Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PSIR Paper 1 Section A (Short Notes)
PSIR Paper 1 Section A (Short Notes)
Shashank Tyagi
Faculty PSIR Optional, StudyiqIAS
Ex. Consultant, Office of Minister
Social Welfare, GNCTD
Paper 1 Part A
Feminist criticism ● Rawls' theory addresses inequality in the political sphere but neglects to
bridge disparities in the personal realm, drawing concern from feminists.
● They advocate for a more comprehensive approach to achieve social
justice and equality.
Libertarian ● Nozick presents the entitlement theory of justice as an alternative to
Criticism by Rawls' theory.
Robert Nozick ● He justifies inequality resulting from fair competition in society.
● Advocates for a minimal state, intervening only in extreme cases, such as
preventing monopolies over essential resources like water.
● Opposes progressive taxation, viewing it as bonded labor and an affront
to human dignity.
● Rejects the concept of historical injustice.
● Not in favor of a welfare state, supporting a night watchman state with
minimal government intervention.
Social Liberal ● Sen criticizes Rawls for considering abstract individuals negotiating in an
Criticism by abstract situation (original position). He advocates for social choice
Amartya Sen theory, focusing on the real choices of people in actual situations.
● Sen argues that a grand idea of justice, as conceptualized by Rawls, is
neither feasible nor preferable in the complexities of the real world.
● He emphasizes that merely distributing goods is not enough. To achieve
justice, it is crucial to ensure that people's capabilities are made equal,
enabling them to effectively utilize the distributed goods.
Value Pluralism ● Berlin criticizes Rawls' lexical order of values: liberty, equality of
Criticism by opportunity, and the difference principle.
Isaiah Berlin ● It implies the inherent supremacy of one value, contradicting value
pluralism's idea that different values can exist independently without one
being inherently superior.
Communitarian ● Alasdair McIntyre: Reality is perceived through the lens of one's
Criticism community. The concept of an original position is unrealistic as individuals
are shaped by their communities, making them realists.
● Charles Taylor: Man is a situated self, influenced by his social context.
● Michael Sandel: Man is an embedded self in a network of social relations.
His sense of justice aligns with his community's, rejecting Rawls' proposal
of abstracted individuals.
● Michael Walzer: Universal principles of justice are untenable. Justice is an
art of differentiation, not a science of universalism. Different goods must
be distributed differently, and justice varies across societies and
institutions. Political and economic spheres require distinct principles of
justice.
Rawls' Response ● Rawls introduces the concept of overlapping consensus, reflecting
people's agreement on common issues based on different but converging
reasons. In pluralistic societies, overlapping consensus emerges from
democratic culture, where toleration, public reasoning, and reciprocity
foster shared understanding.
● In his book "Political Liberalism," Rawls presents a political conception of
justice specifically for Western societies, limited to the political sphere.
Conclusion ● Despite criticism from Nozick and others, Rawls remains a reference point
for contemporary political philosophers.
● His theory of justice has initiated a "golden age" of theorizing about
justice, stimulating important debates in the field.
Thomas Paine's ● In his book "The Rights of Man," Paine argues that humans are inherently
Perspective different from animals and should be granted rights befitting their unique
nature.
● Criticizes the social contract theory for not justifying the binding of future
generations to agreements made by previous generations.
Criticism of ● Source of rights is the law/state, not inherent in individuals.
Natural Rights: ● Natural rights are seen as nonsensical and abstract, lacking certainty.
Legal Positivists' ● Considered a recipe for lawlessness and chaos.
View (Bentham, ● According to Hobbes, man can only enjoy rights under the state's
Hobbes) protection; the state is the real source of rights.
● Bentham criticizes natural rights from a utilitarian perspective, calling
them "terrorist language" that limits state authority and leads to chaos.
● Positive rights, given by the state (legal positivism), are codified and avoid
vagueness.
Theory of ● Cultural, not natural, origins are the source of rights.
Cultural Rights ● Rights must be sanctioned by society, and individuals cannot challenge
(Edmund Burke) customs for untested ideas.
● Natural rights are criticized for being universalist, disregarding
socio-cultural diversity and based on abstract individualism.
Human Rights Rights inherent to all individuals by virtue of being human, making them
universal and inalienable.
Origins Concept strengthened post-WWII due to Hitler's atrocities against Jews.
James Nickel's ● Human rights are a non-negotiable part of human identity.
View ● Universally applicable, fundamental, and absolute.
● Modern and secular version of natural rights, encompassing legal rights
granted by the state.
● Available to all, regardless of caste, creed, religion, race, sex, etc.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) + Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights 1966 + Covenant on Social and Economic Rights = International
Bill of Rights.
Criticism ● Crisis of Legitimacy: Human rights face challenges as they are perceived
as a tool for Western geopolitical interests and regime change.
● Selective Imposition: Western nations are accused of applying human
rights standards selectively, ignoring violations in certain countries.
● Clash of Civilizations: Different interpretations of human rights contribute
to cultural clashes.
● Lack of Consensus: There is no agreement on universal minimum rights or
whether certain groups, like terrorists, should be granted human rights.
Cultural ● Cultural relativists argue that culture shapes one's perception of rights
Relativists and that the concept of rights cannot be separated from cultural context.
Criticism ● Each culture is considered rational, and no culture should be deemed
inferior or superior.
● Cultural relativists claim that natural rights' universalist approach
overlooks socio-cultural diversity.
● Leaders like Xi and Putin view human rights promotion as a guise for
regime change and installing puppet regimes.
Asian Values ● Cultural Imperialism: Lee Kuan Yu and Mahathir Mohammad criticize
human rights as a form of cultural imperialism. They argue that HR is
based on the concept of "Atomistic man," which doesn't align with the
Asian view of "situated self" and the special attachment to community
and organic solidarity in Asian societies.
Indian context ● Article 29 and 30: These articles provide cultural and educational rights to
minorities, allowing them to preserve and promote their distinct
language, script, and culture.
● Fifth and Sixth Schedule: These schedules protect the rights of tribal
communities and grant autonomy to tribal areas to preserve their culture
and traditions.
