You are on page 1of 13

Article

Cite This: J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290 pubs.acs.org/joc

Asymmetric Construction of Bispiro[oxindole-pyrrolidine-


rhodanine]s via Squaramide-Catalyzed Domino Michael/Mannich [3
+ 2] Cycloaddition of Rhodanine Derivatives with N‑(2,2,2-
Trifluoroethyl)isatin Ketimines
Yong-Xing Song and Da-Ming Du*
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
*
S Supporting Information
See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
Downloaded via KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIV on September 8, 2018 at 08:02:01 (UTC).

ABSTRACT: Squaramide-catalyzed asymmetric domino Mi-


chael/Mannich [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between
rhodanine derivatives and N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin keti-
mines has been developed to synthesize various bispiro-
[oxindole-pyrrolidine-rhodanine]s with good to excellent
yields (up to 99%) and excellent stereoselectivities (up to
>99% ee and >99:1 dr). The biologically active rhodanine,
oxindole, and pyrrolidine moieties were embedded in these
novel bispirocyclic products, which will provide some support
for the enrichment of chiral heterocyclic compound databases
with potential medical value.

■ INTRODUCTION
Chiral pyrrolidines have long been considered as the “parent
pharmacologists as an important compound in medicinal
chemistry.11 As a peculiar structure with pharmacological
nuclear structure” in many natural bioactive products and activity (Figure 1), the modification of rhodanine attracted the
pharmaceuticals.1 As an important branch of the pyrrolidine attention of chemists.12 Up to now, only a few cases of
molecule, spiropyrrolidine2 has many special biological asymmetric synthetic methods have been reported for the
activities, so it is always an extremely attractive synthetic preparation of chiral thiazolidinone derivatives (Scheme 1).13
target as the intermediate for the further synthesis of complex In 2012, Ye and co-workers first disclosed the synthesis of
molecules.3 Chiral spirocyclic compounds, characterized by an various spirocyclic compounds via a diamine-catalyzed
interesting connection of two rings through a quaternary asymmetric tandem reaction between α,β-unsaturated ketones
carbon atom, are usually found in many natural products and and rhodanine derivatives.13a Then, in 2013, Ye and co-
bioactive compounds.4 Due to its unique structural properties, workers reported the synthesis of various spirocyclic
spirocycles have demonstrated a wide range of therapeutic compounds via trienamine-catalyzed asymmetric Diels−Alder
potentials, which present great challenges for chemists to reaction between 2,4-dienals and rhodanine/hydantoin de-
prepare such compounds using mild conditions from simple rivatives.13b In 2015, Peng and co-workers developed an
and easy-to-get raw materials.5 Meanwhile, owing to the fact efficient and convenient one-pot, three-component tandem
that the fluorine atom has a small atomic radius and high reaction for the asymmetric synthesis of diverse spirocyclic
electronegativity,6 organofluorine compounds always play a druglike skeletons.13c In the same year, Deng and co-workers
very important role in pharmaceuticals and pesticides.7 Among reported a highly efficient asymmetric 1,3-dipolar cyclo-
the fluorinated compounds, the trifluoromethyl group occupies addition of azomethine ylides to 5-alkylidenethia(oxa)-
a special position, especially when the trifluoromethyl is in the zolidine-2,4-diones catalyzed by a chiral N,O-ligand/Cu-
α-position of the nitrogen atom; meanwhile the N atom is (CH3CN)4BF4 system.13d From a comprehensive point of
considered as a low basic amide, which is considered to be one view, the corresponding asymmetric studies on thiazolidinone
of the key factors affecting the affinity of the drug receptor.8 derivatives were based on the monospirocyclic structures.
However, the methodological choice of introducing the Therefore, combining the three classes of key heterocyclic
trifluoromethyl group to the desired location is still limited motifs (oxindole, pyrrolidine, rhodanine) and the CF3 group
compared to the monofluorination process.9 Therefore, the through two unique spiro-quaternary stereogenic carbons
development of diverse synthetic strategies and methods to would rebuild structurally novel bispiro[oxindole-pyrrolidine-
synthesize trifluoromethyl-containing compounds has been rhodanine]s containing the trifluoromethyl group. The
pursued by chemists in recent decades.10
On the other hand, 2-thioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one, com- Received: May 17, 2018
monly named as rhodanine, has long been sought after by Published: June 29, 2018

© 2018 American Chemical Society 9278 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

Figure 1. Biologically active thiazolidinones and spirooxindole.

Scheme 1. Asymmetric Study of Thiazolidinone Derivatives

resulting novel bispirocyclic heterocycles may provide some methane at room temperature. Using quinine-derived squar-
unprecedented benefits to medicinal chemistry, with the hope amide C1 as the catalyst, the reaction could give the
of finding valuable applications in drug discovery. bispirocyclic compound 3aa in 97% yield with 88% ee and
Recently, N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin ketimines serving as >99:1 dr after 12 h (Table 1, entry 1). Inspired by this good
efficient azomethine ylide precursors have been used to result, a series of bifunctional organocatalysts, C2−C12
generate structurally diverse CF 3 -containing spiro- (Figure 2), were evaluated for this cascade reaction under
[pyrrolidine-oxindole] derivatives.14 Meanwhile, on the basis the same experimental conditions. It was found that a cinchona
of our continuing interest in the construction of diverse alkaloid skeleton was essential for achieving high asymmetric
complex and novel spirocyclic oxindole skeletons with induction (Table 1, entries 1−9 and 12 vs entries 10 and 11).
organocatalysis,15 we envisioned that CF3-containing bispiro- Although catalyst C3 is superior to catalyst C1 in terms of
[oxindole-pyrrolidine-rhodanine]s 3 with multiple stereo- yield and enantioselectivity, it is significantly reduced in
centers, including two spiro-quaternary centers, could be diastereoselectivity (Table 1, entry 3). The catalyst C4 has
constructed by the domino Michael/Mannich [3 + 2] better enantioselectivity than the catalyst C1, but the yield and
cycloaddition reactions between the rationally designed the diastereoselectivity decrease (Table 1, entry 4). The
isatin-derived CF3-containing azomethine ylides 2 with catalyst C5 and catalyst C9 showed similar effects, but the
rhodanine derivatives 1.


