Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Truth 58
The Mind/Body Relationship 59
Five Concepts of Morality 61
Knowledge 61
Self 61
The Nature of a Deity 62
Universe 63
Death 63
Applying Philosophy and Morality to Criminal Justice 64
Conclusion 65
Criminal Justice Problem Solving: Alcohol Policy 66
References 389
Glossary 421
Index 445
Photo Credits 459
Why We Wrote It
We believe it is imperative for students to study the foundations of criminal justice
from their first course in the discipline. Because these ideas underlie so much of current
criminal justice policy and practice, they form the bedrock on which subsequent study
is grounded. Indeed, the foundational concepts of criminal justice are ideas that apply
across the criminal justice curriculum.
We have titled the book Foundations of Criminal Justice not because these are the
only ideas that are central to the theory and practice of the discipline but because they
are among the most significant conversations that have contributed to the field.
xv
Although discussion of the theoretical roots of criminal justice will no doubt continue
and should continue, the ideas and topics surveyed in this text help present a founda-
tional view of criminal justice that can inform the subsequent study of criminal justice
structures and processes.
The challenge in teaching the foundations of criminal justice in an introductory
course is twofold. First, some of the key ideas are complex, particularly those drawing
upon the interdisciplinary roots of criminal justice in areas that may not be very famil-
iar to students, such as policy theory, legal theory, sociology, philosophy, and psychol-
ogy. Second, there is no single source that collects these ideas, leaving instructors either
to assign primary source readings (which can be even more challenging than the ideas)
or to summarize materials in lectures without an accompanying textbook.
In writing this text, we have attempted to remedy both of these problems. We have
included within the book a collection of ideas that are important for beginning crimi-
nal justice students to consider. Furthermore, we have worked to cover complex ideas
in a manner that is engaging and accessible but without diluting their meaning. It is
our hope that this will contribute not only to criminal justice pedagogy but also to pro-
moting conversations—among students, professionals, and scholars alike—about the
theoretical roots of the discipline of criminal justice and their application in practice.
Organization
The balance among three ideas represents the basis of our book: (1) the overarching
and competing ideas of what an orderly and just society should be; (2) the daily prac-
tices of an immensely complex collection of agencies described as criminal justice;
and (3) the individual needs of a student going on to become a responsible citizen and
perhaps a criminal justice professional. In Chapter 1, Introducing Crime and Criminal
Justice, we outline various perspectives on criminal justice and consider the nature
and extent of crime in American society. In addition, we survey the criminal justice
processes that are further developed in later chapters.
In Unit I, Perspectives on Law, we begin exploring the ideas that have vexed soci-
eties across the globe throughout history. That is, how should people live together in
a society? What is right, what is wrong, and how can we act to ensure desired behavior?
Working through the very practical ideas of police discretion and activities you might
see on any street corner, we explore the concepts of law, morality, and formal ways of
questioning those concepts.
In Unit II, Perspectives on Deviance and Crime, we explore the critical distinc-
tions between behaviors society generally condemns as deviant and behaviors society
classifies as criminal. Understanding the behavioral dynamics underlying deviance and
criminal activity can shape criminal justice policy.
In Unit III, Perspectives on Justice, the ideas in the earlier chapters about law and
social control come together in an even bigger fundamental idea: what is justice, and
how do we find it as a society? Furthermore, how do harried professionals facing budget
cuts, shifting policy priorities, high stress, and split-second decisions find justice in
their daily work? In addition, ensuring that actions promote the values of fairness and
equality while protecting due process rights is an important responsibility of all those
working in criminal justice.
In Unit IV, Penal Social Control, we focus on the content of the criminal law and how
punishment is used to enforce society’s priorities. These are the tools that ultimately shape
the work of the police, courts, and corrections as they respond to crime in society.
Finally, in Unit V, Overview of Criminal Justice Institutions, we introduce stu-
dents to the terminology and procedures that are relevant to the police, courts, and
corrections. In some schools, much of this information will be covered in later courses
on each of these institutions. In other schools, students will need a working knowledge
of each institution either because this is the only course they take in criminal justice
or because they need this course as a direct gateway to other courses. These chapters
are available for those who need them, and we have tried to keep the focus on the ter-
minology, the structure, and the motivating ideas of each institution rather than on
ever-changing fads and statistics.
relationship between morality and justice studies was updated and illustrated using
offender re-entry. The chapter contains a new section on Kohlberg’s theory
of moral development and its application to analysis of criminal justice issues.
Finally, the chapter was significantly reorganized to improve flow and readability.
• Chapter 3: Concepts of Legal Philosophy—A new section on “Principles and
Rules in Criminal Justice” is now used to set up the discussion of legal philosophy
(and, by extension, theories of justice) by suggesting that the legal philosophies are
general principles that guide the development of the specific rules codified in the
law. Each of the six concepts of law in the section “Analyzing the Law” are now
explained in more depth. Concrete examples were added to the discussions of
several legal philosophies.