● The concept of "Ganga-Jamuna Tahzeeb" (Ganges-Yamuna Culture)
exemplifies the intermixing of Hindu and Islamic cultures in India
Bhikhu Parekh ● Bhikhu Parekh is a plural multiculturalist with a postcolonial view.
● He criticizes Kymlicka's liberal multiculturalism as an extension of
liberalism.
● Parekh calls for extending special rights to non-citizen minorities and
challenges the sense of superiority in liberals.
● He emphasizes that society's principles should emerge from dialogue
among civilizations, not based on a single culture's values.
● Parekh praises India's handling of a multicultural society.
● He proposes the harm principle, allowing certain cultural practices as long
as they do not harm society or state security.
● Multiculturalism, for Parekh, involves the interplay of insights: individuals
shaped by culture, each culture being inherently plural, and having its
own conception of the good life.
● Raimon Panikkar advocates for "diatopical" exchange, promoting dialogue
and mutual learning between cultures without imposing superiority.
Criticism of ● Feminist (Susan Moller Okin): Criticizes multiculturalism for not
Multiculturalism addressing gender discrimination prevalent in all religions and cultures.
Advocates for the replacement of culture and religion with reason to
ensure gender justice.
● Liberal (Sen): Criticizes multiculturalism for potentially leading to the
isolation and ghettoization of minorities, fostering apprehension among
the majority population.
● Post-colonial (Chandran Kukathas): Calls for protecting minorities within
minorities, such as the LGBT community, to prevent their marginalization
within the larger cultural context.
● Cosmopolitan scholars: Argue that multiculturalism may underestimate
people's capacity to understand and appreciate other cultures,
emphasizing the importance of promoting cosmopolitan values and
mutual understanding.
Crisis of ● Clash of Civilizations by Huntington: Conceptualizes a clash between
multiculturalism different civilizations, questioning the compatibility of multiculturalism
and leading to increased tensions between diverse cultural groups.
● French Ban on Religious Attire: France's ban on Sikh turbans and Muslim
hijabs is seen as a violation of multicultural principles, fueling
controversies and incidents like the Charlie Hebdo bombings and the
killing of a school teacher.
● China's Treatment of Uighur Muslims: China's imposition of the Han way
of life on Uighur Muslims highlights the suppression of cultural diversity
and raises concerns about human rights violations.
● Backlash Against Multiculturalism: Rise of religious fundamentalism and
far-right parties in various liberal countries, exemplified by the AFD in
Germany, Marine Le Pen in France, and Brexit in the UK, reflects growing
intolerance towards immigrants and cultural diversity.
● This consent arises from the social contract, an idea previously explored
by thinkers such as Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau.
Main ideas ● Rousseau emphasized the importance of perceived legitimacy of laws for
effective governance.
● Legality can only be enforced when laws reflect the consent of the
governed.
● Lack of consent leads to a "crisis of governability" as observed in regions
like Kashmir and the north-eastern states in India (Atul Kohli's analysis).
● Coercive state apparatus may be employed when consent is lacking, which
can further challenge governability and even lead to the collapse of the
state.
● Indian state uses Article 371 to grant special powers to certain states,
allowing them to accept specific laws aligned with their traditions and
culture.
● Gramsci suggested that the state generates legitimacy through
manufacturing consent.
● Foucault's view on legitimacy involves discourses, biopower, and creating
a "governed mentality."
● States maintain legitimacy through ensuring fundamental rights for
citizens, freedom of the press, judicial independence, and conducting free
and fair elections.
Crisis of ● Habermas, a neo-Marxist from the Frankfurt School, discussed it in his
Legitimacy book "Legitimation Crisis."
● He criticized the welfarism adopted by capitalist democracies worldwide,
viewing it as unsustainable in the long term due to conflicting principles of
capitalism and socialism.
● Liberal democracies face a contradiction in attempting to fulfill popular
demands for social security and welfare rights while maintaining a market
economy based on private profit.
● The reliance on welfare schemes funded by a capitalist economic system
creates tensions and challenges in sustaining legitimacy.
● In times of crisis, governments may need to reduce welfare schemes and
fiscal deficits, leading to resentment among the masses.
● Democratic systems, rule of law, and freedom of the press are crucial for
creating and maintaining legitimacy, according to Habermas.
● A legitimation crisis indicates a decline in the acceptance and confidence
in administrative functions, institutions, or leadership.
● It occurs when institutions fail to deliver the social goals for which they
were established, resulting in a violation of the social contract.
● Government overload is a term used to describe the situation where
demands of the population exceed the government's capacity to deliver.
● Industrialization and rapid development can lead to social movements
and protests as government regulations and workers' rights struggle to
catch up.
● Examples of the legitimation crisis include the Arab Spring in 2011 and the
failures of unbridled welfarism in countries like Greece and Venezuela.
Authority= Authority refers to legitimate power, and Max Weber identified three ideal
Power+Legitimac types:
y ● Traditional Authority: Based on long-established customs and traditions.
● Charismatic Authority: Derived from the exceptional qualities and
charisma of a leader.
Ideas on ideology ● Michael Foucault asserts that no ideology is free from the connection
between knowledge and power.
● Karl Marx suggests that in every era, the ideas of the ruling class hold
sway and become the dominant ideas.
● Hannah Arendt observes that ideology is employed by totalitarian states
to rationalize acts of terror.
● Karl Mannheim, in his sociology of knowledge, posits that every theory is
shaped by the perspective of a particular social class.
● Jean-François Lyotard, a postmodernist, labels ideology as a
"meta-narrative."
End of Ideology ● Daniel Bell, introduced the concept of the "End of Ideology."
● He argued that regardless of the ideological differences between East and
West, similar political and administrative developments have occurred.
● Both regions have witnessed the rise of bureaucratic and technocratic
societies, especially in the era of globalization.
● S.M. Lipset proposed the idea of moving away from ideological politics
and focusing on the "politics of development."
● According to Lipset, the post-war societies in the West have addressed the
fundamental political challenges of the industrial revolution, rendering
ideologies less necessary.
