Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.
3.180 v6 Signalling Principles Tester - Assessment Checklist
Applicants, assessors and verifiers must follow the notes on pages 2 and 3 when
completing this checklist.
Summary of workplace assessment and assessment methods used Examination of
products/documentation
Professional discussion/questions Review of applicant’s statement Observation Witness
testimony
I confirm that the applicant has met the performance and knowledge requirements and that the
assessment has been carried out impartially in accordance with Licensing Scheme requirements
Name Signature Date
Summary of competence assessment/surveillance
I confirm that this assessment has been carried out impartially in accordance with Licensing
Scheme requirements and that the applicant is competent in this licence category
Name Signature Date
If this assessment was subject to internal verification/quality assurance, please complete
below
Name Signature Date
1.2 (a) Plan to access work locations safely, within any agreed timescales and in accordance
with site access procedures.
(b) You identify the necessary safety requirements and take relevant action to ensure the
safety of yourself, others and railway operations.
(c) You accurately establish the location of the task
Prior to the undertaking the activity, you follow all the necessary safety requirements and take
relevant action to ensure your own safety, the safety of others and, when working on the railway
infrastructure, railway operations.
The safety requirements include relevant local safety procedures, the implementation of relevant
documentation, the implementation of a safe system of work, and the use of relevant personal
protective equipment.
● Design details ● Operational specification ● Signalling principles ● Legislative requirements ●
Testing plan
Suggested evidence: Evidence should be as a result of direct observation if possible. However,
suitable historic evidence, supported by personal accounts and questioning, is acceptable
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 1.2)
1.4 Select and confirm that all resources, tools and test equipment to be used are available,
appropriate for the work, serviceable and suitable for the working conditions.
Examples of the resources, tools and test equipment include:
● Measurement ● Simulation ● Integration ● Personnel (total required and
competences)
Suggested evidence: Evidence should be as a result of direct observation if possible. However,
suitable historic evidence, supported by personal accounts and questioning, is acceptable
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 1.4)
1.5 Identify any integration and/or interface requirements and incorporate them in your plan
for undertaking principles testing.
You clearly identify the interfaces between the equipment to be tested including operational
equipment which may be affected, and also define the limits of testing.
You take into account all relevant factors when developing the test documentation.
Factors include:
● Resources available ● Other testing not yet complete ● Testing that is being undertaken by
1.6 Deal effectively with issues during the development of your plan that are within your
control and escalate those that cannot be solved
Where insufficient information or resources are available, or where doubt exists, you seek advice
from relevant personnel.
1.7 Agree with the appropriate people that your plan for undertaking principles testing is
completed and is compatible with other planned activities
You inform and liaise with the tester-in-charge and other testers as appropriate for the purposes of
2.3 Ensure that your activities minimise the risk of disturbance or damage to the equipment
under test and also to other equipment.
You protect, report and deal with any damage or disturbance to the equipment under test and deal
with it in accordance with organisational processes.
You protect, report and deal with any damage or disturbance to operational equipment and deal
with it in accordance with operational processes.
You clearly identify the boundaries between the equipment under test and operational equipment
and follow the defined limits of testing.
Suggested evidence: Evidence should be as a result of direct observation if possible. However,
suitable historic evidence, supported by personal accounts and questioning, is acceptable.
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 2.3)
2.4 a) Follow the appropriate procedures for the use of tools and equipment to carry out the
required tests
b) You use the test equipment in accordance with instructions and ensure that true and
accurate results are obtained.
Suggested evidence: Evidence should be as a result of direct observation if possible. However,
suitable historic evidence supported by personal accounts and questioning is acceptable
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 2.4)
2.5 Set up and carry out principles tests using the correct procedures
You carry out tests as required by the test plan in sufficient detail to establish the equipment status
You ensure that the tests are appropriate to the equipment, provide true and accurate results and
are in accordance with testing procedures/instructions.
You complete the tests accurately, within the limits of your own authority and maintain the
independence of testing.
You identify any problems with the principles testing activities and effectively solve them.
Suggested evidence: Evidence should be as a result of direct observation. However, suitable
historic evidence supported by personal accounts and questioning is acceptable.
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 2.5)
2.7 You accurately record the results of the tests in the appropriate format.
You record the progression of work accurately, clearly and in accordance with organisational
procedures.
Suggested evidence: Evidence should be as a result of direct observation if possible. However,
suitable historic evidence, personal accounts or questioning are acceptable.
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 2.7)
2.8 Review the results, confirm that they accurately identify the state of the completed
testing and take the appropriate course of action.
You confirm compliance with the design details, specifications, industry standards and plans in
accordance with organisational procedures.
Examples of the “course of action” include:
3.2 a) Review and compare the test results against the product or asset specification and
identify any faults or variations from specification
b) Take effective and safe course of action to promptly resolve any inconsistencies in the
test data
All actions are taken within the limits of your own authority and where doubt arises you seek advice
from suitable reference documents or personnel.
Examples of the types of faults or variations include those relating to
● Design ● Installation
● Specification ● Industry standards
Suggested evidence: Evidence should be as a result of direct observation if possible. However,
suitable historic evidence, personal accounts or questioning are acceptable.
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 3.2)
3.3 Analyse the results of the testing to define the operational status of the tested signalling
system
Where it is not possible to confirm the operational status of the system, appropriate action is taken
in accordance with organisational procedures.
Examples of the status of the tested system include:
● Fit for entry into service ● Fit for entry into restricted service ● Not fit for entry into service.
Suggested evidence: Evidence should be as a result of direct observation if possible. However,
suitable historic evidence, personal accounts, or questioning are acceptable.
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 3.3)
3.4 Consistently comply with the Obligations of Licence Holders and work in an ethical
manner including the principles of:
● Honesty & integrity ● Respect for life, law and the public good
● Accuracy & rigour; ● Leadership and communication
The above 4 ethical principles are expanded in the Engineering Council’s Statement of Ethical
Principles which can be found at www.engc.org.uk/professional-ethics
The Engineering Council and the IRSE believe that all persons engaged in engineering at any level,
from the youngest apprentice and student, should be educated and encouraged to think and work
in accordance with these ethical principles. This performance requirement will apply across all
levels of IRSE licences.
Guidance: Give examples of where you have applied or upheld these ethical principles and the
obligations
Suggested evidence Suitable historic evidence, personal accounts, witness testimony or
discussions with the assessors are acceptable.
Note: The current Obligations of Licence Holders can be found at www.irse.org/licensing
Personal statement (how I meet performance Supporting evidence
requirements 3.4)
The workplace assessor (or competence assessor where there is no workplace assessment) must validate
how the candidate has demonstrated they have met each of the knowledge requirements. This may be by
reference to specific evidence, or by Q & A. All Q & A must be recorded and submitted with this checklist
The knowledge requirements are listed below; the numbers shown in ( ) refer to performance requirement(s)
for which the knowledge is essential but are not exclusive, since many of the knowledge requirements are
applicable across a range of the performance requirements.
Knowledge is about understanding not only what should be done but why and what significant factors should
be taken into account when making decisions. Meeting a performance requirement shown in ( ) in a particular
context does not necessarily show that the candidate has the knowledge to handle any contingencies for
which performance evidence is not available or how the candidate would adapt performance to meet all the
different contexts and circumstances in the scope and unit title of the licence.
The following box is provided for the competence assessor to make additional comments to those they have
provided in the knowledge requirements table.
Guidance: this may be by additional Q&As/notes