enantioselectivity decreased, especially the catalyst C9 (Table
1, entries 5 and 9). Catalyst C12 decreased slightly in the
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION aspect of stereoselectivity (Table 1, entry 12). The
The initial investigation commenced with the reaction of ethyl experimental results show that the catalysts C2, C6, C7, and
2-(4-oxo-3-phenyl-2-thioxothiazolidin-5-ylidene)acetate (1a) C8 are superior to the catalyst C1, in particular, the catalytic
and N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin ketimine 2a in dichloro- effect of the catalyst C2 (Table 1, entries 2, 6, 7, and 8).
9279 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245
J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa rhodanine derivatives 1 was examined (Table 2). As illustrated
in Table 2, the reaction showed good functional group
tolerance, and a variety of bispiro[oxindole-pyrrolidine-
rhodanine]s, 3aa−3na, were obtained in high yields (65−
99%) with excellent enantio- and diastereoselectivities (92:8 to
>99:1 dr and 57% to >99% ee). The effect of the substituents
R1 on the rhodanine derivatives was first investigated. When R1
= Boc, the reaction can still proceed with very high yield and
entry solvent catalyst yieldb (%) drc eed (%) stereoselectivity, and when R1 = CN, the enantioselectivity and
1 CH2Cl2 C1 97 >99:1 88 diastereoselectivity of the reaction are reduced. However, when
2 CH2Cl2 C2 99 99:1 94 R1 = Ph, the reaction cannot occur. We tried to synthesize
3 CH2Cl2 C3 98 86:14 95 alkyl-substituted rhodanine derivatives, but unfortunately, we
4 CH2Cl2 C4 92 97:3 −90 failed to obtain the corresponding substrates. Then we studied
5 CH2Cl2 C5 98 >99:1 86 the effect of substituent R2 on the nitrogen atom of rhodanine.
6 CH2Cl2 C6 98 99:1 92 The experimental results show that, regardless of the R2
7 CH2Cl2 C7 99 >99:1 90 substituent (aliphatic or aromatic), the reaction proceeds
8 CH2Cl2 C8 99 99:1 93 smoothly with high yield and stereoselectivity (Table 2, 3ea−
9 CH2Cl2 C9 98 >99:1 76 3ha). However, when R2 = H, the reaction time becomes
10 CH2Cl2 C10 94 95:5 14 longer and the yield and enantioselectivity decrease. We
11 CH2Cl2 C11 96 99:1 32 believe that this substrate may bind to the catalyst and reduce
12 CH2Cl2 C12 99 96:4 84 the catalytic activity of the catalyst. It was found that either
13 CHCl3 C2 94 99:1 95 electron-donating (1j and 1k) or electron-withdrawing (1l−
14 toluene C2 79 94:6 95 1n) substituents on the benzene ring were tolerated and
15 THF C2 99 81:19 55 delivered the desired bispiro[oxindole-pyrrolidine-rhodanine]s
16 Et2O C2 84 90:10 90 3ja−3na in excellent yields (90−99%) with excellent
17 dioxane C2 39 82:18 37 diastereoselectivities (98:2 to 99:1 dr) and enantioselectivities
18 CH3CN C2 96 5:95 0, 2 (90−91% ee) (Table 2, 3ja−3na).
19 DCE C2 85 98:2 94 Further exploration of the substrate scope was focused on
20 xylene C2 79 96:4 96 the N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin ketimines 2b−2m bearing
21e CH2Cl2 C2 99 98:2 96 various substituents (Table 3). As shown in Table 3, a series of
22f CH2Cl2 C2 97 99:1 95 ketamines, 2b−2m, tolerated the reaction and furnished the
23g CH2Cl2 C2 95 98:2 95 corresponding products 3ab−3am in high to excellent yields
24h CH2Cl2 C2 98 99:1 95 (80−99%) with high to excellent stereoselectivity (86:14 to
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.10 mmol), 2a (0.12 mmol), and catalyst >99:1 dr and 80% to >99% ee). For example, the ketimines
(10 mol %) in solvent (1.0 mL) were stirred at room temperature for bearing electron-donating groups (MeO− and Me−) or
12 h. bIsolated yield after column chromatography purification. cThe electron-withdrawing groups (Cl− and Br−) at the 5-position
diastereomeric ratio (dr) was determined by HPLC analysis. dThe
of the indolinone ring led to similar enantioselectivities of 93%
enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by HPLC analysis. eThe
reaction was performed with 5 mol % catalyst for 12 h. fThe reaction to >99% ee and 93:7 to 99:1 dr (Table 3, 3ab, 3ac, 3af, and
was performed with 2.5 mol % catalyst for 24 h. gThe reaction was 3ah). However, when the substrate 2d with a 5,7-dimethyl
performed at 0 °C for 16 h. hThe reaction was performed at −10 °C group was used, the yield and diastereoselectivity of the
for 24 h. corresponding product were decreased (Table 3, 3ad). When
R3 was 5-F, the stereoselectivity of the reaction was decreased
With optimal catalyst C2 identified, the screening of a (Table 3, 3ae). When Cl was in the 6-position of the ketimine,
variety of solvents, including chloroform, toluene, THF, diethyl the yield and stereoselectivity of the reaction were also
ether, dioxane, acetonitrile, 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), and decreased (Table 3, 3ag). Moreover, we also evaluated the
xylene, was performed (Table 1, entries 13−20). Dichloro- substitution at the 1-position of ketamines. As summarized in
methane was the best solvent for this reaction under the same Table 3, with or without the substituent at the 1-position, N-
experimental conditions. When the catalyst loading was (2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) ketimine showed good reactivity, and the
lowered from 10 to 5 mol %, there was no effect on the [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction gave the products in high to
reactivity and stereoselectivity (Table 1, entry 21). With a excellent yields with high to excellent stereoselectivities (Table
further decrease of the catalyst loading to 2.5 mol %, an 3, 3ai−3am).
excellent yield and diastereo- and enantiocontrol could still be To demonstrate the practical utility and robustness of this
achieved but with a prolonged reaction time (Table 1, entry asymmetric domino Michael/Mannich [3 + 2] cycloaddition,
22). When the reaction temperature decreased, there was no the reaction between 1a and 2a was conducted on a gram scale
significant difference in the results of the reaction except for (3.0 mmol) using our standard conditions, and the
the prolonged reaction time (entries 23 and 24). As the bispirocyclic product 3aa could be obtained in 95% yield
conditions of choice, we utilized rhodanine derivatives and N- with >99:1 dr and 91% ee (Scheme 2). In addition,
(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin ketimines at a molar ratio of 1:1.2 in regioselective N-methylation of 3ai (88% ee) was achieved at
dichloromethane with 5 mol % catalyst C2 at room the N1 position of indolinone, and product 3aj was obtained in
temperature for 12 h. 96% yield with 99:1 dr and 88% ee (Scheme 3a). Finally, we
Having identified the optimal reaction conditions (Table 1, also tried to demonstrate the synthetic transformation of these
entry 21), we then explored the generality of this Michael/ products. The rhodanine moiety could be easily oxidized to
Mannich cycloaddition reaction. First, the scope of the thiazolidine-2,4-dione using chromium trioxide as the oxidant,
9280 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245
J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

Figure 2. Structures of screened organocatalysts.

and the corresponding new type of bispirocyclic heterocycle 4 applicability of the methodology. We expect that the
was obtained in 87% yield (Scheme 3b). availability of these CF3-containing bispiro[oxindole-pyrroli-
To determine the absolute configurations of the target dine-rhodanine]s will provide promising drug candidates for
products, a single crystal of compound 3na was obtained by chemical biology and drug discovery.


recrystallization from petroleum ether/ethyl acetate. As shown
in Figure 3, the absolute configuration of 3na was determined EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
to be (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S). The absolute configurations of the
General Information. All commercial reagents were used without
other products were assigned by analogy with 3na.16 further purification. Solvents were distilled according to the
As shown in Figure 4, on the basis of our experiments and purification procedures. Column chromatography was performed
previously reported17 dual activation model, we proposed a with silica gel (200−300 mesh). Melting points were determined with
plausible mechanism for this domino Michae/Mannich [3 + 2] an XT-4 melting-point apparatus and are uncorrected. 1H NMR
cycloaddition reaction. In the first Michael addition step, spectra were measured with a 400 MHz spectrometer, and chemical
catalyst C2 initially promotes the formation of transition state shifts are reported in δ (ppm) units relative to tetramethylsilane
A through deprotonation of the N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin (TMS) as the internal standard. 13C NMR spectra were measured at
ketimine 2a. Then both 1a and 2a are simultaneously activated 176 MHz with a 700 MHz spectrometer, and chemical shifts are
reported in δ (ppm) units relative to tetramethylsilane and referenced
via hydrogen-bonding interactions with catalyst C2. Afterward, to the solvent peak (CDCl3, δ(C) = 77.00 ppm). 19F NMR spectra
the rhodanine is attacked by the deprotonated N-(2,2,2- were measured at 376 MHz. Proton coupling patterns are described as
trifluoroethyl)isatin ketimine from the Si-face via transition singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), multiplet (m), and
state B, which undergoes an intermolecular Michael addition. broad (br). High-resolution mass spectra were recorded with an
Subsequently, the resulting nucleophilic rhodanine anion Agilent 6520 accurate-mass-Q-TOF MS system equipped with an
attacks the CN double bond of the imine in a Mannich electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Enantiomeric excesses were
cyclization reaction via intermediate C, which delivers the determined by chiral HPLC analysis using an Agilent 1200 LC
observed bispirocyclic product 3aa and regenerates the instrument with Daicel Chiralpak IA, IB, IC, and AD-H columns.
Optical rotations were measured with a polarimeter at the indicated
bifunctional catalyst C2 after a protonation process.


concentration with the units of grams per 100 mL.
1a−1n were prepared according to the literature.18 2a−2m were
CONCLUSIONS prepared according to literature reported by Wang and co-workers
and slightly modified.14a The squaramide organocatalysts were
In conclusion, we have developed a highly diastereo- and prepared by following the reported procedures.19
enantioselective domino Michael/Mannich [3 + 2] cyclo- General Procedure for Asymmetric Domino Michael/
addition reaction of N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin ketimines Mannich [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reaction. Rhodanine derivatives
with rhodanine derivatives. In the presence of a squaramide 1 (0.10 mmol), N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin ketimines 2 (0.12
tertiary amine catalyst, a wide range of CF3-containing mmol), and catalyst C2 (5 mol %) in CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL) were stirred
bispiro[oxindole-pyrrolidine-rhodanine]s bearing four consec- at room temperature for 12 h. After completion of the reaction
utive stereocenters, including two vicinal spiro-quaternary (monitored by TLC analysis), the crude product was purified by flash
column chromatography on silica gel (PE/EtOAc, 8:1) to afford the
chiral centers, were efficiently obtained with excellent results pure product 3. The chiral catalyst was replaced by Et3N, and the
(up to 99% yield, >99:1 dr, and >99% ee). A large-scale other conditions remained unchanged to obtain racemates of 3.
experiment and further transformation of the products were (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-2″-thioxo-
also successfully performed to demonstrate the promising 5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli-

9281 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

Table 2. Substrate Scope of Rhodanine Derivatives 1a

a
Unless noted otherwise, the reaction was carried out with 1 (0.10 mmol), 2a (0.12 mmol), and catalyst C2 (0.005 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL) at
rt for 12 h. The yields were isolated after column chromatography. The dr and ee values were determined by chiral HPLC analysis. bThe reaction
time is 60 h.