● W.W. Rostow, in his book "Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist
Manifesto," presented the modernization theory, asserting that every
state, irrespective of its ideology, goes through comparable stages of
economic growth.
Critics of the ● C. Wright Mills, who argued that the West has not resolved all its social
"End of conflicts through its liberal ideology.
Ideology" theory ● C.B. MacPherson pointed out wealth inequality in Western states.
● Ralph Miliband viewed the "End of Ideology" as a justification for
maintaining the status quo and discouraging the proletariat from pursuing
revolutionary change. He considered the welfare state a myth, as wealth
still remains concentrated in the hands of capitalists.
● Alasdair MacIntyre criticized the "End of Ideology" notion as being an
ideology itself, aimed at preserving the existing order. He suggested that
Lipset implicitly favored Western liberal democracy as the ideal model.
End of History ● Introduced by Francis Fukuyama in 1989 after the Cold War.
● Signifies the endpoint of man's ideological evolution.
● Collapse of communism and the end of the Cold War demonstrated the
superiority of Western liberal democracy.
● Inspired by Hegel's dialectics, suggesting that historical conflicts would
end, leading to a universal homogeneous state.
● Alexander Kojève's idea that history would culminate in the establishment
of a universal state influenced Fukuyama.
● George Kennan's concept of "spiritual vitality" and a country's ability to
provide a better standard of living influenced the idea of winning the Cold
War.
● Christian mythology of the world coming under the unifying influence of
Jesus played a role in the concept.
Criticism of End ● Sees clash between corporate culture and religious orthodoxy.
of History ● Seumas Milne's criticism highlights Western support for authoritarian
regimes, questioning the morality of political traditions like liberalism.
● Samuel P. Huntington's critique suggests that the end of ideological
conflicts has been replaced by the "clash of civilizations," where cultural
and religious differences are the primary source of tensions in the
post-Cold War world.
Relevance of ● Weakening of Liberal World Order
Clash of ● Rising populist movements and authoritarian leaders have undermined
civilization the global influence of liberal institutions.
● Challenge from Chinese Han Way of Life
● China's rise as a superpower has presented an alternative to Western
liberal democracy, with the promotion of its own cultural and political
values.
● The Chinese model of governance, with its emphasis on state control and
limited political freedoms, challenges the universality of liberal principles.
● Ethnic Factors Threatening Liberal Institutions
● Conflicts like the one between Azerbaijan and Armenia, rooted in religious
and ethnic differences, illustrate this challenge.
● There is an ongoing debate over the compatibility of Western rights-based
values and Asian cultural values, which emphasize collective harmony
over individualism.
● Events like the 9/11 attacks, global financial crisis in 2008, and the rise of
China have raised questions about the credibility of liberal institutions and
their ability to address emerging challenges effectively.
● Globalization has increased identity consciousness and intensified
struggles for recognition and representation.
Criticism of the ● Too simplistic and fails to explain complex conflicts, such as civil wars in
Clash of Sudan and Yemen.
Civilizations ● Struggles to account for conflicts within the same civilization, like the
(COC) Theory Sunni-Shia divide in the Middle East.
● Serves to justify U.S. hegemony and its actions to counter perceived
challenges from other regions.
● The Abraham accord between Jewish and Islamic nations is an example of
geopolitical realities trumping civilisational values based on religion.
Conclusion Postmodernists like Lyotard say all ideologies are discourses. No ideology tells
the truth.
SOCIALISM
LIBERALISM
MARXISM
FASCISM
Inspiration ● Plato: Advocated the rule of a philosopher king and absolute obedience,
emphasizing duties over rights of citizens.
● Machiavelli: Justified actions in the national interest (raison d'etat).
● Hegel: Described the state as the embodiment of God's will on Earth.
● Hobbes: Advocated a powerful state (Leviathan) to prevent anarchy.
● Rousseau: Believed that man -must be compelled to embrace freedom.
● Henri Bergson: Introduced the concept of vitality, valuing passions over
reason.
Features of ● Anti-Rationalism: Emphasizes emotions over reason, using myths for
Fascism mass propaganda.
● Totalitarianism: Imposes single-party dictatorship, enabling absolute
control without opposition, leading to no rights or liberties.
● Elitism: Radically rejects equality, promoting rule by a small elite known as
junta.
● Anti-Democracy: Rejects democracy, views it as a luxury of rich nations,
and dismisses parliamentary systems.
● Militarism: Advocates a regimented society based on hierarchy and a
chain of command.
● Ultranationalism and Imperialism: Promotes the idea of nations as
natural rivals in the quest for dominance, advocating expansionist foreign
policies based on racial superiority.
● Economic System: Supports protectionism and self-sufficiency (autarky)
instead of international trade.
● State Supremacy: Believes in the absolute authority of the state, with
nothing above, against, or outside it.
Criticism of ● Arendt and Popper: View fascism as a form of totalitarianism, marking the
Fascism shift from class politics to mass politics.
● Gandhi: Sees fascism as a manifestation of Machiavellianism, likening it to
British imperialism. Gandhi highlights the danger of compromising means
to achieve ends, leading civilization towards satanic tendencies.
● Laski: Considers fascism as a crisis of capitalism and a counter-revolution
by elite classes against the masses. It represents a desperate attempt to
protect against the potential socialist revolution.
Contemporary It is argued that while fascists were defeated in war, they weren't fully
rejected. Since 9/11 and 2008, right-wing and neo-fascist ideologies have
grown, creating a crisis for the liberal project.
Conclusion Fascism lacks coherence, a hodgepodge of ideologies adapting to
circumstances, not a unified school of thought.
FEMINISM
Pluralist Theory
Critical ● They want to keep the state to avoid anarchy but also limit its power.
evaluation of ● But the state automatically assumes primacy due to the unique role that it
pluralists performs.
● Hence they want to keep the cake and have it too.
● More realistic and relevant in present times as there is a cry for more and
more decentralisation and diffusion of power.
KAUTILYA
warfare.
