EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY

WORK QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

COMMON

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Document Number: 21593182 Release: 3
Document Owner: GROUP Manager Maintenance Excellence Released: 25 Jul 2019
Area: Maintenance > Manage Asset Page 1 of 5
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT: Printed copies must be checked for release currency prior to use.
 WORK QUALITY REQUIREMENTS – COMMON

EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................................................. 3
2 SCOPE ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3
3 EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY...................................................................................................................................... 3
4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS...................................................................................................................................... 4
APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY.................................................................................................................................................................................. 5

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Document Number: 21593182 Release: 3
Document Owner: GROUP Manager Maintenance Excellence Released: 25 Jul 2019
Area: Maintenance > Manage Asset Page 2 of 5
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT: Printed copies must be checked for release currency prior to use.
 WORK QUALITY REQUIREMENTS – COMMON

EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY

1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this Work Quality Requirement is to outline the methodology for determining Equipment
Criticality for all maintainable items managed in the SAP A2D Process.

2 SCOPE

These work quality requirements (WQR) applies to all Operational Sites that manage plant and equipment in
SAP following the A2D process. To focus due attention on plant and equipment which can have a significant
impact on MMG’s Operations, equipment criticality must be assessed to identify Critical Equipment and to
determine the required controls or strategies and spares.

3 EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY

All maintainable items will be identified in SAP and will have their equipment criticality assessed based on their
maximum foreseeable loss assuming no effective controls are in place as per MMG’s Risk Management
Procedure.

Equipment Criticality will be primarily determined based on the Direct and/or Consequential Financial Loss or
equivalent Planned Production Throughput Loss. Where a Safety and People, Environment, or Legal
Compliance consequences material risk exists, whilst this will be managed in the site risk register and managed
in GRC, it will not result in the parent level equipment being deemed critical but can result in the component
level FLOC being rated as critical only.

The resulting criticality assessment will be recorded against each maintainable item, maintainable unit, and
production unit (where applicable) using the ABC indicator in SAP.

Equipment
Materiality Rating Critically Require Controls/Strategies Spares Criticality
Rating

Level 5 and 6 A Risk Bow Tie will be completed and Spares identified on Risk
Critical Control Plan developed as per Bow Tie default to being
Risk Management Procedure. Critical.

Asset Strategies specific for the Other spares assessed

equipment developed using FMECA based on Risk Level
methodology as per Asset Strategy (Consequence x Likelihood)
Development Procedure. as per Supply definitions

Level 3 and 4 B Asset Strategies can be either specific
for the equipment, or use generic
common strategies developed using
FMECA methodology or based on
Level 2 C
OEM requirements as per Asset
Strategy Development Procedure.
Level 1 Asset Strategies optional or can be
based on Run to Failure.
Spares criticality assessed
based on Risk Level
(Consequence x Likelihood)
as per Supply definitions.
Note: non-critical
equipment can require
Critical Spares if the
resulting risk is High or
Very High

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Document Number: 21593182 Release: 3
Document Owner: GROUP Manager Maintenance Excellence Released: 25 Jul 2019
Area: Maintenance > Manage Asset Page 3 of 5
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT: Printed copies must be checked for release currency prior to use.
 WORK QUALITY REQUIREMENTS – COMMON

EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY

4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
o
N Document Title and Link Document Type
1. Asset Management Standard Standard
2. Risk Management Procedure Procedure (Common)
3. Asset Strategy Development Procedure Procedure (Common)
4. Warehouse Inventory Management – Work Quality Requirements WQR (Common)
5. Equipment and Spares Criticality – Quick Reference Guide Reference Document

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Document Number: 21593182 Release: 3
Document Owner: GROUP Manager Maintenance Excellence Released: 25 Jul 2019
Area: Maintenance > Manage Asset Page 4 of 5
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT: Printed copies must be checked for release currency prior to use.
 WORK QUALITY REQUIREMENTS – COMMON

EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY

APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY

The terms and/or abbreviations below have been defined to ensure that all users of this document have a common
understanding of the key terms and abbreviations referenced. An MMG-wide glossary can be found in the MMG
Document Framework Glossary.

Term Definition
In the context of the Asset Management standard, assets are MMG’s fixed plant
Asset and mobile equipment, including associated infrastructure, which are owned and
operated by MMG. Otherwise referred generally as Plant and Equipment.
Predictive and Preventative Maintenance activities defined by Reliability Centred
Maintenance (RCM) / Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)
Asset Strategies methodology or Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) requirements that are
needed to achieve the required asset performance at the lowest total life cycle
cost and are critical to the asset’s function, cost, risk and compliance.
Equipment where the maximum foreseeable loss due to failure with no controls
Critical Equipment
in place can result in a Material Risk.
Risks having:
 Potential Exposure/Maximum Foreseeable Loss (MFL) is  Level 5 on
Material Risk MMG’s Consequence Criteria; or
 Risk Level of Very High.
Material risks are described in terms of events.
MMG employees, officers, contractors (including contractors’ subcontractors and
MMG People
their respective employees) and agents.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Document Number: 21593182 Release: 3
Document Owner: GROUP Manager Maintenance Excellence Released: 25 Jul 2019
Area: Maintenance > Manage Asset Page 5 of 5
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT: Printed copies must be checked for release currency prior to use.