Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
1
Nair N.K. (1991) ,Productivity in Indian Cement Industry, Productivity, Vol.32 No.1, April –
June, p.141.
2 2
Anup Agarwal and Nandu J.Nagarajan (1992), Corporate Capital Structure, Agency Costs,
and Ownership control – The case of all equity firms, the journal of Finance, Vol.XLV,
No.4,p.1325.
11
stock holdings rather than managers of similar - sized levered firms in
the industry. ii) There is significantly more family involvement in the
corporate operations of all equity firms is positively related to the extent
of family involvement and iv) All equity firms are characterized by greater
liquidity positions than the levered firms.
3
Subir Cokavn, Rejendra Vaidha (1993), Deregulation and Industrial Performance. The
Indian Cement Industry, Economic and Political Weekly, Feb 20-27,p.106.
4
Chandrasekaran N. (1993), Determinants of Profitability in Cement Industry, Cement
Industry, Vol. 20(4), p.16.
12
additions of capacity, changing technology from inefficient wet process to
efficient dry process and from conditions of scarcity of cement to near
gloat in the market.
5
Debasish Sur (1994), Working Capital Management – An Overview of Balmer Lawrie & Co.
Ltd., Indian Journal of Public Enterprises, 9 (16), pp.140-145.
6
Chandrasekaran N. (1994), Structural Analysis of Cement Industry, Jorunal of
Management,Vol. 7, Jan, p.18.
7
Industrial Resarcher (1994), A review of Cement Industry in India, Industrial
Researcher, Oct – Dec., p.95.
13
Chitna Rao N. and Rao.K.V. (1995)8, in their study, revealed that
the working capital problems faced by executives were huge in the
areas of collection of debts, accumulation of finished goods, availability
of working funds and uncertain cash follows.
8
Chitna Rao N. and Rao.K.V.. (1995), Management of Working Capital – Perception of Chief
Executives,Finance India, Vol. 9(4), pp.959-976.
9
Rengarajan.M.R (1995),Working Capital for Sick Industries, the management Accountant,
Vol.44(5), pp. 96-98.
10
Srinivasa Rao.G and Indrasena Reddy.P (1995), Financial Performance in Paper Industry
– A Case Study, The Management Accountant,Vol. 30(5), pp.327-336.
14
assets for generation of sales had not been improved much during the period of
study period as revealed by its turnover ratios.
11
Bhanu,(1995), Liberalization and performance of cement Industry, Economic and Political
Weekly, August 16-23,pp. 123-126.
12
Reddy.V.N. and Ramkumar Kakani (1996), Econometric Analysis of the Capital Structure
Determinants, Decision,Vol. 23(4), pp.73-98.
13
Dev Prasad, Garry D. Broton and Andreas G.Merikas (1997) , Long – run Strategic Capital
Structure, Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions , Vol.10 (1), Spring ,pp.47-58.
15
Reddy R.V.S.(1998)14, has revealed that decline in profitability alone
need not be considered as a factor that resulted in the inefficiency of the
organization. It was also due to proportionate rise in the cost of operation
coupled with the usually delayed and inadequate increase in fares.
Dash, D.K. (1998)16, in his study, found that the liquidity position of the
bank had been maintained at high level. He also identified that the high level of
liquidity affected the profitability and a low level of liquidity hampered the banks
image. He suggested that the banks could ill – afford to ensure financial
stability and operational efficiency in order to survive in the ever – changing
business environment. The study has also found that the financial performance
of the banks was satisfactory. He identified that the cost for operating and
managing the bank was more than 3% to the working capital which was just
above an ideal level of 2%. The bank was gradually consolidating its position of
net worth as compared to fixed assets.
Ajay Achary (1998)17, has studied the various factors responsible for
rapid changes in the cement industry. The study also pointed out the reasons
for more number of mergers, acquisitions and the fallout of smaller plants. The
factors responsible for excellent performance of cement companies were: good
14
Reddy R.V.S.(1998), Financial Performance of Public Transport Corportation – A Study of
APSRTC, Indian Management, 37 (10), p.40- 46
15
Tiwari R.S. (1998), Cost Reduction in Cement Industry, The Management Accountant,
Vol.33 (4), p.825.