● It emphasizes the importance of a strong king even if other elements in
the state are weak. It serves as a reminder for the king to prioritize the
well-being of his citizens, as their welfare directly affects the prosperity of
the kingdom.
King's Duties: ● Kautilya advocates for the king to follow "rajdharma," understanding that
Rajdharma and the well-being of the citizens is interconnected with the well-being of the
Upholding king himself.
Dharma ● This highlights the significance of just and benevolent rule to maintain the
harmony and prosperity of the state.
● Furthermore, Kautilya advises the king to uphold dharma, the righteous
path, and create conducive conditions for trade and commerce.
● Ensuring a stable and fair economic environment is crucial for the welfare
of the people and the overall prosperity of the kingdom.
On Corruption ● Kautilya identifies 40 ways of embezzlement and corruption within the
state.
● He emphasizes the importance of tackling corruption and suggests
measures such as regular transfers to prevent officials from becoming too
powerful or corrupt.
● Additionally, whistleblowers should be protected, and the entire chain of
corrupt transactions must be punished to discourage corruption within
the state.
Current ● The potential roles that India envisions its two largest neighbours will play
relevance in securing its foreign policy objectives is in tandem with Kautilyan
concepts: of Pakistan as “innate” and China as “contingent” enemy; and
of the former as a “strategic opponent” and the latter, a “strategic
competitor”.
● Can also about India's neighbourhood and extended neighbourhood
through mandal siddhant.
● Checks on govt corruption through PCA and lokpal.
● Espionage through RAW, IB.
Similarities ● Shift to Political Science: Both shifted focus from political philosophy to
between Kautilya pragmatic political science, analyzing statecraft and governance.
and Machiavelli ● Politics vs. Ethics: They distinguished politics from ethics, emphasizing
pragmatic considerations over moral principles.
● State Security: Prioritized state security and advocated for a strong state.
● War as Last Resort: Urged war as a last resort due to economic losses and
citizen well-being.
● Emphasis on Conquest: Stressed territorial expansion to strengthen the
state.
● Use of Strategies: Advocated for clever strategies and tactics in statecraft.
● Corruption Concerns: Addressed corruption issues, with Kautilya
providing a detailed analysis.
Differences ● King and Dharma: Kautilya believed a king must adhere to Dharma, while
between Kautilya Machiavelli suggested using religion to control people.
and Machiavelli ● Implementation of Ideas: Kautilya's ideas were practically applied, while
Machiavelli's remained theoretical.
Weber and ● Max Weber saw Kautilya as more Machiavellian than Machiavelli.
Nehru's ● Nehru referred to Kautilya as the "Indian Machiavelli" in his book
Perspectives "Discovery of India."
Criticism Gandhi criticized the separation of ends and means, advocating for holistic
well-being that includes spiritual aspects.
Conclusion Medha Bisht's book emphasizes Arthashastra's grand strategy, filling gaps in
Eurocentric perspectives on statecraft. Its enduring relevance lies in its holistic
approach and pragmatic principles.
AUROBINDO GHOSH
GANDHI
Dalits to raise their consciousness and become a class for themselves, not
just in themselves.
● Ambedkar preferred the term "depressed classes" over "Harijans" and
supported state-affirmative action and political mobilization.
● Gandhi prioritized freedom from foreign rule as the first step, while
Ambedkar sought to resolve the Dalit question first.
● Though often portrayed as adversaries, their work complements each
other, with Gandhi's tasks leading to Ambedkar's continuation.
Trusteeship ● Gandhi proposed trusteeship as an alternative to communism and
capitalism, which he viewed as based on violence.
● Satyagraha, nonviolent resistance, is justified if the wealthy refuse
voluntary wealth-sharing.
● Trusteeship justifies the demand for communism by preventing labor
alienation in the production process.
● It aligns with the welfare state model and influenced stakeholder
capitalism.
● Trustees are obligated due to the negative externalities of their industries
on society.
● Gandhi's economic actions prioritize the welfare of all beings, reflected in
CSR and philanthropy.
● Concepts like Swaraj, Sarvodaya, Khadi, Swadeshi are woven into the idea
of Atmanirbhar Bharat.
Gandhi and ● Gandhi emphasizes a sustainable economic model against mindless
COVID-19 capitalism and globalization during the pandemic.
● Advocates self-sufficient gram panchayats to combat COVID-19 at the
local level.
● Migrant crisis highlights the need for the owner class to act as trustees
rather than capitalists.
On Swaraj ● True Swaraj is achieved by being free from all desires, inspired by Ghosh
and Upanishads.
● Swaraj encompasses political, social, economic, and cultural dimensions.
● Political Swaraj includes PRI, social Swaraj ends communalism and
untouchability, economic Swaraj involves land reforms, khadi, and cottage
industry, and cultural Swaraj respects every culture.
On Nonviolence ● Nonviolence is the fundamental principle of Gandhi's philosophy and
described as his creed.
● It is more than refraining from violence; it is based on love, compassion,
and fraternity.
● Gandhi opposed British violence for civilizing Indians and built
nonviolence as a counter-hegemony.
● Ahimsa should be practiced toward animals and the environment.
● Nonviolence is the purest means in the pursuit of truth, a powerful force
against physical brutality.
● It is the art of triumphing over brute force with spiritual force.
● Swaraj is meaningless without upholding truth and nonviolence.
Role in Freedom ● Professor Humayun Kabir viewed Gandhi as a man of action and a
Struggle psychologist who understood mass psychology, rather than a traditional
philosopher.
● Bipin Chandra praised Gandhi for his success in making the national
movement a multi-class movement, uniting various social classes.
● Gandhi faced challenges in fighting the British, who ruled through
B.R. AMBEDKAR
M.N. ROY
30s to 40s ● Joined the Indian National Congress to bring radicalism from within.
● Became sympathetic to Gandhi and criticized Soviet Marxism due to
Gandhi's actions in controlling massacres.
● Criticisms of Marxism included neglecting the importance of ideas in
shaping history, suggesting history moves through class cooperation
rather than struggle, emphasizing equitable distribution of surplus value,
requiring an ideological revolution before materialistic revolution, and
opposing the dictatorship of the proletariat.
