Professional Documents
Culture Documents
++
A QUALIFIED TAX REPORT IN INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES.
1
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Acknowledgement
I was given the opportunity to finish my report by Mr. Heenpella, my international taxation
instructor, who also provided me with wise counsel. I am grateful for my parents' support and
sacrifices, as well as for their energy, vision, sincerity, and ambition. My husband and daughter
also helped me finish my report, and I am grateful for their support, love, and intercession.
I would like to express my gratitude to my friends and research associates for their unwavering
support in the preparation of this study.
Last but not least, I'd like to express my gratitude to everyone who helped finish the report in
whatever form.
2
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Table of Content
Acknowledgement..................................................................................................................................2
Introduction..............................................................................................................................................4
1.0 CHALLENGES OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
HARMONIZATION...................................................................................................................................5
Task 01:- Resident, non- resident, Double tax, Double tax Treaty................................................5
2.0 COMPLEXITY OF VARIOUS NATIONAL TAX SYSTEMS...................................................6
Task 02. : - employment tax and self-employment tax....................................................................6
2.1 Employment Tax...................................................................................................................6
2.2 Self- employment Tax...........................................................................................................6
2.3 Difference between Self-employment and employee............................................................7
2.3 Capital gains tax exemptions and rules.............................................................................9
Task 03:- Individual Income tax........................................................................................................10
3.1 - 1st option: - stay in UK and work in headquarters.................................................................10
3.2 - 2nd Option: - move to China and work in the branch for a period of 12 months.............12
Task 4:- Corporation income tax......................................................................................................14
4.1 UK Tax Liability.............................................................................................................................14
4.2 Tax payable to other countries...................................................................................................16
4.3 Suggestions to Harrison ltd on how to reduce their total tax liability.....................................17
4.3.1 Using Transfer Pricing..........................................................................................................17
4.3.2 Use Thin Capitalization........................................................................................................17
4.3.4 Using Tax Havens.................................................................................................................18
4.3.4 Using Trust Funds.................................................................................................................18
References.............................................................................................................................................19
3
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Introduction
The Advisor identifies the impact of various tax systems on corporate income taxes in China
and the UK, the rule of double tax treaties to address the issue of dual residency, current
employment, self-employment, and trades license regulations, and current individual income tax
regulations in the UK and China are all examined in this report. The Advisor also identifies and
advise to the individual tax pays and also the MNC. In this advice report the adviser identifies
the methods that the corporations apply in order to avoid or minimize tax liability
4
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Task 01:- Resident, non- resident, Double tax, Double tax Treaty
Sandra is a resident and domiciled person in the UK as a result of the automatic UK Test.
Applying the test 1, Sandra will be regarded as a UK resident since, unless she accepts the
China offer and remains in the UK for more than 183 days, she will be regarded as a UK
resident for that tax year.
According to the UK residency test 2, a person is regarded as a resident of the UK if they keep
a house there for all or a portion of the tax year. Due to her property and potential time spent
there over 30days or 91days in UK, Sandra is considered a resident of the UK. If she accepts
the offer from China, she will not fall under test 3, thus because of her property and her length of
residence in the UK, she will be regarded as a UK tax resident.
A person must have a permanent registered address, a family or economic interest in China, as
well as have been there for at least 183 days within a tax year, in order to be designated a
resident of that nation. Sandra made a three-year employment offer in China. She is regarded a
Chinese tax resident since she has a job that is an economic interest and will be in China and
employment duration for more than 183 days therefore she is considered as a Chinese tax
resident Her taxable income would include both income from within and outside of China.
When a resident of one country has access to money or earnings produced in another,
international tax can get tricky (OECD, 2011). The source and residence principles overlap,
hence there is a double taxation issue .As per OECD model tax convention definition of
Resident of a contracting state means any person who by the laws of that state is liable to tax
by reason of his domicile, residency and place of management or any other criteria by the
political or local authority. Therefore Sandra is liable to UK tax because she is a UK resident
and she is liable to China tax because she is a China resident.
Where an individual is considered a resident of both states within reason of the above definition
of OECD, then his status will be determined as will be considered a resident of the state that
she has a permanent home. In this case Sandra permanent home is in UK, she will be
considered as a UK resident only.
In Concluding Sandra resides in the UK and has a UK domicile. She won't be regarded as a
resident of China under OECD convention. Sandra will therefore pay taxes on the money she
earned in China to Chinese tax authority and property she has in UK to UK tax authority.
Addition to that her Chinese employment income will be exempted from the UK tax.
If Sandra does not accept the offer. She would have to pay the SDLC tax for the property she
owns. And employment income tax for the salary she receive in UK. If she accept the offer she
will be liable to employment income tax in China, but still need to pay SDLC in UK. Her
employment income in China will be exempted from UK tax.
5
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Any individual who runs their own business and is responsible for its success or failure is
regarded as self-employed. They do not have the same employment rights and responsibilities
as workers because they are not paid through PAYE. They must classify their operations as
either trading or non-trading ones in order to estimate their taxable revenue. Important factors to
take into account when determining whether an activity belongs in the trading or non-trading
category include the subject matter, length of ownership, frequency of transactions,
supplemental employment, justification for selling, and motive.