dine]-4′-carboxylate (3aa). 3aa was obtained as a light yellow solid detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 7.3 min (minor), tR
(60.5 mg, 99% yield), mp 94−96 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak IB, n- = 6.2 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 25.9 min (minor), tR
hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection at 254 = 5.5 min (major); 99:1 dr, 93% ee for the major diastereoisomer.
D = −187.5 (c 2.75, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
[α]20 1
nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 14.0 min (minor), tR = 8.8 min
(major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 32.7 min (minor), tR = 6.9 min 7.74 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.35−7.25 (m, 3H),
(major); 99:1 dr, 96% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = 7.18 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 7.12−7.03 (m, 3H), 6.67 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H),
−189.7 (c 4.01, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.74 (d, J = 5.23 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.58−4.52 (m,
7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (t, 1H), 4.37 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 2.88 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.49 (s, 9H)
J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.3, 173.4, 170.7, 166.0,
7.04 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.70−6.66 (m, 3H), 5.25 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 143.6, 134.8, 134.6, 131.3, 129.6, 129.4, 128.7, 127.9, 127.6, 127.4,
1H), 5.22 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 1H), 4.65−4.55 (m, 1H), 4.41−4.33 (m, 126.6, 124.7 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.6, 122.7, 109.5, 83.9, 73.9,
2H), 4.27−4.19 (m, 1H), 2.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 73.5, 60.3 (q, 2JC−F = 32.6 Hz), 51.7, 44.6, 27.9 ppm. 19F NMR (376
3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.0, 173.3, 170.8, MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.53 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
167.1, 143.6, 134.8, 134.5, 131.3, 129.6, 129.4, 128.7, 127.9, 127.6, C32H29F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 640.1546, found 640.1562.
127.3, 126.6, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.6, 122.7, 109.5, 73.8, (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-1-Benzyl-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-2″-thioxo-5′-
73.2, 62.5, 60.3 (q, 2JC−F = 32.8 Hz), 51.4, 44.6, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5′’-thiazoli-
(376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.60 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for dine]-4′-carbonitrile (3ca). 3ca was obtained as a light yellow solid
C30H25F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 612.1233, found 612.1243. (53.4 mg, 95% yield), mp 110−113 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak IA,
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-tert-Butyl 1-Benzyl-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-2″-thi- n-hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection at 254
oxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thia- nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 7.6 min (minor), tR = 18.1 min
zolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ba). 3ba was obtained as a light yellow (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 14.8 min (minor), tR = 9.5 min
solid (61.4 mg, 96% yield), mp 164−167 °C. HPLC (Daicel D = −28.8
(major); 92:8 dr, 83% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20
Chiralpak IC, n-hexane:2-propanol = 80:20, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, (c 1.83, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.63 (d, J = 7.6 Hz,

9282 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

Table 3. Substrate Scope of Ketimines 2a

a
Unless noted otherwise, the reaction was carried out with 1a (0.10 mmol), 2 (0.12 mmol), and catalyst C2 (0.005 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL) at
rt for 12 h. The yields were isolated after column chromatography. The dr and ee values were determined by chiral HPLC analysis.

Scheme 2. Gram-Scale Experiment Scheme 3. Synthetic Transformations of the


Bispiro[oxindole-pyrrolidine-rhodanine]s

1H), 7.48−7.33 (m, 5H), 7.18 (s, 4H), 7.13 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.89
(d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (d, J = 15.6 Hz,
1H), 5.05 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 4.54−4.45 (m, 2H), 3.27 (d, J = 9.6
Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.0, 171.7, 171.2,
143.3, 134.2, 134.1, 131.8, 130.0, 129.6, 129.0, 128.0, 127.9, 127.3,
127.1, 125.5, 124.1, 123.6, 123.5 (q, 1JC−F = −280.2 Hz), 114.8, 110.2,
74.1, 70.9, 63.1 (q, 2JC−F = 33.1 Hz), 44.7, 38.3 ppm. 19F NMR (376
MHz, CDCl3): δ −72.68 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
C28H20F3N4O2S2 [M + H]+ 565.0974, found 565.0969.
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1,3″-Dibenzyl-2,4″-dioxo-2″-thioxo-5′- −331.3 (c 2.12, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.62 (d, J =
(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli- 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.25−7.18 (m, 6H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.04−6.97
dine]-4′-carboxylate (3ea). 3ea was obtained as a light yellow solid (m, 3H), 6.84 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.56 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.35 (d, J
(53.2 mg, 85% yield), mp 90−93 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak IB, n- = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 5.04−4.93 (m, 3H), 4.52−4.46 (m, 2H), 4.15−4.07
hexane:2-propanol = 90:10, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection at 254 (m, 1H), 3.97−3.89 (m, 1H), 2.76 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.01 (t, J = 7.2
nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 13.3 min (minor), tR = 11.5 min Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.8, 173.8, 170.9,
(major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 8.0 min (minor), tR = 8.9 min 166.6, 143.6, 134.9, 133.7, 131.2, 128.6, 128.4, 127.7, 127.64, 127.57,
(major); 99:1 dr, 97% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = 126.8, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.6 Hz), 122.9, 122.5, 109.7, 72.93, 72.88,

9283 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

Figure 3. X-ray crystal structure of compound 3na (displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level).

Figure 4. Proposed mechanism for the domino Michael/Mannich [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction.

62.2, 59.7 (q, 2JC−F = 32.9 Hz), 51.5, 47.6, 44.5, 13.8 ppm. 19F NMR 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (t, J = 7.4
(376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.38 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.23−5.19 (m, 2H), 4.53−4.46 (m,
C31H27F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 626.1390, found 626.1402. 2H), 4.41 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.30−4.22 (m, 1H), 4.16−4.08 (m,
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-3″-cyclohexyl-2,4″-dioxo-2″-thio- 1H), 2.76 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.14 (q, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (d, J =
xo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thia- 12.8 Hz, 1H), 1.66 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 1.55−1.45 (m, 3H), 1.30−
zolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3fa). 3fa was obtained as a light yellow 1.23 (m, 1H), 1.18 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.09−1.07 (m, 2H), 0.71−
solid (58.3 mg, 94% yield), mp 190−193 °C. HPLC (Daicel 0.68 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ
Chiralpak ADH, n-hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, 196.0, 173.7, 170.9, 167.0, 143.6, 135.1, 131.2, 128.7, 128.2, 127.8,
detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 15.4 min (minor), 126.6, 124.7 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.3, 122.5, 109.1, 73.2, 70.3,
tR = 58.9 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 7.3 min (minor), 62.2, 60.0 (q, 2JC−F = 32.7 Hz), 58.5, 51.0, 44.7, 27.2, 26.6, 25.77,
tR = 6.0 min (major); 99:1 dr, >99% ee for the major diastereoisomer. 25.75, 24.7, 14.1 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.48 ppm.
D = −207.0 (c 1.58, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
[α]20 1
HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H31F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 618.1703,
7.63 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, found 618.1695.

9284 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-3″-methyl-2,4″-dioxo-2″-thioxo- 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.28 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR
5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli- (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.2, 173.3, 170.9, 167.1, 143.6, 139.8, 134.8,
dine]-4′-carboxylate (3ga). 3ga was obtained as a light yellow solid 131.8, 131.3, 130.1, 128.7, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 126.6, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F
(51.2 mg, 93% yield), mp 79−82 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak IC, n- = −280.4 Hz), 123.7, 122.7, 109.5, 73.8, 73.1, 62.4, 60.4 (q, 2JC−F =
hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection at 254 32.6 Hz), 51.4, 44.6, 22.3, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ
nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 8.1 min (minor), tR = 16.3 min −71.62 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C31H27F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+
(major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 5.6 min (minor), tR = 6.5 min 626.1390, found 626.1381.
(major); 98:2 dr, 95% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-3″-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2,4″-
−239.6 (c 2.56, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.62 (d, J = dioxo-2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrroli-
7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32−7.26 (m, 5H), 7.22 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (t, J = dine-3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ka). 3ka was obtained as a
7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.22−5.18 (m, 2H), 4.58−4.47 light yellow solid (62.5 mg, 97% yield), mp 141−143 °C. HPLC
(m, 2H), 4.26−4.20 (m, 1H), 4.15−4.08 (m, 1H), 3.21 (s, 3H), 2.83 (Daicel Chiralpak ADH, n-hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0
(d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 1.55 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 mL/min, detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 25.6 min
MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.2, 173.4, 171.4, 166.8, 143.5, 135.0, 134.5, (minor), tR = 43.5 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 15.6 min
131.2, 128.7, 127.8, 127.6, 126.7, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.7, (minor), tR = 20.2 min (major); 99:1 dr, 90% ee for the major
122.6, 109.5, 73.0, 72.6, 62.3, 60.0 (q, 2JC−F = 32.7 Hz), 52.3, 44.4, diastereoisomer. [α]20D = −168.9 (c 2.80, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400
1