40s to 50s ● Left Congress and advocated for partyless democracy while developing
radical humanism.
● Roy is credited with introducing the idea of socialism in the Indian
Constitution by Granville Austin in his book "Indian Constitution:
Cornerstone of a Nation."
Conclusion Sudipto Kaviraj refers to M.N. Roy as a "remarkable failure" because Indian
society has not fully embraced the rationalist way of life advocated by Roy.
Despite his ideas and efforts, the broader societal transformation towards
radical humanism has not materialized in India.
Theory of ● Plato argued that until philosophers become rulers, people will continue to
Philosopher face predicaments.
King ● The philosopher king is an individual with true knowledge and a lack of lust for
power.
● Plato opposed the idea of democracy, asserting that decision-making should
not involve the general population.
● The ruler's responsibility is to govern reluctantly, and states governed by such
rulers are considered the best.
● The philosopher king represents both knowledge and sacrifice.
● Critics argue that Plato's diagnosis is correct but his prescription is flawed, as
power has a corrupting influence. However, examples like Ashoka are cited as
potential instances of a philosopher king in practice
Theory of ● According to Plato, justice is functional specialization, wherein everyone
Justice performs their designated duties.
● Plato's view of justice is hierarchical, while Rawls' view is egalitarian.
● Aristotle believed in treating equals equally and unequals unequally as a form
of justice. Both Aristotle and Plato uphold a meritocratic principle of justice.
● Rawls, inspired by Immanuel Kant, disagrees with the Greek conception of
justice, emphasizing the inviolability of human dignity.
● Plato considered justice to be superior to power, leading to a peaceful society.
Plato believed that knowledge should hold a supreme position in society,
giving rise to the concept of the philosopher king to establish a just state.
● Sabine described justice as the bond that holds society together, while Barker
argued that Plato's entire thought revolved around the concept of justice
Theory of ● According to Plato, education is crucial to developing ideas about a just society.
Education Individuals must perform duties suitable to their abilities.
● Plato proposed a theory of education to determine which individuals should
perform specific duties in a state.
● The process involved state-sponsored education, strict oversight, education
for women, subjects like philosophy, literature, mathematics, and compulsory
military training.
● Upon completing this education, an individual becomes eligible for the role of
philosopher king.
● Plato considered the state as an individual writ large, created to establish an
ideal state based on the concept of justice.
● He emphasized the interconnection between politics, ethics, and the principles
guiding both individuals and the state
First Feminist ● Plato argued that women do not have any natural disability preventing them
Perspective from receiving an education.
● He even mentioned the concept of a philosopher queen.
● Some argue that his motivation for liberating women was not solely for their
benefit but to utilize their services for the state
Aristotle vs ● Aristotle, Plato's greatest disciple and critic, differed in various aspects,
Plato particularly Plato's theory of communism regarding private property and
family.
● Aristotle was pragmatic, advocating for the best practicable state, while Plato
was an idealist aiming for an ideal state.
● Plato was radical and perfectionist, desiring extensive reforms, while Aristotle
was more conservative, believing in the principle of the golden mean.
● While Plato correctly diagnosed that even a philosopher king could succumb to
corruption, Aristotle disagreed with Plato's solution.
● He argued that property gives individuals a sense of achievement and
motivation, and everyone's property is no one's responsibility. Aristotle
considered the abolition of property and family as an impractical remedy.
Criticism ● Karl Popper wrote "The Open Society and Its Enemies," in which he
considered Plato an enemy of an open society. Popper argued that those who
were seduced by Plato's writing style disagreed with him. He criticized Plato's
holistic approach, essentialism, and historicism, claiming they hindered critical
examination and questioning.
● Isaiah Berlin labelled Plato as a fascist.
Conclusion Ronald Levinson defended Plato and argued against comparing him to Hitler,
stating that they were incomparable. He considered the concept of the
philosopher king as utopian and challenging to compare with Hitler's fascism.
Ralph Waldo Emerson famously said, "Plato is philosophy, and philosophy is Plato."
ARISTOTLE
Theory Components
Introduction Aristotle is widely recognized as the father of political science due to his
pioneering analysis of politics. Work- ‘Politics’
Similarity ● Both Aristotle and Plato shared a belief in the natural inequality of men.
between ● Plato introduced the concept of the "myth of metals," while Aristotle justified
Aristotle and the institution of slavery.
Plato ● They both prioritized the state over the individual.
● Neither had faith in the masses; Plato advocated for a philosopher king, while
Aristotle considered democracy as the second worst form of government.
Theory of ● Aristotle's theory of justice was formulated in the context of revolution.
Justice ● He acknowledged inherent inequality among individuals and consequently
justified slavery.
● According to him, equals should be treated equally, while unequals should
be treated unequally.
● He advocated for proportional equality, where those who contributed more to
the state and displayed greater civic excellence deserved greater rewards.
● Marxists opposed this view, as they rejected any form of inequality.
● Aristotle disagreed with absolute equality, arguing that it would be unjust
towards individuals with more talent and merit.
● He believed that treating unequals as equals would lead to a sense of
injustice, potentially resulting in revolution and sedition.
● While numerical equality was relevant in democracies, Aristotle did not
support democracy, considering it the second worst form of government after
tyranny.
Theory of the ● Aristotle famously stated that "man is by nature a political animal,"
State emphasizing the natural inclination of humans towards political organization.
● He asserted that only the state could fulfill the needs of individuals, making it
the highest form of association, surpassing even the village and family.
● This idea influenced the monistic theory of sovereignty advocated by Hobbes
and John Austin. Aristotle argued that those who could live without a state
would either be beasts or gods, but not true humans.
● He believed that the state was more important than the individual since
individuals truly became human in the presence of the state.
● Aristotle contended that nature had not made humans self-sufficient, and
living in a state was the destiny of humankind.
Theory of ● Aristotle defended the natural and practical aspects of slavery.
Slavery ● He contended that individuals lacking reason or courage were suited to be
slaves.