6
AS2: Comparative Case Study
7
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Income
access
numerous
growth and
networking
opportunitie
s
Income Revenue may monthly
fluctuate as compensatio
going through
periods where no
n is the
work is available. same, thus
money is
consistent.
earning potential Likely to Employers set
make more prices based on
qualifications and
money and experience.
set their own
prices.
Tax Taxes must be paid Pay tax
through a self- automatically
assessment through PAYE
Benefits don't acquire paid rewards.
any consisting of health,
dental, and life
advantages insurance
until they
establish
them for
themselves.,
Professional Opportunitie There are countless
8
AS2: Comparative Case Study
9
AS2: Comparative Case Study
When an asset is sold, capital gains are the rise in value. When an asset is sold, they are
typically realized by deducting the original cost from the sale price. In some cases, the IRS
levies personal capital gains taxes. For some stocks and collectibles, as well as if the income
exceeds the 15% level, capital gains are taxed at a higher rate. Losses are not deductible,
although the first $250,000 of the sale price of a principal residence is tax-free. Short-term gains
are taxed at the ordinary income tax rate, whereas long-term gains might be taxed at 0%, 15%,
20%, or 25% depending on income, filing status, and asset type.
Motor Vehicle
1st 6 Months -Millage Note 05 1250
Last 6 Months - Usage Note 06 6840 19115
10
AS2: Comparative Case Study
(-)allowable expenses
professional subscription Note 07 1300 (1,300)
Total Taxable Income 292,815
11
AS2: Comparative Case Study
David has receive a loan from his employer that is interest-free. There is taxable benefit
emerging because sum of all beneficial loans granted to an employee exceed £10,000.
Therefore Beneficial loan taxable income = 20,000*2.5% = 500
Note 04:- Gym
Since employee David is benefited by the gym facilities provided by the company therefore
benefit of accessing the Gym will increase taxable benefit.
Note 05:-Motor Vehicle (tax on Motor vehicle of 1st 6 months)
David actually receive (13000miles * 0.50) = 6500
David receive tax free millage allowance (10000*0.45) + (3000*0.25) = (5250)
David’s taxable millage allowance = 1250
employees who use their private vehicles for business use subjected to the approved
mileage allowance provided by the HMRC
For Motor cars and vans
first 10,000 miles in tax year 45p per mile
each mile over 10,000 miles 25p per mile
Note 06:- Tax on usage of motor vehicle for last 6 months
Unless it cannot be used for personal purposes, an employee will be taxed on the car that the
employer provides. The cost of the car is used to determine the taxable benefit, which is then
multiplied by the car's carbon dioxide emissions which is stated below.
Co2 percentage for 2019-2020
- 95g/km – 23%
- Each additional 5g/km 1% increase
- The percentage is increased by a 4% for diesel-driven cars
Since David use a diesel powered motor car above mention percentage are applicable.
Taxable allowance usage of motor car = {38000* (23%+ (45)/5 + 4%)}/2 = 6840
Note 07:- professional subscription
Subscriptions to relevant professional bodies’ expenses incurred by an employee are deductible
or allowable for tax purpose
3.2 - 2nd Option: - move to China and work in the branch for a period of
12 months
RMB
12
AS2: Comparative Case Study
13
AS2: Comparative Case Study
If we David chose the option 1 as Stay in UK. His total taxable income will be £292,815and total
tax liability to the Tax department would be £=£111,698.75 as per the computation. If he
accepted the china offer his total taxable Annual income in RMB is1669900. If RMB is converted
to GDP it would be £75735 (1RMB: 0.12GDP). Since the taxable income paid in china is less is
advised to take the Chinese Employment and pay less income tax to the government
14
AS2: Comparative Case Study
( 56520)
Trading profit adjusted for tax purposes 1,215,980
Corporate tax Rate for the year 2020/2021 main rate is 19% .There are no thresholds applicable
to year 2020/2021 Therefore corporation tax liability payable by the company to the UK
government is as follows 1,205,980*19% = £231036.20
Note 01:- Dividend received
Dividends are not included in the taxable total profits since they are paid from profits that have
already been subject to corporate tax. This prevents double taxation.
Note 02:- Income from property not considered as trading income.
15
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Note 06 :- Some charitable donations and gifts are referred to as qualifying charitable donations
and are deducted when calculating a company’s total taxable profits
Note 07 :- Main pool capital allowances
General pant and machinery, motor vans, motor cycles and lorries, and cars with emissions
below 110g/km are all allocated to this pool. The writing down allowance is calculated as a
percentage of the pool balance. Main pool at 18% per annum.
Main pool
Vehicle- motor car with emissions not exceeding 50g/km is eligible for a 100% FYA therefore
this car is 35g/KM so it is allowable for 100% which is 30000
Main pool
Opening balance 85,000
Addition
Plant 40,000
Van 30,000
Deduct
Machinery (15,000)
Asset Balance 140,000
Deduct – Capital Allowances 18% (25,200)
WDV 114,800
This is for trade purposes, therefore it is allowable but Gross patent royalties of £7,000 and further
£1,000 was owing so it is added to the income
16
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Note 01 :-
Since Tax rate % are given by each country the taxable income has been converted to that
country currency using given exchange rates.
