Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In the simplest possible terms, the biblical doctrine of penal substitution holds that Jesus’ sacrifice on
the cross takes the place of the punishment we ought to suffer for our sins. As a result, God’s justice is
satisfied, and those who accept Christ can be forgiven and reconciled to God.
According to the doctrine of penal substitution, God’s perfect justice demands some form of atonement
for sin. Humanity is depraved, to such an extent that we are spiritually dead and incapable of atoning
for sin in any way (Ephesians 2:1). Penal substitution means Jesus’ death on the cross propitiated, or
satisfied, God’s requirement for justice. God’s mercy allows Jesus to take the punishment we deserve
for our sins. As a result, Jesus’ sacrifice serves as a substitute for anyone who accepts it. In a very
direct sense, Jesus is exchanged for us as the recipient of sin’s penalty.
In Genesis 3:21, God uses animal skins to cover the naked Adam and Eve. This is the first reference to
a death (in this case, an animal’s) being used to cover (atone for) sin. In Exodus 12:13, God’s Spirit
“passes over” the homes that are covered (atoned) by the blood of the sacrifice. God requires blood for
atonement in Exodus 29:41–42. The description of Messiah in Isaiah 53:4–6 says His suffering is
meant to heal our wounds. The fact that the Messiah was to be “crushed for our iniquities” (verse 5) is
a direct reference to penal substitution.
During and after Jesus’ ministry, penal substitution is further clarified. Jesus claims to be the “good
shepherd” who lays down His life for the sheep in John 10:10. Paul, in Romans 3:25–26, explains that
we have the righteousness of Christ because of the sacrifice of Christ. In 2 Corinthians 5:21, he says
that the sinless Christ took on our sins. Hebrews 9:26 says that our sins were removed by the sacrifice
of Christ. First Peter 3:18 plainly teaches that the righteous was substituted for the unrighteous.
In penal substitution, the penalty that is due to us for our transgression is paid by a substitute, namely,
Jesus Christ. The principle of penal substitution undergirds the old covenant sacrificial system. God
told Adam that the penalty for sin was death (Gen. 2:16–17). In the old covenant sacrifices, the people
placed their hands on the sacrificial animals, thereby identifying with them, and then the animals were
put to death (see Lev. 4). This depicted the transfer of sin and guilt from the sinner to the substitute.
The sinner could live because the animal died in the sinner’s place, bearing the punishment the sinner
deserved.
But since “it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins” (Heb. 10:4), the animal
sacrifices of the old covenant did not effect true atonement. They were types and shadows that pointed
to the only true atoning sacrifice, which was offered once for all on Calvary by our Lord and Savior
Jesus Christ (vv. 5–18). This final and only effective act of penal substitution was foreshadowed by the
entire old covenant sacrificial system and explicitly predicted in Isaiah 53. The prophet tells us that
God laid on the Suffering Servant (Christ) our iniquity (Isa. 53:6)—our sin was transferred to Him in
the atonement. He was pierced and crushed for our iniquities, “cut off out of the land of the living . . .
for the transgression of my people” (vv. 4–5, 8). In other words, Christ endured the punishment His
people deserve in their place. If we trust in Him alone for salvation, we need not fear eternal death, for
Jesus bore our sin on the cross so that we will not receive everlasting judgment (v. 10; John 3:16).
⁹ Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from
the wrath of God.
1 Peter 2:24
1 John 4:10
1 Corinthians 1:4-10
Jeremiah 33:8
In penal substitution, the penalty that is due to us for our transgression is paid by a substitute, namely,
Jesus Christ. The principle of penal substitution undergirds the old covenant sacrificial system. God
told Adam that the penalty for sin was death (Gen. 2:16–17). In the old covenant sacrifices, the people
placed their hands on the sacrificial animals, thereby identifying with them, and then the animals were
put to death (see Lev. 4). This depicted the transfer of sin and guilt from the sinner to the substitute.
The sinner could live because the animal died in the sinner’s place, bearing the punishment the sinner
deserved.
But since “it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins” (Heb. 10:4), the animal
sacrifices of the old covenant did not effect true atonement. They were types and shadows that pointed
to the only true atoning sacrifice, which was offered once for all on Calvary by our Lord and Savior
Jesus Christ (vv. 5–18). This final and only effective act of penal substitution was foreshadowed by the
entire old covenant sacrificial system and explicitly predicted in Isaiah 53. The prophet tells us that
God laid on the Suffering Servant (Christ) our iniquity (Isa. 53:6)—our sin was transferred to Him in
the atonement. He was pierced and crushed for our iniquities, “cut off out of the land of the living . . .
for the transgression of my people” (vv. 4–5, 8). In other words, Christ endured the punishment His
people deserve in their place. If we trust in Him alone for salvation, we need not fear eternal death, for
Jesus bore our sin on the cross so that we will not receive everlasting judgment (v. 10; John 3:16).
1. Jesus as the “Ransom for Many”
“For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a
ransom for many.” – Mark 10:45 (cf. Matthew 10:28)
This prophetic statement that Jesus makes about himself has clear allusions to the Suffering Servant of
Isaiah 53. The idea that Christ came as a servant hearkens back to the Servant Songs of Isaiah. Mark
has already referenced these songs in his gospel and so this would be in continuing with that theme.
And since the language used in Mark 10:45 closely resembles the language used in Isaiah 53:12
(especially in the Greek versions of these two verses), the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53 is in view. It
has been “almost universally assumed that [Mark] 10:45 derived from the suffering of the servant in
Isaiah 53:10-12.”[1] Thus, in Mark 10:45, Jesus identifies himself as the one who bore our griefs
(53:4), carried our sorrows (53:4), was pierced for our transgressions (53:5), was crushed for our
iniquities (53:5), had the iniquity of us all laid on him (53:6), made an offering for guilt (53:10), bore
our iniquities (53:11), was numbered with the transgressors (53:12), and bore the sin of many (53:12).
