 & 68 i =2 <3 2 5 1 1 1 1 1)Ry>R,-2R, ~ [0 3 0 -3 -Tp7 Rap =19 -1 0 1 Gaggia 7 R53 PR, 0 -3 -4 4) R,>R,-R, R3>R3 x (—1) and Rz = R3 1ae\ P 1 1 ig MAO <1 -4 |W -3 0 -3 -7 0-3 -4 1 4 R,>R,- Ry; R, > R3+3R,3 Ry > Ry +3R, 1 0 1 2 5 R,>R,x(-1) a ee es =lo 0 0 -6 ~-19/RyrRy-) 00 -4 -2 -8/R,-R,Lt i Be 8 ‘ 01 0 -1 -4 AB=lo 9 4 2 8 (00 6 6 19 Ry R, > R,--g and R,> Ry +2 R,>R,+ (1 0 0 3/2 3 _|0 10 -1 -4 Slo Oo a a 4 00 ¢ 1 19/6 3 R,>R,-5 Rg RR +Ry R,>R,-R, 1000 -7/4 lo 100 -5/6 lo 020 5/6 0090 1 19/6 R,>R,+2 10 0 0 —7/4) 010.0 -5/6 (A.B)= 1 (Milo “5/12 0001 19/6 ; i 7, 3. — . Solution Le-Gys- gi z= TPH |: 13. (a)(ii) Solve by Gauss — Seidal method the following system : 28x + dy — 2 = 325 x + 3y + 10z = 24; 2x + I7y + 4z = 35. (8)Ans: Rearrange the equation in such a way that satisfying diagonally dominant condition: 28x + 4y -— 2x + 17y + 4z = 35 32. x +3y + 10z = 24. Iteration Formula $ 1 OD ae [82 dy) 2 yor De he [35 = 20 * Dg grt = 7g WO FD gym Dy put y = Oandz = Owe get and First Iteration I x = 59 [32] = 1.1429; y= ee [35 — 2(1.1429) = 1.9244 20) = dh [24 ~ 1.1429 — 3(1.9244)] = 1.8088,ok n+t_i nat _ 1 “3 yo Sy 8 aay [32 — dy) 4 2) ppg—a9l 41 g6)) rg gO HN_gyln ty Iteration ne) First putn =0 x) = 1.1429 yO = 1.9244 2) = 1.8084 Second putn=1 x@ = 0.9325 y@ = 1.5236 2 = 1.8497 Third putn=2] x= 0.9913 y® = 1.5070 2° = 1.8488 Fourth putn=3 | x = 0.9936 y=1.5069 2 = 1.8486 Fifth putn=4 | x) = 0.9936 y®) = 1.5069 2) = 1.8486. From Fourth and Fifth iteration we conclude that the solution of the system of equation is x = 0.9936; y = 1.5069; z= 1.8486. {or) 13. (b) (i) Solve by Gauss - Elimination method 3x + 4y + 5z = 18; 2x -y + 8z = 13; 5x — ly + 7z = 20. (8) 3 4 5 18 Ans: (A,B) = |2 -1 8 13 4 5 -2 7 20 3 3 4 5 18)R,>R,-3R, = (0 = 11/3 14/3 a 5 0 -26/3 -4/3 -10 = “ Ryo Ry 7 Ri3 4 5 18)R,>R,x (3) 10 —11, 14 3 3 0 413: 2. 15. R,>R, x (- zl |e an i} R 13 = 15 775 204 20a] Ra Rta Ra 11 1 3 4 5 18 ‘ 1i = {O -11 14 3} R,=R,x (=0s] ' 01 ) ses eos ; — lly + 14z =3 and 3x + 4y +5z= 18. By back substitution method 3 - 142 sey x= 3. Solution: x = 3; y= 1; and z= 1. 13.(a)(ii) Using power method, find all the eigen values of S UOw A=|0 -2 0]. (8) ko FO. 5 ft Ans: Let Xo = 3 be an approximate eigen vector. $0 Nt) [5 1 xg = 710 2 9] -(] 5/0 =i; Xi 1 ostlol it 02 5 0 1/1) 452) 1 AX,=|0 -2 0] | o - [2B] <2 0,4] 2% 1 0 5} lo2} {2} 0.3846(5.3846) 1 AXy=| 0° | = 5.3846] 0 |= d3 Xz 2.9231 0.5429 5.5429 Lt AX3=| 0 {=5.5429] 0 | =a4Xq 3.7143 0.6701 (5.6701 tH AXq=| 0 | =5.6701| 0 | =d5 Xs 4.3505 (0.7672 (5.7672 1 AXs=| 0 | =5.7672| 0 | =’6.X6 | 4.836 (0.8385 5.8385) (1 \ AXe=| 0 | = 5.8385} 0. | =a) Xy 5.1927] 10.8894) 5.8894 1 AX7=/| 0 | =5.8894] 0 | =A Xg 5.4470 0.9249 (5.9249 1 AXg=| 0 | =5.9249|' 0 | =a Xo : 5.6244 0.9493] (5.9493 Y 1 4 AXy=|] 0 | =5.9493| 0 | =ajo Xi 5.7465 0.9659 (5.9659 1 AX = | 0 | =5.9659| 0 | =a Xn 5.8296 0.97715.9847 1 0 = 5.9847 0 5.9236 5 9898) 1 oO | =5.9808) OB | =ay X14 \ Ay = 6 and its corresponding eigen vector 1) Oo}. 1 To find other eigen vetor: X= -1 #0 1 NowB=A-Al=A-61=| 0 -8 Oj}, 1 Q -1 1 Take Yo = |0 0" ' 1 on full BY,=| 0 2 BY3 u 1 Non i 1 1 vb w eu i Boe Hon go Ses. wee SoS fT = “ 2-2. .. Smallest eigen value of A= -2+6= 4, We know that A, +4, +43 = Trace of A=5-2+5=8 -g2/|.