● Slavery served a purpose, allowing masters to engage in activities beneficial to
the state.
● Aristotle argued that slavery was also useful for the slaves themselves, as they
required constant guidance and could learn from their masters to develop
virtues.
● He even suggested that a slave who demonstrated virtue should be liberated.
● Critics, however, argue that while slavery may be a law of nature, societal
context should shape our understanding of what is morally acceptable.
● Immanuel Kant criticized Aristotle's justification of slavery, asserting that
individuals should not be treated merely as means to an end.
Theory of ● Aristotle criticized Plato's communism and recognized the negative
Property consequences of extreme wealth.
● He advocated for individual property rights with a concept of common use,
similar to Gandhi's model of trusteeship.
● Aristotle believed that property gave individuals a sense of achievement and
drew inspiration from Locke's ideas.
● He argued that excessive inequality in property ownership led to revolution,
aligning with Buddha's perspective that wealth accumulation breeds hatred,
cruelty, and violence.
● Supporting references to Thomas Piketty's work and the World Inequality
Report 2022 can be cited.
Theory of ● Aristotle extensively studied 158 constitutions.
Constitution ● He viewed the polity as a balance between democracy and oligarchy,
considering democracy the second worst form of government after tyranny.
● Drawing on the works of Sydney Verba and Gabriel Almond, Aristotle asserted
that excessive participation in politics posed risks to the stability of the polity.
● He believed that the civility of the middle class would help alleviate societal
conflicts.
● Aristotle argued that the rule of the middle class was preferable, as neither
the rich nor the poor could be trusted fully.
● He advocated for a greater number of middle-class citizens, as excessive
inequality bred revolution.
Theory of ● Aristotle was a conservative who opposed revolution and favoured the status
Revolution quo.
● He believed that any change, whether small or large, constituted a revolution.
● According to Aristotle, the main cause of revolution was inequality and
injustice.
● He asserted that societies built on extreme inequality were destined to
collapse.
Critics ● Immanuel Kant criticized Aristotle for justifying slavery.
● Dworkin criticized Aristotle's theory of justice, asserting that individuals
should not be held responsible for circumstances beyond their control.
Aristotle as an ● Aristotle influenced Locke's justification of the need for private property.
Inspiration ● Aristotle's ideas influenced Arendt's theories of deliberative democracy and
direct democracy, highlighting the importance of collective deliberation
among different families within a state.
MACHIAVELLI
Theory Components
Introduction Niccolò Machiavelli was an Italian Renaissance diplomat, philosopher, and writer.
His book "The Prince" is widely considered the best book on statecraft.
Context ● The rise of nation-states in Europe influenced Machiavelli's ideas.
● Machiavelli aimed to consolidate Italy into a strong nation-state.
● Corruption in the Roman church was prevalent, affecting the common people.
Ideas ● Machiavelli believed that a prince should possess the art of power
management and be a political entrepreneur.
● He embraced a realpolitik perspective, emphasizing practicality in politics.
● National interest should always take precedence, even over personal religion or
ethics.
● He separated church and state, aligning with the ideals of the Renaissance.
● Machiavelli's prince was not a hereditary monarch but a political entrepreneur.
● He emphasized the importance of history and psychology for a prince, rather
than philosophy.
Advice ● Machiavelli advised understanding politics before entering the field,
highlighting the need to be cunning like a fox and brave like a lion.
● He urged princes to see things as they are and not abandon reality for idealistic
notions.
● Machiavelli believed that human nature was inherently selfish, cowardly,
ungrateful, fickle-minded, avaricious, and deceitful.
● People prioritize self-interest over the interest of the state, making gratitude
fleeting.
● Machiavelli advised maintaining law and order to allow individuals to pursue
their property interests.
● A wise prince provides security for the lives of his subjects to maintain control.
● Machiavelli stressed the importance of a cold-blooded approach, avoiding
actions driven by passion.
● He endorsed the idea that the ends justify the means, with the prince's success
Conclusion ● Machiavelli is considered the first modern political thinker, and his ideas have
influenced political realism.
● Laski calls him the father of political realism.
● His works highlight the practicalities of politics and the importance of the
state's well-being.
HOBBES
Theories Components
Intro ● Thomas Hobbes, hailed as the first modern thinker in Western philosophy, is
renowned for presenting a comprehensive theory of sovereignty.
● His notable work, "Leviathan," delves into the intricate aspects of political
authority and governance.
Context ● Hobbes's experiences during the Puritan Revolution of the 17th century in
Britain deeply influenced his concerns for establishing peace and order in
society.
● In medieval times, the theory of the "two swords" caused chaos, with
conflicting authorities of the emperor and the pope.
● Hobbes, however, advocated for the integration of the church under the
state's authority to ensure a unified power structure.
Core Ideas ● Belongs to the social contract tradition, viewing the state as a result of a
social contract.
● Belongs to the positive school of law, emphasizing that the state is the
source of laws.
● Advantages of positive law: Certain source, Definite, Enforceable, Creates
equality between individuals
● Rejects natural law derived from reason, instead focusing on positive law as
man's reason is limited.
● Describes natural law as "counsels of prudence."
● Considers security of life as paramount, emphasizing the absolute right to
life given by nature.
● Methodological individualist and normative individualist, establishing that
man is utilitarian by nature using the resolutive compositive method.
● Advocates for an all-powerful state with absolute powers to preserve human
life, making him an absolutist.
State ● Inspired by Aristotle's theory, giving primacy to the state over other
Absolutism institutions.
● Monistic theory of sovereignty, emphasizing that the state alone possesses
authority.
● Rejects the sharing of authority with any other institution.
● Sabine says that there is no contradiction between his individualism and
state absolutism. It is in the interest of individualism that state absolutism
becomes necessary. Only a centralised state with institutional law and order
can prevent anarchy to save life of man.
Hobbes as a ● Asserts that all men are guided by pain and pleasure, driven by their
Scholar of passions.
possessive ● Establishes equality among men based on their shared pursuit of
individualism self-interest.