He is the Suffering Servant who was smitten by God (53:4), crushed by the LORD (53:10), and was put
to grief by him (53:10). The penal substitutionary sacrifice of Jesus is clearly laid out in Isaiah 53.
Moreover, the concept of Jesus dying as a ransom for many also reinforces the thought of substitution.
A ransom is the payment made to release someone from slavery. Thus, Jesus gives his life as payment
for our freedom. His death paid the penalty for our sins. So although the word “ransom” is not found
in Isaiah 53, it still provides “a perfect summary of the servant’s vicarious death on behalf of many
others.”[2]
Jesus is called “the Lamb of God” twice in John 1. This phrase is jam-packed with Old Testament
themes of substitution and sacrifice. When we consider that Jesus is “the Lamb of God”, we are
reminded of when Abraham told Isaac that God would provide a substitute lamb for the sacrifice
(Genesis 22:8). We remember the Passover lamb that was sacrificed so that God would spare the lives
of his people (Exodus 12:1-13). We recall the lamb led to the slaughter in Isaiah 53:7 (again, a
reference to the Suffering Servant) who was stricken for the transgressions of his people (Isaiah 53:8).
And we also think of the lamb without blemish that God required to be sacrificed as a sin offering for
atonement (Leviticus 4:32-5:6). Under the OT sacrificial system, “the shed blood of the substitute
covered the sins of others and appeased the divine wrath by way of atonement (cf. 1 John 2:2;
4:10).”[3] Therefore, in saying that Jesus is “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world,”
John the Baptist is saying that Christ takes away sin through his sacrificial, substitutionary death.
Here Jesus explicitly identifies as the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53. The prophecy, “And he was
numbered with the transgressors,” comes straight from Isaiah 53:12. While other texts in the Gospels
allude to Isaiah 53, this text explicitly quotes from it. In Luke’s Gospel, this quotation from Isaiah 53
appears at the beginning of the passion narrative so that his readers might “understand Isaiah’s fourth
Servant Song as the hermeneutical key to the narrative of Jesus’ suffering and death.”[4] Why is this
important? What is the theological significance of Jesus quoting Isaiah 53:12 as being fulfilled in him?
Listen to how one commentator seeks to answer these questions, “By mentioning the fact that he,
though conscious of his innocence, in fact of his holiness, will, in fulfillment of prophecy, be numbered
with the transgressors, does he not clearly imply that his death is substitutionary in character? Would
Jesus have quoted these words from Isaiah 53:12 if he had not also believed the words which
immediately follow: ‘yet he bore the sin of many and made intercession for the transgressors’? How
tragic that, once again, the disciples do not understand the meaning of Christ’s words.”[5] Thus,
Christ quotes Isaiah 53:12 as being fulfilled in himself to shed light on how he was about to be pierced
for our transgressions and crushed by the LORD for our iniquities as the Suffering Servant.
The language that Jesus uses here closely resembles language used of Old Testament sacrifices.
Sacrifices for sin in the Old Testament are substitutionary by their very nature. An animal without
blemish would be sacrificed to appease God’s wrath as an atonement for the sins of his people. The
animal would be sacrificed for the sake of God’s people. Here in John 17:19, Jesus is reminding us of
his self-sacrifice. The words “for their sake” imply the substitutionary nature of Christ’s sacrifice. The
word “consecrate” alludes to the sacrifice itself. To consecrate means to “set apart”, much like an
animal would be “set apart” for sacrifice. Commenting on this verse, Carson explains, “If Jesus
consecrates himself to perform the Father’s will, he consecrates himself to the sacrifice of the cross – a
theme he registers elsewhere. The point is intimated in this verse by the fact that Jesus sanctifies
himself for them: the language is evocative of atonement passages elsewhere. It is also evocative of
Old Testament passages where the sacrificial animal was ‘consecrated’ or ‘set apart’ for death –
indeed, of language where consecration becomes synonymous with the sacrificial death itself.”[6]
Thus, in John 17:19, Jesus reminds us that he has been set apart to die as a wrath-appeasing sacrifice
in our place.
This short verse is teeming with Old Testament meaning. Jesus institutes the Lord’s Supper during
Passover. When he identifies the cup of wine with his own blood that will be poured out, he is
identifying with the Passover lamb whose blood was shed to save Israel’s firstborn sons in Egypt. Jesus
is the new Passover lamb whose blood was shed for our salvation. However, there are also again clear
allusions to the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53. Isaiah 53:12 says that the Servant’s soul would be
“poured out” to death and that he would bear the sins of “many.” Further, the final phrase “for the
forgiveness of sins” recalls how Christ would die for the sins of his people (Isaiah 53:5-6,8,10,11,12).
We’ve seen several times now that Isaiah 53, a passage that clearly articulates the penal
substitutionary atonement of Christ, is central to his teachings on his death and what it accomplished
for his people.
——————————————————–
[1] Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, p. 203.
[2] The Cross from a Distance: Atonement in Mark’s Gospel , p. 72.
[3] Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, p. 428.
[4] Ibid., p. 385.
[5] New Testament Commentary: Exposition of the Gospel of Luke, p. 977.
[6] The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Gospel According to John, p. 567.
[7] Commentary on Matthew: The Gospel of the Kingdom, p. 429.
84 Bible Verses about Penal Substitution