IN THE COURT OF THE 1st ADDL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE ::NELLORE.

I.A. No. 762 /2024.

O.S. No. 50/2019

1. Valipi Venkateswarlu And 4 others .... Petitioners / Plaintiffs

Vs.

1. Valipi Chinna Ankaiah. (died)

And 13 others .... Respondents / Defendants.

COUNTER FILED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS.

1. The petition is not true, just and sustainable at law.

2. The respondents deny the allegations mentioned in the affidavit and put the

petitioners to strict proof of the same.

3. The suit is coming up for trail and stood posted to 12-10-2023 for trail on costs of

Rs.150/- to the respondents. On the said date by Valipi Srinivasulu attended before

the Hon'ble Court along with chief affidavit of Pw-1. But this Hon'ble court called

only the name of the 1st Plaintiff who died. This Hon'ble court dismissed the suit for

default as there were no representation and costs not paid of D1. Valipi Srinivasulu

is waiting on the veranda all are false allegation mentioned in the petition this

plaintiff not paid the cost of D1 and Valipi Srinivasulu doesn't come to Hon'ble Court

Premises there is no strict proof of this story.

4.The ancestral property share of the

It is submitted that the petitioner with an intention to delay the proceedings filed this

application with all false allegations. The petition is not bonafide and the Hon’ble

Court may be pleased to dismiss the petition with costs.

Advocate for Respondents.

 IN THE COURT OF THE
1st ADDL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
::NELLORE.

I.A. No. /2023.

O.S. No. 491/2023

COUNTER FILED ON BEHALF

OF THE RESPONDENT
Address For Service

Advocate,
SPSR Nellore District
 IN THE COURT OF THE 1st ADDL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE ::NELLORE.

I.A. No. /2023.

O.S. No. 491/2023

Rapuru Anjamma, .... Petitioners / Plaintiffs

Vs.
1.Achi Eswaraiah
and 1 another. .... Respondents / Defendants.

COUNTER FILED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS

1. The petition is not true, just and sustainable at law.

2. This respondent denies the allegations mentioned in the affidavit and puts the
petitioner to strict proof of the same.

3. It is submitted that the respondent in their written statements after receiving

summons from this Hon’ble Court the respondents claimed counter claim seeking
permanent injunction as prayed by the petitioner. The counter claim of the
respondents is in time as the natures of suit and jurisdiction is changed. This
application under Section 151 C.P.C. is not maintainable and this application is filed
unnecessarily to drag on the proceedings. The petition is not bonafide and hence
the petition may be dismissed with costs.

1.

2.

Filed by, We, the above named respondents do hereby

declare that the facts stated above are true to the
best of my knowledge, information and belief.

Advocate for respondents. 1.

2.
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE :: KOVUR

I.A.NO. / 2012
O.S.NO. 60/ 2012

COUNTER FILED ON BEHALF OF THE

RESPONDENTS

Advocates,
SPSR Nellore District.