16
Dash, D.K. (1998), Financial Performance Evaluation through Ratio Analysis: A Case Study
of Nawanager Co- operative Bank, Jamnagar ( Gujarat), Co – operative Perspective, Vol.
34(2), pp.63- 69
17
Ajay Achary (1999), Indian Cement Industry Present and the past, Indian Cement Review,
Annual, p.63-64
16
quality with international standards, ability to keep up with competition,
integration of information technology and finally nurture the people within the
industry.
18
Desai B.H (2000), Assessment of Capital Structure and Business Failure, The Management
Accountant, 35 (8), pp.605-610.
19
Rajeswari.N (2000), Liquidity Management of Tamilnadu Cements Corporation Ltd.,
Alangulam – A Case Study, The Management Accountant 35(3), pp.377-378.
20
Ralph I. Vegbunam (2001), Financial Distress and Performance Difference Among
Commercial Banks in Nigeria – a Multivariate Ratio Analysis, Finance India, Vol. 25(2),
pp.551-556
21
Amitha S.Kantawala (2002), Financial Performance of Non – Banking Finance Compaines
in India, The Indian Journal of Economics, Vol.49 (1), pp.88-92.
17
liquidity ratios of various categories of NBFCs. She concluded that the analysis
of variance along with the details the average ratio may become a useful guide
to companies so as to decide for continuation or otherwise in same line of
business considering the overall profitability within the regulatory frame work.
22
Mansur Mulia. A (2002) , Use of Z Score Analysis for Evaluation of Financial Health of
Textile Mills – A Case Study, Abhigyam, Vol. 19(4), pp.37- 41
23
Nand Kishore Sharma (2002), Financial Appraisal of Cement Industry in India, the
Management Accountant, 36 (9), pp.622-625.
24
Prasad Sangameshwaran (2002), Cementing Brand Equity, Indian Cement Review,
October, pp. 5-6.
18
media, walls and hoardings. He spelled out measures as to why branding
becomes important for cement players today. Being bulky in nature, cement
manufactures sell their products close to the area of manufacturing. Finally, he
pointed out that, to stand out in the cluster, branding would naturally help.
Ghosh S.K, and Maji S.G (2004)26 , in their paper, made an attempt to
examine the efficiency of Working capital management of the Indian cement
companies from the year 1992- 1993 to 2001-2002. Findings of the study
indicated that the Indian cement industry, as a whole, did not perform
remarkably well during the period of the study.
25
Sanwar N.Mishra, (2003), Improving performance for a competitive gain in a cement plant ,
Indian Cement Review, April ,p.15.
26
Ghosh S.K, and Maji S.G (2004), Working Capital Management Efficiency: A Study on the
Indian Cement Industry, The Management Accountant, Vol. 39(5), pp.363-372.
27
Hamsalakshmi and Manickam (2004), Financial Performance Analysis of selected
Software Companies, Finance India, Vol. XIX, No.3, pp.915-935.
19
Alovsat Muslumov (2005)28, has studied the financial and operating
performance of Turkish cement industry. He examined the post – privatization
performance of privatized companies. The findings indicated that when the
performance criteria for both the state and private enterprises were considered,
privatization in the cement industry have resulted in significant performance
deterioration. Total value added and the return on investment have declined
significantly after privatization. This decrease mainly stems from deterioration in
asset productivity. The decline in asset productivity, however, was not caused
by an increase in capital investment, since post – privatization, capital
investment did not change significantly. Significant contraction in total
employment and an increase in financial leverage after privatization were
among the key research findings. Privatization through public offering, gradual
privatization and domestic ownership were found to stimulate the financial and
operating performance of firms.