31.6, 14.0 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.71 ppm. HRMS MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.73 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.28−7.12 (m, 6H), 7.03
(ESI): m/z calcd for C25H23F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 550.1077, found (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.67 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H),
550.1073. 6.62 (br s, 2H), 5.24−5.19 (m, 2H), 4.63−4.57 (m, 1H), 4.40 (d, J =
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-2,4″-dioxo-3″-propyl-2″-thioxo- 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.38−4.31 (m, 1H), 4.27−4.19 (m, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H),
5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli- 2.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR
dine]-4′-carboxylate (3ha). 3ha was obtained as a light yellow solid (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.4, 173.3, 171.0, 167.1, 160.1, 143.5, 134.8,
(56.3 mg, 97% yield), mp 152−155 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak IC, 131.3, 129.0, 128.8, 127.6, 127.4, 126.9, 126.6, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F =
n-hexane:2-propanol = 95:5, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection at 254 −280.4 Hz), 123.7, 114.7, 109.5, 73.8, 72.9, 62.4, 60.3 (q, 2JC−F = 32.6
nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 15.0 min (minor), tR = 27.8 min Hz), 55.4, 51.4, 44.6, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ
(major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 9.1 min (minor), tR = 12.9 min −71.63 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C31H27F3N3O5S2 [M + H]+
(major); 99:1 dr, >99% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = 642.1339, found 642.1331.
−274.6 (c 2.44, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.63 (d, J = (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-3″-(4-fluorophenyl)-2,4″-dioxo-
7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.27 2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-
(d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3la). 3la was obtained as a light
6.66 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (d, J = 15.6 yellow solid (56.7 mg, 90% yield), mp 85−88 °C. HPLC (Daicel
Hz, 1H), 4.55−4.43 (m, 2H), 4.28−4.20 (m, 1H), 4.14−4.06 (m, Chiralpak ADH, n-hexane:2-propanol = 80:20, flow rate 1.0 mL/min,
1H), 3.82−3.66 (m, 2H), 2.80 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 13.6 min (minor),
2H), 1.15 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.50 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR tR = 25.9 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 12.0 min (minor),
(176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.2, 173.6, 171.0, 166.8, 143.6, 135.1, 131.2, tR = 7.8 min (major); 98:2 dr, 91% ee for the major diastereoisomer.
128.7, 127.9, 127.8, 126.7, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.5 Hz), 123.3, 122.5, [α]20D = −180.6 (c 2.55, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
1

109.4, 73.1, 72.5, 62.2, 60.0 (q, 2JC−F = 32.7 Hz), 51.6, 46.2, 44.5, 7.74 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30−7.19 (m, 4H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H),
19.7, 13.9, 10.5 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.56 ppm. 7.07−7.00 (m, 3H), 6.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H), 5.25−5.20 (m, 2H),
HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C27H27F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 578.1390, 4.65−4.56 (m, 1H), 4.41−4.32 (m, 2H), 4.28−4.20 (m, 1H), 2.94 (d,
found 578.1373. J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz,
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-2,4″-dioxo-2″-thioxo-5′- CDCl3): δ 194.9, 173.2, 170.9, 167.2, 162.8 (d, 1JC−F = −250.8 Hz),
(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli- 143.5, 134.8, 131.4, 130.2 (d, 4JC−F = 2.8 Hz), 129.9 (d, 3JC−F = 9.0
dine]-4′-carboxylate (3ia). 3ia was obtained as a white solid (34.8 Hz), 128.8, 127.7, 127.4, 126.6, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 122.9,
mg, 65% yield), mp 104−107 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak IA, n- 116.5 (d, 2JC−F = 22.9 Hz), 109.5, 73.8, 72.9, 62.5, 60.4 (q, 2JC−F =
hexane:2-propanol = 80:20, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection at 254 32.6 Hz), 51.5, 44.6, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ
nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 12.2 min (minor), tR = 29.0 min −71.67, −110.32 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H24F4N3O4S2
(major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 9.0 min (major); >99:1 dr, 57% [M + H]+ 630.1139, found 630.1132.
ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = −124.5 (c 1.59, CH2Cl2). (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-3″-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,4″-dioxo-
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.16 (br s, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-
1H), 7.31−7.23 (m, 7H), 7.03 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ma). 3ma was obtained as a
1H), 5.20 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.57−4.48 light yellow solid (63.4 mg, 98% yield), mp 94−96 °C. HPLC (Daicel
(m, 2H), 4.35−4.27 (m, 1H), 4.21−4.13 (m, 1H), 2.79 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, Chiralpak ADH, n-hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min,
1H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 23.1 min (minor),
194.2, 173.4, 171.5, 166.9, 143.6, 134.9, 131.4, 128.8, 127.8, 127.5, tR = 35.1 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 20.7 min (minor),
126.8, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.6, 122.7, 109.8, 76.0, 73.0, tR = 11.9 min (major); 99:1 dr, 90% ee for the major diastereoisomer.
[α]20D = −155.3 (c 2.91, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
1
62.6, 60.6 (q, 2JC−F = 32.7 Hz), 52.2, 44.5, 13.9 ppm. 19F NMR (376
MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.60 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for 7.73 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.31−7.19 (m, 6H), 7.13 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H),
C24H21F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 536.0920, found 536.0914. 7.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 6.0 Hz,
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-2,4″-dioxo-2″-thioxo-3″-(p-tolyl)- 2H), 5.24−5.20 (m, 2H), 4.65−4.56 (m, 1H), 4.39 (d, J = 15.2 Hz,
5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli- 1H), 4.37−4.31 (m, 1H), 4.28−4.20 (m, 1H), 2.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz,
dine]-4′-carboxylate (3ja). 3ja was obtained as a light yellow solid 1H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ
(61.0 mg, 97% yield), mp 175−177 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak 194.6, 173.1, 170.8, 167.1, 143.5, 135.7, 134.7, 132.8, 131.4, 129.7,
ADH, n-hexane:2-propanol = 75:25, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection 129.3, 128.7, 127.7, 127.5, 126.6, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.7,
at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 11.2 min (minor), tR = 26.2 122.9, 109.5, 73.9, 73.0, 62.5, 60.4 (q, 2JC−F = 32.7 Hz), 51.4, 44.6,
min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 9.1 min (minor), tR = 6.5 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.69 ppm. HRMS
min (major); 99:1 dr, 90% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H24ClF3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 646.0843, found
−115.8 (c 2.81, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.73 (d, J = 646.0835.
7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21−7.11 (m, 7H), 7.03 (t, J = (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-3″-(4-bromophenyl)-2,4″-dioxo-
7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (br s, 2H), 5.24 (d, J = 9.6 2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-
Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.64−4.55 (m, 1H), 4.42 (d, J = 3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3na). 3na was obtained as a light
15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.38−4.32 (m, 1H), 4.27−4.19 (m, 1H), 2.92 (d, J = yellow solid (68.5 mg, 99% yield), mp 106−108 °C. HPLC (Daicel

9285 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

Chiralpak IA, n-hexane:2-propanol = 90:10, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, 73.9, 72.7, 62.5, 61.1 (q, 2JC−F = 32.3 Hz), 52.1, 45.8, 20.9, 18.7, 14.2
detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 14.8 min (minor), ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.92 ppm. HRMS (ESI):
tR = 42.2 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 18.2 min (minor), m/z calcd for C32H29F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 640.1546, found 640.1563.
tR = 11.7 min (major); 98:2 dr, 91% ee for the major diastereoisomer. (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-5-fluoro-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-2″-
D = −145.6 (c 3.23, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
[α]20 1 thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-
7.73 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.30−7.18 (m, thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ae). 3ae was obtained as a light
4H), 7.13 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 8.0 yellow solid (61.8 mg, 98% yield), mp 91−94 °C. HPLC (Daicel
Hz, 1H), 6.56 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 5.23−5.19 (m, 2H), 4.63−4.57 (m, Chiralpak ADH, n-hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min,
1H), 4.40−4.31 (m, 2H), 4.27−4.19 (m, 1H), 2.93 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 14.4 min (minor),
1H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ tR = 12.1 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 10.4 min (minor),
194.5, 173.1, 170.7, 167.1, 143.5, 134.7, 133.3, 132.7, 131.4, 129.6, tR = 8.4 min (major); 95:5 dr, 80% ee for the major diastereoisomer.
[α]20D = −204.2 (c 0.63, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
1
128.7, 127.7, 127.5, 126.6, 124.5 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.9, 123.7,
122.8, 109.5, 73.9, 73.1, 62.5, 60.4 (q, 2JC−F = 32.8 Hz), 51.4, 44.6, 7.56 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47−7.37 (m, 3H), 7.22−7.12 (m, 5H),
14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.69 ppm. HRMS 6.99 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 2H), 6.61 (q, J = 4.2 Hz,
(ESI): m/z calcd for C30H24BrF3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 690.0338, found 1H), 5.23 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 4.64−4.55
690.0328. (m, 1H), 4.43−4.25 (m, 3H), 2.92 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.31 (t, J = 7.0
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-5-methoxy-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl- Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.5, 173.1, 171.1,
2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine- 167.2, 158.7 (d, 1JC−F = −243.1 Hz), 139.5, 134.5 (d, 4JC−F = 4.4 Hz),
3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ab). 3ab was obtained as a light 129.8, 129.5, 128.9, 128.0, 127.8, 127.3, 125.7 (d, 3JC−F = 7.9 Hz),
yellow solid (63.7 mg, 99% yield), mp 185−188 °C. HPLC (Daicel 124.5 (q, 1JC−F = −280.7 Hz), 117.7 (d, 2JC−F = 19.4 Hz), 115.1 (d,
Chiralpak IC, n-hexane:2-propanol = 95:5, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, 2
JC−F = 22.5 Hz), 110.2 (d, 3JC−F = 7.7 Hz), 73.9, 72.5, 62.7, 60.7 (q,
2
detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 32.0 min (major); JC−F = 33.1 Hz), 51.8, 44.8, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3):
minor diastereoisomer, tR = 13.9 min (minor), tR = 17.7 min (major); δ −71.56, −118.12 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
98:2 dr, >99% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = −89.9 (c C30H24F4N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 630.1139, found 630.1147.
1.50, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.45−7.35 (m, 4H), (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-5-chloro-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-
7.19−7.11 (m, 5H), 6.82−6.77 (m, 3H), 6.58 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-
5.22 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.65−4.59 (m, 3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3af). 3af was obtained as a light
1H), 4.42−4.33 (m, 2H), 4.28−4.24 (m, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.96 (d, J yellow solid (61.3 mg, 95% yield), mp 200−203 °C. HPLC (Daicel
= 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.30 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, Chiralpak IC, n-hexane:2-propanol = 90:10, flow rate 1.0 mL/min,
CDCl3): δ 195.0, 172.8, 171.3, 167.4, 155.8, 136.6, 134.8, 134.5, detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 5.3 min (minor), tR
129.7, 129.5, 128.8, 128.0, 127.6, 127.3, 125.3, 124.5 (q, 1JC−F = = 9.4 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 6.0 min (minor), tR =
−280.4 Hz), 116.3, 113.5, 110.2, 74.3, 72.7, 62.5, 60.8 (q, 2JC−F = 32.6 7.5 min (major); 93:7 dr, >99% ee for the major diastereoisomer.
Hz), 56.0, 51.6, 44.7, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ [α]20D = −52.2 (c 1.37, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.76
1

