Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Both these are Fundamental Rights and Article 26 provides that all existing laws that
are inconsistent with Fundamental Rights are void, and the State shall not make any
law that is inconsistent with these rights. The provisions of a number of international
human rights instruments that Bangladesh has agreed to uphold such as the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities concretize its commitment to
protecting access to justice further.
Section 89A and 89C of the CPC has provided for court-annexed ADR. After filing
of the written statement if all the contesting parties are present in the court it shall
adjourn the hearing of the suit and order to mediate to resolve the dispute. Through
this section of the CPC, it has been made mandatory to resolve the dispute initially by
ADR. Again mediation under CPC is meant as informal, nonbinding and consensual
dispute resolution process where the mediator shall only aid without straitening any
terms of the dispute. If we closely examine these sections it stated that, it is
obligatory for the court to resolve the dispute through mediation.
Higher expense is responsible for not having access to justice. Our legal services are
not even available in the remote village areas.
Case study
5th Senior Assistant Judge Court, Chittagong
Eviction suit (Suit No.259/08)
This case resolved through mediation by the 5th Assistant Judge court who was
appointed as a mediator he also made a report on it.
Fact of the Case
The plaintiff’s case, in short is that the scheduled land was obtained by the plaintiff
by way of sale. It was acquired by CNB from the holders under R.S Khatian and
proper compensation was given to them by the government. One Mofizur Rahman
obtained the scheduled land vide registered settlement deed 21611 dated 27.12.82 as
a landless distressed person. That Mofizur Rahman sold the land to Abdul Hakim,
S/O kala Mia vide registered deed no 3152 dated 10. 02.83. Subsequently that Abdul
hakim sold that land to the plaintiff vide registered deed no 4386 dated 03.03.83. The
plaintiff filed suit for mutation and his name was recorded as the owner of the land in
the B.S khatian. The plaintiff paid all the rent and revenues incurred time to time to
the government. The defendants got permission to stay in the scheduled land from
the plaintiff for two months and promised to vacate the premise thereafter. Defendant
no. 2-4 entered into the scheduled premise as the relative of defendant no.1, yet again
the plaintiff came to know from a reliable source that the defendant no. 2-4 were no.1
relative of defendant no.1 and they paid money to defendant no1 to stay therein from
February. The plaintiff was willing to erect multistoried building demolishing old
building thus the plaintiff requested the defendants to vacate the premise but the
defendants failed to vacate that premise. Therefore, the plaintiff went to the scheduled
land on 25. 07.08 and asked the defendant when they would vacate the premise. But
the defendants refused to fix any specific time and the defendants entered into the
scheduled premise fraudulently trying to obstruct peaceful possession of the land by
the plaintiff.
The defendants’ case in short is that the scheduled land is under defendants’ peaceful
possession without any interruption beyond the prescribed period of limitation so far,
under the R.S khatian ,one Mofizur Rahman holds the disputed land and erected a
semi –pacca building therein. The defendants are in possession of that premise as
monthly rated tenant. That Mofizur Rahman sold the scheduled land to Abdul
Hakim ,S/O, kala Mia vide Registered deed no 3152 dated 10.02.83,however Mofizur
Rahman accepted the premise under the possession of defendants as he was highly
pleased with the amicable manner of the defendants. Abdul Hakim never interrupted
peaceful possession of the defendants. He sold the scheduled land to the plaintiff
excepting the premise under the possession of the defendants. The plaintiff purchased
the land being aware of the fact, thus the defendants reconstructed the old deplorable
house under their possession. They never sought any permission from the plaintiff.
After filing of the suit it was mediated by the 5th Assistant Judge court since he was a
mediator in this case. And it was agreed that the defendant no 2, 3 would vacate the
premise within 60 days.
Terms of Agreement
Defendants shall have no objection upon decree which is passed as per claim
sought by plaintiff.
They shall vacate the premise and remove structures etc therein.
If they fail to vacate the scheduled premise as agreed above the plaintiff shall be
entitled to decree for possession by the court.
Terms of ADR shall be considered as part of decree
Barriers for access to justice:
the courts are primarily located in urban areas, people living in rural areas are
particularly disadvantaged when seeking legal assistance.
Masrur Salekin, an Additional District and Sessions Judge in Bangladesh.
He told me: ‘women victims of various sexual offences feel uncomfortable
and unsafe in lodging their complaints. The male-dominated state mechanism
and the method of medical examination is an addition to the other obstacles
in accessing justice. Also, the fear of courts, unregulated fees of lawyers,
outdated laws, and procedures are also acting as barriers.’
The role or lawyers are the prominent part to ensure access to justice to
resolve backlog of cases as in terms complying constitutional mandate to
ensure the rule of law. As it is the ethical obligation to the legal
professionals / advocates not to be money oriented in their profession
rather try to settle the dispute outside the court. And help the distress to
achieve legal remedy in a efficient way as well as ensuring the right
based humanitarian principle.