● Views man as individualistic by nature and social only due to compulsion.
● Presents life as a continuous search for power, leading to competition and
anarchy
● Utilizes the resolutive compositive method to scientifically prove his
theories.
Political ● States that man has liberty only where the law is silent, losing liberty when
Obligation the state creates laws.
● Advocates for state punishment of those who do not follow the sovereign's
law, resonating with Rousseau's concept of forcing individuals to follow the
general will. Says covenants without swords are nothing but empty words.
● In the state of nature man's life is poor, nasty, brutish and short. State of
nature is characterized by “war of all against all.”
● He calls the state Leviathan (all powerful). In a piece of territory, there can
only be one sovereign, the state.
● Hobbes dealt with the dilemma of limited means and boundless desires.
● He developed a political obligation model based on the "consent-contract"
theory, asserting that individuals are morally obligated to obey the
commands of the sovereign for the sake of their own lives.
● Hobbes introduced the right to punish, including the use of violence, against
those who defy the sovereign's commands.
● Hobbes's concept of political obligation shares similarities with Plato's
philosopher king.
● However, it is important to acknowledge that totalitarian and fascist
JOHN LOCKE
Theories Components
Introduction John Locke, known as the "father of liberalism," is renowned for his
contributions to political philosophy. He developed theories on natural rights,
government by consent, and toleration.
Context Locke witnessed the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which involved the peaceful
transfer of power from the monarchy to parliament.
Locke's Key ● Critique of Robert Filmer: In his first book, Locke criticized Robert Filmer's
ideas theory of divine rights, which posited that the state is created by God and the
king represents God's absolute authority on Earth.
○ Locke opposed this view and replaced it with the concept of natural
rights, asserting that the state is a creation of humanity and should serve
the purpose of facilitating a good life rather than being worshipped.
● Theory of Limited State: Unlike philosophers like Plato, Rousseau, and
Hobbes who advocated for an all-powerful state, Locke proposed the idea of
a limited state.
○ He argued that the government does not possess original powers but only
delegated powers.
● Reason and Passion in Man: Locke believed that humans possess both
reason and passion but should maintain a balanced state.
○ He argued that even in a state of nature, individuals do not harm others
as they possess enough reason to understand that anarchy is to their own
disadvantage.
○ This concept influenced MN Roy's idea that humans develop morality to
foster harmonious and mutually beneficial social relationships.
● Tabula Rasa: Locke rejected Socrates' view that the soul guides a good life.
○ Instead, he proposed the concept of the mind as a "tabula rasa," a clean
slate, asserting that humans learn from their experiences.
● Toleration of Religions: Locke advocated for religious tolerance, stating that
the state should tolerate all religions since individuals do not listen to the
magistrate in matters of religion.
J.S. MILL
Theories Components
● Critics of utilitarianism pointed out that two actions alone cannot define
the entirety of human actions, as there is also a sense of sacrifice in human
behavior.
● Mill believed that utility, in its broadest sense encompassing both
happiness and pleasure, should guide human actions.
● Despite initial criticism, Mill's revision and humanization of utilitarianism
strengthened the philosophy over time.
On Liberty ● First person to provide a comprehensive liberal concept of liberty.
● Initially, liberty was associated with property rights and justifying
capitalism.
● Emphasized individual sovereignty and transcendental utility as the core
ideas of liberty.
● Argued for the protection of freedom of speech, expression, and from
exploitative customs and traditions.
● Defended absolute freedom of speech and expression, with restrictions
only when it harms rational individuals.
● Asserted that silencing discussion assumes infallibility and hinders the
pursuit of truth.
● Mill argued that the state must guarantee three essential freedoms to
individuals:
○ freedom of speech and expression
○ freedom to act on one's ideas
○ freedom to form associations with like-minded individuals.
● He defended liberty because he recognized that without it, there can be no
self-development.
● Mill supported negative liberty and compared individuals to plants that
must be free to grow and develop themselves.
● He believed that a state cannot become great by stifling its own people.
On Speech and ● Mill regarded freedom of speech and expression as the most special gift to
Expression humans from God.
● He emphasized that only humans, unlike animals, possess the capacity to
resolve conflicts through dialogue.
● “No state becomes great by dwarfing its own people.”-Mill
● Mill acknowledged that this freedom can be limited if it harms rational
individuals rather than hypersensitive ones.
● He famously stated, "The silencing of discussion is an assumption of
infallibility."
● Mill argued that through dialogue and speech, individuals can arrive at the
truth. Suppressing the truth is futile, as the truth is bound to emerge.
● He believed that only the truth can help individuals lead a good life, and
denying someone the truth deprives them of their right to live a fulfilling
life.
The Harm ● Mill proposed the harm principle to determine the extent of liberty that
Principle the state should provide.
● He distinguished between self-regarding actions and others-regarding
actions.
● The state should only intervene in others-regarding actions, as
self-regarding actions primarily affect the individual themselves.
● Mill contended that any restrictions on liberty, other than preventing harm
to others, are unjustified and mere restrictions for the sake of restrictions.
KARL MARX
Theories Components
Intro Karl Marx's reputation primarily rests on his revolutionary ideas rather than his
philosophical contributions. He is renowned for inspiring the establishment of
numerous communist regimes during the twentieth century.
Inspirations ● Hegel - Marx drew inspiration from Hegel's philosophy, particularly the
concept of dialectics. He criticized Hegel for "standing on his head,"
suggesting that Hegel's philosophy was inverted and needed to be
transformed.
● Ricardo - By Ricardo's labor theory of value, which states that the value of a
good is determined by the amount of labor required to produce it.
● Louis Blanc - By Blanc's ideas on socialism and the need for revolutionary
change.
Marx's Ideas ● Critique of Adam Smith and Laissez-Faire Theory:
o In his book "Critique of Political Economy" Marx argued that this theory
leads to the accumulation of wealth by only a few, as he believed it allows
unrestricted free market forces to prevail.
● Violence as the Midwife of Change
● Scientific Socialism and Praxis: Marx described his version of socialism as
scientific and emphasized its praxis, which means it focuses on practical
action rather than just theory.
