First Municipal Circuit Trial Court New Washington and Batan New Washington, Aklan HEIRS OF OOOOOOOOOOO Special Civil Action No.11111 Plaintiffs, For:Unlawful Detainer -versus- RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR, PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS, Defendants. X------------------------------------X
NOTICE OF APPEAL
COMES NOW, Defendant ___________ , through the undersigned counsel, and
unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully alleges: ThatDefendant_________, received the Decision dated August 15, 2018 rendered by the Honorable Presiding Judge and the same was received on August 24, 2018. Defendant has fifteen (15) days or until September 8, 2018 within which to appeal the Decision rendered in this case; That after a careful perusal of the said Decision, Defendant ___________honestly believed that same was not in accordance with law and the facts presented in the case, and therefore, files this Notice of Appeal. Defendant hereby appeals the said Decision dated August 15, 2018 to the Regional Trial Court, 6th Judicial Region, Kalibo, Aklan, with compliance to the payment of the required appeal fees; That defendant respectfully requests that the records of this present case be forwarded to the Regional Trial Court, 6thJudicial Region, Kalibo, Aklan for proper consideration and disposal. WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this NOTICE OF APPEAL be duly NOTED for all legal purposes. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Iloilo for New Washington, Aklan, Philippines. September 03, 2018. ATTY. HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Counsel forDefendant _________ Attorney’s Roll No. 57712 IBP No. 000000, Jan. 10, 2018, Pasig City PTR No. 00000000, Jan. 3, 2018 Pasig City MCLE Compliance No. 00000000 Copy furnished: ATTY. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Counsel for Plaintiffs The Waldolf Garcia Building Estancia, Kalibo, Aklan Reg. Receipt No. _________________ Date:________________ EXPLANATION This certifies that personal service as required by the rules was not resorted to furnish the Plaintiffs of this Notice of Appeal, for the reason that due to distance and personnel constraints, the same is not practicable. ATTY. HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
GR No. 213394. April 6, 2016 Spouses Emmanuel D. Pacquiao and Jinkee J. Pacquiao, Petitioners, vs. Court of Tax Appeals & Commission of Internal Revenue Facts
GR No. 213394. April 6, 2016 Spouses Emmanuel D. Pacquiao and Jinkee J. Pacquiao, Petitioners, vs. Court of Tax Appeals & Commission of Internal Revenue Facts