4.3 Suggestions to Harrison ltd on how to reduce their total tax liability
17
AS2: Comparative Case Study
involving a parent business and its subsidiaries. Through a survey, Cravens (1997) discovered
that MNCs employ transfer pricing to gain a competitive advantage and other corporate
purposes, influencing performance measures and advancing corporate goals. When divisions
sell products to divisions in other foreign jurisdictions during intercompany transactions, transfer
prices are applied.
Additionally, it can be utilized to circumvent international tariffs on the exchange of products and
services. Harrison ltd can use transfer pricing to book higher profits in another country with a
lower tax rate and avoid tariffs on goods and services exchanged internationally. PAT
maximization and worldwide tax management can both benefit from using international transfer
pricing, according to (Korn & Lengsfeld, 2004).
Take Harrison Ltd. as an example from the above. China has a large tax burden, while Ireland
has a modest one, according to the aforementioned tax rates. More profits for the company to
emerge in Ireland, where the company will pay lesser taxes, would be advantageous to
Harrison Ltd as a whole. Assume Harrison Ltd. may then try to sell them to Ireland for less than
market value by having China offer a transfer price. As a result, China would experience
decreased sales revenue and higher overall earnings, whereas Ireland would have a lower
cost of goods sold (COGS) and higher earnings. Harrison Limited will therefore attempt to
relocate a large percentage of its economic activity to locations with lower tax rates in order to
avoid paying taxes.
In most nations, interest that has been paid or that is still owed can be subtracted from the tax
measure of profit. This means that compared to equity, debt is frequently a more tax-efficient
form of funding. Multinational firms are able to customize their financial arrangements to best
take advantage of these benefits, resulting in a tax-efficient mix of debt and equity in the
countries that borrow money as well as changing how the lender who receives the interest is
taxed. Debt financing costs, such as interest, are tax deductible. In high-tax nations, this
enables businesses to deduct interest payments from earnings or taxable income, lowering
overall tax payments.
A worldwide corporation called Harrison Ltd. has operations in the USA and Hong Kong. Its
subsidiary in Hong Kong has extended a substantial loan to its subsidiary in the United States.
As it employs excessive debt financing to shift earnings to Hong Kong, where the tax rate is
lower, and reduce its tax liability in the USA, where the tax rate is greater, this might be viewed
as having thin capitalization.
18
AS2: Comparative Case Study
income to a tax haven with lower tax rates from a jurisdiction with higher tax rates (Slemrod,
2004). Tax reductions in tax haven countries, which might be zero to low single digits, benefit
both individuals and businesses.
Singapore uses tax incentives, a lack of withholding taxes, and profit shifting to maintain fair
corporate rates. Due to its stable political climate and cutting-edge financial technology, it is also
a desirable location to park wealth.so it is advice to do a profit shifting to Singapore by Harrison
Ltd.
4.3.4 Using Trust Funds
Trusts are formal agreements under which a third party holds a person's assets in accordance
with specific objectives or directives. While irrevocable trusts are exempt from both estate and
inheritance taxes, revocable trusts are subject to estate tax. Trust beneficiaries may end up
owing taxes on earnings or gains produced by the trust assets after they receive them, whereas
testamentary trusts are created in the will and taxed accordingly. In order for family members to
prepare and be informed of what will happen to all of their loved one's possessions, it is crucial
to understand the many forms of trusts. Therefore MNC can create trust to deposit their
reserves and profit in order to avoid the tax imposed by the government.
References
Haegele, B. (2023) Tax havens: Examples, benefits and legality, SmartAsset. SmartAsset.
Available at: https://smartasset.com/taxes/tax-haven-examples-benefits-and-
legality#:~:text=Tax%20Haven%20Examples,-Many%20countries%20and&text=Places
%20like%20Switzerland%2C%20Bermuda%20and,investors%20to%20park%20their
%20wealth. (Accessed: April 6, 2023).
19
AS2: Comparative Case Study
Kumar.r, P. (2021) How does thin capitalization affect taxation? , TaxGuru. Available at:
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/thin-capitalization-affect-taxation.html (Accessed: April 6,
2023).
Report • By Thomas L. Hungerford • March 31 (no date) The simple fix to the problem of how to
tax multinational corporations - ending deferral, Economic Policy Institute. Available at:
https://www.epi.org/publication/how-to-tax-multinational-corporations/ (Accessed: April 6,
2023).
Seth, S. (2023) Transfer pricing: What it is and how it works, with examples, Investopedia.
Investopedia. Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/transfer-pricing.asp
(Accessed: April 6, 2023).
Waluyo, W. and Doktoralina, C.M. (2018) “Factor affecting tax avoidance through thin
capitalisation: Multinational Enterprises in Indonesia,” SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint].
Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436024.
Waluyo, W. and Doktoralina, C.M. (2018) “Factor affecting tax avoidance through thin
capitalisation: Multinational Enterprises in Indonesia,” SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint].
Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436024.
20
AS2: Comparative Case Study
21