• Chapter 4: Deviance and Social Control—The chapter now contains a brief dis-
cussion of “positive deviance,” the various forms that adult socialization can in-
clude, and further differentiation of formal and informal social control. The material
on medicalization of deviance has been restructured significantly by deleting the
discussion on the types of medical social control and replacing it with much broader
coverage of criminal responsibility, which includes information on the insanity de-
fense, the new DSM-5, mental health courts, and access to firearms by persons
with mental illnesses.
• Chapter 5: Deviance and Criminal Behavior—The chapter-opening Case Study
has been revised to include additional detail. Smoking now serves as an example of
changing societal conceptions of deviance. A discussion of social constructionism
as it pertains to criminological theory has been added. The chapter now features
additional examples, contemporary research, and critiques of numerous crimino-
logical theories. Also significantly expanded is the discussion of youth gangs in the
Criminal Justice Problem Solving feature at the end of the chapter, including a
definition of gangs, statistics, impacts of gangs, and why persons join gangs.
• Chapter 6: Concepts of Justice—The structure in which the theories of justice
are presented has been reworked. Many topics have been updated and/or revised,
particularly the discussions of justice theory materials, including virtual vigilan-
tism, discourse perspective justice, distributive justice, retributive justice, and
Rawl’s “veil of ignorance.”
• Chapter 7: Concepts of Justice Policy—The chapter-opening Case Study about
the status of state marijuana laws has been updated and recent U.S. Supreme
Court cases affecting social justice, including National Federation of Independent
Business v. Sebelius and Arizona v. United States, have been integrated into the
chapter. The chapter now includes more concrete examples to contextualize policy
theories, including Amber Alerts as policy diffusion; carjacking as federalization
of crime; the Prison Rape Elimination Act as an example of tying policy out-
comes to federal funding; and three strikes laws as an example of issue networks.
Two new sections have been added: “Themes in American Criminal Justice Policy
Development,” which includes discussions of comparative criminal justice and a
historical perspective on criminal justice policy development, and “Politics and
Politicians.” A new box on police civil liability has been added.
• Chapter 8: Concepts of Criminal Procedure—Both the chapter-opening Case
Study and end-of-chapter Criminal Justice Problem Solving feature have been
replaced. The Fourth Amendment materials have been restructured in light of
United States v. Jones. Coverage of a variety of topics has been expanded, including
probable cause, Miranda, due process, equal protection, and the exclusionary rule.
The chapter now features a box on searches of cell phones incident to arrest.
Seventeen additional U.S. Supreme Court cases are now covered, including
Blueford v. Arkansas, Board of Education of Indiana School District 92 of Pottawato-
mie County v. Earls, Berghuis v. Thompkins, Colorado v. Bertine, Florida v. Jardines,
through the chapter; in fact, some questions in the chapter will ask you to reflect once
again on the case study and how concepts from the chapter might apply to it. Your
understanding of the rest of the chapter will be enriched by considering this case.
Each main section of the text opens with a Focusing Question. These straightfor-
ward questions are meant to help you think about the main idea to come in that section
and provide you with a framework for the ideas you will examine. The Focusing Ques-
tions can help you see the issue to be addressed in each section rather than reading the
chapter as a simple stream of data to memorize.
Each main section of the text concludes with several in-text questions. These ques-
tions are designed to allow you to reflect upon, analyze, or apply the material you have
just read.
In each chapter, you will find several boxes that highlight current or noteworthy
issues in criminal justice, related to the content of the chapter. One box in each chapter
(“Ethics in Practice”) is focused specifically on ethical dilemmas that may present them-
selves to criminal justice practitioners; another box in each chapter (“Research in Action”)
considers how research findings may shape criminal justice policy and practice.
At the end of each chapter, you will find a section called Criminal Justice Problem
Solving. Introductory textbooks can sometimes give readers the mistaken impression
that all the answers are already set in stone and that there is nothing new to discover in
a discipline. These Problem Solving sections focus on a real-life issue the criminal jus-
tice system is still struggling to solve. Chances are, if you become a criminal justice
professional, you will in some way personally be part of the efforts to solve these types
of issues.
Each chapter also includes several pictures connecting material from the text to
practical issues or dilemmas faced by the criminal justice system and the professionals
working within it. Finally, the text includes a glossary that provides definitions for the
key terms and other important vocabulary introduced in each chapter.
It is our hope that each of the above features will contribute to your understanding
of material in the text and your ability to see connections between theoretical ideas and
criminal justice practice. We hope the text conveys what a dynamic and important field
of study that criminal justice is!