--aal 6+444,=8 > [4,=-2 .. Eigen values of A are 6, 4, — 2. 14.(a)(i)_ By dividing the range into ten equal parts, evaluate x J sin x dx by Trapezoidal and Simpson’s rule. Verify 0 your answer with integration. (8) x Ans: Let I = f sin x dx. Here a=0; b= 7. 0 Hence h =z 2e 3a an Sa 6x Tt St OK x ja0 iy 0 610 «TO 610 16 6 tO 6 1O [Cte 7 y = sin x/0.0 0.3090 0.5878 0,809 0.9511 1.0 0.9511 0,809 0.5878 0.309 0 YM YY. ¥3) M4 Ys G7 YB M0 (i) By Trapezoidal rule. h T=5 [00 + yn) + 201 +2 + + nD] T= 35 [0 + 0) + 2(0.3090 + 0.5878 + 0.809 + 0.9511 + 1.0 + 0.9511 + 0.809 + 0.5878 + 0.309)] T= 1.9843, (ii) By Simpson’s one third rule. h lez [0% + ¥_) + 20g + ¥4 Fe) +40, +93 +] > 39 [ootyi0) + 202+y4at¥etys) + 401ty3 + ysty7+ya)] = 3p [(0 + 0) + 2(0.5878 + 0.9511 + 0.9511 + 0.5878) + 4(0.309 + 0.809 + 1 + 0.809 + 0.309] 1 = 2.0009 l= i cine dy = [- cos x]j = (0) + )] 0 1=2,Solution: By Trapezoidal rule I = 1.9843 By Simpson’s one third rule I = 2.0009 By Actual integration I = 2. 14. (a)(ii) If f(x) = = show that fxg, 4) where r is any positive integer. Ans: 1 1 focr)-flxo) x1 Xo. Tt eh feo) = amy amy 7 7 eA So Let us prove the result by induction. Let the result be true for r=n, Then fixqs %45 + « (2) Now fix, 1, «+5 Xao Xn #1) Fey) Xqpees Xp gem Fx qs Xy2 Xyp or X) *n+1 7% 1" xy xy *yHence the result is true for r =n +1, Hence by induction the given statement is true. (or) 14.(b)() +The population of a certain town is given below. Find the rate of growth of the population in 1931, 1941, 1961 and 1971. (8) Year (x) 1931 1941 1951 1961° 1971 Populationin 40.62 60.80 79.95 163.56 132.66 thousands (y). Ans: Difference Table: x y | ay Ary a’y Aty | x, 1931 | 40.62] Ay, (y,) }20.18 ay, 1941 | 60.8 1.03 Ay 19.45 5.49 ty, 1951 | 79.95 4,46 -4,47 23.61 1.02 aty, 1961 103.56 5.48 A*y, 29.09 dy, x, 1971 | 132.65] Ay, MnTo find y (1931) and y (1941) we use Newton’s forward difference formula - Xp = 1931, x, = 1941, w= 1 When x = 1931, u=0. vers = 1 1, 1 33 dL cA w y@ = 1931) =y, 9 F(A ~ AM + 5A — 3894 i 1 1 1 = 9 [pots “5 1.03) + 5 (5.49) - a (- wan) y (1937) = 2.36425 ed If x= 1941 then w= 2H 193! oy, y= 1941) = 5 1% +t y+ eRe + 2) £2 a3, ; ie i thu + 22u - SJa%, of 1 1 1 1 Yeu1" [pas + 9 (— 1.03) - (5.49) + gy (- 149) en. | y (1941) = 1.83775. To find y (1961) and y (1971) we use Newton’s backward formula 1 oo L 1 =i tg mg mt gnWhen x= 1971 = x,. y (971) = i [> 09 + 5 5. 48) + = Fa, 02) +4 i (4 «| y (1971) = 3.10525. 2 ay 1 2V + 1 av +6V42 a = [" 7 Vint —————¥ 3 a + 1961 - 1971 _ = De Le y (1961) = 2.65525, 14. (b)(ii) Using Newton’s divided difference formula, find the values of f(2), {(8) and £(15) given the following table. (8) x 4 5 7 wW 13 f(x) 48 100 294 900 1210 2028. Ans: (Refer: Question Paper Code : 11395, MA 2266 - Statistics and NM; April/May 2011, Question Number: 14.{a) (ii)]. 15. (a)(ii) Using Runge-Kutta method of fourth-order, solve 2 2 Xe 3 —*palven y(0) = Lat x = 0.2, 0.4 8) Ans: [Refer: Question Paper Code: 55444, MA 2266 - Statistics and NM, November/December 2011, Question Number 15.(b)(ii)]. (or)15.) Given y + xy + y = 0, yO) =1, y (0) = 0, find the value of y(0.1) by using Runge-Kutta method of fourth order. (16) Ans: [Refer: Question Paper Code: 55444, MA 2266 - Statisticsand NM, November/December 2011, Question Number 15.(b)(i)].