−71.64 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C31H27F3N3O5S2 [M + H]+ (s, 1H), 7.46−7.37 (m, 3H), 7.25−7.12 (m, 6H), 6.79 (br s, 2H),
642.1339, found 642.1333. 6.60 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (d, J = 9.6
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-5-methyl-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl- Hz, 1H), 4.64−4.56 (m, 1H), 4.43−4.23 (m, 3H), 2.91 (d, J = 6.8 Hz,
2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine- 1H), 1.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ
3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ac). 3ac was obtained as a light 194.4, 173.0, 171.0, 167.0, 142.0, 134.4, 134.3, 131.2, 129.8, 129.5,
yellow solid (61.8 mg, 99% yield), mp 170−172 °C. HPLC (Daicel 128.9, 128.3, 127.9, 127.8, 127.3, 127.2, 125.7, 124.5 (q, 1JC−F =
Chiralpak IC, n-hexane:2-propanol = 90:10, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, −280.6 Hz), 110.5, 73.7, 72.6, 62.7, 60.5 (q, 2JC−F = 32.7 Hz), 51.7,
detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 10.1 min (minor), 44.7, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.59 ppm. HRMS
tR = 13.2 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 6.9 min (minor), (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H24ClF3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 646.0843, found
tR = 8.8 min (major); 99:1 dr, 93% ee for the major diastereoisomer. 646.0832.
D = −116.7 (c 1.42, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
[α]20 1
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-6-chloro-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-
7.56 (s, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (t, 2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-
J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 7.13−7.06 (m, 3H), 6.71 (br s, 2H), 6.57 (d, J = 8.0 3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ag). 3ag was obtained as a light
Hz, 1H), 5.23−5.19 (m, 2H), 4.63−4.57 (m, 1H, CH), 4.41−4.33 yellow solid (58.9 mg, 91% yield), mp 181−183 °C. HPLC (Daicel
(m, 2H), 4.29−4.22 (m, 1H), 2.90 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H), Chiralpak IB, n-hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min,
1.29 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.2, detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 12.4 min (minor),
173.2, 171.0, 167.2, 141.1, 134.9, 134.5, 132.5, 131.5, 129.4, 129.6, tR = 8.6 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 20.0 min (minor),
129.4, 128.7, 128.0, 127.6, 127.4, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.8, tR = 6.7 min (major); 86:14 dr, 91% ee for the major diastereoisomer.
[α]20D = −40.5 (c 2.25, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.67
1
109.3, 74.0, 73.1, 62.4, 60.5 (q, 2JC−F = 32.7 Hz), 51.4, 44.6, 21.2, 14.2
ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.70 ppm. HRMS (ESI): (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.47−7.35 (m, 4H), 7.22−7.15 (m, 4H), 7.04 (d,
m/z calcd for C31H27F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 626.1390, found 626.1393. J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (br s, 2H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 5.24−5.18 (m, 2H),
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-5,7-dimethyl-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phe- 4.62−4.55 (m, 1H), 4.40−4.23 (m, 3H), 2.86 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H),
nyl-2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine- 1.30 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.6,
3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ad). 3ad was obtained as a light 173.3, 170.9, 167.1, 144.8, 137.4, 134.4, 129.8, 129.5, 129.2, 129.0,
yellow solid (51.2 mg, 80% yield), mp 145−148 °C. HPLC (Daicel 127.94, 127.90, 127.7, 127.3, 124.5 (q, 1JC−F = −280.5 Hz), 123.3,
Chiralpak IC, n-hexane:2-propanol = 90:10, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, 122.8, 122.2, 110.1, 73.4, 72.7, 62.6, 60.3 (q, 2JC−F= 32.7 Hz), 51.7,
detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 10.9 min (minor), 44.7, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.60 ppm. HRMS
tR = 13.5 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 7.4 min (minor), (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H24ClF3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 646.0843, found
tR = 11.9 min (major); 97:3 dr, 98% ee for the major diastereoisomer. 646.0848.
D = −139.4 (c 1.62, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
[α]20 1
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-5-bromo-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-
7.47 (s, 1H), 7.43−7.38 (m, 3H), 7.15−7.04 (m, 5H), 6.90 (s, 1H), 2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-
6.85 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 5.23 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.03 (d, J = 9.2 3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3ah). 3ah was obtained as a light
Hz, 1H), 4.94 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 1H), 4.68−4.62 (m, 1H), 4.38−4.24 yellow solid (66.3 mg, 96% yield), mp 205−208 °C. HPLC (Daicel
(m, 2H), 2.99 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.30 (t, Chiralpak IC, n-hexane:2-propanol = 95:5, flow rate 1.0 mL/min,
J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.3, 173.8, detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 16.8 min (minor),
171.9, 167.5, 138.9, 136.7, 135.6, 134.6, 132.6, 129.7, 129.4, 128.8, tR = 18.3 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 9.5 min (minor),
128.0, 127.1, 125.7, 125.5, 124.9, 124.5 (q, 1JC−F = −280.2 Hz), 120.0, tR = 13.1 min (major); 95:5 dr, 95% ee for the major diastereoisomer.