● The Goal of Communism
● "Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains."
● According to Marx, philosophers have traditionally interpreted the world,
but he emphasized the importance of actively changing it.
● Marx argued that human history is primarily shaped by the act of
production rather than abstract thinking. He contended that manual labor
and the creation of goods and services hold greater significance in historical
development than intellectual pursuits.
Base and ● According to this model, the base represents the economic foundation
Superstructure (including the means of production and class relations), while the
Model superstructure encompasses institutions like the family, education, and the
state that are influenced by the economic base.
● Super structure is the reflection of basic structure and as base changes so
does superstructure.
● The class which controls the basic structure(means of production) controls
the institutions of superstructure.
State as a Marx diverged from Hegel's view of the state as a universal institution. Instead,
Class he argued that the state primarily functions as an instrument of the ruling class
Institution to maintain its dominance and suppress the working class.
False ● Marx asserted that religion and nationalism are forms of false consciousness
Consciousness that distract workers from recognizing their true class interests.
and ● He believed that workers needed to become aware of their material
Revolutionary conditions and develop revolutionary consciousness to bring about social
Consciousness change.
True Freedom ● Marx defined true freedom as liberation from the basic necessities of life,
in which he believed could be achieved in a communist society.
Communism ● In communism, private property would be abolished, eliminating the pursuit
of profit and competition.
● Resources would be allocated according to the principle of "from each
according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
Marx's ● Marx believed that capitalism carries within itself the seed of its own decay.
Analysis of ● Under capitalism, individuals view each other as competitors rather than
Capitalism fellow humans, creating a contradiction between man and society.
● Capitalists pay lower wages to workers to remain competitive, leading to the
elimination of small capitalists and the growth of the proletariat.
● This process ultimately leads to the disappearance of the middle class and
exacerbates social inequality.
● Marx argued that this state of inequality is a state of disequilibrium, and
nature is bound to move towards equilibrium.
● The more workers work and generate profit, the stronger the bargaining
power of the capitalists, which leads to the workers' own exploitation and
demise.
Historical ● Marx's theory of historical materialism, also known as the materialistic
Materialism interpretation of history, posits that the driving force of history is not ideas
but the relations between individuals in the process of production.
Dialectical ● Dialectical materialism refers to the conflict between classes that arises due
Materialism to material conditions, driving historical progress.
and Dialectical ● In contrast, dialectical idealism refers to the conflict between ideas that
Idealism influences historical development.
Critiques of ● Karl Popper: Labelled him as reductionist and determinist. He argued that
Marx Marx's theory, with its emphasis on economic factors as the driving force of
historical change, was unscientific and not open to falsification.
● Max Weber criticized Marx for providing a monocausal explanation of
history, as he believed that multiple factors, including culture and ideas,
influenced societal development.
● Gramsci criticized Marx for underestimating the significance of the
superstructure, particularly cultural institutions and their role in shaping
social consciousness.
● Louis Althusser accused Marx of economic reductionism.
● Michel Foucault contended that Marx's focus on relations of production
overlooked the importance of power dynamics in shaping society. He
suggested that power can manifest through various mechanisms unrelated
to economic class, such as gender and sexuality.
Conclusion Hannah Arendt remarked that Marx's enduring influence in our present world
serves as a testament to his greatness.
Antonio Gramsci
Theories Components
Intro Antonio Gramsci is widely celebrated as one of the most original political thinkers
in Western Marxism and is considered the father of neo-Marxism.
Context As a contemporary of Mussolini, Gramsci sought to understand why Marxist
predictions didn't come true and why capitalism continued to prosper.
Neo-Marxism aimed for human emancipation beyond just economic revolution,
emphasizing the need to challenge the mental hegemony of the capitalists.
Influences ● Benedetto Croce: Gramsci appreciated Croce's use of scholarly journals and
the press to shape ideological and social change, saturating the intellectual
life of Italy with a particular culture.
Key Ideas ● Gramsci criticizes Marx for overemphasizing the role of the base structure
and undermining the importance of the superstructure.
● He introduces the concept of cultural hegemony, where a dominant class
controls the oppressed through indoctrinated "common sense" or belief
systems.
● Gramsci seeks to understand the techniques of "bourgeois hegemony" in
order to replace cultural hegemony with one that serves the interests of the
proletariat.
Role of State ● Gramsci argued that the state exists to protect the capitalist class, while civil
and Civil society functions as the first layer of protection.
Society ● Civil society, through institutions like the family, school, and church,
manufactures consent and builds the hegemony of the capitalists.
● The state represents the second level of power, coercive power, which
becomes operational when ideological domination (hegemony) fails.
Obstacles to ● Gramsci suggests that the attraction to capitalist values prevents workers
Revolution from hating capitalists. The values of the capitalist class become the values of
the worker class.
Hannah Arendt
Theories Components
Intro Hannah Arendt is a prominent political philosopher who is known for her
heterodox thinking and her unique approach to political philosophy, which is
often described as thinking without barriers. She holds a rare designation in a
male-dominated discipline.
Inspired by ● Aristotle
● Karl Jaspers
● Martin Heidegger
Context As a German Jew during the time of Hitler, Arendt had first-hand experience of
Hitler's totalitarianism. Her work revolves around the importance of politics
and the necessity of participation in politics. She is considered a scholar of civic
republicanism.
On ● Arendt describes her thinking as thinking without barriers, and her method
totalitarianism as phenomenology, emphasizing experience rather than observation or
logic to understand things.
● In her book "The Origins of Totalitarianism," she explains totalitarianism
as arising when the public sphere is lost and the state gains total control.
● Totalitarianism is characterized by the use of terror, ideology, and
propaganda, with ideology playing a crucial role in legitimizing the use of
terror.
● Totalitarian ideologies, such as Nazism and Stalinism, cannot be subjected
to falsification, empirical observation, or logical reasoning.
Shashank Tyagi
Faculty PSIR Optional, StudyiqIAS
Ex. Consultant, Office of Minister
Social Welfare, GNCTD