Ancillaries
Oxford University Press is proud to offer a complete and authoritative supplements
package for both instructors and students. When you adopt Foundations of Criminal
Justice, Second Edition, you will have access to a truly exemplary set of ancillary mate-
rials to enhance teaching and support students’ learning.
Ancillary Resource Center (ARC) at www.oup-arc.com is a convenient, instructor-
focused single destination for resources to accompany Foundations of Criminal J ustice,
Second Edition. Accessed online through individual user accounts, the ARC provides
instructors with access to up-to-date ancillaries at any time while guaranteeing the
security of grade-significant resources. In addition, it allows OUP to keep instructors
informed when new content becomes available.
The ARC for Foundations of Criminal Justice, Second Edition, contains an enor-
mous variety of materials to aid in teaching, whether at a four-year university or com-
munity college, online, or in person. In addition to general ideas for using Foundations
of Criminal Justice, Second Edition, in an introductory course, the ARC includes:
• Teaching tips and ideas customized for instructors working in community col-
leges and online courses, as well as for those teaching out of sociology departments.
New teachers, and those teaching the introductory course in a general education
context, will also find specialized suggestions.
Companion Website
Foundations of Criminal Justice, Second Edition, is also accompanied by an extensive
companion website (www.oup.com/us/owen), which includes materials to help stu-
dents with every aspect of the course. For each chapter, you will find:
• Objectives for learning that identify, in a clear, concise way, the concepts and
subjects that students should understand after reading a given chapter
• A brief summary of the broad themes of each chapter, to help students organize
their thinking and reading
• Additional links to websites providing supplemental information on the topics
and ideas covered in the chapter
• Additional recommended readings that delve more deeply into the topics dis-
cussed in the chapter
• Self-grading review questions to help students review the material and assess
their own comprehension
• Case links to the original text of every case cited in the book
• Glossary flashcards to assist students in studying and review
Kristine Artello, Penn State University– Ashmini Kerodal, John Jay College of Criminal Justice
New Kensington David Keys, New Mexico State University
Thomas Babcock, University of Texas at San Antonio Fred Kramer, John Jay College
Sarah Bacon, Florida State University Peter Kraska, Eastern Kentucky University
Allan Barnes, University of Alaska–Anchorage Christina Lanier, University of North
Kevin Beaver, Florida State University Carolina–Wilmington
Christopher M. Bellas, Youngstown State University Lonn Lanza-Kaduce, University of Florida
Jay Berman, New Jersey City University Minna Laurikkala, Shenandoah University
Michael G. Bisciglia, Southeastern Louisiana Brian Lawton, George Mason University
University William Lay, University of Bridgeport
Michael Bush, Northern Kentucky University Lynette Lee, California State University–Sacramento
Frank Butler, La Salle University Jason Levy, Virginia Commonwealth University
Mark Byington, Jefferson College Elizabeth Lewis, Virginia Western College
Amy Cass, California State University–Fullerton Melissa A. Logue, Saint Joseph’s University
Tammy Castle, James Madison University Sean Maddan, University of Tampa
Paul Chwialkowski, University of Findlay Elisha Marr, Calvin College
David Clark, University at Albany–SUNY Sanjay Marwah, Guilford College
Charles Crawford, Western Michigan University Mary Ellen Mastroilli, Boston University Metropolitan
Michael Cretacci, University at Buffalo–SUNY College
Mengyan Dai, University of Baltimore Carol Mathews, Century College
Randal Davis, Santiago Canyon College Greg Matoesian, University of Illinois at Chicago
Mary Louis Davitt, University of Maine–Augusta Bruce McBride, Utica College
Peggy DeStefano, Bakersfield College Karen McCue, University of Minnesota
Kristen DeVall, University of North Alida Merlo, Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Carolina–Wilmington Eric Metchik, Salem State University
Heather Donovan, University of Emil Moldovan, Radford University
Massachusetts–Dartmouth Thomas O’Connor, Austin Peay State University
Martha Earwood, University of Alabama–Birmingham David Orrick, Norwich University
George Eichenberg, Tarleton State University Leanne Owen, Holy Family University
Patricia Erickson, Canisius College Allison Payne, Villanova University
Aaron Fichtelberg, University of Delaware Terrylynn Pearlman, Marist College
Linda Fleischer, The Community College of Baltimore Amy Pinero, Baton Rouge Community College
Laurin Flynn, Guilford College Hillary Potter, University of Colorado–Boulder
Michelle Foster, Kent State University Elaine Rizzo, Saint Anselm College
Alan Frazier, Glendale Community College Manuel Roman, Consumnes River College
Natasha Frost, Northeastern University Dennis Santore, Indian River State College
Christie Gardiner, California State Joseph Schafer, Southern Illinois
University–Fullertown University–Carbondale
Lior Gideon, John Jay College of Criminal Justice Donna Schuele, University of California–Irvine
Kay Gillespie, Weber State University Michael Scott, Kaplan University
Julie Globokar, University of Illinois at Chicago Todd Scott, Schoolcraft College
Andrea Hampton, Truman State University Diane Sjuts, Metropolitan Community College of
Barry Harvey, Alvernia College Omaha
Stacy Haynes, Mississippi State University Alisa Smith, The University of Tampa
Deborah Howard, TESST College of Technology Hayden Smith, University of South Carolina
Cyndy Hughes, Western Carolina University Susan Smith-Cunnien, University of St. Thomas
Patrick Ibe, Albany State College Jason Sole, Metropolitan State University
Fred Jones, Simpson College Paul Steele, Morehead State University
Mark Jones, East Carolina University Mark Stelter, Lone Star College–Montgomery Campus
Delores Jones-Brown, John Jay College of Criminal Quanda Stevenson, Athens State University
Justice David Struckhoff, Lewis University
Antonia Keane, Loyola University L. Paul Sutton, San Diego State University
William E. Kelly, Auburn University Chloe Tischler, ITT-Technical Institute
The following extracts are given with the view of explaining some
allusions made in the Journal.