9286 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

D = −10.6 (c 2.08, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.88


[α]20 1
detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 11.1 min (minor),
(s, 1H), 7.46−7.36 (m, 4H), 7.21−7.11 (m, 5H), 6.78 (br s, 2H), tR = 9.3 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 8.4 min (major);
6.55 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.22−5.15 (m, 2H), 4.60−4.55 (m, 1H), >99:1 dr, 90% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = −241.3 (c
4.41−4.23 (m, 3H), 2.91 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.30 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) 2.36, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz,
ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.4, 172.9, 170.9, 167.0, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.35−7.30 (m,
142.5, 134.4, 134.3, 134.1, 129.9, 129.7, 129.5, 128.9, 127.9, 127.8, 5H), 7.09 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 5.38−5.30 (m,
127.3, 125.9, 124.5 (q, 1JC−F = −280.7 Hz), 115.4, 111.0, 73.7, 72.6, 2H), 4.62−4.56 (m, 1H), 4.43−4.35 (m, 2H), 4.27−4.19 (m, 1H),
62.6, 60.4 (q, 2JC−F = 32.9 Hz), 51.7, 44.7, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 2.92 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR
MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.69 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.5, 173.7, 170.4, 166.7, 147.3, 143.0, 142.2,
C30H24BrF3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 690.0338, found 690.0346. 134.3, 131.6, 129.9, 129.5, 128.5, 127.7, 127.2, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F =
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 2,4″-Dioxo-3″-phenyl-2″-thioxo-5′- −280.7 Hz), 123.9, 123.1, 123.0, 108.8, 73.7, 73.6, 62.5, 59.9 (q, 2JC−F
(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli- = 33.0 Hz), 50.8, 43.8, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ
dine]-4′-carboxylate (3ai). 3ai was obtained as a light yellow solid −71.66 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H24F3N4O6S2 [M + H]+
(44.3 mg, 85% yield), mp 95−98 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak IC, n- 657.1084, found 657.1100.
hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection at 254 (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-(4-Bromobenzyl)-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-
nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 9.4 min (minor), tR = 19.1 min 2″-thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-
(major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 7.3 min (minor), tR = 6.4 min 3′,5″-thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3am). 3am was obtained as a
(major); 97:3 dr, 89% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = light yellow solid (60.1 mg, 87% yield), mp 109−112 °C. HPLC
−133.8 (c 0.55, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.07 (s, (Daicel Chiralpak ADH, n-hexane:2-propanol = 80:20, flow rate 1.0
1H), 7.69 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (s, 3H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), mL/min, detection at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 13.2 min
7.07 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 5.24 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, (minor), tR = 37.2 min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 9.2 min
1H), 4.57−4.52 (m, 1H), 4.40−4.30 (m, 1H), 4.28−4.20 (m, 1H), (minor), tR = 11.3 min (major); 98:2 dr, 92% ee for the major
diastereoisomer. [α]20D = −199.3 (c 2.06, CH2Cl2). H NMR (400
1
2.79 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR
(176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.0, 175.3, 170.8, 167.0, 141.4, 134.6, 131.5, MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.74 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H),
129.8, 129.5, 127.9, 127.2, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.7 Hz), 123.6, 122.7, 7.36 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.6 Hz,
110.2, 73.8, 73.4, 62.5, 60.0 (q, 1JC−F = 32.5 Hz), 51.3, 14.2 ppm. 19F 2H), 7.07 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.66−6.61 (m, 3H), 5.29 (d, J = 9.6 Hz,
NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.41 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd 1H), 5.22 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.61−4.57 (m, 1H), 4.42−4.34 (m,
for C23H19F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 522.0764, found 522.0759. 1H), 4.27−4.19 (m, 2H), 2.88 (br s, 1H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H)
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Methyl-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-2″-thioxo- ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.7, 173.5, 170.5, 166.9,
5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli- 143.3, 134.4, 133.8, 131.8, 131.5, 129.8, 129.5, 129.4, 127.8, 126.9,
dine]-4′-carboxylate (3aj). 3aj was obtained as a light yellow solid 124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.6 Hz), 123.3, 122.9, 121.6, 109.2, 73.7, 73.4,
(49.3 mg, 92% yield), mp 160−162 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak 62.5, 60.1 (q, 2JC−F = 32.9 Hz), 51.0, 44.0, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376
ADH, n-hexane:2-propanol = 70:30, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.68 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
at 254 nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 9.0 min (minor), tR = 36.1 C30H24BrF3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 690.0338, found 690.0337.
min (major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 5.2 min (minor), tR = 7.0 Synthetic Transformation of 3aa. To a solution of compound
min (major); 99:1 dr, 89% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D = 3aa (61.2 mg, 0.10 mmol) in acetic acid (1.0 mL) was added
−181.9 (c 2.11, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.72 (d, J = chromium trioxide (30.0 mg, 0.30 mmol) in three portions over 30
7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (s, 4H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 7.2 min at room temperature. The solution was stirred at 50 °C for 12 h.
Hz, 3H), 5.26 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (br s, 1H), 4.39−4.31 (m, The mixture was treated with H2O (10 mL) and extracted with
1H), 4.27−4.19 (m, 1H), 3.11 (s, 3H), 2.86 (s, 1H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.2 EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed
Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.1, 173.4, 170.8, with brine and dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed
167.0, 144.2, 134.6, 131.4, 129.8, 129.5, 127.8, 126.7, 124.6 (q, 1JC−F under vacuum. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography
= −280.6 Hz), 123.3, 122.6, 108.3, 73.5, 73.4, 62.5, 60.1 (q, 2JC−F = to yield the desired product 4.
32.8 Hz), 51.4, 20.5, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Benzyl-2,2″,4″-trioxo-3″-phenyl-5′-
−71.33 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C24H21F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ (trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli-
536.0920, found 536.0904. dine]-4′-carboxylate (4). 4 was obtained as a light yellow solid (51.8
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-Allyl-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-2″-thioxo-5′- mg, 87% yield), mp 88−91 °C. [α]20 D = −95.8 (c 1.14, CH2Cl2). H
1

(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″-thiazoli- NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.73 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.39−7.32 (m,
dine]-4′-carboxylate (3ak). 3ak was obtained as a light yellow solid 3H), 7.30−7.22 (m, 3H), 7.19 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,
(55.0 mg, 98% yield), mp 83−86 °C. HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak IC, n- 2H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.69 (d, J = 8.0
hexane:2-propanol = 85:15, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, detection at 254 Hz, 1H), 5.32 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.63−
nm): major diastereoisomer, tR = 8.2 min (minor), tR = 9.9 min 4.54 (m, 1H), 4.42 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.38−4.32 (m, 1H), 4.30−
(major); minor diastereoisomer, tR = 5.2 min (minor), tR = 6.8 min 4.23 (m, 1H), 2.87 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H) ppm.
(major); 98:2 dr, 89% ee for the major diastereoisomer. [α]20 D =
13
C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.7, 169.1, 167.1, 166.7, 143.7,
−180.3 (c 1.95, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.73 (d, J = 134.9, 132.2, 131.4, 129.4, 129.3, 128.7, 127.7, 127.5, 127.0, 126.9,
7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42−7.36 (m, 4H), 7.09 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.84−6.80 124.7 (q, 1JC−F = −280.4 Hz), 123.7, 122.6, 109.5, 73.7, 71.9, 62.4,
(m, 3H), 5.69−5.60 (m, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 5.15 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 60.2 (q, 2JC−F = 32.7 Hz), 51.6, 44.6, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 MHz,
5.10 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.61−4.55 (m, 1H), 4.49 (dd, J1 = 16.4 Hz, CDCl3): δ −71.54 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H25F3N3O5S
J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.39−4.31 (m, 1H), 4.27−4.19 (m, 1H), 4.00 (dd, [M + H]+ 596.1462, found 596.1462.


J1 = 16.0 Hz, J2 = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.28 (t, J =
7.2 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.0, 172.9, ASSOCIATED CONTENT
170.8, 167.1, 143.4, 134.6, 131.3, 130.8, 129.8, 129.4, 127.9, 126.6,
124.6 (q, 1JC−F = −280.5 Hz), 123.6, 122.7, 118.2, 109.2, 73.8, 73.4, *
S Supporting Information
62.5, 60.4 (q, 2JC−F = 32.6 Hz), 51.2, 42.8, 14.2 ppm. 19F NMR (376 The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
MHz, CDCl3): δ −71.59 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245.
C26H23F3N3O4S2 [M + H]+ 562.1077, found 562.1053. 1
(3S,3′R,4′S,5′S)-Ethyl 1-(4-Nitrobenzyl)-2,4″-dioxo-3″-phenyl-2″- H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectra, HPLC chromatograms of
thioxo-5′-(trifluoromethyl)dispiro[indoline-3,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,5″- the products, and X-ray crystallographic data of 3na
thiazolidine]-4′-carboxylate (3al). 3al was obtained as a light yellow
solid (53.9 mg, 82% yield), mp 110−113 °C. HPLC (Daicel (PDF)
Chiralpak IB, n-hexane:2-propanol = 70:30, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, X-ray crystallographic data of 3na (CIF)
9287 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245
J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

■ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
2006, 62, 779−828. (c) Kotha, S.; Deb, A. C.; Lahiri, K.; Manivannan,
E. Selected synthetic strategies to spirocyclics. Synthesis 2009, 2009,
165−193.
*E-mail: dudm@bit.edu.cn. (5) (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Vourloumis, D.; Winssinger, N.; Baran, P. S.
ORCID The Art and Science of Total Synthesis at the Dawn of the Twenty-
Da-Ming Du: 0000-0002-9924-5117 First Century. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 44−122; Der stand der
totalsynthese zu beginn des 21. jahrhunderts. Angew. Chem. 2000,
Notes 112, 46−126. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Edmonds, D. J.; Bulger, P. G.
The authors declare no competing financial interest. Cascade reactions in total synthesis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,

■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural
7134−7186; Kaskadenreaktionen in der Totalsynthese. Angew. Chem.
2006, 118, 7292−7344. (c) Li, J. W. H.; Vederas, J. C. Drug discovery
and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier? Science
2009, 325, 161−165. (d) Gaich, T.; Baran, P. S. Aiming for the ideal
Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21272024). We also synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 4657−4673.
thank the Analysis & Testing Center of the Beijing Institute of (6) Alonso, C.; Martinez de Marigorta, E.; Rubiales, G.; Palacios, F.
Technology for the measurement of NMR and mass Carbon trifluoromethylation reactions of hydrocarbon derivatives and
spectrometry. heteroarenes. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1847−1935.