Parasuram N.R. (2006)30, has made an attempt to identify and study the
movement of key financial parameters and their relationship with the
profitability of automobile industry and he also made an attempt to study
whether the key identified parameters move in a synchronous way of going up
28
Alovsat Muslumov (2005), The financial and operating performance of Privatisation
Companies in Turkish Cement Industry, METU Studies in Development, Dogus University,
Vol.23(1),pp.59-100.
29
Rajendran P. and Ramesh D.(2006), Liquidity Management of Tamilnadu Tourism
Development Corporation Limited – An empirical study, The Management Accontant, Vol.
41,No.3,pp.205-208.
30
Parasuram N.R. (2006), Synchronous movement of Key Parameters with Profitability – An
Explanatory study on the Two Wheeler and Three Wheeler sector, GIM Journal of
Management, Vol.1(1), pp.26-28.
20
and coming down with basic profitability parameters. On the basis of the
analysis the broad conclusion was that the parameters were consistent within a
wide horizon and parameters have also responded in a synchronous manner
with the growth of companies over the period of time.
31
Debasis Mukherjee and Mallika U.K.(2006), Performance of Leasing Industry in W est
Bengal, The Management Accountant, Vol.41(5),pp.196-199.
32
Bardia (2006), Liquidity Management: A case study of Steel Authority of India Limited, The
Management Accountant, Vol.36(6),p.307-312.
33
Durga Rao S. and Janaki Ramudu (2006), Inventory Management of Indian Commercial
Vehicles Industry, The Mangement accountant, Vol. 41 (10), pp.725-728.
34
Misra and Mishra (2006), Factor Influencing Profitability of Sugar Industry: An Econometric
Analysis, The Management Accountant, Vol.41(21),pp.945-949.
21
assumed a direct bearing on profitability are: Growth in size, growth in volume
of business, operating cost ratio, leverage, liquidity, receivables turnover, fixed
assets turnover and age. Their conclusion revealed that the variations in
profitability was caused by the factors, namely, operating cost ratio, liquidity
ratio and fixed assets turnover ratio.
35
Amalendu Bhunia (2007), Liquidity Management of Public Sector Iron and Steel Enterprises
in India, Vidhyasagar University Journal of Commerce, Vol.12, March, pp.85-98.
36
Rathore G.S and Pinki Roi (2007), Financial performance Air India, Yojana, Vol.42 (11),
pp.36-42.
22
trend. The overall financial position of Air India Limited revealed the fact that
the company’s financial performance was good, as well as, the efficiency of the
organization of the organization as increased.
37
Debasis Sur, Laushik chakraborthy and Santanu Das (2007), Measuring the efficiency of
Asset Management of Private Sector Enterprises in India during the pre and post Liberation
Periods: A study on Colgate- Palmolive(India) Limited, The ICFAI Journal of Management
Research, Vol.VI, No.7, pp.25-35.
38
Siddharth Mahajan and Mainak Sankar (2007), How does financial performance of MNCs
in the Auto Mobile Sector Compare with Indian Companies?- An analysis using financial ratios,
PARADIGM,Vol.XI,No.2, July – December, pp.38-45.
23
Sudipta Ghosh (2008)39 has conducted a case study in Liquidity
Management of Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO). During of the study, it
was found that the liquidity position of the company, on the basis the period of
current ratio as well as quick ratio, was not satisfactory. It indicated that the
share of current assets in total assets of the company, on an average, was 29.1
percent during the period of study.
39
Sudipta Ghosh. (2008), Liquidity Management: A case study of TISCO Ltd., The
Management Accountant, VOl.43(2), pp.77-85.
40
Rajmohan S. and Vijayaragavan T. (2008) Production Performance of Madras Cement
Limited and that of All Cement Units in India-A Comparative Analysis, The Management
Accountant, Vol. 43(4), pp.264-265.
41
Adolphus J. Toby (2008), Liquidity Performance Relationship in Nigerian Manufacturing
Companies, Finance India, Vol.XXII, No.1., pp.117-131
24
financial performance analysis. This study shows that the liquidity positions of
fertilizer industry in Tamil Nadu are high.
25