In a letter to Mr. G. D———d, Mr. Davidson says, “after
endeavouring to enter Africa in forma pauperis, I tried another tack,
and got up a staff of six officers in field-day regimentals, and
embarking in a brig of war the ‘Jasséen,’ landed at Tangier under a
salute of eleven guns. This stamped me at once as a great man; and
though I have been somewhat accustomed to such kind of
greatness, I find it not very pleasant here, for I have Messúd, my
Jewish interpreter, and Ben Hayed, my Moorish interpreter, and I can
hardly stir without both being on the alert, the one watching my
mouth, the other my eye.”
Speaking of the feelings of the natives towards a foreigner he
says, “the people here are worse than any I have yet seen; they hate
me because I am a Christian, although they are ready to praise me
for my kindness to Abú, who is half-anxious and half afraid to
proceed. His health is bad and spirits worse, and his powers quite
unequal to what we shall have to go through. We certainly run some
risk: I am very careful what he eats, and much fear that the threats
thrown out against his getting back will prove too true. As for myself,
I pass the time in riding with the Taurick, chatting with the Jews, and
taking snuff with the Moors.”
Speaking of the Mona he observes, “I had to pay for a sheep,
fowls, eggs, bread, and preserves, but being neither butcher,
poulterer, baker or confectioner, the things were of little use to me.
They call the present Mona, which may mean Manna; and as these
vagabonds call themselves the image of God upon earth, they think
it enough if they give only food.”
In allusion to the Lob el Barool he says, “It is literally ‘the game of
smoke,’ and played by soldiers on horseback, who fire off their guns
with only blank cartridges; but sometimes they put in a ball, which is
sure to strike, of course by mere accident, a Christian.”
With regard to the ruins near the outset, Mr. D. seems to think
they are Druidical, and he compares them with the remains of
Stonehenge in Wiltshire.
Speaking of his medical life in Africa, he says, “all whom I cure
come to be paid for allowing me to improve myself in my profession,
and demand a piece of coin for every dose they have been taking;
while those I fail to cure abuse me for want of skill, and threaten to
shorten my life for not prolonging theirs.”
The allusion to the electrical horse will be best explained by the
following letter, written by Mr. D. to Professor Faraday, and by whom
it was read at the Royal Institution.
“The great interest you take in all matters relating to electricity,
and the great advantages which have resulted from your researches
in that science, induce me to call your attention to a circumstance,
perhaps not new to you, but which has recently fallen under my own
observation. I received from the Sultan of Marocco the present of a
horse of a peculiar breed, and as every person in this country is his
own groom, I observed a peculiar tingling sensation in the hand on
dressing the neck of the animal; this I attributed at first to the dirt and
vermin with which the poor animals here are infested, and then
thought no more of it. On leaving Marocco I proceeded towards the
Atlas; and whenever I had occasion to consult my compass I found it
extremely difficult, nay, impossible to keep it steady. I supposed this
was owing to my sword and pistol; but as I wore these, when
walking, without observing the same deflection, I dismounted, and
holding the compass, I still perceived the same effect as long as I
held it near the horse’s head; but when I left the animal, and put the
instrument on the ground, the needle settled to its point. After a little
reflection, the effect produced on my hand by rubbing the horse’s
neck on the near side occurred to me; when repeating the
experiment, I could perceive several distinct intimations of the same
tingling sensation. We proceeded to our halt; and as soon as the
party had sat down to their evening meal, I began to examine into
the matter more closely. It was now dusk; on passing my hand down
the neck, not only could I hear distinctly the electrical detonation, but
perceive a quantity of sparks; both were such as would be produced