■ REFERENCES
(1) (a) Michael, J. P. Indolizidine and quinolizidine alkaloids. Nat.
(7) For examples on organofluorine compounds, see: (a) Isanbor,
C.; O’Hagan, D. Fluorine in medicinal chemistry: A review of anti-
cancer agents. J. Fluorine Chem. 2006, 127, 303−319. (b) Dal Pozzo,
A.; Ni, M.; Muzi, L.; de Castiglione, R.; Mondelli, R.; Mazzini, S.;
Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 139−165. (b) Vitaku, E.; Smith, D. T.;
Njardarson, J. T. Analysis of the structural diversity, substitution Penco, S.; Pisano, C.; Castorina, M.; Giannini, G. Incorporation of the
patterns, and frequency of nitrogen heterocycles among US FDA Unusual Cα-Fluoroalkylamino Acids into Cyclopeptides: Synthesis of
approved pharmaceuticals: miniperspective. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, Arginine-Glycine-Aspartate (RGD) Analogues and Study of Their
10257−10274. Conformational and Biological Behavior. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49,
(2) For examples, see: (a) Marti, C.; Carreira, E. M. Construction of 1808−1817. (c) Smits, R.; Cadicamo, C. D.; Burger, K.; Koksch, B.
Spiro [pyrrolidine-3,3′-oxindoles]- Recent Applications to the Syn- Synthetic strategies to α-trifluoromethyl and α-difluoromethyl
thesis of Oxindole Alkaloids. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2003, 2209− substituted α-amino acids. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1727−1739.
2219. (b) Galliford, C. V.; Scheidt, K. A. Natürliche Pyrrolidinylspir- (d) O’Shea, P. D.; Chen, C. Y.; Gauvreau, D.; Gosselin, F.; Hughes,
ooxindole als Vorlagen für die Entwicklung medizinischer Wirkstoffe. G.; Nadeau, C.; Volante, R. P. A practical enantioselective synthesis of
Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 8902−8912; Pyrrolidinyl-Spirooxindole Odanacatib, a potent cathepsin K inhibitor, via triflate displacement of
Natural Products as Inspirations for the Development of Potential an α-trifluoromethylbenzyl triflate. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1605−
Therapeutic Agents. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8748−8758. 1610. (e) Nie, J.; Guo, H. C.; Cahard, D.; Ma, J. A. Asymmetric
(c) Badillo, J. J.; Hanhan, N. V.; Franz, A. K. Enantioselective construction of stereogenic carbon centers featuring a trifluoromethyl
synthesis of substituted oxindoles and spirooxindoles with applica- group from prochiral trifluoromethylated substrates. Chem. Rev. 2011,
tions in drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2010, 13, 111, 455−529. (f) Wang, J.; Sánchez-Roselló, M.; Aceña, J. L.; del
758−776. (d) Zhou, F.; Liu, Y. L.; Zhou, J. Catalytic Asymmetric Pozo, C.; Sorochinsky, A. E.; Fustero, S.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Liu, H.
Synthesis of Oxindoles Bearing a Tetrasubstituted Stereocenter at the Fluorine in pharmaceutical industry: fluorine-containing drugs
C-3 Position. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1381−1407. (e) Rios, R. introduced to the market in the last decade (2001−2011). Chem.
Enantioselective methodologies for the synthesis of spiro compounds. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432−2506. (g) Cheng, G.; Wu, Q.; Shang, Z.; Liang,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1060−1074. (f) Hong, L.; Wang, R. Recent X.; Lin, X. Stereoselective Transformations of α-Trifluoromethylated
Advances in Asymmetric Organocatalytic Construction of 3,3′- Ketoximes to Optically Active Amines by Enzyme-Nanometal
Spirocyclic Oxindoles. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1023−1052. Cocatalysis: Synthesis of (S)-Inhibitor of Phenylethanolamine N-
(g) Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Wan, J. Recent Advances in Diversity Oriented Methyltransferase. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 2129−2133. (h) Yang, X.;
Synthesis through Isatin-based Multicomponent Reactions. Asian J. Chen, Z.; Cai, Y.; Huang, Y. Y.; Shibata, N. An aza-Michael addition
Org. Chem. 2013, 2, 374−386. (h) Cheng, D.; Ishihara, Y.; Tan, B.; protocol to fluoroalkylated β-amino acid derivatives and enantiopure
Barbas, C. F., III Organocatalytic asymmetric assembly reactions: trifluoromethylated N-heterocycles. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 4530−
synthesis of spirooxindoles via organocascade strategies. ACS Catal. 4534.
2014, 4, 743−762. (8) Müller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Fluorine in pharmaceuticals:
(3) (a) Edmondson, S.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Sepp-Lorenzino, L.; looking beyond intuition. Science 2007, 317, 1881−1886.
Rosen, N. Total synthesis of spirotryprostatin A, leading to the (9) (a) Dolbier, W. R., Jr Fluorine chemistry at the millennium. J.
discovery of some biologically promising analogues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. Fluorine Chem. 2005, 126, 157−163. (b) Kirk, K. L. Fluorination in
1999, 121, 2147−2155. (b) Boldi, A. M. Libraries from natural medicinal chemistry: methods, strategies, and recent developments.
product-like scaffolds. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 281−286. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 305−321. (c) Zhu, W.; Wang, J.;
(c) Ding, K.; Lu, Y.; Nikolovska-Coleska, Z.; Qiu, S.; Ding, Y.; Gao, Wang, S.; Gu, Z.; Aceña, J. L.; Izawa, K.; Liu, H.; Soloshonok, V. A.
W.; Stuckey, J.; Krajewski, K.; Roller, P. P.; Tomita, Y.; Parrish, D. A.; Recent advances in the trifluoromethylation methodology and new
Deschamps, J. R.; Wang, S. Structure-based design of potent non- CF3-containing drugs. J. Fluorine Chem. 2014, 167, 37−54.
peptide MDM2 inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10130− (10) (a) Liang, T.; Neumann, C. N.; Ritter, T. Introduction of
10131. (d) Shangary, S.; Qin, D.; McEachern, D.; Liu, M.; Miller, R. Fluorine and Fluorine-Containing Functional Groups. Angew. Chem.,
S.; Qiu, S.; Nikolovska-Coleska, Z.; Ding, K.; Wang, G.; Chen, J.; Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 8214−8264; Einfü hrung von Fluor und
Bernard, D.; Zhang, J.; Lu, Y.; Gu, Q.; Shah, R. B.; Pienta, K. J.; Ling, fluorhaltigen funktionellen Gruppen. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125,
X.; Kang, S.; Guo, M.; Sun, Y.; Yang, D.; Wang, S. Temporal 8372−8423. (b) Besset, T.; Poisson, T.; Pannecoucke, X. Recent
activation of p53 by a specific MDM2 inhibitor is selectively toxic to Progress in Direct Introduction of Fluorinated Groups on Alkenes
tumors and leads to complete tumor growth inhibition. Proc. Natl. and Alkynes by Means of C−H Bond Functionalization. Chem. - Eur.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 3933−3938. J. 2014, 20, 16830−16845. (c) Egami, H.; Sodeoka, M. Trifluor-
(4) For examples on spirocyclic compounds, see: (a) Sannigrahi, M. omethylation of alkenes with concomitant introduction of additional
Stereocontrolled synthesis of spirocyclics. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, functional groups. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 8294−8308;
9007−9071. (b) Pradhan, R.; Patra, M.; Behera, A. K.; Mishra, B. K.; Trifluormethylierung von Alkenen unter gleichzeitiger Einführung
Behera, R. K. A synthon approach to spiro compounds. Tetrahedron weiterer funktioneller Gruppen. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 8434−8449.

9288 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

(d) Merino, E.; Nevado, C. Addition of CF3 across unsaturated (15) For selected examples, see: (a) Yang, W.; Du, D. M. Cinchona-
moieties: a powerful functionalization tool. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, based squaramide-catalysed cascade aza-Michael-Michael addition:
6598−6608. enantioselective construction of functionalized spirooxindole tetrahy-
(11) (a) Brown, F. C. 4-Thiazolidinones. Chem. Rev. 1961, 61, 463− droquinolines. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8842−8844. (b) Li, J. H.;
521. (b) Lesyk, R. B.; Zimenkovsky, B. S. 4-Thiazolidones: Feng, T. F.; Du, D. M. Construction of spirocyclopropane-linked
centenarian history, current status and perspectives for modern heterocycles containing both pyrazolones and oxindoles through
organic and medicinal chemistry. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 1547− Michael/alkylation cascade reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80 (22),
1577. (c) Mendgen, T.; Steuer, C.; Klein, C. D. Privileged scaffolds or 11369−11377. (c) Liu, L.; Zhao, B. L.; Du, D. M. Organocatalytic
promiscuous binders: a comparative study on rhodanines and related Asymmetric Michael/Cyclization Cascade Reaction of 3-Isothiocya-
heterocycles in medicinal chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 743− nato Oxindoles with Maleimides for the Efficient Construction of
753. Pyrrolidonyl Spirooxindoles. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 2016, 4711−
(12) For selected examples, see: (a) Singh, S. P.; Parmar, S. S.; 4718. (d) Zhao, B. L.; Du, D. M. Squaramide-Catalyzed
Raman, K.; Stenberg, V. I. Chemistry and biological activity of Enantioselective Cascade Approach to Bispirooxindoles with Multiple
thiazolidinones. Chem. Rev. 1981, 81, 175−203. (b) Nomura, M.; Stereocenters. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 3992−3998. (e) Lin, Y.;
Kinoshita, S.; Satoh, H.; Maeda, T.; Murakami, K.; Tsunoda, M.; Liu, L.; Du, D. M. Squaramide-catalyzed asymmetric Michael/
Miyachi, H.; Awano, K. (3-Substituted benzyl) thiazolidine-2, 4- cyclization cascade reaction of 3-isothiocyanato oxindoles with
diones as structurally new antihyperglycemic agents. Bioorg. Med. chalcones for synthesis of pyrrolidinyl spirooxindoles. Org. Chem.
Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 533−538. (c) Lugovskoy, A. A.; Degterev, A. I.; Front. 2017, 4, 1229−1238.
Fahmy, A. F.; Zhou, P.; Gross, J. D.; Yuan, J.; Wagner, G. A novel (16) CCDC 1843248 (for 3na) contain the supplementary
approach for characterizing protein ligand complexes: molecular basis crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free
for specificity of small-molecule Bcl-2 inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.
2002, 124, 1234−1240. (d) Soltero-Higgin, M.; Carlson, E. E.; (17) (a) Martínez, J. I.; Villar, L.; Uria, U.; Carrillo, L.; Reyes, E.;
Phillips, J. H.; Kiessling, L. L. Identification of inhibitors for UDP- Vicario, J. L. Bifunctional squaramide catalysts with the same absolute
galactopyranose mutase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10532−10533. chirality for the diastereodivergent access to densely functionalised
(e) Carlson, E. E.; May, J. F.; Kiessling, L. L. Chemical probes of cyclohexanes through enantioselective domino reactions. synthesis
UDP-galactopyranose mutase. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13, 825−837. and mechanistic studies. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3627−3648.
(f) Murugan, R.; Anbazhagan, S.; Narayanan, S. S. Synthesis and in (b) Sun, Q. T.; Li, X. Y.; Su, J. H.; Zhao, L.; Ma, M. X.; Zhu, Y. Y.;
vivo antidiabetic activity of novel dispiropyrrolidines through [3 + 2] Zhao, Y. Y.; Zhu, R. R.; Yan, W. J.; Wang, K. R.; Wang, R. The
cycloaddition reactions with thiazolidinedione and rhodanine Squaramide-Catalyzed 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of Nitroalkenes
derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 3272−3279. (g) Tomasic, with N-2,2,2-Trifluoroethylisatin Ketimines: An Approach for the
T.; Masic, L. P. Rhodanine as a privileged scaffold in drug discovery. Synthesis of 5′-Trifluoromethyl-spiro[pyrrolidine-3,2’-oxindoles].
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 3187−3196. (c) Wang, Z. H.; Wu, Z.
Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 1596−1629. (h) Ponnuchamy, S.;
J.; Yue, D. F.; Hu, W. F.; Zhang, X. M.; Xu, X. Y.; Yuan, W. C.
Sumesh, R. V.; Kumar, R. R. Regioselective synthesis of novel dispiro
Organocatalytic asymmetric [3 + 2] cycloaddition of N-2,2,2-
oxindole−pyrrolizine−thiazolidine-2,4-dione hybrids. Tetrahedron
trifluoroethylisatin ketimines with 3-alkenyl-5-arylfuran-2(3H)-ones.
Lett. 2015, 56, 4374−4376.
Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11708−11711. (d) Guo, J.; Wong, M. W.
(13) For examples on chiral thiazolidinone derivatives, see: (a) Wu,
Cinchona Alkaloid-Squaramide Catalyzed Sulfa-Michael Addition
W. B.; Huang, H. C.; Yuan, X. Q.; Zhu, K. L.; Ye, J. X. Asymmetric
Reaction: Mode of Bifunctional Activation and Origin of Stereo-
construction of spirocyclohexanonerhodanines catalyzed by simple
induction. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 4362−4368. (e) Grayson, M. N.
diamine derived from chiral tert-leucine. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
Mechanism and Origins of Stereoselectivity in the Cinchona
9180−9182. (b) Zhu, K. L.; Huang, H. C.; Wu, W. B.; Wei, Y.; Ye, J. Thiourea-and Squaramide-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition
X. Aminocatalyzed asymmetric Diels-Alder reaction of 2,4-dienals and of Nitroalkanes to Enones. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 4396−4401.
rhodanine/hydantoin derivatives. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2157− (f) Huang, W. J.; Chen, Q.; Lin, N.; Long, X. W.; Pan, W. G.; Xiong,
2159. (c) Han, B.; Huang, W.; Ren, W.; He, G.; Wang, J. H.; Peng, C. Y. S.; Weng, J.; Lu, G. Asymmetric synthesis of trifluoromethyl-
Asymmetric Synthesis of Cyclohexane-Fused Drug-Like Spirocyclic substituted 3,3′-pyrrolidinyl-dispirooxindoles through organocatalytic
Scaffolds Containing Six Contiguous Stereogenic Centers via 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions. Org. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 472−
Organocatalytic Cascade Reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 482. (g) Zhi, Y.; Zhao, K.; von Essen, C.; Rissanen, K.; Enders, D.
561−568. (d) Yang, W. L.; Tang, F. F.; He, F. S.; Li, C. Y.; Yu, X.; Thiourea-catalyzed domino Michael-Mannich [3 + 2] cycloadditions:
Deng, W. P. Asymmetric Construction of Spirocyclic Pyrrolidine- A strategy for the asymmetric synthesis of 3,3′-pyrrolidinyl-
thia(oxa)zolidinediones via N, O-Ligand/Cu(I) Catalyzed 1,3- dispirooxindoles. Synlett 2017, 28, 2876−2880. (h) Wang, P.; Gao,
Dipolar Cycloaddition of Azomethine Ylides with 5-Alkylidene Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y. Unveiling Mechanism of a Quinine-
Thia(oxa)zolidine-2,4-diones. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4822−4825. Squaramide Catalyzed Enantioselective Aza-Friedel-Crafts Reaction
(14) For examples on N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)isatin ketimines, see: between Cyclic Trifluoromethyl Ketimine and Naphthol: A DFT
(a) Ma, M. X.; Zhu, Y. Y.; Sun, Q. T.; Li, X. Y.; Su, J. H.; Zhao, L.; Study. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 13109−13114.
Zhao, Y. Y.; Qiu, S.; Yan, W. J.; Wang, K. R.; Wang, R. The (18) (a) Shailendra, T.; Singh, K. P.; Akhilesh, K.; Poonam, P.;
asymmetric synthesis of CF3-containing spiro [pyrrolidin-3,2’oxin- Ansari, N. F. Synthesis and pesticidal activities of some 3,5-
dole] through the organocatalytic 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction. disubstituted furothiazole-2-thiones. J. Appl. Chem. (Lumami, India)
Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8789−8792. (b) Li, X. Y.; Su, J. H.; Liu, Z. 2014, 3, 2372−2377. (b) Jin, S.; Tagliazucchi, M.; Son, H. J.; Harris,
R. J.; Zhu, Y. Y.; Dong, Z. H.; Qiu, S.; Wang, J. Y.; Lin, L.; Shen, Z. R. D.; Aruda, K. O.; Weinberg, D. J.; Nepomnyashchii, A. B.; Farha,
Q.; Yan, W. J.; Wang, K. R.; Wang, K. Synthesis of Chiral α- O. K.; Hupp, J. T.; Weiss, E. A. Enhancement of the yield of
Trifluoromethylamines with 2,2,2-Trifluoroethylamine as a “Building photoinduced charge separation in zinc porphyrin−quantum dot
Block. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 956−959. (c) Ponce, A.; Alonso, I.; Adrio, complexes by a bis (dithiocarbamate) linkage. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015,
J.; Carretero, J. C. Stereoselective Ag-Catalyzed 1,3-Dipolar Cyclo- 119, 5195−5202. (c) Ü ngören, Ş . H.; Albayrak, S.; Günay, A.;
addition of Activated Trifluoromethyl-Substituted Azomethine Ylides. Yurtseven, L.; Yurttaş, N. A new method for the preparation of 5-
Chem. - Eur. J. 2016, 22, 4952−4959. (d) Gao, Y. N.; Shi, M. acylidene and 5-imino substituted rhodanine derivatives and their
Enantioselective Synthesis of Isatin-Derived α-(Trifluoromethyl) antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 4312−
imine Derivatives: Phosphine-Catalyzed γ-Addition of α-(Trifluor- 4323.
omethyl) imines and Allenoates. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, (19) (a) Zhu, Y.; Malerich, J. P.; Rawal, V. H. Squaramide-Catalyzed
1552−1560. Enantioselective Michael Addition of Diphenyl Phosphite to Nitro-

9289 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article

alkenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 153−156; Squaramide-


Catalyzed Enantioselective Michael Addition of Diphenyl Phosphite
to Nitroalkenes. Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 157−160. (b) Yang, W.;
Du, D. M. Highly enantioselective Michael addition of nitroalkanes to
chalcones using chiral squaramides as hydrogen bonding organo-
catalysts. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5450−5453. (c) Yang, W.; Du, D. M.
Chiral Squaramide-Catalyzed Highly Enantioselective Michael
Addition of 2-Hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinones to Nitroalkenes. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2011, 353 (8), 1241−1246.

9290 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01245


J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9278−9290

You might also like